1. 5th Plenary Meeting Agenda
2. IDESG-NSTIC Orientation Session
3. Remote Login Information
4. Plenary Meeting Highlights (Taxonomy, Use Case, and Policy Committee Reports, Media Lab Tour, and Happy Hour)
5. Study Indicates that an NSTIC-Aligned Identity Management System Could Save the IRS up to $305 Million

This agenda is subject to change. View most up-to-date version and more details at 

• 9:00                           Registration Opens
• 9:00 - 12:00 noon        Management Council Meeting
• 10:00 - 12:00 noon      NSTIC-IDESG Orientation and Informational Session
• 10:30 - 12:00 noon      Use Case Ad Hoc Group Meeting
• 1:00 - 3:00 p.m.          Welcome from MIT Media Lab Hosts 
• Overview of Proposed Agenda - Bob Blakley, Plenary Chair
• NSTIC NPO Updates - Jeremy Grant, NSTIC NPO Director
• Business Sustainment/Plan Subcommittee Update - Kim Little, Business Plan Subcommittee Chair
• Management Council Chair Work Planning Update - Peter Brown, Management Council Chair

• 3:00 - 3:15 p.m.          Break Sponsored by MIT Kerberos & Internet Trust Consortium
• 3:15 - 4:45 p.m.          Committee Breakout Sessions 
• Healthcare Committee, International Coordination Committee, Functional Model Meeting (all IDESG members invited), and Trust Framework and Trustmark Committee
• 4:45 - 5:00 p.m.          Organizational Direction Update - Bob Blakley, Plenary Chair
• 5:00 - 5:45 p.m.          Chairs Meeting and Debrief
• 5:30 p.m.                   Opening Reception at John Harvard's Brewery & Ale House Sponsored by User-Centric ID Live

• 8:30 - 10:15 a.m.         Committee Breakout Sessions
• Taxonomy Ad Hoc Working Group, Healthcare Committee, Trust Framework and Trustmark Committee, Joint Meeting of Business Plan Subcommittee and the Communications and Outreach Subcommittee
• 10:15 - 10:30 a.m.       Break Sponsored by Verizon
• 10:30 - 12:00 noon       Trusted Identities for a New Deal on Data - Professor Sandy Pentland, MIT
• 12:00 - 1:30 p.m.         Lunch on your own & Optional MIT Media Lab Tour
• 1:30 - 2:15 p.m.           Taxonomy Ad Hoc Group Report
• 2:15 - 2:35 p.m.           Use Case Criteria and Life Cycle Update
• 2:35 - 3:00 p.m.           Policy Coordination Committee Report
• 3:00 - 3:30 p.m.           Pilot Presentation from UCAID and MIT
• 3:30 - 3:45 p.m.           Break Sponsored by Troop ID
• 3:45 - 6:00 p.m.           Committee Breakout Sessions
• Financial Services Committee, Privacy Coordination Committee, Policy Coordination Committee, Trust Framework and Trustmark Committee, Security Committee, and Attribute Ad Hoc Group
• 6:00 - 6:30 p.m.           Chairs Meeting and Debrief 

• 8:30 - 11:15 a.m.        Committee Report-outs
• 11:15 - 11:30 a.m.      Break 
• 11:30 - 12:00 Noon     E-Deliberation Procedure Proposal 
• 12:00 - 12:45 p.m.      New Business
• 12:45 - 1:00 p.m.        Closing Wrap-up and Next Steps for October Plenary 
• 1:30 - 3:00 p.m.          Taxonomy Ad Hoc Group - Part 2

Taxonomy Ad-Hoc Group Report - Thursday 1:30 pm ET

The Taxonomy Ad-Hoc Group (AHG) was tasked by the IDESG Standards and Security Committees to develop an IDESG glossary of terms to enable these committees to effectively complete their work via common and well understood key definitions. This glossary may be used for all internal activities as well as IDESG definitions for external interactions. This presentation will provide a brief overview of the activities of the Taxonomy Ad-Hoc Working Group including their objectives, the approach that they have used to perform their work, the status of their work - the definitions that they have completed, their next steps - the sets of terms that they are going to be working on, and a proposal for the plenary on an adoption process and how to use the terms.

At the May plenary, a Use Case Workshop was held.  You may be wondering what has been happening with the use case effort since then.  This presentation will fill you in on the status and plans of the Use Case AHG and overall use case development effort.  Additionally, a proposed "Use Case Life Cycle" will be presented, along with a re-visit of the draft use case criteria, with an explanation of how these are intended to be used, and plans for a formal review and comment period.