Some very interesting facts or How do we explain our own life events to ourselves?
BiO Spiritualism Newsletter  
Helping our customers help themselves
 June 2013  
in this issue
F.u.t.u.r.e Writing Plans Expanded
Watch Dog
New Customers
Quick Links


Greetings Customers


 From last time (March 2013 NL)


It is true: I have a lot of crow to eat in regards to my (failed) predictions--e.g., Herman Cain is 'gonna win the 2012 Presidential election; The Cozy Sax bet is "cozy"; to name just two--but I don't feel like doing it just yet.


I have bigger fish to fry.




and so on


and so forth




Ary Ering--aka gARY deERING the world's most consistent handicapper--has a 

Kentucky Derby "dosage" factor that is better than thee Dosage Index  (Wikipedia Link) for looking at Kentucky Derby horses and gaging their prospects--or lack thereof--for winning the Kentucky Derby. However, Ary is not telling HOW the "Dough-Sage" (i.e., Money-Guru) Number is derived but he is providing the Number for your consideration--that is, is Ary's Number better than thee Dosage Index (for handicapping purposes) or not?




Now, as reader of my Newsletters you know that I don't have the best track record with my predictions but that doesn't stop me from making another one, and it is this:


The above assertion by the world's most consistent handicapper is true.


So, long story short: if the number holds up this year as it did last year then I will be motivated to pursure "proving" it with more historical data.


But like always, if not then not. (Except, maybe not, because thee famous Dosage Index falsely eliminated winners in 4 of the Kentucky Derby's over the past
tweny years or so (see here) but people still try to use it to help them in their handicapping efforts.)


And so two things: we'ul see and we move on.






And so NOW what do I have to say about this last NewsLetter?


Nothing other than I was right in spades and I had more fun than a barrel of monkeys with the Ary Number.


And to explain it I am giving the (wips) Conclusion section of my third and final book on The Triple Crown Affair in the following.


(sounds boring I know but before you conclude this read just a little bit further)





So what have "we" learned from our excursion into the world of The Triple Crown and it's investment in fun formulas (iiff's)?


Some very interesting facts.


One is, iiff's can be their own fun or combined with other Logical Choice™ thingys to make betting the Kentucky Derby a downright exciting if not euphoric experience. This year's "high"--2013--that I got from pre-planning and then betting my newly discovered D# and winning the almost thousand dollar exacta payout rivaled my euphoric-36 hour-foreplay-high that I got (back-in-the-day, i.e. late '70's) when I first discovered Biocentric Psychology in general with its many psych(h)ological principles and specifically its Principle about emotions: they flow freely in both directions or they flow in neither. (Mini ps first: rivaled is a bit of a misnomer here as the KD experience was only about one-100th (or maybe less) as "pleasurable" as the "physically in a foreplay state for 36 hours" event referred to--for more see my upcoming PsycHHology Series of "How to cure yourself of any and all mental disorders before they become mental illnesses" books.) But we digress, so back to the point at hand, that is, Maslow's peak experiences finally or rather almost finally figured out as the (my) quest to quantify comparative fun/pleasures continues. (I know the injection here of the Maslow connection is a bit of a non sequitur but ... sbi (so be it) ... for now ... I had wanted to intro it somewhere and here seems like a good place ... ):


That is, preplanning and betting the KD is lots of fun: (like mess of fish, lots is a teleömetric x ... that is, x=quantity or x=measurement I haven't figure out yet which it is ... I want it to be quantity but I suspect it is measurement ... ):


The Preakness pre-planning and betting is less so;


The Belmont Stakes' is more than the Preakness but less than the Kentucky Derby;


The Kentucky Derby is the hands-down best all around fun-time betting.


Two, the above comparative statements can be presented mathematically (the "exponents" are operators not exponents) as indicated by the following and explained in Appendix B:*



        Kentucky Derby $33ĀW1$35.81   $97ĀX3$1328.41     $0Āt5$19,937.47

             Preakness       $  8ĀW1$10.91   $39ĀX3$101.87    $524Āt5$1,014.82

              Belmont        $  0ĀW1$36.82    $26ĀX3$377.58     $99Āt5$3,352.50


* anticipating Appendix B and by fun meaning potential fun look at the right most column (average trifecta payout over the last dozen years or so): the Belmont is some three times more fun than the Preakness and the KD almost 20 times and the KD is more than 5 times more fun than the Belmont ... or ... the Belmont is one-fifth as much fun as the KD and the Preakness one-third the Belmont or one-twentieth the KD or ... etc. and so on ... tbc


Three, I didn't realize before writing this series that it would have some experimental value as in I discovered something about my Logical Choice™/TMS Handicapping approach that I did not know about and would not have discovered had it not been for this series. That is, see the D.ö.s.a.g.eNumber link in Appendix A.


