|
|
|
Find Solutions & Strategies January 3, 2011 |
|
Permanent Total Disability & Total Loss of Future Earning Capacity:
Recent interpretations of cases under Labor Code 4662 |
|
A Note From the Editor |  |
Dear WC Professionals:
Happy New Year! 2011 is a pivotal year for California, one of the first states in the country to adopt workers' compensation legislation. The Roseberry Act established a voluntary system, effective September 1, 1911, which was replaced two years later with a compulsory system (see Boynton Act of 1913). How far have we come in 100 years? Sincerely,
Robin E. Kobayashi, J.D. LexisNexis Editorial & Content Development |
Workers' Comp Cost Reduction: Free Newsletter |
|
Click on the image above to sign up for the free Workers' Comp Kit Newsletter.
To view past newsletters by Workers' Comp Kit, click here.
|
Workers' Comp Videos |
listen to videos or read transcripts on:
Medicare Secondary Payer
Work Comp Analysis Group
Executive Roundtable Session w/Robert Rassp & Stuart Colburn |
|

|
Do You Want to Become an Expert on the AMA Guides? Start Here.
January 29, 2011
 
Instructors: Judge Colleen Casey
& Robert G. Rassp, Esq.
Learn how to accurately calculate a rating, follow other road maps set forth in Blackledge, and ensure your PD rating will hold up in court. Other agenda topics include AMA Guide glitches, quirks, and add-ons, protocols for rating under Guzman, and strict ratings under the Guides.
Click here for details. |
|
|
featured articles |
The hot topic this week is cases that are based on LC 4662. Here are two articles that analyze the issues:
WCAB Panel Concludes That 100% Loss Of Future Earning Capacity Is A Factor To Consider When Calculating Permanent Disability, by David Bryan Leonard, Esq. The panel decision of Clark Baldridge v. Swinerton, Inc./Zurich (ADJ 636377), 2010 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS 271, highlights the role of consistency in the judicial process by recognizing that while the law may change, long standing principles remain. In Baldridge, a WCAB panel was asked to determine the impact of the 2004 reforms enacted pursuant to SB 899 on the principles set forth by the California Supreme Court in LeBoeuf v. W.C.A.B. (1983) 34 Cal.3d 234 [48 Cal.Comp.Cases 587]. The subtlety of the question presented is dramatized by the seemingly overwhelming scope of the 2004 reform legislation. In a nutshell, the 2004 reform seemed to change everything. Of relevance to Baldridge, post 2004, we now have new ways to calculate the extent of permanent disability caused by an industrial injury along with new rules regarding apportionment of disability causation. > Read more.
Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Permanent Total Disability Under Labor Code Section 4662, by Robert G. Rassp, Esq. The title of this article is appropriate here because if you ever represented someone who actually has an 85% to 100% permanent disability, in real life your client is between a rock and a hard place because real disabilities like these truly affect a person's quality of life and not just their ability to work....LC 4662 has recently been interpreted by the WCAB in a number of cases where the date of injury is on or after 1/1/05 or the case otherwise falls under the 2005 PDRS and WPI ratings under the AMA Guides. Section 4662 creates a conclusive presumption of permanent total disability. Up until recently there have been very few WCAB cases that fall under section 4662 and virtually no published appellate court decisions that apply the last sentence. However, the current WCAB has tackled the issue of how and when the last sentence in section 4662 can apply in a number of post SB-899 panel decisions, including a very detailed one called Boatright vs. Argonaut Construction. > Read more.
Editor's Note: eNewsletter subscribers were given access to the Gary Boatright panel decision in the Dec. 6, 2010 issue.
Editor's Note: Lexis.com subscribers can link to the Clark Baldridge case here. If you would like to become a lexis.com subscriber, contact Robin.E.Kobayashi@lexisnexis.com. |
 |
featured law blog |
|
Announcing....a new law blog by Robert G. Rassp, Esq. Now you can find all of his articles in one place! > Check it out |
|
 |
recent panel decisions - sneak preview |
Each week we report a few recent panel decisions that we're considering for the LexisNexis� services:
NOTE:This free eNewsletter reports only a handful of panel decisions each month. If you want notification of all 50 to 65 noteworthy panel decisions added each month to the Lexis database, please consider purchasing our new panel decisions reporter (see below). Average Weekly Wage; Seasonal Employees. WCAB rescinded WCJ's award of permanent disability to applicant based on in-season earnings of $320.23 per week, contrary to pre-trial stipulation, when WCAB found that (1) there are different considerations in determining earning capacity in computing temporary disability and permanent disability, (2) although WCJ correctly utilized LC 4453(c)(4) to calculate applicant's earnings, it was improper to determine her earning capacity based only on weekly earnings during the part of the year that she worked, as if she worked yearlong with same earnings, because evidence of applicant's work history up to time of her injury did not demonstrate any willingness to work throughout the entire year, (3) applicant's choice not to work throughout the year was