Same trusted LexisNexis content. Whenever you're ready. Wherever you are.

Sign up for this free eNewsletter by sending your full name and email address, along with your request for the Calif. edition, to:

 [email protected]

When Can an Applicant's Attorney Be Paid From a Lien Claimant's Recovery? There are many disputed cases where an applicant's attorney may be successful in proving that an industrial injury occurred or that an employment relationship existed. This in turn will often result in a defendant having to pay, adjust or litigate outstanding lien claims. Where the lien claimant did not participate in the underlying proceedings, the applicant's attorney may be left asking, "Why should the lien claimant directly benefit from my services without having to pay me?" > Read more.

Lexis.com subscribers can link to the citations in this article. Reminder: check the subsequent history of a case before citing to it.

DWC Conference Attendees in Los Angeles: Take Advantage of Special Deals Through March 15, 2012, by Christine Hyatt, LexisNexis. It was  a pleasure to meet everyone at the DWC conference in Los Angeles last week! All Los Angeles attendees can still take advantage of special conference discounts through March 15, 2012. Whether you want print or ebook, we've got your research solutions:

*Herlick, Calif. Workers' Comp. Handbook (2012 Ed.)

*Workers' Comp. Laws of Calif. (2012 Ed.)

*Calif. WCAB Noteworthy Panel Decisions Reporter

*Lawyer's Guide to AMA Guides & Calif. WC (2012 Ed.)

*Complete Guide to MSP Compliance (2011 Ed.)

To take advantage of this offer, contact me asap:

Toll free: 1-800-424-4200 Ext. 3149

Email: [email protected]

Fax: 1-800-624-8278

Penalties; Attorney's Fees; Enforcement of Medical Award. WCAB upheld WCJ's order instructing defendant to pay applicant's attorney $112,948 (282.37 hours at $400 per hour) pursuant to LC 5814.5, as attorney's fee for enforcing payment of part of applicant's award of medical treatment, when WCAB found that WCJ thoroughly reviewed hours claimed by applicant's attorney and awarded payment only for those hours justified under LC 5814.5, that $400 per hour was not excessive or unreasonable for someone with applicant's attorney's experience and certified specialist status, and that, while a LC 5814.5 is not analogous to punitive damages or sanctions as it simply compensates injured worker for costs incurred as a result of a defendant's unreasonable delay in paying awarded compensation, WCJ's order did not exceed authority expressly granted in LC 5814.5 simply because it, in effect, punished defendant by requiring defendant to compensate applicant for attorney's fees incurred as a result of defendant's unreasonable conduct. See the Abernathy panel decision.