How do you make a pedophile?
BiO Spiritualism Newsletter  
Helping our customers help themselves
 December 2013  
in this issue
Theoretical PsycHHology
PsycHHology Engineering
Watch Dog II
Watch Dog
New Customers
Quick Links




Greetings Customers



In my last ISBN'd book--Selfish'ism-(ISBN 978-0-977-49961-8)--I identified three subject matters for my future writings.  These were (and are): Theoretical Psychhology, Psychhology Engineering and Teleömetrics (the mathematics of introspection).

I am going to use this Newsletter as opportunity to add more to my understanding of these topics.

For those who are interested in posting any comments see reprint of this at my blog, which is set up to handle posts by others, whereas these newsletters are not.

So ... how do you make a pedophile. 






Theoretical PsycHHology

How do you make a pedophile?

If we can believe the mainstream media as regards its reports on (the seemingly inordinate number of) pedophile Catholic Priests, then it appears as if the way to do this--for males--is to commit your mind to faith, your psych(h)ology to repression and your spirit to suffering.

Then after you do this--it is easy for us to surmise--you will discover there is still something inside of you that rebels against such commitments. And then, when you discover that that something is your ego you will then figure out that in order to achieve your (freely chosen) goal of COMITTING your life to The Church--as described in the foregoing by identifying The Church's Three Highest Human Virtues to be controlled: Father mind, psychhology son and Holy Ghost spirit--you will then discover your first order of business is:  not kill bill, but rather, kill ego.

When the ego gets wind of this he heads underground as he should. (For elaboration on this, see Selfish'ism.)

Without your partner ego you are--at best--half human, or--at worst--on that paved road to hell (that is, evil).

If you want to cure yourself of your pedophilia--or better yet, prevent yourself from going over the abyss edge into becoming a pedophile in the first place--then you have to reverse the process.  That is, you have to dedicate your mind to reason, your psychology to unobstructed awareness and your spirit to happiness.  (If you personally are reversing a process that is more than 10 years old then your dedication will have to approach the level of:  worship--and if it is much much greater than 10 years it will have to reach that level.)

Then after you successfully cross over the 50% point in pursuit of these--your three--new (replacement) values you set about dealing with the human being known as--you. (For more on this see last quarter's newsletter about Deering's X-curves--from his Handbook on PsycHHology Engineering--for changing your values and monitoring your progress towards achieving them.)

If you happen to be a Catholic Priest in pursuit of a better life, good luck. 

If you are clergy "of lesser faiths" and then by default presumably "of more reason" then don't kid yourself into thinking you can freely choose life-negating values with impunity: since no human being can (Theoretical PsycHHology Principle #N) and since you are a human being then you can't either.

Or as they say, everything you do counts.  (Theoretical PsycHHology Principle #L)

Of course, some things count more than others.  (Theoretical PsycHHology Principle #M)

If you are neither of the foregoing but rather just an individual human being seeking moral perfection then take notice from the mistakes of others--i.e., Catholic Priests in particular and Clergy in general--as it still is a good way to learn what not to do. 






PsycHHology Engineering


PsycHHology is H uman PsycHology, hence it is the science that studies the attributes and characteristics that human beings possess by virtue of their distinctive form of consciousness--i.e., their volitional, rational, conceptual atop the sensory-perceptual form of consciousness.


 PsycHHology is the human component by itself separated out of your (total) PsycHology.  Your real psychology (psycHology) entails all characteristics and aspects--animal and human--of your immutable human nature ("we" assume aspects below these--insect, amoebic, vegetative and on down are NOT purely psycHological but rather trail off by degrees into pure physiological).  Your human nature is embodied in the seedling-you.  As you grow and develop from that seedling into a born human and then an adult human your human nature is ever present and your (post-birth) responses to it forms the foundation of your personal identity and your continuing responses ultimately form your fully formed personal identity.  (The adult you along with others can use your adult personality to help you gain insights into your actual personal identity.  Such insights are good because ultimately no one--with one exception--can understand you to the degree you need to be understood.  The exception is: you, you are the only one IN THE ENTIRE UNIVERSE who can understand you to the degree, to the depth, to the precision you need in order to enjoy your life to its fullest.) [See Selfish'ism for more, especially Nomenclature and Glossary for distinction between personal identity and personality]


Engineering is the application of science to the problem of making man-made things work in reality--of making the statement, it works in theory AND in practice a true statement.  For example, the word processor on the computer I just used to write the foregoing sentence demonstrates that the hardware and software "works in theory AND in practice".