best evidence that her earning capacity under LC 4453(c)(4) was same as what she actually earned, and (4) based on applicant's actual earnings during 2004, 2005 and 2006, applicant was entitled to permanent disability indemnity at minimum rate of $130 per week. See Arreola panel decision. Permanent Disability; Offers of Regular, Modified or Alternative Work. WCAB, rescinding WCJ's finding, held that defendant was not entitled to a 15 percent decrease under LC 4658(d) of 6 percent permanent disability awarded to applicant, when defendant did not provide applicant with written notice of alternative/modified work within 60 days of date his disability became permanent and stationary as required under LC 4658(d)(3)(A), and WCAB found that "substantial compliance" with 60 day period specified in LC 4658(d)(3)(A) was insufficient. See Choi panel decision.
|
|
 |
 |
lexisnexis workers' comp notable people - nominations |
Seeking Nominations for 2010 LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Notable People awards. Nominations are being accepted for the categories of Risk Managers, Insurance Professionals, and Industry Vendors.
For details and to post a nomination on the Work Comp Analysis Group on LinkedIn, click HERE. Deadline: January 12, 2011.
Note: You must be a member of the Work Comp Analysis Group on LinkedIn to participate in this nomination process for the three categories listed above. To join the Work Comp Analysis Group on LinkedIn, click here.
LexisNexis will review all nominees and determine the finalists in the above three categories. Automated voting by members of the Work Comp Analysis Group on LinkedIn will occur during the second half of January 2011. |
 |
BLOG ROUND UP: lexisnexis workers' comp law community |
Workers' Comp Fraud Blotter 12/16/2010 - recent arrests, charges, convictions, investigations. Read it.
Workers' Comp Fraud Blotter 12/22/2010 - recent arrests, charges, convictions, investigations. Read it.
Workers' Comp Fraud Blotter 12/30/2010 - recent arrests, charges, convictions, investigations. Read it.
Cal. Comp. Cases December Advanced Postings 12/15/2010. Read it.
Cal. Comp. Cases December Advanced Postings 12/27/2010. Read it.
California: Notice of Intention to Consolidate Durable Medical Equipment Withdrawn, by Goldman Magdalin & Krikes, LLP. Read it.
Presiding Judge Jorja Frank Holds Further Hearing on Los Angeles WCAB District Office's Notice of Intent to Consolidate Interpreting Liens, by Goldman Magdalin & Krikes, LLP. Read it.
|
 |
HOW TO ACHIEVE MEDICARE SECONDARY PAYER COMPLIANCe |
Take Control of Your Insurance Settlements With A Brand New Resource From LexisNexis!
"Finally, someone delivers a clear, concise reading in this area, with some definitive answers for both lawyers and claims specialists and accurate reporting dealing with MSP compliance and MSA allocations with all of the necessary resources found in one place."
"An excellent new book ... a one-of-a-kind resource ... [Jennifer C. Jordan's] straight-talk is much appreciated when it comes to this illusive area of the law."
There are many people who don't understand that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' approval process of a Medicare set-aside arrangement is voluntary and carries an inherent cost. In fact, many of the decisions that need to be made in a settlement negotiation are risk management decisions rather than being truly Medicare Secondary Payer-oriented. Once you understand why CMS wants what it wants, you will realize that its preference may not be the only way to achieve MSP compliance. The Complete Guide to Medicare Secondary Payer Compliance, Jennifer C. Jordan, Editor-in-Chief, will help you take control of your insurance settlements. > Read more about the contents (1,350 pages). List Price: $179
|
 |
 |
judges in the NEWS |
> PJ Thomas J. Clarke of the Salinas District Office is also the Acting Assistant Chief Judge for the North.
> WCJ Barry Goldman of the Van Nuys District Office retired 12/30/2010.
> WCJ Larry M. Greenblatt (annuitant) is now with the Marina Del Rey District Office. |
 |

|
Designed especially for Lexis.com subscribers only, this monthly reporter saves you research time so that you can quickly find recent panel decisions on key topics.
JANUARY ISSUE NOW IN PRODUCTION
We do the legwork for you: Our editorial consultants pour through hundreds of cases to find noteworthy decisions that you should know about.
What you get each month: Brief summaries of typically 40 to 65 cases, arranged by topic. Commentary articles written by guest contributors.
How you'll get it: (1) Word document (sent via email), which allows Lexis subscribers to link directly to the WCAB decisions on lexis.com; and (2) Print version, which can be stored in a binder.
What it costs: List price - $199/yr. PRICE INCLUDES BOTH PRINT AND ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT
|
 |
enewsletter archives |
Take a deep dive into our past eNewsletters for 2010...warning - some links to articles may not work...report any linking problems to Robin.E.Kobayashi@lexisnexis.com.
CLICK HERE TO ACCESS 2010 ARCHIVES. |
LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are registered trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used under license. Other products or services may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies.
Privacy & Security Copyright � 2011 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
|
|
|