web header
July 2009
Wealth Counsellor Alert
Breaking news for wealth planning professionals
Austin Office: 476.0888            GreeningLawFirm.com         Georgetown Office: 931.0888
In This Issue
Speaker's Bureau
Event Calendar
Newsletter Archive
Executive Summary
Facts
Comment
Cites
Manage Subscription
Speaker's Bureau

Invite an estate planning expert to speak at your next client, staff, professional, or community event.

Event Calendar - July/August
beige tree

Events for Wealth Planning Professionals:

Please consider attending the following events for Wealth Planning Professionals that feature speakers from, or are hosted by, The Greening Law Firm, P.C.:
Please tell your clients about these upcoming events!  (Click any course title for details)

  • 7/9/09 5:30 PM Austin Cosmopolitan Rotary Club
  • 7/16/09, 2:00 - 3:00 pm Georgetown Office
  • 7/21/09, 2:00 - 3:00 pm or 6:00 - 7:00 pm, Austin Office
  • 8/12/09, 6:30 - 8:30 pm, UT
  • 8/20/09 2:00 - 3:00 pm or 6:00 - 7:00 pm, Austin Office 
  • 8/26/09 2:00 - 3:00 pm or 6:00 pm - 7:00 pm, Georgetown Office 

  • 7/16/09, 3:15 pm - 4:15 pm, Georgetown Office
  • 7/21/09, 3:15 pm - 4:15 pm and 7:15 pm - 8:15 pm, Austin Office
  • 7/29/09, 6:30 - 8:00 pm, Westlake High School, Austin
  • 7/30/09, 6:30 - 8:00 pm, Westwood High School, Round Rock
  • 8/20/09, 3:15 pm - 4:15 pm and 7:15 pm - 8:15 pm, Austin Office
  • 8/26/09, 3:15 pm - 4:15 pm or 6:15 pm - 7:15 pm, Georgetown Office

IRA/401K: The Five Beneficiary Options
  • 7/8/09, 6:30 - 8:00 pm, Westlake High School, Austin
  • 7/16/09, 6:30 - 8:00 pm, Westwood High School, Round Rock
Newsletter Archive (New Feature, Old Newsletters)
Listen In: When to use an Elder Law Attorney
Online Services Offer Estate Planning for the Digital Age
Keeping Mom and Dad Safe at Home
Listen In: What is a Reverse Mortgage All About
Future Benefits from Trust Cannot be Considered in Divorce Property Settlement
Steve Oshins, Esq. on Dynasty Trusts
Family Business?...You Might Flip For A FLP...
Reverse Mortgage Variation is Aimed at Seniors Looking to Downsize
Stimulus Payment to Social Security Recipients Arriving
Economic Stimulus Law: How Does It Impact You?
Listen In: 3 Reasons Why a Will is Not Enough
The Dangers of Joint Accounts
Understanding the New Economic Stimulus Law: How Does It Impact You?
Benefits of Naming a Trust as Beneficiary of a Retirement Asset
5 Big Financial Changes for Retirees in 2010
Listen In: Selling Long Term Care Insurance
Understanding Education Savings Vehicles
What the Stimulus Bill Does for the Elderly
Time and Tide Wait for No Man
NYT RE: Estate Planning
Individual and Small-Business Tax Benefits in the Stimulus Package
IRS/Treasury Issues Madoff Ruling and Procedure
Things to Remember at Tax Time
Lies and Life Insurance Illustrations
Divorce Inadequate to Determine Beneficiaries
Solidifying the Adviser Relationship through Creative Trust Planning
Tough Times Are Good Times to Trim Estates
Planning You Should Consider Now
The Bear Market's Impact on Safe Retirement Withdrawal Rates
Obama Plans to Keep Estate Tax
New FDIC Rules: Are You Protected?
New Opportunities Under the Worker, Retiree, and Employer Recovery Act of 2008

Greenbing Head-shot

We would like to share with you LISI's recent email newsletter on the planning issues raised by Notice 2008-30.  Please feel free to share this with your centers of influence.

I hope this helps you and others make a positive difference!

We stand ready to serve you.

Sincerely,

                                                              tree2
Ronald G. Greening
The Greening Law Firm, P.C.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Notice 2008-30 generally provides that non-spouse beneficiaries can now make qualified rollover conversions to a Roth IRA.  Previously, only spousal beneficiaries, because of their ability to perform spousal rollovers into an account in their own name, had the option of converting to a Roth IRA.  The ability of non-spouse beneficiaries to convert retirement plan assets to a Roth IRA provides an amazingly powerful opportunity.  However, due to asset protection planning matters, the prudent advisor may want to consider advising clients to maintain the assets in the qualified plan during lifetime instead of converting to a Roth IRA.
FACTS:
The Mechanics of Revenue Ruling 2008-30

Prior to amendment by the Pension Protection Act (PPA), a Roth IRA could only accept a rollover contribution of amounts distributed from another Roth IRA, from a traditional or SIMPLE IRA or from a designated Roth account. These rollover contributions to Roth IRAs are called "qualified rollover contributions."