For humans of course this "works in theory and in practice" is a rather large "occupational hazard" so to speak and one for which the animals below man don't have to face. Since "Man is a being of self-made soul" but animals below man are not, the works in theory and in practice sentiment as applies to man-the-maker of things, depends on the maker.


PsycHHology Engineering then, is applying the Science-of-Self-In-The-Universe--that is, applying Theoretical PsycHHology--to the problem of making self's psycHology work in reality--that is, off making one's self be happy.

If it--your psychhology--doesn't work then your choice is to change your real psychology or change reality.  Since reality is immutable and real reality redundant, if changing it is always your first choice then that by itself is proof that it is your psycHHology that needs to be changed. (Since one's psychhology is in large part one's applied philosophy this (pen)ultimately means: change your philosophy.  And since philosophy means, metaphysics, epistemology and ethics this ultimately means: change for the better not worse--that is, make better, that is, make match reality better--your metaphysic, your epistemology and your ethic.

So, how do we do this?

See previous section: Theoretical PsycHHology, as well as my f.u.t.u.r.e books, i.e., the one I'm currently working on with working title:   

How to cure yourself of bipolar disorder in 6 months or less ...

... expected release date of which is on or before this time of the year's newsletter one year from now.



Of course it goes without saying, see also all of my writngs, especially my ISBN'd books:  Yes and Selfish'ism.








As it turns out I'm really not prepared to get into this at this time so I will simply relay some thoughts about Number'ology--the to be defined thing that I have been using as counterpoint to those who argue that if you can't get accuracy to 10,000 decimal places then you can't know--that is ... oh sh..!!! wait wait ... do tell me.

I use Teleömetrics, qua (some kind of tbd) subset of modern philosophy's (Objectivism's) teleological measurement, to mean the introspective process(es) by which you get accuracy ABOUT SELF AND SELF THINGS--especially values as held internally--to infinite decimal places!!!

Yikes! I didn't know that this is what I was doing. So I need more time to think this through but in the interim consider this number'ology example as meaning, something and to be figured out, somehow.

Mathematics involves numbers ... somehow.

Teleömetrics then--as I am trying to use the term--has to do with the mathematics of introspection.

Exacly how I don't yet know.

But for the numbers part I do know something that has served me well.

An example.

In my never ending (internal) sword fights with Kantian sympathizers who always insist if they can ask a question that I can't answer then humans can't know. An often used one on me by my Christian friends is: How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?  After being dumbfounded by this for some number of years I had the opportunity--see lte, letter-to-editor below--to finally think about this question and answer it.

My "teleömetric/inner" process went like this:

   1. This question is answerable.

   2. There is only one correct answer.

   3. The answer can be as tic (tongue-in-cheek) as the question.

After sleeping on it for one night I woke up the next morning as it were--voila!--with the answer.

I encoded it in a letter-to the-editor and shipped it off to my local newspaper editor for him to not publish it then I could add it to my website of unpublished lte's.

Here it is from that site:


Finally an answer to one of Religion's oldest and most unanswerable questions:

How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?



St. Paul Pioneer Press
Fax: 651-228-5564
December 12, 2002

Dear Editor:

In regards to the December 5th Article, "In Search of the real Islam", by Syndicated Columnist Cal Thomas,
a Christian conservative with whom I (as a serious atheist) disagree with most of the time, I have one
and only one thing to say: Hooray! Hooray! Hooray!

Gary Deering


Also, as an aside, I just want to mention that the only thing I found wrong in Mr. Thomas's article is his claim that the question: "How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?" is an unanswerable question. It is not. The answer is: zero. Because angels can't dance.


