June 2015
The Healthcare Savings Quarterly
 
      Powered by United Claim Solutions
Welcome to The Healthcare Savings Quarterly!  

This publication is designed to provide useful, timely and actionable information on a host of topics impacting the health insurance and healthcare markets.  Each quarter we identify a "hot topic" in the market, and solicit articles from industry leaders to provide varying perspectives on issues and opportunities.  
  
If you are a Self-Insured Employer, Payer, Labor or Trust Organization, Stop-loss Carrier, Health Plan, or a business that services this market, this publication can be a useful source of information and guidance.  
  
We hope you find this valuable and encourage your feedback, including future topics on which you would like information.

How TPAs Can Find the Right PBM Partners to Control Rising Costs Under Reform

 

By Jack Feingold, Senior Vice President of Account Development, WellDyneRx


It's a case of good news and bad news. And good news.

 

Under Obamacare, insurers no longer may consider a group's demographics or claims experience. The hope is that community rating will broaden access, enabling all people in a group to obtain health insurance, regardless of their health risks.

 

That's good news. But a likely effect of community rating is that group rates will rise into the upper middle of rate bands, resulting in rate increases. And that's bad news. But it's good news for third-party administrators (TPAs) because many employers, seeking safe haven from rate increases, will trade in their fully insured benefit plans for self-funded ones.

 

So, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) will bring new business to benefit administrators. To retain these new accounts, TPAs will demonstrate their well-known knack for innovative plan design. They'll leverage their historical strengths in personalized customer service. Also, they'll do all they can to help their new employer customers contain health care costs.

 

Here's where pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) can help. Since the 1980s, PBMs have negotiated with drug makers for discounts and honed deep expertise in formulary management, utilization management and medication-specific analytics. They've helped many organizations reduce their drug costs by 15 to 40 percent.1

 

A unique few PBMs bring the right combination of people, programs, technology and insight to help TPAs control costs in the uncharted realm of reform. Here, for consideration, are the competencies that TPAs should seek in a PBM partner to successfully navigate ACA changes.

 

Flexible in Its Pricing

A majority of U.S. employers (71 percent) spent 16 percent or more of their total health care budget on pharmacy benefits in 2013, so a PBM's pricing model certainly requires thoughtful evaluation.2 A PBM derives its revenue from one of two prevailing models:

 

Traditional (spread) pricing: Revenue stems from retail, mail order, and pharmaceutical rebates and discounts on drugs. This model includes a low or no administrative fee.

Pass-through pricing: The PBM passes along to the TPA the actual cost of all drugs, including all rebates and discounts. An administrative fee is the PBM's primary or sole source of revenue.

 

There are permutations of each of the two models. A PBM that wishes to be a TPA's partner will use whichever pricing model the benefits administrator prefers. More than this, the PBM will be fully transparent. Although it must hit a pre-script margin to operate profitably, a worthy partner will listen to the needs of the benefits administrator and conscientiously customize a pricing model to meet the client's needs.

 

Offers a Specialty Drug Program

A TPA should ensure the PBM offers specialty medication services, and scrutinize the offering. Specialty drugs are the fastest-growing cost component of prescription benefits and, by 2019, will comprise 50 percent of overall drug spending.3 These medications treat a growing number of patients who struggle with cancer, HIV/AIDS, hepatitis and other debilitating chronic illnesses.

 

Beyond offering a specialty program, a PBM that owns a specialty pharmacy brings distinct advantages. Ownership uniquely enables the PBM to measurably manage specialty costs, provide comprehensive care management and optimize therapeutic outcomes. Ownership facilitates the very best patient-centered care through payment assistance, disease and drug education, therapy compliance monitoring, and coordination with physicians and case managers across the care continuum. Ownership integrates specialty medication services with pharmacy and medical plan benefits. And this, in turn, enables cost-efficient benefits based on the most informed reporting and trend analysis.

 

Offers Programs that Support Services Not Covered by ACA-Compliant Plans

While the ACA mandates coverage of more medical services than pre-reform plans, compliant plans fail to cover a wide arrange of health and wellness products and services valued by members. In response, a select few PBMs provide individuals and organizations with programs that offer pre-negotiated savings on such vital products and services as prescriptions, dental care, lab tests, MRI and imaging, vision care and hearing care. Discerning TPAs will partner with PBMs that possess this key competency.

