|
|
|
Find Solutions & Strategies May 14, 2012 |
|
The Real McCoy
Is a "mental-physical" injury compensable? |
|
A Note From the Editor |

|
Dear WC Professionals:
Thanks to Robert Rassp for his helpful analysis of the McCoy case.
Sincerely,
Robin E. Kobayashi, J.D.
LexisNexis Legal & Professional Operations
|
Free eNewsletter |
|
|
|
the real mccoy |
The Real McCoy: Is a "Mental-Physical" Injury Compensable? How the California 4th DCA Muddies the Water in County of San Bernardino vs. WCAB (McCoy), by Robert G. Rassp, Esq. An employee has a pre-existing history of migraine headaches. He gets a job with the County of San Bernardino as an automated systems technician in July 2005 through January 19, 2006. His supervisor yells at him during the six months he works for the County and then he files a cumulative trauma claim to his psyche which is denied AOE/COE. On the day of trial, his attorney gets cute and amends the claim to include injury in the form of migraine headaches. The WCJ issues a "take nothing" based on the defense under Labor Code section 3208.3(h) that the psychiatric injuries were substantially caused by lawful, non-discriminatory, good faith personnel actions and therefore were not compensable. Read more.
|
 |
ama guides & fibromyalgia |
Here's a sneak preview of a recent noteworthy panel decision that will be added to the LexisNexis services soon:
Permanent Disability; Rating; AMA Guides. WCAB rescinded WCJ's finding that applicant incurred 78 percent permanent disability as a result of injuries to her psyche, skin and in forms of headaches, chronic pain and fibromyalgia, when WCAB held that, in making permanent disability finding, WCJ improperly rejected opinion of AME in rheumatology, who had combined applicant's WPI using Table 13-4 of AMA Guides with WPI utilizing Table 13-8 of AMA Guides, based upon his interpretation that Chapter 13.2 of AMA Guides precluded combining of impairments from Tables 13-4 and 13-8, and that AME's opinion constituted substantial evidence and should have been followed because (1) AME clearly incorporated descriptions of impairments in AMA Guides as required under LC 4660(b)(1), (2) since there is no impairment rating relating to fibromyalgia in AMA Guides, there was no scheduled rating to rebut and therefore the rules set forth in Almaraz/Guzman and Milpitas Unified School Dist. v. W.C.A.B. (Guzman) were not strictly applicable, and (3) AME used tables within four corners of AMA Guides and explained his methodology. See Mrozek-Payne panel decision.
Reminder: Be sure to check the subsequent history of a case before citing to it. |
|
 |
 |
job posting |

WC Defense Associate
Glendale and Brea offices of Goldman, Magdalin & Krikes, LLP seeks attorneys with minimum 5 years workers' comp defense experience, competitive salary & benefits. Submit in Word format cover letter, resume, salary history/requirements to dcaldarelli@gmklaw.com.
Post jobs for free in this eNewsletter. Contact Robin.E.Kobayashi@lexisnexis.com for information. |
blogs: lexisnexis workers' comp law community |

Workers' Comp Fraud Blotter - Court Affirms Conviction of CHP Officer, by LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Community Staff. Read it.
Insurer Entitled to Credit for Third Party Recovery in Porta-Potty Injury Case: Cal. Comp. Cases May Advanced Postings (5/12/2012), by Cal. Comp. Cases Staff. Lexis.com users can access the complete headnotes and summaries. Read it.
|
 |
 |
LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are registered trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used under license. Other products or services may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies.
Privacy & Security Copyright © 2012 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
|
|
|