Gary Deering
My address
my phone number, myemail@myISP


Be sure to click your Browser's BACK button to get back to the text from whence you cometh.



"published" here: > unpublished LTE's > -more-


To be honest I don't know if there is any teleömetric value in this example or just "number'ology" value but if I think about one of my BiO Spiritualism Principles (#5, Yes page 14):

Consciousness is the only thing that can measure consciousness ...

... maybe this has something to do with us using our own consciousness to measure our own consciousness???

Also in psychotherapy for example when a therapist is one-on-one with a client working on the client's psych(h)ological problems it is pretty clear that when the process works it works and there is no way in heck that a person working with a computer could get the same kind of results.

That is, the therapist's consciousness measures the client's consciousness and results ensue.

Or some such, to be--as I said--determined.


Watch Dog II:
====================Any Updates For this WD? =================
Yes, see modified Final Form Graph below. 
It is a kind of check on the predictor's --i.e. Dr. Peikoff's--record:  in his Ominous Parallels:  The End of Freedom in America  (1982, Stein and Day,  New York)  he predicted the United States--economically--was going to go the way of Germany's Weimar Republic which had super duper hyper inflation.  He predicted more than this in that book but I am only interested in applying his 50 year window he mentioned in his DIM Hypothesis--see page 340, hardcover version--for philosophical predictions to the hyperinflation part of his earlier book to see if it comes to pass.  That is, I have a better chance of  being alive and seeing this prediction of his come true than I do of the Religious Dictatorship one ... again see below.   
So, Voila! if .... etc. and so on ... see the modified Final Form graph below.
========Original for this WD II from September 2013 Newsletter======

Another one of those "it's a tedious task but somebody has to do it" thingy:


See this Headline: 


The United States of America to become a Religious Dictatorship on or before the year of our Lord 2062


*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *



In the shadow of the above headline it's up to us whether or not the following headline also comes to pass:


2nd Dark Ages to Start September 11th, 2050


THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS GOING TO BECOME a Religious Dictatorship on or before September 11th, 2062 as predicted in The DIM Hypothesis by Dr. Leonard Peikoff who - if not the world's top of the heap smartest person alive, then for sure - is the world's smartest living philosopher. If the Religious Dictatorship comes to pass then it could suck the entire planet into its Second Dark Ages.  Second that is, if we consider all the spotty first Dark Ages from around the planet over the past two millennium as summed up into one big Dark Ages, but if not then this could be the first Global Dark Ages as in it's going to affect everybody on the planet AT-THE-SAME-TIME.  So, if we don't start doing something about it right now we will cross over that critical-X-marks-the-spot point on the downside of the slippery slope on September 11th, 2050 and then it will be too late ... I for one am not taking any chances, so as means to doing something now read my stuff: Yes. (Is BiO Spiritualism the answer?), on and Selfish'ism (Get up off of your death bed and save yourself brother, I had to and so do you) also on Then read all my web content starting here: . Talk about a call to action: we can still stop this, IF WE WANT TO. But of course as always, if not then not--it's up to us; or I suppose I could say: "Since I've done my part and continue to do so, it's now up to you."


Path here is: t hink   i nside   t he   s quare  as in if p then q, p therefore q... that is for:


            p = religious dictatorship


            q = dark ages accompaniment just like last time--historically speaking





UPDATE 12.31.13
We could notice that in 1982'ish Gold was selling in the 100 to 200 dollar per ounce range and today, a mere 30 years later, it's in the 1000 to 2000 dollar range which means relative to gold the dollar's value has gone down by a factor of 10 to one.  But this really isn't the meaning of hyperinflation.  Hyperinflation is when the currecy of the government in question becomes worthless and this has no effect on the price of gold or any commodity for that matter.  The currency is the thing: it either has value or it doesn't and when it doesn't it becomes worthless such that it might take a million dollars to buy a loaf of bread.  This seems so unlikely to happen over the next 20'ish years that I don't know what to say--other than, tbd.






