~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
EDiscovery Case Law
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Court Orders Monetary Sanctions for Production Delay Resulting from Counsel's Failure to Become Familiar with Plaintiff's Retention Policies and Systems
In re A
& M Fla. Props. II, LLC, 2010 WL 1418861 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Apr. 7,
2010)
Where
plaintiff's counsel "failed in his obligation to locate and produce all
relevant documents in a timely manner" by failing to gain a sufficient
understanding of plaintiff's computer systems resulting in significantly
delayed production of relevant documents, the court declined to impose
terminating sanctions or an adverse inference but ordered monetary sanctions
against plaintiff and counsel in an amount to be determined. Continue reading
here.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Court Rules Failure to Copy Files on Flash Drive Prior to Failure of the drive Violated Duty to Preserve
Wilson v.
Thorn Energy, LLC, 2010 WL 1712236 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 15, 2010)
In this
case, the court ordered sanctions for defendants' failure to preserve relevant
data where defendants failed to back up a flash drive containing all relevant
financial records and where that data was lost as the result of the flash
drive's failure. Read more
here.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Court Orders Forensic Examination of Plaintiff's Computers Absent Denial that "Responsive Emails May have Existed at One Point
Adhi v.
Twp. of W. Pikeland, 2010 WL 1047894 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 16, 2010)
In this
zoning dispute, defendant moved to enforce a prior order of the court and,
essentially, compel more complete responses to discovery, including the
production of electronically stored information ("ESI"), specifically
emails. Plaintiff indicated that even if responsive emails had existed,
they were deleted in the ordinary course of business. Accepting
defendant's assertions that "the mere deletion of an email does not make it
lost forever", however, the court ordered plaintiff to allow defendant's
"e-Discovery expert" to inspect plaintiff's computers to determine if any
responsive information was still contained on the hard drives or the
servers. In so ordering, the court reasoned that this would "allow
Defendant to conduct discovery on information to which it is entitled without
burdening Plaintiff with the expense of hiring a discovery expert." Read more
here.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Court Orders Monetary Fine for Gross Negligence and Intentional Spoliation of ESI, Including Emails, Text-Message, and Skype Messages
Passlogix,
Inc. v. 2FA Tech., LLC, 2010 WL 1702216 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 27, 2010)
Upon
finding that defendants spoliated relevant information, including emails, Skype
messages, and computer logs, the court declined to order an adverse inference,
to preclude defendants from the presentation of arguments implicating the discarded
documents, or to order defendants to pay plaintiff's costs, but ordered
monetary sanctions in the amount of $10,000, after balancing "2FA's litigation
conduct with its status as a small corporation."
Read more
here.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Court Order Provides Students, Parent Opportunity to View Images Captured by School-Issued Laptops
For anyone
who hasn't heard, a school district in Pennsylvania has recently come under
fire for using the webcams on school-issued laptops to capture images of
students both during and outside of school hours - about 56,000 of them, according
to reports. According to the complaint filed in this case, students and
parents were not informed of the school's ability to use the webcams. In
at least one instance, a student was called to the assistant principal's office
to discuss an image captured by the webcam on his laptop. His family has
now sued the district and hopes that other students will join them.
According to the school district, the webcams were intended for tracking lost
or stolen computers.
Read more
here.