Under prior law, taxpayers who wanted to do a rollover from a qualified plan had to first roll the assets from the qualified plan to a traditional IRA, and then do a rollover from the traditional IRA to the Roth IRA.

Under Section 824 of the PPA, however, the law now (beginning in 2008) allows taxpayers to rollover assets directly from a qualified plan to a Roth IRA without having to first go through a traditional IRA.

There was no indication that this would change the prohibition of non-spousal beneficiaries converting to a Roth IRA. Q&A 7 of Section II in Notice 2008-30, however, expands this conversion power to non-spousal beneficiaries. Q&A 7 specifically states as follows:
 
Q-7. Can beneficiaries make qualified rollover contributions to Roth IRAs?
 
A-7. Yes. In the case of a distribution from an eligible retirement plan other than a Roth IRA, the MAGI and filing status of the beneficiary are used to determine eligibility to make a qualified rollover contribution to a Roth IRA. Pursuant to § 402(c)(11), a plan may but is not required to permit rollovers by non-spouse beneficiaries and a rollover by a non-spouse beneficiary must be made by a direct trustee-to-trustee transfer.
 
A non-spouse beneficiary that is ineligible to make a qualified rollover contribution to a Roth IRA may recharacterize the contribution pursuant to § 408A(d)(6). A surviving spouse who makes a rollover to a Roth IRA may elect either to treat the Roth IRA as his or her own or to establish the Roth IRA in the name of the decedent with the surviving spouse as the beneficiary. (See Notice 2007-7, Q&A-13, for a rule on how to title a beneficiary IRA.) A non-spouse beneficiary cannot elect to treat the Roth IRA as his or her own. (See Notice 2007-7, Part V.)
 
In the case of a rollover where the beneficiary does not treat the Roth IRA as his or her own, required minimum distributions from the Roth IRA are determined in accordance with Notice 2007-7, Q&As -17, -18 and -19.
 
If this position stands, it provides remarkable planning opportunities for beneficiaries. While the non-spousal beneficiary will still have to begin taking required minimum distributions from the Roth IRA during his/her lifetime, for many clients a substantial benefit continues to exist.

Asset Protection Planning Issues - A Case for Leaving Funds in the Qualified Plan During Lifetime

From a pure asset protection perspective, the "exclusion" of qualified plan assets from the bankruptcy estate under ERISA generally makes it more attractive to retain funds in a qualified plan instead of converting the funds to a Roth IRA.  This is true because the Federal exclusion afforded ERISA plans (i.e. qualified plan assets) provides stronger protection than the exemption protection afforded IRA assets under the Bankruptcy Act.  Further, in non-bankruptcy situations, asset protection for IRA assets is based on uncertain and diverse state asset protection statutes, thus strengthening the proposition that leaving assets in a qualified plan provides superior asset protection. 

Therefore, due to the increased asset protection afforded qualified plan assets, the professional may want to consider counseling the beneficiary about the potential benefit of leaving the funds in a qualified plan during the beneficiary's lifetime and then having the beneficiary's children execute a Roth IRA conversion after the beneficiary's death.

The following section provides a summary of the basic asset protection principles regarding qualified plans and IRA assets in bankruptcy and non-bankruptcy situations.

The Basics of Asset Protection in Bankruptcy:  Exclusion vs. Exemption

Debtors that have filed for bankruptcy generally have two means through which to protect their retirement plan assets from attachment by creditors.  The debtor can either seek to claim an "exclusion" from the bankruptcy estate for their retirement assets or an "exemption" from the bankruptcy estate. 

The most favorable treatment an asset can achieve is exclusion from the bankruptcy estate.  This is because retirement assets qualifying for exclusion are never brought into the bankruptcy estate, and are therefore never subject to the claims of creditors. 

Although less favorable, an exemption from the bankruptcy estate may also provide creditor protection for assets in bankruptcy.  Assets which are ineligible for exclusion are included in the bankruptcy estate, but may nonetheless find protection from creditor's claims through an exemption.

Analysis of the Federal Laws Providing Creditor Protection for Qualified Plans in Bankruptcy Situations

The two main bodies of federal law providing protection for retirement plan assets are the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA")[1] and the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 ("the Bankruptcy Act"). [2] 

ERISA is the primary federal law under which retirement plan assets receive exclusion from the federal bankruptcy estate.  ERISA provides virtually impenetrable protection for assets within covered employer retirement plans by excluding the plan assets from the debtor's bankruptcy estate. However, ERISA protection is not all encompassing.  A retirement plan must fall under the scope of ERISA regulation in order to be afforded its protection. 

The covered employee retirement plans which are afforded ERISA protection include 401(k) and 403(b) plans, defined benefit plans, money-purchase plans, and profit-sharing plans.  Most noticeably absent from this list are Traditional IRAs and Roth IRAs.  These retirement plans are not covered by ERISA and are therefore not excluded from the debtor's bankruptcy estate.  However, these retirement plan assets are currently afforded protection in the form of an exemption under the Bankruptcy Act.

