traps to avoid when filing a petition for reconsideration |
How to avoid the shock of a notice of intent to sanction
A party usually files a Petition for Reconsideration with the hope that their argument will be accepted and that the trial level determination will be reversed by the WCAB. It is always a bit of a shock when a Petitioner finds a Notice of Intent to Sanction in their mail instead. Set forth below are some helpful hints to avoid that unwelcome surprise when filing Petitions for Reconsideration with the WCAB. The case of Prisk v. Los Angeles Unified School District is a cornucopia of examples illustrating what a party should NOT do in a Petition for Reconsideration...read more. |
wcab provides guidance on addressing insufficient ur documentation |
The UR process requires a good faith effort by both the treating physician and UR physician to assure that the necessary and appropriate information is available
In Smith v. Plant Construction, 2014 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS --, the WCAB panel rescinded the WCJ's award of medical treatment to the applicant with a 6/2/2007 industrial injury to his left shoulder, lumbar spine and left knee based on his findings that the defendant's 1/29/2014 UR contained material procedural defects and that substantial medical evidence supported the need for left shoulder surgery and other modalities of treatment related to surgery. Here, the treating physician's request for authorization for treatment did not include information regarding... read more. |
the drug law evolution & the workplace |
The proverbial sky could fall soon for drug testing and drug policies
By Roger Rabb, J.D.
Since 1970, marijuana has been listed as a Schedule I controlled substance under the Controlled Substances Act, making the possession and usage of marijuana illegal under federal law. Employers have traditionally relied on this classification of marijuana as an illegal drug when setting policies designed to keep workplaces safe and free from drug use. However, the legalization of medical marijuana in some states (20 and counting since 1996, plus the District of Columbia) has placed employers in these states, as well as state legislatures and courts, in a precarious position...read more.
|