 

Offers Standard OOP Integration

In the past, annual out-of-pocket maximums for individuals and families did not include prescription benefit costs. Maximums included only medical claim costs. Under the ACA, annual caps include prescription and medical costs for large-group plans. The combined claim costs - prescription and medical - must be tracked, presenting an onerous administrative task.

An ideal PBM partner will take the lead in tracking both categories of claims. It will tally the costs; reconcile discrepancies; flag the eligibility files of those members who meet their out-of-pocket caps, or MOOPs; and alert the benefits administrator.

 

Ready and Able to Work Together to Leverage New Cost-Saving Models of Care

An elite few PBMs can coordinate with TPA partners to implement innovative models that help control costs, enhance the quality of care and improve member health. The ACA acknowledged the important role of value-based insurance plans in optimizing both cost and patient outcomes in pharmaceutical treatments and medical services. In addition, some PBMs offer innovative programs that capture manufacturer coupon amounts with savings applied to the plan, mandatory mail and specialty with incentives, and narrow pharmacy networks that limit access to pharmacies with better pricing.

 

These programs require knowledgeable staff and flexible adjudication systems to coordinate with TPA partners to implement integrated plan designs, accountable care organizations and other emerging models of care delivery.

 

Demonstrates Flexibility

The best PBM partners can accommodate TPAs when they wish to customize an employer's plan, such as its formulary, prior authorizations and step therapy programs. For example, if a particular employer wants the brand-name statin Lipitor covered at a preferred price, the PBM should demonstrate flexibility in accommodating this request. If a group that uses mail order fulfillment wants to allow a particular member to fill his prescriptions at retail locations, the PBM should enable this exception.

 

Commits to Ongoing Communication, Review and Modification

This is an important intangible and therefore included as a competency. The best PBMs approach every encounter with TPA partners as an opportunity to strengthen the working relationship. A committed PBM partner communicates regularly and strives to meet performance and savings targets, as well as service and quality expectations. It performs regular reviews and, through reporting and analytics, suggests how the prescription plan can be tweaked or augmented to optimize the health spend of the benefits administrator's clients.

In closing, health care reform presents challenges and opportunities to control costs and improve the quality of care delivery. This is a handy checklist for TPAs in choosing PBM partners that can concretely help navigate this new landscape for continued success. 

ojecting the future of the Employer Stop Loss Market requires trend analysis, review of multiple market factors, and detailed examination and probability assignment for the occurrence of external events.

 

All other things being equal, the Stop Loss market will continue to grow as the number of self insuring employers continues to grow.  Current estimates put the overall size of the Stop Loss market at between $10 and $14 billion - that's a large spread, but it's due to the way some of the larger insurers classify this product on their financial statements.

 

About WellDyneRx.

 

WellDyneRx is a full-service, national pharmacy benefit manager that offers clients customized solutions to lower their total cost of care and improve member health. For more information visit our site at www.welldynerx.com, or contact Jack Feingold at jfeingold@welldynerx.com.

 

 

Payer Strategies for Specialty Drug Management - Beyond the Basics

    

By Scott Pickens and Jamie Solak

© Arlington Healthcare Group, May 2015

 

"Houston, we have a problem."

from Medical Cost Trend Behind the Numbers, PWC Health Research Institute, June 2013
from Medical Cost Trend Behind the Numbers, PWC Health Research Institute, June 2013

 

Fortunately most payers and many employers are increasingly aware of the rapidly evolving challenge of specialty drug spending. Between greater availability and high pricing this spending is growing at an unsustainable rate. These drugs can make a real difference in the lives of thousands of patients and their families. But how do we as an industry manage the large and increasing cost burden while ensuring appropriate access to those who need them?

The good news is that there are a set of best practice strategies payers and employers can use to address this challenge. Some of these strategies are generally well understood. A few are less so. None are simple to implement or execute. This article will highlight 4 core strategies with high potential for impact. But often these 4 are not enough.  Leading organizations are finding that implementing an additional 4 "optimizing" strategies can support the core approaches to best meet the challenge of specialty drug program design and management.