Four, Going Galt is for the betterment of me not society. Society more than likely will over the next thousand years or so benefit from this (I'm predicting sure-to-grow cultural) phenomenon but I benefited from it right now. If you Go Galt and don't benefit now then don't Go Galt--rather, go back to feeding the beast from the crumbs off your productive table as such is the way life is: since we only get one, design tradeoffs have to be made in order to optimize our own personal happiness.


Five, I personally love explaining things and with this kindle triple crown series I feel I have explained my TMS Handicapping Approach ... well ... no ... not exactly ... rather, I have explained the LC-Tb (Logical Choice - Thoroughbred) wagering intersection as best I can ... that is ... I have--for me at least--optimized its fun.


The End.



See you at the races.



And this book (book 3) is the end of the line for this series.


FPS = Summary Conclusion:

A professional, thoroughbred pari-mutually-bet horse race is a physics experiment designed and conducted by kindergartners.





Triple Crown Affair Book 3 Cover
Kindle Version Pending


F.u.t.u.r.e Writing Plans Expanded


From last NL:

I plan to take the rest of this year off so to speak by tieing up some loose ends to my writing, e.g. , start more kindle books, e.g., My Breeders Cup Runneth Over: The Marathon Race, Book 1 of 14 and other Kindle type projects.


Then next year, 2014, I plan to start my next PsycHHology Book: How To Cure Yourself of Bi-Polar Disorder. (For jumping off point (pun not intended) see Selfish`ism Glossary, Keyword: Dipolar Man.) The intended audience for this upcoming book is non-evil people who have three characteristics: a degree of "bi-polar" that is below average, an IQ that is above average and a desire to be happIER.


For this NL:

So after the above it (magically) dawned on me (one morning) that this book is already outlined:


Part I - Non Evil People


Part II - Below Average People - "Bi-Polar" Symptomwise


Part III - Above Average People - IQ-Wise (pun intended)


Part IV - happIERness


... and so just add a Prologue, Epiloge and an Introduction and voila! I'm done.


The following is works-in-progress (wips) Preliminary Prologue or Book Introduction or Part I Introduction ... which ... to be determined:





There currently is 328,516 evil people alive and living on planet earth. If you are one of these my next book:


BiO Spiritualism: Mental Health Series


How to cure yourself of any mental disorder before it becomes a mental illness


Book 1


Bi-Polar Disorder


is NOT for you. Rather you should either commit suicide or have yourself incarcerated for the rest of your life because to be part of this group means you--as an adult--committed one or more actual murders.


All actual murderers are evil people and all evil people are actual murderers (the borderline cases, e.g. Charles Manson, Adolph Hitler, Stalin ... et al ... how you gonna deal w these ... that is those who are lightening rods for  those wh commit the actual murder in the name of the lightening rod??? ... dunno, tbd


So if you have not committed at least one actual murder and are more than likely not going to then if you also have the following characteristics then my next book is for you.


The characteristics:



(to be continued)










Watch Dog:

Another one of those "it's a dirty job but somebody has to do it" thingy:


See this Headline: 

Abnormal is the New Normal


*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *



Abnormal Is the New Normal
Why will half of the U.S. population have a diagnosable mental disorder?
By Robin S. Rosenberg|Posted Friday, April 12, 2013, at 8:00 AM


[exerpt from this post]:


Beware the DSM-5, the soon-to-be-released fifth edition of the "psychiatric bible," the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual. The odds will probably be greater than 50 percent, according to the new manual, that you'll have a mental disorder in your lifetime.


Although fewer than 6 percent of American adults will have a severe mental illness in a given year, according to a 2005 study, many more--more than a quarter each year--will have some diagnosable mental disorder.


That's a lot of people. Almost 50 percent of Americans (46.4 percent to be exact) will have a diagnosable mental illness in their lifetimes, based on the previous edition, the DSM-IV. And the new manual will likely make it even "easier" to get a diagnosis.


