Vol. 7, Issue 5

Find Solutions & Strategies                 February 1, 2016

Magnifier URInvalid Utilization Review Determinations in a Post-Dubon World

In This Issue
Workers' Compensation Index
A Note From the Editor
invalid ur determinations in a post-dubon world
When UR decision didn't address issue raised by treating physician's request for authorization, there was no timely UR
 
In Arroyo v. Inland Concrete Enterprises, Inc., 2016 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS --, the WCAB granted removal and rescinded the WCJ's finding that the defendant's 2/12/2015 utilization review determination was timely, thereby precluding the WCAB from exercising subject matter jurisdiction over the applicant's request for medical treatment. Here, the treating physician requested authorization to replace the applicant's broken motorized scooter which the defendant had earlier provided to the applicant. Although the UR decision issued within the time allowed by LC 4610(g)(1), the defendant's UR decision did not address the issue of the replacement scooter and instead considered whether the use of the motorized scooter was medically supported. The WCAB concluded that because the UR decision did not address the issue raised by the treating physician's request for authorization, there was no timely UR...read more.
newsletter ISSUES YOU MAY HAVE MISSED
Mailbox red Due to technical problems, many of you didn't receive the eNewsletters for January or it ended up mangled in your spam box. We believe the problem is now resolved. Here are the links for the January issues you may have missed:

california news headlines

eNewsletter archives

Take a deep dive into our past eNewsletters for 2015 and prior...warning - some links to articles may not work...report any linking problems to Robin.E.Kobayashi@lexisnexis.com.