 

The Accelerating Cost Challenge

Specialty drugs are generally defined as complex drugs addressing serious conditions for

specific groups of patients, which often require special administration mechanisms. Typically there is no lower cost substitute. The FDA is recently speeding up their review process to where specialty drugs represent the majority of new drug approvals. In 2013, 19 of 28 new approvals were for specialty drugs. Some are biologics

which are derived from living organisms instead of chemicals. Some, called orphan drugs, are developed to treat rare diseases and don't allow drug makers to spread research and development costs over a large market. Many of the drugs require special handling and storage and can't be purchased easily at retail pharmacies. 

 

For example, a new multiple sclerosis therapy

is expected soon that may

add $40,000 a year to the cost of treatment. A new

high cholesterol drug for people who can't use statins can cost $1000 per month. A cystic fibrosis drug impacting only 7% or 300,000 afflicted Americans sells for $300,000 per year. Last year's introduction of hepatitis C therapies costing as much as $95,000 have set the table for new specialty drugs coming soon treating cancer and heart disease.

These drugs accounted for 31.8 % of all US drug spending in 2014 which represents a 30.9% year over year increase from 2013 according to the Express Scripts 2014 Drug Trend Report. Average projected cost trend for these drugs is over 20% each year for 2015-2017 according to the same report.  

 

The Total Cost of Access

Ideally, access for whomever can benefit from these drugs is available at reasonable cost. Clinical benefits from these drugs by definition accrue to a fairly narrow set of patients and indirectly their families and caregivers. Unfortunately it is the inability to spread research and development costs over larger numbers of potential patients that can drive the costs for these drugs so high. This has the unfortunate effect of making it challenging for drug makers to recover their costs with some minimal margin at a price that is affordable for most patients via their payers. 

 

But economic benefits to offset the costs can also be very real and take the form of clinical cost savings or avoidance, as well as increased productivity of employees or ill family members of employees. In some cases these cost savings can exceed the cost of the drug - in other cases not. Understanding the full scope of both costs and benefits is ultimately necessary to determine which policies and practices are most appropriate for employers and their payers.

 

4 Core Strategies for Payers

The following 4 strategies are increasingly used by payers to address the challenge of managing cost while assuring appropriate access to specialty drugs.

 

1.     Ensure Effective Utilization and Adherence

Specialty drugs are typically newly or only recently available to treat less common or very complex diseases. As a result many physicians are not necessarily completely up to speed on appropriate effective usage. It has been reported that is not uncommon in cancer treatment for example for a third of oncology regimens to be at variance to guidelines. Monitoring the appropriate use - medical necessity and effectiveness - of specialty drugs is key. Requiring prior authorization for specialty drug prescriptions can be a very effective tool to support medically appropriate usage. 

 

Other effective approaches include step therapy and dosage management. Specialty Drugs focus on a specific set of patients with specific characteristics. Step therapy - trying less expensive drugs first - ensures that if some less expensive solution can work it is given a chance to do so. Dosage management limits doses based on whether the patient is responding. Paid for but ineffective drugs are extremely wasteful at these prices and potentially dangerous.

 

Finally, care coordination is a key best practice. Particularly for patients with chronic illnesses. Managing the integration of benefits and clinical care including appropriate coordination of prescription drugs as part of overall treatment can maximize patient compliance (sometimes called adherence) and reduce wasteful spending.  

 

2.     Integrate Pharmacy and Medical Benefits 

Sometimes specialty drugs are managed under the medical benefit plan separate from the pharmacy benefit plan.   This approach is problematic in that it inhibits visibility of total prescribing and utilization patterns necessary to optimize the effectiveness of comprehensive and coordinated utilization management. Managing all drugs under the pharmacy benefit plan allows for integrated data collection, reporting, and analysis of all the data necessary to create actionable benefit management information. 

 

And applying the same cost sharing mechanisms shown to be effective in managing demand for more common drugs - e.g. out of pocket cost tiers and coinsurance - to specialty drugs is at least as effective for those as well.

 

3.     Maximize Treatment Adherence

Obviously patient compliance with treatment protocols that include specialty drugs is critical to cost effectiveness. Engagement with both patients and providers is key to assure that both understand the treatment plan, what to expect, how and when to take the drugs, possible side effects, etc. so that patients can achieve the desired results if they are clinically achievable. Nothing is more unfortunate that a patient missing out on the benefits of a very expensive drug due to ignorance or misunderstanding by patient or provider of the best way to achieve those benefits. Common engagement practices such as phone outreach and consultation can be effective. But even approaches that would not make financial sense for less expensive therapies such as dedicated house call visits, etc. may be warranted in certain situations.

