A Note From the Editor |
Could the IMR process in LC 4610.5(e) survive if employers could no longer UR doctors in their MPNs? The answer lies in a case now before the WCAB. Find out more at "Dealing With Dubon" July 26 in Long Beach. See box below.
Join our community today. Sign up here for our free eNewsletter.
Sincerely,
LexisNexis Legal & Professional Operations
|

|
Registration is Open!
Dealing With Dubon:
The En Bancs, Facts and
Friction of IMR. Plus,
Midyear Case Law Update.
Presiding Judge Paige Levy
Marina del Rey
Judge Craig Glass
Oxnard-Marina del Rey
Maurice Abarr, Esq.
attorney for Jose Dubon
Corey Ingber, Esq.
Dennis Thomas, Esq.
Saturday, July 26
Long Beach Grand Event Center
4 MCLEs. Whatever Happens
to Dubon, We'll Talk About It.
or call (310) 822-1955.
Presented by LawWorm.com, an
MCLE provider with the CA Bar. |
|
|
accounts receivable purchase of liens at reduced value - trade secret or not? |
"The AR companies have become a cottage industry that now fills the courts with significant and sometimes unnecessary lien litigation on issues..."
In Gonzalez v. Thang Vi Duong, Inc., 2014 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS --, a WCAB panel denied the lien claimants' petition for removal and affirmed the WCJ's discovery orders requiring the lien claimants, i.e., Med Rx Funding and Pharma Finance, compound pharmacies owned by the same individuals whose liens in questions were purchased by an accounts receivable company, Landmark Medical Management, to produce documents representing the contracts between the lien claimants and certain health care providers, which contracts the lien claimants had alleged were protected by the "trade secret" privilege...read more.
|
 |
claims adjuster testimony REGARDING UR DENIAL OF MEDICAL TREATMENT |
This noteworthy panel decision will soon be added to the LexisNexis services.
In Reis v. Silvas Oil Company, Inc., 2014 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS --, a WCAB panel granted the defendant's petition for removal and rescinded the WCJ's order requiring the defendant's claims adjuster to appear at an expedited hearing on the issue of a 12/10/2013 utilization review determination that did not certify the applicant's carpal tunnel surgery request. Here, the WCAB found no good cause to force the claims adjuster to travel from the insurance company's office in Portland, Oregon to testify in Fresno, California, because there was no indication, based on the facts in this case, that the claims adjuster had any knowledge regarding the issue of whether the utilization review denial was justified. The WCAB further found that requiring the claims adjuster to appear would result in substantial prejudice and/or irreparable harm. Read the Reis noteworthy panel decision.
|
 |
wcab seeks candidates for two staff attorney positions |
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, Office of the Commissioners in San Francisco, seeks candidates to fill two full time permanent staff attorney vacancies:
- Industrial Relations Counsel II $6,347 - $8,141 salary plus benefits
- Industrial Relations Counsel III $7,682 - $9,857 salary plus benefits
Read more. |
california compensation cases |
Payroll Company Liable for Temp Worker's Injuries: Cal. Comp. Cases July Advanced Postings (7/10/2014). Lexis.com and Lexis Advance online subscribers can read it.
California Workers' Comp Case Roundup (7/10/2014): June CCC Cites Now Available. Lexis.com and Lexis Advance online subscribers can read it. |
|