Watch Dog:
====================Any Updates For this WD?=================
No, not at this time.
=============Original for this WD from June 2013 Newsletter========

Another one of those "it's a dirty job but somebody has to do it" thingy:


See this Headline: 

Abnormal is the New Normal


*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *



Abnormal Is the New Normal
Why will half of the U.S. population have a diagnosable mental disorder?
By Robin S. Rosenberg|Posted Friday, April 12, 2013, at 8:00 AM


[exerpt from this post]:


Beware the DSM-5, the soon-to-be-released fifth edition of the "psychiatric bible," the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual. The odds will probably be greater than 50 percent, according to the new manual, that you'll have a mental disorder in your lifetime.


Although fewer than 6 percent of American adults will have a severe mental illness in a given year, according to a 2005 study, many more--more than a quarter each year--will have some diagnosable mental disorder.


That's a lot of people. Almost 50 percent of Americans (46.4 percent to be exact) will have a diagnosable mental illness in their lifetimes, based on the previous edition, the DSM-IV. And the new manual will likely make it even "easier" to get a diagnosis.


If we think of having a diagnosable mental illness as being under a tent, the tent seems pretty big. Huge, in fact. How did it happen that half of us will develop a mental illness? Has this always been true and we just didn't realize how sick we were--we didn't realize we were under the tent? Or are we mentally less healthy than we were a generation ago? What about a third explanation--that we are labeling as mental illness psychological states that were previously considered normal, albeit unusual, making the tent bigger. The answer appears to be all three.



and so on ... see link for full article ... ( and if you do go there and read it I ask you to especially notice its introductory "tone" which is this: "Friends, Romans, Countrymen, lend me your ears ... )



I applaud R.S. Rosenberg for giving us this article.


However, I take issue with his first conclusion: The answer appears to be all three.


That is, he is concluding that:

            1. we didn't realize how sick (mentally ill) we were and

            2. we are mentally less healthy today than we were a generation ago and finally

            3. we are labeling as mental illness psychological states that are not mental illness.


Rather, I should say I disagree with 2/3rds of his conclusion and agree with 1/3rd: "we" (that is T.H.E.Y ) are labeling as mental illness psychological states that are not mental illness.


Mental illness is the loss of mental health. Mental health is the "unobstructed capacity for reality bound cognitive functioning and the exercise of this capacity". Mental illness is the sustained impairment of this capacity. [Branden]


DSM-5, that is DSM-Any Number, is ... a ... bad book.


It is designed to look and sound like a (Hand)book of science but it is nothing more than the dead sea scrolls of mystics past.


Like the MMPI (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory)*--which is equally bad as a "psychological" test tool--the DSM-N series of books is nothing more than a "steering wheel" designed and used by BM's to control (steer) the entire body of individual citizens of our country in the direction of-the(any)-moment that T.H.E.Y desire.


You as autonomous individual can allow them to so drive you or you can increase your autonomy and ego strength and make sure you take care of yourself so that T.H.E.Y don't continue succeeding in driving America into the ground.


The foregoing I know some would say is ... "diatribe" ... is "dogmatic" ... is a "rant" ... is demagoguery.


But of course I don't call it this, rather I call it: Hypothesis.


And more, in these (Watch Dog) "pages" here and going forward I plan to explore this hypothesis of mine further (which I have already started and documented in my first Book, Yes, Is BiO-Spiritualism the answer? ) and present the new results here.


For starters cosider one simple question, the article says "fewer than 6 percent of American adults will have a severe mental illness in a given year" ... if--per that famous 20th century psychiatrist Thomas Szasz--it is true that mental illness is a myth then we have to ask, what is a "severe" myth?




* ( Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory  is " ... a psychological test ... primarily intended to test people who are suspected [emphasis mine] of having mental health or other clinical issues". 