If we think of having a diagnosable mental illness as being under a tent, the tent seems pretty big. Huge, in fact. How did it happen that half of us will develop a mental illness? Has this always been true and we just didn't realize how sick we were--we didn't realize we were under the tent? Or are we mentally less healthy than we were a generation ago? What about a third explanation--that we are labeling as mental illness psychological states that were previously considered normal, albeit unusual, making the tent bigger. The answer appears to be all three.



and so on ... see link for full article ... ( and if you do go there and read it I ask you to especially notice its introductory "tone" which is this: "Friends, Romans, Countrymen, lend me your ears ... )



I applaud R.S. Rosenberg for giving us this article.


However, I take issue with his first conclusion: The answer appears to be all three.


That is, he is concluding that:

            1. we didn't realize how sick (mentally ill) we were and

            2. we are mentally less healthy today than we were a generation ago and finally

            3. we are labeling as mental illness psychological states that are not mental illness.


Rather, I should say I disagree with 2/3rds of his conclusion and agree with 1/3rd: "we" (that is T.H.E.Y ) are labeling as mental illness psychological states that are not mental illness.


Mental illness is the loss of mental health. Mental health is the "unobstructed capacity for reality bound cognitive functioning and the exercise of this capacity". Mental illness is the sustained impairment of this capacity. [Branden]


DSM-5, that is DSM-Any Number, is ... a ... bad book.


It is designed to look and sound like a (Hand)book of science but it is nothing more than the dead sea scrolls of mystics past.


Like the MMPI (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory)*--which is equally bad as a "psychological" test tool--the DSM-N series of books is nothing more than a "steering wheel" designed and used by BM's to control (steer) the entire body of individual citizens of our country in the direction of-the(any)-moment that T.H.E.Y desire.


You as autonomous individual can allow them to so drive you or you can increase your autonomy and ego strength and make sure you take care of yourself so that T.H.E.Y don't continue succeeding in driving America into the ground.


The foregoing I know some would say is ... "diatribe" ... is "dogmatic" ... is a "rant" ... is demagoguery.


But of course I don't call it this, rather I call it: Hypothesis.


And more, in these (Watch Dog) "pages" here and going forward I plan to explore this hypothesis of mine further (which I have already started and documented in my first Book, Yes, Is BiO-Spiritualism the answer? ) and present the new results here.


For starters cosider one simple question, the article says "fewer than 6 percent of American adults will have a severe mental illness in a given year" ... if--per that famous 20th century psychiatrist Thomas Szasz--it is true that mental illness is a myth then we have to ask, what is a "severe" myth?




* ( Minnesota MultiPhasic Personality Inventory  is " ... a psychological test ... primarily intended to test people who are suspected [emphasis mine] of having mental health or other clinical issues". 


This test we should remember has as its starting-point-baseline for "normal" the responses from a small number of people from St. Paul Minnesota who happened to walk into some St. Paul Hospital back in the late 1930s when "they" were getting a base line of peoples responses for this inventory.  That is, its baseline for "normal" is from that same City that One Ex-Governor of Minnesota--The Honorable Jessie Ventura--said had streets designed and laid out by drunken Irishmen--I have driven these streets and though the Governor's remarks are not politically correct they are metaphorically correct.







How are "we" any different than the Muslims we are fighting the world over???


  • see military sentiments within military people and man on the street ...
  • "we" differ in degree not kind ...
  • we believe in faith in god and doing god's will, they believe it more (see the religion called Islam)
  • we believe in sacrificing your life to others for our soldiers, Muslims believe it more (see suicide bombers who apparently are so witless that they allow others to tell them to blow themselves up AND THEY DO IT!?!?!?)


A reader/friend emailed me a "why haven't we heard about this story in the main media" email.  I do not want to put anyone on the spot so I'm not saying who it was.


But I am going to give my response to it here (I did not send this response to her...notice it could be a him and this is my "crafty" way of concealing identity...but I feel strongly enough about it that I have to put it somewhere and so am going to put it here):


My Response:

(email contents below this)


Hey ███,


Thanks for sending this.


I had not heard of it and I agree it is a very interesting story.


I don't want to start any controversy between us but I'm thinking you must know for sure that I think sacrificing your life for others is morally wrong (reference that I know you have read many of).


The two guys in your story are no doubt great guys, but ...


They were no longer Navy Seals therefore not bound by the Navy Seal Oath that they apparently took voluntarily when they were Seals.


I know all this stuff is very sensitive stuff but ... could those two ex-Seals have saved themselves or were they doomed based on proximity?


If they could have saved themselves and chose not too BECAUSE they believe ALTRUISM is a moral ideal then ... well ... you know what I think about this ... again see, especially the March 2011 and then September 2012 NewsLetters and also my books on amazon ( especially my last one: Selfish'ism.)


