|
|
|
Find Solutions & Strategies July 6, 2010 |
|
Roadblocks to Return-to-Work Programs |
Barriers remain despite legislative mandates and employer efforts |
|
A Note From the Editor |  | Dear WC Professionals:
I'm pleased to announce that the 50% Discount Offer on Larson's Workers' Compensation Law and Larson's Workers' Compensation Desk Edition has been extended through December 2010, We appreciate the positive response from the workers' community!
Sincerely, Robin E. Kobayashi, J.D.
LexisNexis Editorial & Content Development
|
Impairment Guides Resource Center |
Click here |
Workers' Comp Profile |
Maureen Kohl Bennington, MS, CCM, CDMS, CPUR, CRC, has over 20 years experience in the field of workers' compensation. She has a Masters of Science degree in Rehabilitation Administration and is credentialed in Case Management, Disability Management, Utilization Review and Vocational Counseling. Ms. Bennington has extensive knowledge related to all managed care products. She has been responsible for the development of case management, medical bill review and utilization review programs, file review and audit procedures, return-to-work programs and disability management product development and implementation procedures. She has also worked with carriers in auto, general liability, group health, long term disability and short term disability. |
|
FEATURED ARTICLE |
Roadblocks to Return-to-Work Programs. Statistics consistently indicate an estimated 50 percent of injured workers who are off work for more than 6 months never return to the workforce. Some studies suggest the risk is increased as early as 12 weeks. It is difficult to digest these statistics and grasp an understanding of why so many injured or ill workers do not return to the work force. ADA legislation mandates an interactive process and job accommodation. Workers' compensation regulations incorporate language outlining the necessity to assist injured workers with vocational rehabilitation and return to work. How can barriers to return-to-work remain for injured and ill workers despite legislative mandates and employer effort? > Read more
 By Maureen Kohl Bennington, MS, CCM, CDMS, CPUR, CRC |
 |
Larson's spotlight: 5 recent cases you should know about |
Larson's Spotlight reports noteworthy workers' comp cases each week. This list was compiled by Thomas A. Robinson, a staff writer for Larson's Workers' Compensation Law, the nation's leading authority on workers' compensation law.
#1 LA: Third District Court of Appeal Upholds $262 Million Award Against Multiple Preferred Provider Organizations
#2 CT: Exercise Walk on Employer's Property During Unpaid Lunch Held Not Compensable
#3 DC: "Mental-Mental" Claim That Arose From Employer's Confrontation over Alcohol Use Fails
#4 GA: Widow of Slain Deputy May Not Maintain Tort Action Against Sheriff and Other County Officials #5 NJ: Attorney's Tactical Delay, Coupled With His Serious Illness, Spells Doom for Reinstatement of Workers' Compensation Claim
|
 |
blog round up |

Workers' Comp Fraud Blotter - Recent Arrests, Charges, Convictions, Investigations 7/1/2010. Read it.
Subsequent Remedial Measures Rule and Applicability to the Workers' Compensation Arena, by National Workers' Compensation Defense Network (NWCDN). Posted by WorkersCompensation.com. Read it.
Subsequent Remedial Measures Rule State by State Survey, by National Workers' Compensation Defense Network (NWCDN). Posted by WorkersCompensation.com. Read it.
NYSIF Announces Release of 2009 Annual Report. Report highlights NYSIF's 95 years of continuous service to the New York workers' compensation system. Read it.
Another Delaware UR appeal--The Jesus Syndrome: Dr. Rudin walks on water, by Cassandra Roberts. Read it.
No Headache for This Claimant When DE IAB Allows Permanent Impairment Benefits to Both the Brain and the Head, by Cassandra Roberts. Read it.
No "News" Here: Delaware IAB Rules Newspaper Carrier Is Independent Contractor, by Cassandra Roberts. Read it. |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
what's new in larson's workers' compensation law | 
Lexis.com subscribers to Larson's Workers' Compensation Law can link to the chapter discussion below.
Find out more about how to become a Larson's online subscriber by contacting: Caroline.Conway@lexisnexis.com. Traveling Employees. Where an employer is able to control the conditions of the workplace, such as within a manufacturing facility or an office complex, it is reasonable to burden the employer with the cost of work-related injuries. Where the employee's activities take place at other locations, far outside the control of the employer, the rule is not so strictly applied. An exception applies generally where the employee's work entails travel away from the employer's premises. Such travel is usually considered to be within the course of his or her employment continuously during the trip, except when there is a distinct departure on a personal errand.
This rule is discussed in Chapter 25,which has been revised and updated as well. In Houck v. Tarragon Mgmt., 4 So. 3d 73 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009), one such personal departure is illustrated [See Ch. 25, § 25.03[1] (Digest) n.7]. The employer arranged for a property manager to travel to another city to perform some training activities. She was to stay in a company-owned condominium while performing her duties. The manager was killed while crossing the street as she walked to a nightclub several days before her official duties were to begin. The court concluded that her fatal injuries were not sustained within the course and scope of the employment. |
 |
save 50% now on larson's |
Larson's Workers' Compensation Law (12 vols.)
Regular Price: $3,981
Discount Price: $1,990.50
Larson's Workers' Compensation, Desk Edition (3 vols.)
Regular Price: $1,063
Discount Price: $531.50
Due to popular demand, our offer is now extended through December 2010 |
 |
ENEWSLETTER ARCHIVES |
Take a deep dive into our past eNewsletters for 2010...warning - some links to articles may not work...report any linking problems to Robin.E.Kobayashi@lexisnexis.com.
June 28, 2010
June 21, 2010
June 14, 2010
June 7, 2010
June 1, 2010
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1103429848711.html
May 24, 2010
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1103413363850.html
May 17, 2010
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1103381311800.html
May 10, 2010
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1103357743816.html
May 3, 2010
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1103341205434.html
April 26, 2010
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1103322693319.html
April 19, 2010
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1103297165462.html
April 12, 2010
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1103271969813.html
April 5, 2010
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1103241142980.html
March 29, 2010
http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs077/1102828640660/archive/1103227422480.html |
 |
LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are registered trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used under license. Other products or services may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies.
Privacy & Security Copyright © 2010 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
|
|
|
|