The Bankruptcy Act is the second body of federal law which confers protection upon retirement plan assets in bankruptcy proceeding.  Under the Bankruptcy Act, protection in the form of a specific exemption is now provided for "retirement assets to the extent that those funds are in a fund or account that is exempt from taxation under section 401 [3], 403[4], 408 [5], 408A [6], 414[7], 457 [8], or 501(a) [9] of the In­ternal Revenue Code of 1986."[10] 

Therefore, even though ERISA still provides protection for the covered retirement assets, the all encompassing provision of the Bankruptcy Act is generally now controlling on the issue of creditor protection for both ERISA and non-ERISA (i.e. IRA and Roth IRA) retirement plans.

Protection Afforded IRAs in Bankruptcy Situations

Through the Bankruptcy Act, creditor protection is now afforded to all IRA accounts regardless of state bankruptcy laws.  Currently, unlimited exemption protection is provided for rollover IRAs and a contributory IRA (i.e. a Traditional IRA or a Roth IRA) is afforded limited protection in the form of a $1,000,000 exemption. 

To the extent a contributory Traditional and/or Roth IRA exceeds the $1,000,000 limitation, excluding funds from qualified plan rollovers[11], the amounts above the $1,000,000 cap will not receive exclusion and will be subject to creditor claims in bankruptcy.

Therefore, due to the $1,000,000 limitation placed on contributory IRA protection, qualified plan accounts should not be rolled over into or otherwise commingled with an existing contributory IRA.  Instead, the assets should be rolled into a new IRA set up specifically for the purpose of receiving the rolled over funds. 

Protection of Retirement Assets in Non - Bankruptcy Situations

ERISA protection generally applies consistently between bankruptcy and non-bankruptcy situations.  However, protection afforded non-ERISA retirement plan assets (i.e. IRA assets) in non-bankruptcy situations is heavily dependent on state law.[12]  This is because the Bankruptcy Act generally only applies to debtors who have filed for bankruptcy.  Therefore, investors in non-bankruptcy situations will need to consult state asset protection laws for protection of their IRA assets. 
COMMENT:
In light of asset protection considerations, the professional must be very conscientious when analyzing the scenario of rolling over retirement plan funds from a qualified plan into a Roth IRA.  The decision does not hinge purely on tax or financial planning considerations, but on legal implications involving the creditor protection afforded the transferred assets. 

Therefore, the professional will want to encourage their clients to seek the counsel of qualified bankruptcy/creditor protection attorneys to ascertain whether a rollover from a qualified plan into a Roth IRA is appropriate.

However, in general, it suffices to say that due to the exclusion afforded ERISA plan assets (i.e. qualified plans), their protection remains stronger than the protection afforded rolled over IRA assets (i.e. Roth IRA assets).  While ERISA plan assets receive an exclusion in bankruptcy situations and are largely protected in non-bankruptcy situations, non-ERISA plan assets, although provided exemption protection under the Bankruptcy Act, must rely on the uncertainty of IRA protection under state asset protection laws in non-bankruptcy situations. 

Therefore, before executing a Roth conversion, the client's asset protection needs should be determined and incorporated into the Roth IRA conversion feasibility analysis.  The potential income tax benefits achieved through the Roth IRA conversion may not outweigh the asset protection risks. 

SITES:
[1] ERISA Sec. 4.
[2] Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (P.L. 109-8).  Signed into law on April 20, 2005.
[3] Qualified pension, profit-sharing, and stock bonus plans.
[4] Employee annuities.
[5] IRAs.
[6] Roth IRAs.
[7] Multi-employer annuities.
[8] Deferred compensation plans of state and local governments and tax-exempt organizations.
[9] Tax-exempt organizations.
[10] Bankruptcy Act Sec. 224 of P.L. 109-8, supra note 2.
[11] Rollover contributions under Code Sections 402(c), 402(e)(6), 403(a)(4), 403(a)(5), and 403(b)(8).
[12] Asset protection law may vary greatly from one state to another state. 



Practice Limited to Estate Planning, Estate Administration, Probate, and Elder Law

506 West 15th Street, Austin, Texas 78701, 476.0888
1601 Williams Drive Georgetown, Texas 78628, 931.0888


For professionals' use only. Not for use with the general public.
You have received this newsletter because I believe you will find its content valuable, and I hope that it will help you to provide better service to your clients. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions about this or any matters relating to estate or wealth planning.

The hiring of an attorney is an important decision.  The items discussed in this newsletter are of a general nature and not intended to provide legal advice.  Please consult with a qualified estate planning/elder law attorney to determine the best options for your personal circumstances.

In accordance with IRS Circular 230, the content of this newsletter is not to be relied upon for the preparation of a tax return or to avoid tax penalties imposed by the Internal Revenue Code.  If you desire a formal opinion on a particular tax matter for the purpose of filing a return or avoiding the imposition of any penalties, please contact us to discuss the further Treasury requirements that must be met and whether it is possible to meet those requirements under the circumstances, as well as the anticipated time and fees involved.

To comply with the U.S. Treasury regulations, we must inform you that (i) any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this newsletter was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding U.S. federal tax penalties that may be imposed on such person and (ii) each taxpayer should seek advice from their tax advisor based on the taxpayer's particular circumstances.