Again, thanks for sending and my goal here is NOT to dissuade you from sending me stuff in the future as I like all the stuff you send me, especially that Owens Corning one on glass surfaces computers etc., quite the thing and I've never seen anything on it except your email.


There's been others too, so keep sending and I'll only do this eval when you hit really close to (my) home (i.e., core).



Gary Deering



I agree that the Hilary question is particularly pathetic and this article email of yours sure highlights it.



Many people mistakenly call a trade a sacrifice and I am not talking about this, but rather real sacrifice, i.e., giving up a higher value for a lower one.



 [copy of initiating email sent to me by a reader/friend]


---------------------------------beginning of email content I responded to-------------------------------------------


very interesting, have any of you heard about this????????


"What difference does it make"

The stunning part of this story is that Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty killed 60 of the attacking force. Once the compound was overrun, the attackers were incensed to discover that just two men had inflicted so much death and destruction.

The news has been full of the attacks on our embassies throughout the Muslim world, and in particular, the deaths of Ambassador Chris Stevens and three others in Benghazi, Libya.

However, there's a little known story of incredible bravery, heroics, and  courage that should be the top story.

So what actually happened at the U.S. embassy in Libya?  We are learning more about this every day.  Ambassador Stevens and Foreign Service officer Sean Smith, along with administrative staff,              were working out of temporary quarters due to the fact that in the spring of 2011 during the so-called Arab Spring, the United States cut ties with then president Moammar Gadhafi.  Our embassy was looted and ransacked, causing it to be unusable.  It is still in a state of disrepair.

Security for embassies and their personnel is to be provided by the host nation.  Since Libya has gone through a civil war of sorts in the past 18 months, the current government is very unstable, and therefore, unreliable

A well-organized attack by radical Muslims was planned specifically targeting the temporary U.S. embassy building.  The Libyan security force that was in place to protect our people  deserted their post, or joined the attacking force.  Either way, our people were in a real fix.  And it should be noted that Ambassador Stevens had mentioned on more than one occasion to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton,  that he was quite concerned for his personal safety and the welfare of his people.  It is thought that Ambassador Stevens was on a "hit list."

A short distance from the American compound, two Americans were sleeping.  They were in Libya as independent contractors working an assignment totally unrelated to our embassy.  They also happened to be former Navy Seal's.

When they heard the noise coming from the attack on our embassy, as you would expect from highly trained warriors, they ran to the fight. Apparently, they had no weapons, but seeing the Libyan guards dropping their guns in their haste in fleeing the scene, Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty snatched up several of these discarded weapons and prepared to defend the American compound.

Not knowing exactly what was taking place,  the two Seal's set up a defensive perimeter.  Unfortunately Ambassador Stevens was already gravely injured, and Foreign Service officer, Sean Smith, was dead. However, due to their quick action and suppressive fire, twenty administrative personnel in the embassy were able to escape to safety. Eventually, these two courageous men were overwhelmed by the sheer numbers brought against them, an enemy force numbering between 100 to 200 attackers which came in two waves.  But the stunning part of the story is that  Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty killed 60 of the attacking force.  Once the compound was overrun, the attackers were incensed to discover that just two men had inflicted so much death and destruction.

As it became apparent to these selfless heroes, they were definitely going to lose their lives unless some reinforcements showed up in a hurry.  As we know now, that was not to be.  I'm fairly certain they knew they were going to die in this gun fight, but not before they took a whole lot of bad guys with them!
Consider these tenets of the Navy SEAL Code:
1) Loyalty to Country, Team and Teammate,
2) Serve with Honor and Integrity On and Off the Battlefield,
3) Ready to Lead, Ready to Follow, Never Quit,
4) Take responsibility for your actions and the actions of your teammates,
5) Excel as Warriors through Discipline and Innovation,
6) Train for War, Fight to Win, Defeat our Nation's Enemies, and...
7) Earn your Trident every day

Thank you, Tyrone and Glen.  To the very last breath, you both lived up to the SEAL Code.  You served all of us well.  You were courageous in the face of certain death.
And Tyrone, even though you never got to hold your newborn son, he will grow up knowing the character and quality of his father, a man among men who sacrificed himself defending others.

Senior Pastor
Former Staff Sergeant,
USMC Captain,
U. S. Navy Chaplain Corps (Ret.)

This should be passed on
and on and on.


And Let us never forget the Hillary Clinton Comment

"What Difference does it make?