This test we should remember has as its starting-point-baseline for "normal" the responses from a small number of people from St. Paul Minnesota who happened to walk into some St. Paul Hospital back in the late 1930s when "they" were getting a base line of peoples responses for this inventory.  That is, its baseline for "normal" is from that same City that One Ex-Governor of Minnesota--The Honorable Jessie Ventura--said had streets designed and laid out by drunken Irishmen--I have driven these streets and though the Governor's remarks are not politically correct they are metaphorically correct.







How are "we" any different than the Muslims we are fighting the world over???


  • see military sentiments within military people and man on the street ...
  • "we" differ in degree not kind ...
  • we believe in faith in god and doing god's will, they believe it more (see the religion called Islam)
  • we believe in sacrificing your life to others for our soldiers, Muslims believe it more (see suicide bombers who apparently are so witless that they allow others to tell them to blow themselves up AND THEY DO IT!?!?!?)


A reader/friend emailed me a "why haven't we heard about this story in the main media" email.  I do not want to put anyone on the spot so I'm not saying who it was.


But I am going to give my response to it here (I did not send this response to her...notice it could be a him and this is my "crafty" way of concealing identity...but I feel strongly enough about it that I have to put it somewhere and so am going to put it here):


My Response:

(email contents below this)


Hey ███,


Thanks for sending this.


I had not heard of it and I agree it is a very interesting story.


I don't want to start any controversy between us but I'm thinking you must know for sure that I think sacrificing your life for others is morally wrong (reference that I know you have read many of).


The two guys in your story are no doubt great guys, but ...


They were no longer Navy Seals therefore not bound by the Navy Seal Oath that they apparently took voluntarily when they were Seals.


I know all this stuff is very sensitive stuff but ... could those two ex-Seals have saved themselves or were they doomed based on proximity?


If they could have saved themselves and chose not too BECAUSE they believe ALTRUISM is a moral ideal then ... well ... you know what I think about this ... again see, especially the March 2011 and then September 2012 NewsLetters and also my books on amazon ( especially my last one: Selfish'ism.)


Again, thanks for sending and my goal here is NOT to dissuade you from sending me stuff in the future as I like all the stuff you send me, especially that Owens Corning one on glass surfaces computers etc., quite the thing and I've never seen anything on it except your email.


There's been others too, so keep sending and I'll only do this eval when you hit really close to (my) home (i.e., core).



Gary Deering



I agree that the Hilary question is particularly pathetic and this article email of yours sure highlights it.



Many people mistakenly call a trade a sacrifice and I am not talking about this, but rather real sacrifice, i.e., giving up a higher value for a lower one.



 [copy of initiating email sent to me by a reader/friend]


---------------------------------beginning of email content I responded to-------------------------------------------


very interesting, have any of you heard about this????????


"What difference does it make"

The stunning part of this story is that Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty killed 60 of the attacking force. Once the compound was overrun, the attackers were incensed to discover that just two men had inflicted so much death and destruction.

The news has been full of the attacks on our embassies throughout the Muslim world, and in particular, the deaths of Ambassador Chris Stevens and three others in Benghazi, Libya.

However, there's a little known story of incredible bravery, heroics, and  courage that should be the top story.

So what actually happened at the U.S. embassy in Libya?  We are learning more about this every day.  Ambassador Stevens and Foreign Service officer Sean Smith, along with administrative staff,              were working out of temporary quarters due to the fact that in the spring of 2011 during the so-called Arab Spring, the United States cut ties with then president Moammar Gadhafi.  Our embassy was looted and ransacked, causing it to be unusable.  It is still in a state of disrepair.

Security for embassies and their personnel is to be provided by the host nation.  Since Libya has gone through a civil war of sorts in the past 18 months, the current government is very unstable, and therefore, unreliable

A well-organized attack by radical Muslims was planned specifically targeting the temporary U.S. embassy building.  The Libyan security force that was in place to protect our people  deserted their post, or joined the attacking force.  Either way, our people were in a real fix.  And it should be noted that Ambassador Stevens had mentioned on more than one occasion to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton,  that he was quite concerned for his personal safety and the welfare of his people.  It is thought that Ambassador Stevens was on a "hit list."

