|
|
|
Find Solutions & Strategies October 4, 2010 |
|
Three Tips for Trial - Submission of Evidence
How to successfully navigate through EAMS |
|
A Note From the Editor |  |
Dear WC Professionals:
I'm pleased to announce that we're taking pre-orders now for our new Medicare Secondary Payer compliance handbook. As a newsletter subscriber, you can take advantage of the special discount offer through 10/19/2010! Books are scheduled to ship to customers in late October. Be first in line to get your copy.
Sincerely,
Robin E. Kobayashi, J.D.
LexisNexis Editorial & Content Development
|
Top 25 Blogs |  |
Top 25 Blogs for Workers' Compensation and Workplace Issues: A Call for Suggestions.
The time has arrived for the LexisNexis Workers' Compensation Law Community Staff to make its selections for 2010. Please send us your recommendations by Oct. 15, 2010. We want to hear from you!
> Read more |
|
trial tips |

Three Tips for Trial - Submission of Evidence, by Judge Colleen Casey. Robert Gallagher once said: "Change is inevitable - except from a vending machine." Last time I looked, EAMS was nothing like a vending machine... although, wouldn't that be cool? Get your ice cold Coke and two OCR forms to go... Anyway, back to the concept of change. EAMS has mandated quite a few of them in the past couple of years. Some people are still a bit unfamiliar with the more esoteric changes, so I've set forth below a few tips for navigating successfully through this new system. > Read more. |
how to achieve medicare secondary payer compliance |
Take Control of Your Insurance Settlements With A Brand New Resource From LexisNexis!
"An excellent new book ... a one-of-a-kind resource ... [Jennifer C. Jordan's] straight-talk is much appreciated when it comes to this illusive area of the law"
- Rebecca Shafer, JD, President, Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc.
There are many people who don't understand that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' approval process of a Medicare set-aside arrangement is voluntary and carries an inherent cost. In fact, many of the decisions that need to be made in a settlement negotiation are risk management decisions rather than being truly Medicare Secondary Payer-oriented. Once you understand why CMS wants what it wants, you will realize that its preference may not be the only way to achieve MSP compliance. The Complete Guide to Medicare Secondary Payer Compliance, Jennifer C. Jordan, Editor-in-Chief, will help you take control of your insurance settlements. > Read more about the contents (1,350 pages). List Price: $179
PRE ORDER SPECIAL OFFER FOR NEWSLETTER SUBSCRIBERS: $145 (plus shipping & handling & applicable sales tax). Offer good through 10/19/2010. Contact Robin.E.Kobayashi@lexisnexis.com. |
 |
recent panel decisions - sneak preview |
Each week we report a few recent panel decisions that we're considering for the LexisNexis® services:
NOTE: This free eNewsletter reports only a handful of panel decisions each month. If you want notification of all 40 to 65 noteworthy panel decisions added each month to the Lexis database, please consider purchasing our new panel decisions reporter (see box below).
Credit; Overpayment of Permanent Disability. Defendant was not entitled to a credit under LC 4909 for permanent disability advances paid to applicant, when applicant's permanent disability was apportioned between three dates of injury (2000, 2003, 2007) pursuant to SB 899 and Benson v. W.C.A.B., resulting in a smaller monetary award to applicant than if permanent disabilities from all three injuries were combined; allowing a credit for permanent disability advances for 2003 injury against permanent disability due for 2007 injury would unfairly result in applicant not receiving any "new money" for 2007 injury. Read Dunehew panel decision.
Petitions to Reopen; New and Further Disability. WCJ erred in finding that applicant, who received award based upon her stipulation that she suffered a neck and back injury, suffered a compensable consequence psychiatric injury but that psychiatric disability was no greater at time applicant sought to reopen stipulated award for new and further disability than it was at time stipulated award was issued, when WCJ improperly "went behind" prior stipulated award to conclude that applicant was barred from asserting injury to new body parts and an increase in her disability merely because evidence existed prior to time of stipulation which could have supported a finding that applicant only had neck and back injury. Read Santillan panel decision. |
|
 |
 |
 |

|
NEW! Designed especially for Lexis.com subscribers only, this monthly reporter saves you research time so that you can quickly find recent panel decisions on key topics.
OCTOBER ISSUE NOW IN PRODUCTION: Guest contributors write about developing the record and range of evidence in AMA Guides cases.
We do the legwork for you: Our editorial consultants pour through hundreds of cases to find noteworthy decisions that you should know about.
What you get each month: Brief summaries of typically 40 to 65 cases, arranged by topic. Commentary articles written by guest contributors.
How you'll get it: (1) Email/Web version*, which allows Lexis subscribers to link directly to the WCAB decisions on lexis.com; and (2) Print version, which can be stored in a binder.
What it costs: Regular price - $199/yr. Special Limited Time Offer for eNewsletter subscribers - $159 for the first year's subscription. Offer expires 12/31/2010.
$159 PRICE INCLUDES BOTH PRINT AND EMAIL/WEB VERSION
* Each email/web issue accessible for up to a year |
 |
BLOG ROUND UP |
Workers' Comp Fraud Blotter 9/30/2010 - recent arrests, charges, convictions, investigations. Read it.
California Compensation Cases October Advanced Postings 9/29/2010. Read it.
Workers Comp 20/20: Will Congress Overhaul Workers Compensation? by Peter Rousmaniere. Read it. |
 |
 |
 |
enewsletter archives |
Take a deep dive into our past eNewsletters for 2010...warning - some links to articles may not work...report any linking problems to Robin.E.Kobayashi@lexisnexis.com.
September 27, 2010
September 20, 2010
September 13, 2010
September 7, 2010
August 30, 2010
August 23, 2010
August 16, 2010
August 9, 2010
August 2, 2010
July 12, 2010
July 6, 2010
June 28, 2010
June 21, 2010
June 14, 2010
June 1, 2010
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1103428836972.html
May 24, 2010
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1103424392153.html
May 17, 2010
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1103406552817.html
May 10, 2010
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1103375976783.html
May 3, 2010
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1103353063934.html
April 26, 2010
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1103330236374.html
April 19, 2010
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1103299190031.html
April 12, 2010
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1103274786037.html
April 5, 2010
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1103253375187.html
March 29, 2010
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1103221393952.html
March 22, 2010
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1103194496278.html
March 15, 2010
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1103158082746.html
March 8, 2010
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1103143755983.html
March 1, 2010
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1103099894039.html
February 22, 2010
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1103073800750.html
February 16, 2010
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1103029296112.html
February 9, 2010
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1102999766740.html
February 2, 2010
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1102970190663.html
January 26, 2010
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1102967250030.html |
 |
LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are registered trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used under license. Other products or services may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies.
Privacy & Security Copyright © 2010 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
|
|
|
|