 

4.     Utilize Specialty Pharmacies

Specialty pharmacies have better trained personnel and are better and equipped than regular pharmacies to coordinate the often complex delivery and treatment processes associated with these drugs. They are typically better positioned with specially designed information systems to monitor and track usage, and to support a focus on patient education and engagement.

 

These companies typically serve multiple providers and networks and can distribute their costs and leverage their reach to offer best pricing for certain high cost drugs.

 

And they can retain ownership of the drug to the point of delivery to provider for administration or delivery to the patient at home to take to the doctor for administration - practices known as white and brown bagging respectively. IN both instances the provider doesn't purchase the drug so there is no additional markup.

 

But while these 4 core strategies can be effective, in practice they are often less so than they could or should be. What is missing?

 

4 Additional Payer Strategies to Optimize Specialty Drug Management

1.     Really Understand Your Population, Market and Economics

Unfortunately simple economics dictate that offering every specialty drug at any price to every potential patient is economically unsustainable. So how do you decide what to offer to whom, when, how, and at what price to the ultimate payer and cost to the patient?

 

It is critical for the payer to understand the cost, efficacy and potential cost savings or offsets from prescribing a specialty drug to various patient populations in order to determine whether to facilitate patient access to the drug at all, and if so, at what payer price and patient cost, and through what mechanism or channel to offer it.

 

Without this comprehensive understanding payers today often find themselves simply executing blindly and reactively rather than proactively to the availability of great sounding new therapies at unsustainable prices. 

 

There is no substitute for solid comprehensive market research to gain such understanding. The required investment will be minimal compared to the advantages of more effective strategy and management that can result.  

 

Such research should provide an understanding of not only real but market perceptions of efficacy, value, costs and benefits, competitor directions and approaches, etc. by target population. There are exciting new approaches and supporting tools to this work including expert crowd sourcing, and powerful new statistical survey techniques combined with powerful enabling computing capability.

 

2.     Enhance Data-Driven Performance Management

There is too much as stake given the cost of specialty drugs to not have a clear and accurate understanding of how your specialty drug management program is performing at all times. Define exactly what the financial, quality, service, and compliance performance objectives of your program are in detail and the associated metrics and target values that will demonstrate a successful program. Utilize state of the art techniques borrowed from business intelligence disciplines to create, collect, report, and analyze data to describe performance, predict future performance, and prescribe actionable initiatives to improve performance.

 

3.     Formalize Specialty Drug Program Management

Properly designing, implementing and managing a specialty drug program as a payer - including programs involving direct contracts - is a complex undertaking requiring coordination of resources, strategies, and tactics across multiple internal and external organizational functions and enterprises. The very significant resources at stake combined with the potential political ramifications across the market require a formal comprehensive program management approach. This often starts with a robust business case with a clear return-on-investment for a formal specialty drug management program. This includes a dedicated leader with both high level expertise as well as access to key decision makers. This leader should be supported by appropriate direct staff as required. There should be clear program accountability to performance objectives, and tools and processes to measure, report, analyze, and support program performance.

 

4.     Get Expert Help If Needed

Designing and implementing an effective specialty drug management program is a complex undertaking. Understanding the interoperation of all the components and players to inform program design requires significant and varied expertise and experience. And program design and implementation take dedicated resources. Most organizations don't have the required expertise in sufficient capacity to effectively re-purpose to create, implement, and operate such a program. Investment in expert consulting for program research, design, and implementation can very cost effectively pave the way for permanent staffing for program operation and management.

 

Combining the four core strategies with the four optimizing strategies above offers an effective approach to managing the increasing challenge of managing specialty drug costs while assuring appropriate access wherever possible.

 

About The Arlington Healthcare Group

Arlington Healthcare Group helps healthcare enterprises optimize their growth while achieving their financial, quality, service level, and compliance operational performance objectives.

