|
|
|
Find Solutions & Strategies August 29, 2011 |
|
Depositions, Anyone?
A helpful primer on depositions in workers' compensation cases |
|
A Note From the Editor |  |
Dear WC Professionals:
Thank you to Robert G. Rassp, Esq. for his lessons on depositions. His primer will surely come in handy.
One hundred years ago, on Sept. 1, 1911, California's first workers' compensation law, known as the Roseberry Act, went into effect. Two years later a compulsory workers' compensation law (the Boynton Act) was enacted. Thanks to David Bacon for showing us the importance of unions and workers' compensation over the years.
Sincerely,
Robin E. Kobayashi, J.D.
LexisNexis Editorial & Content Development
|
Free eNewsletter: Sign Up |

If you haven't subscibed yet to our free weekly eNewsletter, send your name and email address along with your request to:
| |
|
depositions |
Depositions, Anyone? by Robert G. Rassp, Esq. Recently, a defense attorney took the deposition of an Applicant who had filed two claims - an admitted specific injury and a denied cumulative trauma case. The deposition itself went smoothly (no one overtly lied about anything) but at the end of the deposition, the defense attorney (who was from a large, well established law firm) asked the applicant's attorney:
"Will you stipulate to relieve the court reporter of her obligations under CCP section 2025(q) and (s), that the deposition transcript can be signed under penalty of perjury, that the Applicant will review the transcript within 30 days of your receipt of it and defendants will be notified within 45 days of the date the transcript is received of any changes the Applicant made, otherwise, a certified unsigned copy of the transcript can be used for any purpose?"
Now, this got us thinking. When was the last time this defense attorney (or for that matter all of us) referred to the pertinent sections of the California Code of Civil Procedure that govern depositions? Hint: CCP sections 2025(q) and (s) were repealed years ago and a whole new series of sections were substituted in. Read more.
Lexis.com subscribers can link to the cases, statutes, etc. cited in this article. |
 |
workers' comp centennial |
Workers' Compensation Centennial 1911-2011- California: Justice, Equality and a Decent Life, by David Bacon.
In the hundred and fifty year history of workers in the San Francisco Bay Area, the watershed event was one that happened 70 years ago - the San Francisco general strike. That year sailors, longshoremen and other maritime workers shut down all the ports on the west coast, trying to form a union and end favoritism, low wages, and grueling 10- and 12-hour days. Shipowners deployed tanks and guns on the waterfront, and tried to break the strike.
At the peak of this bitter labor war, police fired into crowds of strikers, killing two union activists. Then workers shut down the entire city in a general strike, and for four days nothing moved in San Francisco. The strike gave workers a sense of power described in a verse in the union song Solidarity Forever: "Without our brain and muscle, not a single wheel can turn."
The strike marked the end of a period in which, for seventy years, the efforts of workers to form unions were met with violence and firings. By the end of the 1930s, the International Longshore and Warehouse Union was one of the strongest in the nation, workers had a hiring hall instead of a humiliating shapeup in which they had to beg for jobs, and workers on both sides of the bay were busy building other unions, as well as political organizations that eventually elected mayors and sent pro-worker candidates to Congress. The strike marked the beginning of our modern labor movement. Read more.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
SNEAK PREVIEW: RECENT PANEL DECISION |
NOTE:This free eNewsletter reports only a handful of panel decisions each month. If you want notification of all 50 to 65 noteworthy panel decisions added each month to the Lexis database, please consider purchasing our new panel decisions reporter. Panel decisions are citeable, but not binding precedent.
Medical Treatment; Treatment of Non-industrial Psychiatric Condition. WCAB affirmed WCJ's finding that defendant was liable to applicant/team leader for psychiatric treatment under Labor Code � 4600, even though there was no industrial psychiatric injury found under predominant cause standard in Labor Code � 3208.3, when psychiatric treatment was necessary to treat effects of applicant's 1/26/2009 industrial back injury as reflected in AME's report recommending that applicant's intractable post-surgical low back and left leg pain should be treated not only with pharmacological pain management, but also with psychological pain management. See Hammerly panel decision.
Reminder: Practitioners should check the subsequent history of a panel decision before citing to it. |
 |
blogs at the lexisnexis workers' comp law community |
Workers' Comp Fraud Blotter - Embezzled County Workers' Compensation Funds Used For Playboy Mansion Visit to Meet Hugh Hefner, by LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Community Staff. Read it.
Cal. Comp. Cases August Advanced Postings (8/25/2011). Here's the fourth batch of advanced postings for the August 2011 issue. Lexis.com subscribers can link to the complete headnotes and summaries. Read it.
Proposed Changes in the P&P Manual - Dealing With Lien Claims, by Judge Colleen Casey. Read it.
CWCI Finds Average TD Payments In California Workers' Comp Are Up as TD Duration Increases, by California Workers' Compensation Institute. Read it.