  ----------------------------------end email content I responded to--------------------------------------





ˇ  New Customers 
As of this time BiO Spiritualism Counseling Centers are only available online.
If you feel you need more than "sounding board" advice as same is afforded you via BiO Spiritualism's Online processes (including the multiple benefits you can get for $$$ FREE $$$ from just reading the content in`s BiO Spiritualism and Gary's Venns websides) you are best advised to seek out a therapist with whom you can establish a rapport and get some serious psychological (that is, psychological as in Selfishness Training) work done.  
For some insight on how you can help yourself manage this aspect of your growth and development go here and click on the "How to choose a therapist" article.

            BiO Spiritualism, The New Millennia Spiritualism:
Book 1a

Selfish'ism Cover  


Increase your intelligence, decrease your naiveté.





Increase your joy, decrease your guilt.





Increase your selfishness, decrease your greed.








that is, travel the Enlightened, Reason-paved-road to authentic Happiness.


            The Triple Crown Affair - Book 1 Secret WHITE SHEET iif Formulas for The Kentucky Derby: Kindle Version
Kindle version



Increase your excitement, decrease your boredom.





Increase your joy, decrease your guilt.





Increase your selfishness, decrease your greed.




that is, travel the Enlightened, Reason-paved-road to authentic FUN.


Fun is GOOD.




Here for:  IN COLOR & PRINTABLE Pdf Version 


            The Triple Crown Affair - Book 2 Secret WHITE SHEET iif Formulas for The Preakness:  
Kindle version



Increase your excitement, decrease your boredom.





Increase your joy, decrease your guilt.





Increase your selfishness, decrease your greed.




that is, travel the Enlightened, Reason-paved-road to authentic FUN.


Fun is GOOD.


Joy of course--i.e. winning more money than you bet--is BETTER.




Here for:  IN COLOR & PRINTABLE Pdf Version 


            The Triple Crown Affair - Book 3 Secret WHITE SHEET iif Formulas for The Belmont Stakes:

Triple Crown Affair Book 3 Cover  


Increase your excitement, decrease your boredom.





Increase your joy, decrease your guilt.





Increase your selfishness, decrease your greed.




that is, travel the Enlightened, Reason-paved-road to authentic FUN.


Fun is GOOD.


Joy of course--i.e. winning more money

than you bet--is BETTER.


And finally, ultimately, the BEST of course is: Happiness--i.e. a state of non-contradictory joy.





Here for:  IN COLOR & PRINTABLE Pdf Version 


            BiO Spiritualism, The New Millennia Spiritualism:
Yes. (Is BiO Spiritualism the answer?)



Increase your intelligence, decrease your naiveté.





Increase your joy, decrease your guilt.





Increase your selfishness, decrease your greed.








that is, travel the Enlightened, Reason-paved-road to authentic Happiness.


Yes. (Is BiO Spiritualism the answer?)Yes Book is now available for Kindle:
Buy BiO Spiritualism's Yes book today at RaIse Books' online store or on  Spread the word about the new, Third Millenium Spiritualism by picking up an extra copy for family and friends! BiO Spiritualism, qua integration of Objectivism AND Biocentric Psychology IN-THE-PERSON, is infinitely scalable so as to provide for the equivalent of

7,095,103,584 (and counting) individual "sects". (Starting with U.S. of A's 316,155,074 individuals.)

(11:06 UTC (EST+5) or (ETD+4) Jun 30, 2013)



PS ... FYI ... Note of Interest ... last year's 2012 total growth for the year:
  over 70 million more people on Planet Earth and
over 2 million more in the United States of America .  
$150 Value for FREE 
  $150 Value for $$$ FREE $$$$ when you become a beta tester:
Agree to be a Beta Tester of BiO Spiritualism's new online process called Reflect'ology and receive 3 FREE additional rounds--each a $50 value--redeemable at any time for a year from the end of your Beta Tester round. To be a beta tester requires you to go to and after you have registered order the eM.One product under BiO Spiritualism Products, enter a problem or two you desire help with and then start the process by returning it to my email address. Initially you pay $10 for the $10 eM.One and then later you pay $40 for the $40 eM.Three and then when you return your feedback, critiquing what you did, did not like about the process and/or suggestions on how you think it would be better, your $50 will be refunded to you and your name noted for your 3 FREE Rounds in the future. So take advantage of this offer that is limited to this development time before the Reflect'ology Process gets finalized.
Offer Expires: When Reflect'ology Process is Finalized