Vol. 5, Issue 45

Find Solutions & Strategies                 November 10, 2014

The Cannon Case: Permanent Objective Medical Diagnosis
In This Issue
* CANNON CASE
* UR 12 MONTH BAR
* UR 24 HOUR EXTENSION
* MEDICAL LIEN DISCOVERY
* FREE CLE WEBINAR
* NEWS: Brown going in "very progressive", "fiscally responsible"
* eNEWSLETTER ARCHIVES
2015 Edition Ships in December
Preorder at 1.800.223.1940
A Note From the Editor
  
Join our community today. Sign up here for our free eNewsletter. 
  
  
Robin E. Kobayashi, J.D.
LexisNexis Legal & Professional Operations 
Attn: Risk Managers, Insurance & HR Professionals, Attorneys
   
50 State Legislation for 2014
Expert Analysis & Commentary
Larson's on Interesting Cases
  
Purchase now at special discount rate of $79.50 + tax + shipping
the cannon case: permanent objective medical diagnosis

By Robert G. Rassp, Esq.

 

Robert Rassp grayThroughout the years, since the enactment of SB 899, all of the guidebooks have directed physicians and attorneys to focus on permanent objective medical conditions in order to determine whether that condition is ratable under the AMA Guides. Some people interpret the AMA Guides to stand for the proposition that if a medical condition does not have permanent objective medical findings, then it cannot be rated at all. It took only 10 years for the appellate courts to tell us that this proposition is wrong. In January 2014, the Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, issued its published decision in City of Sacramento v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (Cannon) indicating two important points that apply in our cases. The first point is...read more

UR: 12-month bar to resubmission of rfa

WCAB finds in absence of changed circumstances, UR decision was valid for 12 months

 

In Reyes v. Target, Inc., the WCAB panel affirmed the WCJ's finding that the applicant, who suffered an admitted industrial injury to her spine, right upper extremity and psyche, and claimed diabetes, hypertension and sleep disorder, during the period 9/4/85 through 3/30/2010, was barred under LC 4610(g)(6) from litigating a 6/17/2014 utilization review denial of her primary treating physician's request for home care...read more.

ur determination: 24-hr extension of time

WCAB finds UR untimely and defendant did not communicate UR determination initially by phone, fax or email 

 

In Rivera v. Valley Radiology, the WCAB panel affirmed the WCJ's finding that the applicant, who sustained an admitted industrial injury to her low back on 8/27/2010, was in need of further medical treatment in the form of acupuncture and medications as prescribed by her primary treating physician, Norman Kahan, M.D...read more.

medical lien discovery; in camera review

WCAB provides guidance on the discovery of corporate and financial documents and the right of privacy  

 

In Garcia v. Arun Enterprises dba Subway, a WCAB panel, granting the defendant's petition for removal, reversed the WCJ's order and held that the WCAB had jurisdiction over (1) the issue of whether the lien claimant violated a ban on the corporate practice of medicine and whether such violation was a defense against the liability for the lien claimant's lien, and (2) the discovery of the financial/business relationships between...read more.

 
Thursday, Nov. 13. 11 a.m. (PT). Duration: 95 minutes. Earn 1.5 CLE credits.
california news headlines

CA: Jerry Brown to Serve Fourth Term as Governor.

eNewsletter archives

Take a deep dive into our past eNewsletters for 2014 and prior...warning - some links to articles may not work...report any linking problems to Robin.E.Kobayashi@lexisnexis.com.
 
LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are registered trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used under license. Other products or services may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies.

Privacy & Security Copyright © 2014 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.