A short distance from the American compound, two Americans were sleeping.  They were in Libya as independent contractors working an assignment totally unrelated to our embassy.  They also happened to be former Navy Seal's.

When they heard the noise coming from the attack on our embassy, as you would expect from highly trained warriors, they ran to the fight. Apparently, they had no weapons, but seeing the Libyan guards dropping their guns in their haste in fleeing the scene, Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty snatched up several of these discarded weapons and prepared to defend the American compound.

Not knowing exactly what was taking place,  the two Seal's set up a defensive perimeter.  Unfortunately Ambassador Stevens was already gravely injured, and Foreign Service officer, Sean Smith, was dead. However, due to their quick action and suppressive fire, twenty administrative personnel in the embassy were able to escape to safety. Eventually, these two courageous men were overwhelmed by the sheer numbers brought against them, an enemy force numbering between 100 to 200 attackers which came in two waves.  But the stunning part of the story is that  Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty killed 60 of the attacking force.  Once the compound was overrun, the attackers were incensed to discover that just two men had inflicted so much death and destruction.

As it became apparent to these selfless heroes, they were definitely going to lose their lives unless some reinforcements showed up in a hurry.  As we know now, that was not to be.  I'm fairly certain they knew they were going to die in this gun fight, but not before they took a whole lot of bad guys with them!
Consider these tenets of the Navy SEAL Code:
1) Loyalty to Country, Team and Teammate,
2) Serve with Honor and Integrity On and Off the Battlefield,
3) Ready to Lead, Ready to Follow, Never Quit,
4) Take responsibility for your actions and the actions of your teammates,
5) Excel as Warriors through Discipline and Innovation,
6) Train for War, Fight to Win, Defeat our Nation's Enemies, and...
7) Earn your Trident every day

Thank you, Tyrone and Glen.  To the very last breath, you both lived up to the SEAL Code.  You served all of us well.  You were courageous in the face of certain death.
And Tyrone, even though you never got to hold your newborn son, he will grow up knowing the character and quality of his father, a man among men who sacrificed himself defending others.

Senior Pastor
Former Staff Sergeant,
USMC Captain,
U. S. Navy Chaplain Corps (Ret.)

This should be passed on
and on and on.


And Let us never forget the Hillary Clinton Comment

"What Difference does it make?


  ----------------------------------end email content I responded to--------------------------------------





ˇ  New Customers 
As of this time BiO Spiritualism Counseling Centers are only available online.
If you feel you need more than "sounding board" advice as same is afforded you via BiO Spiritualism's Online processes (including the multiple benefits you can get for $$$ FREE $$$ from just reading the content in`s BiO Spiritualism and Gary's Venns websides) you are best advised to seek out a therapist with whom you can establish a rapport and get some serious psychological (that is, psychological as in Selfishness Training) work done.  
For some insight on how you can help yourself manage this aspect of your growth and development go here and click on the "How to choose a therapist" article.

            BiO Spiritualism, The New Millennia Spiritualism:
Book 1a

Selfish'ism Cover  


Increase your intelligence, decrease your naiveté.





Increase your joy, decrease your guilt.





Increase your selfishness, decrease your greed.








that is, travel the Enlightened, Reason-paved-road to authentic Happiness.


            The Triple Crown Affair - Book 1 Secret WHITE SHEET iif Formulas for The Kentucky Derby: Kindle Version
Kindle version



Increase your excitement, decrease your boredom.





Increase your joy, decrease your guilt.





Increase your selfishness, decrease your greed.




that is, travel the Enlightened, Reason-paved-road to authentic FUN.


Fun is GOOD.




Here for:  IN COLOR & PRINTABLE Pdf Version 


            The Triple Crown Affair - Book 2 Secret WHITE SHEET iif Formulas for The Preakness:  
Kindle version



Increase your excitement, decrease your boredom.





Increase your joy, decrease your guilt.





Increase your selfishness, decrease your greed.




that is, travel the Enlightened, Reason-paved-road to authentic FUN.


Fun is GOOD.


