Vol. 7, Issue 3

Find Solutions & Strategies                 January 19, 2016

UR stethoscopeUtilization Review: Prospective vs. Retrospective Review
In This Issue
Workers' Compensation Index
UR: prospective vs. retrospective review
A recent decision with an interesting fact pattern provides analysis of retrospective vs. prospective RFA, retro care and UR review on delayed benefits

By Richard M. Jacobsmeyer, Esq.
 
 
The W.C.A.B. has affirmed a Findings and Award determining a defendant failed to conduct timely retrospective UR on a host of pending medical treatment requests, and rejected defendant's arguments that a timely prospective utilization review determination of the most recent medical report from the PTP resulted in a timely denial of treatment requests. The noteworthy panel decision of Belling v. United Parcel Service, Inc. involved a contentious claim for both specific and contemporaneous cumulative claims for...read more.
A Note From the Editor
california COMPENSATION CASES 
Cal Comp CasesWCAB Bars Applicant's Psychiatric Injury Caused by Disciplinary Action: Cal. Comp. Cases January Advanced Postings (1/13/2016). Lexis.com and Lexis Advance online subscribers can read it.
california news headlines

eNewsletter archives

Take a deep dive into our past eNewsletters for 2015 and prior...warning - some links to articles may not work...report any linking problems to Robin.E.Kobayashi@lexisnexis.com.