Vol. 5, Issue 46

Find Solutions & Strategies                 November 17, 2014

Tips for Stips & More
UR Decision Must Be Consistent With MTUS
Profitability of Workers' Comp Insurance Industry
In This Issue
* TIPS FOR STIPS
* UR AND MTUS
* WC INSURANCE PROFITS
* PD COMMENCEMENT DATE
* NEWS: Insurance Commissioner recommends lower advisory pure premium rate
* eNEWSLETTER ARCHIVES
A Note From the Editor
   
Join our community today. Sign up here for our free eNewsletter. 
  
  
Robin E. Kobayashi, J.D.
LexisNexis Legal & Professional Operations 
Attn: Risk Managers, Insurance & HR Professionals, Attorneys
   
50 State Legislation for 2014
Expert Analysis & Commentary
Larson's on Interesting Cases
  
Purchase now at special discount rate of $79.50 + tax + shipping
 
tips for stips & more

What if Defendant "#1" and applicant agree to use an AME in a case, but Defendant "#2" does not. Will Defendant "#2" be bound by the findings of the AME it never agreed to use? These questions and more were answered in the recent Noteworthy Panel Decision of Lorenz v. Encino Hospital Medical Center, 2014 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS 410. At the time of his first injury, Lawrence Lorenz was a 56-year-old x-ray technician who sustained three industrial injuries to his low back...read more.

slow taper of opioid usage: ur decisions must be consistent with the mtus

In McCool v. Monterey Bay Medicar, the WCAB panel, in dicta, expressed serious concerns regarding the defendant's UR denial of the prescription medications Oxycontin, Norco and Lyrica to the applicant, as the UR reviewer claimed to base the denial on the Medical Treatment Utilization Schedule (MTUS), yet declared an abrupt halt to the applicant's long term opioid usage after quoting specific language in the MTUS regarding the risk of abruptly stopping opioid medications and recommending the "slow taper" of the medications under direct, ongoing...read more.

the profitability of the workers' compensation insurance industry

John Burton's Workers' Compensation Resources Research Report analyzes the latest A.M. Best report

 
As explained in the November 2014 issue of Workers' Compensation Resources Research Report (WCRRR), the operating ratio is the "most comprehensive measure of underwriting results because it considers investment income." In order for the workers' compensation insurance industry to be profitable, the operating ratio must be less than 100. The operating ratio has decreased from 93.7 in 2012 to 82.9 in 2013, which means in 2013 "the industry earned $17.10 of profits for every $100 of net premiums." For the last 20 years, the workers' compensation insurance industry has been profitable each year except 2001, 2002 and 2011. WCRRR also examines for the first time the profitability of the workers' compensation industry at the state level using data from the National Association of Insurance Commissioners. Order the WCRRR Nov. 2014 issue.
california compensation cases

Cal Comp CasesPD Payable Retroactively 14 Days After Last Payment of 4850 Benefits: Cal. Comp. Cases November Advanced Postings  (11/12/2014). Lexis.com and Lexis Advance subscribers can read it.

california news headlines

CA: Insurance Commissioner Recommends Lower Advisory Pure Premium Rate.

CA: WCIRB Releases Updated SB 863 Cost Monitoring Report.

CA: DWC Issues Revisions to WCIS Rules for Additional 15 Day Comment Period.

CA: Maximus Reports Fourth Quarter 2014 Revenue Growth of 13 Percent.

CA: L.A. City Attorney Sues Several Govt. Contractors for Alleged Worker Misclassification.

CA: Wage Theft Rampant in So. Cal. Garment Industry.

NCCI Posts Comprehensive WC Financial Results for 2013, Estimates for 2014.

A.M. Best Reports Recent Improvement in U.S. Workers Comp Industry Results.

Workers Comp Benchmarking Study Released Nov. 2014.

Survey: 37% of Americans Believe Workers Comp Claimants Don't Want to Work.

eNewsletter archives

Take a deep dive into our past eNewsletters for 2014 and prior...warning - some links to articles may not work...report any linking problems to Robin.E.Kobayashi@lexisnexis.com.
 
LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are registered trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used under license. Other products or services may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies.

Privacy & Security Copyright © 2014 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.