FRANCHISOR 101: INITIAL FRANCHISE FEES AND ROYALTY FEES
Initial franchise fees and royalty fees lie at the heart of
franchising, and for start-up and existing franchisors alike, they can prove
big stumbling blocks to fashioning a viable business model.
This is true because initial franchise fees and royalty fees
must reflect three intangibles crucial to your success as a franchisor - the
unique strengths of your brand, your business systems, and your capacity to
help your franchisees prosper.
It is, however, no easy task to analyze these intangibles;
you can't just plug numbers into a set formula and hope things work out.
Certainly, as your franchise system matures, these fees should cover your
operating costs and provide sufficient profits to make it worth your while to
be a franchisor and, at the same time, leave enough on the plate for your
franchisees. But the analysis must cover legal as well as financial matters.
Here are two key legal questions to consider:
How
strong are the legal fences protecting your brand and trademarks from
competition? To be sure, a franchisor without a brand and trademarks is a
cowboy without a horse. But it can take as much work to protect these
assets as it does to create them in the first place, and the more
successful you get, the more likely it becomes that competitors will try
to get in on the action. Ray Kroc may have been among the first to see
opportunity in fast food, but McDonald's isn't the only place serving up
hamburgers.
What
about your business systems? Like your brand and trademarks, your business
systems constitute valuable intellectual property. You must protect the
unique processes you develop to manage your supply chain, your inventory,
and your production or delivery processes. This means shielding these
systems from outside view, for starters. It also means understanding that
outsiders will figure things out sooner or later and keeping watch to make
sure that, once they do, they don't copy what you do to your disadvantage.
Initial franchise fees and royalty fees must reflect the
existing and future value of these assets. It follows that they aren't just
sources of income. They are the means by which you will help existing and new
franchisees to prosper, not to mention yourself. They are, in other words, the
wellspring of the future, and you must analyze and protect them carefully
|
FRANCHISEE 101: PAY US NOW OR PAY US NOW
Fledgling franchisees, like people launching any business,
tend to be optimists, and when they talk about the future, they generally see
opportunity, not the threat of failure.
But failure happens in franchising, too, and when it does,
it may bring into play a complex, sometimes-overlooked clause in the typical
franchise agreement that can prove devastating - the liquidated damages clause.
In essence, a liquidated damages clause in a franchise
agreement may mean that losing your franchise won't put an end to your misery.
In fact, it could mean that if your franchise agreement is terminated before
its scheduled expiration date for any
reason at all -that is, no matter if or why you close your doors - you may
still owe your franchisor a pile of royalties despite your straitened financial
circumstances.
How much? A typical franchise agreement might require the
franchisee to pay liquidated damages equal to two years' worth of royalties - a
heavy burden to bear on top of failure itself. Worse, the agreement may give
the franchisee only 30 days to hand over the money.
Why so much? And why so soon? Because, as a typical
franchise agreement might put it:
"It would be impossible and impracticable to determine the
precise amount of damages franchisor will incur upon the termination of this agreement
due to the complications inherent in determining the amount of revenue lost by franchisor
because of the uncertainty regarding the number of months that will expire
while franchisor searches for a replacement franchisee...or for a replacement location
in the trade area of the franchised business. Franchisor and franchisee...acknowledge
and agree that this calculation of franchisor's potential damages is a
reasonable, good faith estimate of such damages."
In plain English, this means that by signing on as a
franchisee you acknowledge from the get-go that your franchisor can't know how
long it might take, or how much money it might cost, to recruit and train
somebody to take up the slack in the event your franchise is terminated, and
that when it all shakes out, something like two years' worth of royalties will
compensate your franchisor for the trouble.
Does this mean that franchisors hold most of the cards when
recruiting franchisees? You bet. However, the good news is that in many states,
including California, certain liquidated
damages clauses are unenforceable. Nevertheless, the bottom line is
clear: Before you sign that franchise agreement, look carefully at its
liquidated damages clause. You probably can't get out from under it, but
prudence dictates that you prepare by factoring its possible costs into your
budget, just in case you walk away from your franchise agreement before it
expires.
That way, if you have to close up shop, you can put an end
to your misery. If you succeed, you can put the money to other uses - say,
growing your business.
|
Barry Kurtz Honored as 2010 Super Lawyer
Barry Kurtz has been selected
as a 2010 Super Lawyer in his specialty of Franchise Law. This honor is
bestowed by the Journal of Law and Politics, in conjunction with Los Angeles
Magazine.
The Super Lawyer designation is the
result of peer evaluation. Nominations are received from thousands of lawyers
throughout the state. According to the Journal of Law and Politics, this honor
is reserved for the top 5% of the lawyers in each practice area.
|
Nicola McDowall named Certified Specialist in Franchise Law
Nicola McDowall, of counsel to Barry Kurtz PC, was recently named a Certified Specialist, Franchise & Distribution Law, by
The State Bar of California Board of Specialization.
This certification is awarded to attorneys whose knowledge and experience in
Franchise & Distribution Law is of the highest level. Mr. Kurtz and Ms. McDowall are 2 of only 31 specialists certified.
|
|
This communication published by Barry Kurtz, APC is intended as general information and may not be relied upon as
legal advice, which can only be given by a lawyer based upon all the relevant
facts and circumstances of a particular situation.
Copyright © Barry Kurtz, A Professional Corporation 2009 All Rights
Reserved.
|
|
|
Contributing Expert
Don Snyder Partner Green Hasson & Janks
GH&J Food Digest - Steps to Prevent Fraud
|
 Barry Kurtz is a prolific writer on the subject of franchise law. From due diligence to franchise
appraisal, his articles are a valuable resource to any franchisee and franchisor. He
was recently named a Certified Specialist in Franchise and Distribution
Law by the State
Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization.
Visit our website for more articles
|
|
|