Announcements:
The Southern Nevada Board of Officials (SNBO) have met and agreed on an adoption schedule for all 2009 building codes. Adoption will occur In July/August 2010 and will become effective July 2011 for most codes.
Clark County Development Services, (CCDS), has announced that by the end of March, the new, paperless, ePlan review system will take effect for commercial projects. ePlan review has been available for residential projects since December, 2009. For more information on the implementation of ePlan review for commercial projects, click here. | |
|
Greetings!
Recently, I have had some interesting conversations with current clients and prospects that are pursuing new government projects. The majority of these projects are required to be delivered through the design-build method as opposed to the conventional design-bid-build process. Most of us have experience with both methods, my firm included, and can argue for or against either one. Here is my attempt to scratch the surface of both arguments.
Proponents believe the design-build method benefits the owner by taking advantage of combining the knowledge and experience of the design and construction team from the beginning of the project. Collaboration amongst the team members and employing their knowledge of the entire design and construction process enables them to efficiently work together during those two phases. Consequently, the owner receives the best functioning and most efficiently constructed building, faster, cheaper and with minimal risk.
Opponents, on the other hand, argue that design-build stifles design creativity and could diminish quality. It should be reserved for cookie-cutter, boxy and cheap looking type of buildings. Others aren't so sure that design-build reduces costs since contractors aren't fully engaging in competitive bidding. The resistance to design-build has a lot to do with a change in roles. In a design-build contract, a consortium of companies is expected to provide a firm price for the completed project before it has been designed.
In my opinion, either method can be successfully used to deliver most types of projects. The key is to select the best team members for the job. I realize that only one method must be selected before beginning a project. However, how about embracing the best of both worlds by applying the strengths of each method in our practice, regardless of which method is  used in delivering the project?
|
Focus On: Structural Efficiency & Constructability |
Projects designed with consideration of structural efficiency and constructability can help owners and developers use fewer materials, shorter schedules and ultimately lower building costs which for most projects these days are critical to their survival.
A focus on how the building structure is designed must be done early on during the conceptual and schematic design phases. It will set the tone for how the building will be constructed. For example, consideration of an efficient concrete formwork system will result in a speedy core construction. Conversely, disregard to constructability will require considerable redesign around randomly placed walls or columns. Structural efficiency requires thoughtful consideration of what to build and how to build. The most appropriate building materials such as concrete, steel, masonry and wood must be selected. Means and methods such as detailing, formwork and construction sequencing used to assemble them into a structure must be clearly understood.
Post-tensioning method: A great contribution to efficiency
Hilton Grand Vacation Club, 26-story time share tower located on the Las Vegas Strip, completed in 2003 features 15,000 sf post-tensioned concrete floor plates. Architect: MBH Architects, Newport Beach, Calif., Contractor: Penta Building group, Las Vegas
 | The post-tensioning method addresses both sides of the efficiency coin. Its use can significantly reduce the amount of rebar and concrete as well as shorten construction schedule of a project. Construction crews can pour a post-tensioned floor in one or two days, compared to three or four days required for their rebar-only counterparts. Additionally, it allows for greater freedom in building layout by incorporating larger spans; controlling long-term deflection; allowing for the use of shallow framing members and lighter foundations; reducing floor-to-floor height; and decreasing seismic demand due to lower seismic mass; most of which positively affects architectural and mechanical systems. Exterior skin quantities are reduced resulting in less overall building volume to heat and cool. |
Featured Project: Paradise Plaza, Sparks, NV |
THOMAD Engineering provided structural engineering consulting and design services for the recently completed Paradise Plaza project in the Sparks-Reno area. The project combined both new construction of retail pads and remodeling of outdated existing inline retail stores. The scope of work included the design of new facades for all existing buildings, structural retrofits to some of the existing stores and design of two new retail pads. Construction was completed on schedule and within budget while keeping all existing tenants open for business. To see more of this project, click here.
Some of the challenges faced by the design team include:
- The project is located within a highly active earthquake area which demands special seismic design considerations.
- Extensive on-site survey and observation was required since as-built drawings were not available.
- Damaged structural members were uncovered during demolition and preparation work which required our immediate attention.
Project Highlights:
- Design and detail for strengthening or replacement of existing framing members and their connections.
- Innovative bracing system for new tall parapets and facades.
- Complete 'face lift' to all existing stores with new facade structures.
- Demanding seismic design requirements.
- Addition of new 3,500 sq. ft. and 3,900 sq. ft. retail pads on site.
- Architect: KKE Architects, Pasadena, CA
Mr. Dan Sandoval, owner's representative of Rimester, Inc. in Beverly Hills, Calif., said "THOMAD Engineering did an outstanding job on our Sparks, NV project. Their engineers had a clear understanding of our framing problems and provided quick solutions on the spot to stay on schedule and reduce change order cost. You are an asset to the engineering profession and we look forward to working with you again soon!" | |
|
|
|