A Lesson in Pugilism: The Battle of the AMA Guides in Delaware, by Cassandra Roberts, Esq. What happens when different results are arrived at under the AMA Guides Fifth Ed. and the AMA Guides Sixth Ed.? Read it.
|
 |
job posting |
WC Defense Associate. Brea office of Goldman, Magdalin & Krikes, LLP seeks attorney with minimum 5 years workers' comp defense experience, competitive salary & benefits. Submit in Word format cover letter, resume, salary history/requirements to dcaldarelli@gmklaw.com. |
 |
 |
citeability of panel decisions |
Practitioners should proceed with caution when citing to a panel decision that hasn't been designated as a "significant panel decision" by the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, and should also verify the subsequent history of the panel decision. WCAB panel decisions are citeable authority, particularly on issues of contemporaneous administrative construction of statutory language [see Griffith v. WCAB (1989) 209 Cal. App. 3d 1260, 1264, fn. 2, 54 Cal. Comp. Cases 145]. However, WCAB panel decisions are not binding precedent, as are en banc decisions, on all other Appeals Board panels and workers' compensation judges [see Gee v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (2002) 96 Cal. App. 4th 1418, 1425 fn. 6, 67 Cal. Comp. Cases 236]. While WCAB panel decisions are not binding, the WCAB will consider these decisions to the extent that it finds their reasoning persuasive [see Guitron v. Santa Fe Extruders (2011) 76 Cal. Comp. Cases 228, fn. 7 (Appeals Board En Banc Opinion)].
Lexis.com subscribers can link to the cases cited above. |
 |

|
Designed specifically for Lexis.com subscribers only, this monthly reporter saves you research time so that you can quickly find recent panel decisions on key topics.
SEPTEMBER ISSUE NOW IN PRODUCTION
We do the legwork for you: Our editorial consultants pour through hundreds of cases to find noteworthy decisions that you should know about.
What you get each month: Brief summaries of typically 40 to 65 cases, arranged by topic. Commentary articles written by guest contributors.
How you'll get it: (1) PDF document (sent via email), which allows Lexis subscribers to link directly to the WCAB decisions on lexis.com; and (2) Print version, which can be stored in a binder. What it costs: List price - $204/yr. PRICE INCLUDES BOTH PRINT AND ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT |
 |
 |
enewsletter archives |
Take a deep dive into our past eNewsletters for 2011 and prior...warning - some links to articles may not work...report any linking problems to Robin.E.Kobayashi@lexisnexis.com.
August 22, 2011: Vocational Expert Evaluation
August 15, 2011: Supreme Court COLA Decision
August 8, 2011: Administrative Director Rosa Moran Interview
August 1, 2011: Ogilvie: Reversed and Remanded
July 25, 2011: Liens: The Tribble Factor
July 18, 2011 (Special Alert): Valdez En Banc
July 18, 2011: Should Calif. Adopt the AMA Guides Sixth Edition?
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1106525994549.html
July 11, 2011: QME Regulations: Face to Face Meetings
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1106451027759.html
July 5, 2011: PQME Supplemental Reports
June 27, 2011: An MPN World: Change of Treating Physician
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1106168961873.html
June 20, 2011: Sanctions: Three-Cent Dispute
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1105985996029.html
June 13, 2011: A Balanced Approach to Litigation
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1105844751127.html
June 6, 2011: Post-Valdez Defense Protocols
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1105783834099.html
May 31, 2011: Stress-Related Compensable Consequence Injuries
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1105669474005.html
May 23, 2011: Developing the Record
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1105575703257.html
May 16, 2011: Overpayments
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1105406423234.html
May 9, 2011: Third Party Cases
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1105318030890.html
May 2, 2011: Temporary Total Disability
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1105244021985.html
April 25, 2011: Non-MPN Physician Reports
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1105193487500.html
April 20, 2011 (Special Alert): Valdez En Banc
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1105235321520.html
April 18, 2011: 2011 Alphabet Soup
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1105150789071.html
April 11, 2011 (Special Alert): Hernandez significant panel decision
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1105133131069.html
April 11, 2011: Rule 38 and Medical Examiner Reports
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1105054845922.html
April 4, 2011: Penalties Post SB-899
March 28, 2011: Verification and Lien Claimants
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1104894131044.html
March 21, 2011: Workers' Comp and Earthquakes
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1104811663390.html
March 17, 2011 (Special Alert): Guitron En Banc
March 14, 2011: LC 5710 Attorney's Fees
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1104743080821.html
March 7, 2011: Mediation
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1104680877858.html
February 28, 2011: Arbitrations http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1104610163532.html
February 21, 2011: AMA Guides Rating: Roles of Rater, Judge, Physicians http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1104523390560.html
February 14, 2011: In Memoriam: Carrie Nevans http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1104442568858.html
February 7, 2011: Good Faith Personnel Actions http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1104364443854.html
January 31, 2011: Service in EAMS
January 24, 2011 (addendum): Sanctions; EAMS rules
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1104294156793.html January 24, 2011: Public Self-Insured Employers
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1104266393095.html
January 17, 2011: CHSWC Report on Liens
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1104223885119.html
January 10, 2011: Temporary Workers
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1104176109442.html
January 3, 2011: Permanent Total Disability & Total Loss of Future Earning Capacity
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1104077989541.html
CLICK HERE TO ACCESS 2010 ARCHIVES. |
 |
LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are registered trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used under license. Other products or services may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies.
Privacy & Security Copyright � 2011 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
|
|
|