To learn how your peer industry leaders are optimizing revenue, margin, market share, and service delivery operational performance please contact us for a complimentary executive briefing at 703-887-6615 or hello@arlingtonhealthcaregroup.com.  You may also contact Jamie and Scott directly at: 

 

Jamie Beth Solak, Jamie.Solak@ArlingtonHealthcareGroup.com 703.967.1440

Scott Pickens, Scott.Pickens@ArlingtonHealthcareGroup.com  703.887.6615

 

Prescription Drugs Costs to Jump in 2015

 

pills2.jpg

By Dan Cook, As seen in the October 2, 2014 edition of BenefitsPro
 

The ongoing corporate battle to hold down health plan increases should show some results next year. But prescription drugs continue to foil attempts to truly rein in health care costs.

 

That is the main finding in a new health plan cost trend survey from benefits and HR consulting firm The Segal Group. It's the 18th edition of the trend survey, and Segal made no bones about the concerns raised by the trending of drug prices.

 

"New specialty drugs coming onto the market and price increases for brand-name drugs are the main forces driving prescription drug plan cost trends," said Edward Kaplan, Segal's national health practice leader. "Typically, less than one percent of all prescriptions are specialty drug medications, yet these drugs now account for more than 25 percent of total prescription drug cost trends. The projected specialty drug/biotech trend rate for 2015 is an exceptionally high 19.4 percent."

 

This bleak forecast of prescription drug increases comes on the heels of a decrease for large plan members overall reported earlier this year by Buck Consultants. Buck said prescription drug plan increases had shown moderation in its survey, with a 9.2 percent hike this year compared to 9.9 percent in 2013.

 

That won't be the case next year, Segal predicted. Its respondents said they foresee "higher trend rates for all prescription drug plans," Segal said in a release.  "The trend for carve-out coverage is projected to jump from 6.3 percent in 2014 to 8.6 percent in 2015. The carve-out trend for retirees 65 and older is projected to rise from 5.7 percent in 2014 to 7.5 percent in 2015, more than twice the rate of retiree medical cost trends," Segal reported.

 

However, Segal's Kaplan noted that "forecasts are generally higher than actual experience, as insurers and analysts typically add margin to estimates to cover claim volatility. In 2013, actual trends for managed care plans were the lowest reported in more than 12 years."

 

Among other data drawn from the survey, Segal reported that HMOs could expect increases in the 6 percent range, while fee-for-service plans might see increases exceeding 10 percent. Open-access PPOs and point-of-service plans could see actual declines, from 7.9 percent this year to 7.8 percent next year, based upon the information gathered.

 

Asked to estimate how much out-of-pocket maximums might increase as employers adjusted for health care reform, respondents said they saw a 1 percent increase for medical plans and 1.5 percent for prescription drug plans.

  

Revised UCS Logo                          




UCS Update: Significantly Reduce Your Air Ambulance Costs 

 

We are pleased to announce that we've partnered with Aeromedevac, Inc., an internationally accredited air ambulance provider to offer our Clients access to quality, cost-effective air ambulance services nationally and internationally. 

 

Aeromedevac, Inc. provides coverage nationwide, and can also facilitate travel internationally to the US.  We've used their services with several Clients to date with great success and savings for the Plans.  They have the ability to work with the provider, patient, the Payer and the Plan to coordinate urgent, emergent and non-emergent travel at a moment's notice.  Their service includes coordination of travel including ground transportation and medical escort services if appropriate.

 

EXAMPLE; Aeromedevac coordinated cross state travel for an 18 month infant and the parents to a Children's hospital.  The fee was based on a percentage of Medicare resulting in savings of approximately $40K.  The feedback we received was very positive from our Client, the Plan and the parents.   

 

UCS Clients will have access to a dedicated Toll Free number and email to immediately start the process, along with the peace of mind of knowing that the service is being provided by a highly reputable company at a cost well below the market average.

                  

To learn more please contact Corte Iarossi, VP, Sales & Marketing at 866-762-4455 ext. 120, or at ciarossi@unitedclaim.com 

Issue: 9 

Rx Costs in the Brave New World of the ACA 
In This Issue

Previous Issues 

 

March 2015:

 Stop-loss; What Can We Expect in 2015? 

 

November 2014:

The Affordable Care Act: Where is the Market Today?

 

The Value of Aggressive Cost Containment for Self-Insured Plans

 

January 2014

Medical Management in a Changing Industry 

 

October 2013

Impacting Stop-Loss in an Evolving Market 

 

July 2013

Impacting PBM Services and Rx Costs 

 

March 2013

A Focus on the Affordable Care Act 

  

  
Join Our Mailing List