Joy of course--i.e. winning more money than you bet--is BETTER.




Here for:  IN COLOR & PRINTABLE Pdf Version 


            The Triple Crown Affair - Book 3 Secret WHITE SHEET iif Formulas for The Belmont Stakes:
Triple Crown Affair Book 3 Cover
Kindle Version
Increase your excitement, decrease your boredom.
Increase your joy, decrease your guilt.
Increase your selfishness, decrease your greed.
that is, travel the Enlightened, Reason-paved-road to authentic FUN.
Fun is GOOD.
Joy of course--i.e. winning more money
than you bet--is BETTER.
And finally, ultimately, the BEST of course is: Happiness--i.e. a state of non-contradictory joy.

            BiO Spiritualism, The New Millennia Spiritualism:
Yes. (Is BiO Spiritualism the answer?)



Increase your intelligence, decrease your naiveté.





Increase your joy, decrease your guilt.





Increase your selfishness, decrease your greed.








that is, travel the Enlightened, Reason-paved-road to authentic Happiness.


Yes. (Is BiO Spiritualism the answer?)Yes Book is now available for Kindle:
Buy BiO Spiritualism's Yes book today at RaIse Books' online store or on  Spread the word about the new, Third Millenium Spiritualism by picking up an extra copy for family and friends! BiO Spiritualism, qua integration of Objectivism AND Biocentric Psychology IN-THE-PERSON, is infinitely scalable so as to provide for the equivalent of

7,137,459,060 (and counting) individual "sects". (Starting with U.S. of A's 317,293,919 individuals.)

(10:35 UTC (+6)/ CDT=4:35am / Dec 31, 2013)


PS ... FYI ... Note of Interest ... last year's 2012 total growth for the year:
  over 70 million more people on Planet Earth and
over 2 million more in the United States of America.  
PS ... FYI ... Note of Interest ... past year's 2013 total growth for the year:
  over 80 million more people on Planet Earth and
over 2 million more in the United States of America.  
Selfish'ism Cover Selfish'ism Book is now available for Kindle:

Buy Selfish'ism book today at RaIse Books' online store or on  Spread the news about the new, Third Millennium PsycHHology by picking up an extra copy for family and friends! Selfish'ism--as continuing integration of Objectivism AND Biocentric Psychology INTO-THE-PERSON's soul--is also the continuation of BiO Spiritualism's goal to turn America's more than 300 million individuals--and counting--and eventually the worlds' more than 7 billion individuals--and counting--into Happy, (mentally) Healthy human beings who worship reason & freedom and de-worship faith & force. (And if ALL is to ambitious a goal then for sure--at minimum--76% of them). 



PS ... FYI ... Note of Interest ... last year's 2012 total growth of Objectivist & Biocentric Psychology sympathizers for the year:
  X more on Planet Earth and
Y more in the United States of America.
(that is, at this point in time it is a big fat unknown)

PS ... FYI ... Note of Interest ... past year's 2013 total growth of Objectivist & Biocentric Psychology sympathizers for the year:
  X more on Planet Earth and
Y more in the United States of America.
(that is, at this point in time it is a big fat unknown)
$150 Value for FREE 
  $150 Value for $$$ FREE $$$$ when you become a beta tester:
Agree to be a Beta Tester of BiO Spiritualism's new online process called Reflect'ology and receive 3 FREE additional rounds--each a $50 value--redeemable at any time for a year from the end of your Beta Tester round. To be a beta tester requires you to go to and after you have registered order the eM.One product under BiO Spiritualism Products, enter a problem or two you desire help with and then start the process by returning it to my email address. Initially you pay $10 for the $10 eM.One and then later you pay $40 for the $40 eM.Three and then when you return your feedback, critiquing what you did, did not like about the process and/or suggestions on how you think it would be better, your $50 will be refunded to you and your name noted for your 3 FREE Rounds in the future. So take advantage of this offer that is limited to this development time before the Reflect'ology Process gets finalized.
Offer Expires: When Reflect'ology Process is Finalized