Vol. 7, Issue 7

Find Solutions & Strategies                 February 16, 2016

King v. CompPartners

Do UR physicians owe a duty of care to applicants?
In This Issue
A Note From the Editor
king v. comppartners, inc.
Do Utilization Review Physicians Owe a Duty of Care to Applicants and What Is the Nature and Scope of the Duty of Care

By Raymond F. Correio, Esq.
 
Raymond CorreioA recent decision from the Fourth District Court of Appeal, King v. CompPartners, Inc., et al. 243 Cal.App.4th 685, 80 Cal. Comp. Cases 10, certified for publication, raises a number of provocative issues which will no doubt impact on the ongoing contentious battle between applicants' attorneys and defendants related to the Utilization Review ("UR") and Independent Medical Review processes implemented as part of SB 863...It is important to note this is a civil case in which the plaintiffs, a husband and wife, sued a UR company, CompPartners, Inc., and...read more.
california COMPENSATION CASES 
Cal Comp CasesJanuary Cal. Comp. Cases Cites Now Available (2/11/2016). Lexis.com and Lexis Advance online subscribers can access the complete headnotes and summaries here.
california news headlines

eNewsletter archives

Take a deep dive into our past eNewsletters for 2015 and prior...warning - some links to articles may not work...report any linking problems to Robin.E.Kobayashi@lexisnexis.com.