enews Logo
an e-newsletter for members of the National Association for PET Container Resources  

Inaugural Issue - December, 2012
In This Issue
See you in Chicago?
Deposits at work in Oregon
Members' page at napcor.com
Policy outlook 2013
CA: AB 837 and RPPCL
ASTM and NAPCOR

Quick Links


A new(s) service for NAPCOR members
You're looking at the first edition of news from NAPCOR, a monthly roundup of items we think will be of interest to members. Rather than replacing our occasional breaking-news emails, it's intended to consolidate news and links so you can find them when you need them.

We're eager to hear your comments and suggestions and receive your contributions. Send them all right here. And look for the next issue in mid- to late January.

 

2013 member meetings
Dates for our three 2013 meetings have been set, and the venue will once again be in the O'Hare area.

We hope you can make it April 16 and 17, July 16 and 17, and November 12 and 13. More details soon.

Bringing the bottles back home
Oregon's beverage container deposit program is a successful system that has all the stakeholders on board. That's the slant of a 2-part article in the October and November issues of Resource Recycling, which is available here and on the member pages of the NAPCOR website.

 

Members only!

Do you have only the vaguest recollection of Slide 127 from the April 2010 members meeting? No worries; meeting documents and minutes are archived on the members-only pages at www.napcor.com. A simple log-in procedure will get you there, starting in the upper right corner of the home page; email David if it isn't quite simple enough. 

 

Policy outlook for 2013

Expectations are high for the 2013 legislative session. Campaigns around the country are gearing up to protect recycling infrastructure and to push for more recycling. For more information on these initiatives, contact Resa Dimino.

 

Beverage Container Recycling

Stakeholders in Oklahoma and Indiana will begin meeting soon to discuss options and recommend legislation for increasing beverage container recycling.

 

In Iowa and Vermont, recycling advocates will be fighting to retain and expand existing deposit programs, while other forces are expected to push for repeal. And in Massachusetts, advocates are gearing up for yet another expansion campaign.

 

Campaigns for new deposit legislation are on the horizon in Florida, Maryland, Minnesota, Louisiana and Texas.

 

Extended Producer Responsibility for Packaging and Printed Products

2012 saw much debate on, and analysis of, the merits of extended producer responsibility (EPR) for packaging and printed products. Notably, the Grocery Manufacturers Association issued a report critical of EPR for packaging and printed products. It was met with responses from a European expert and from the Minnesota county it cites as an example of success without EPR. The report and the two responses make interesting reading; access them here or on the member pages of the NAPCOR website.  

 

In December 2012, a Special Legislative Commission to Study Producer Responsibility Models for Paper and Packaging was convened in Rhode Island. The Commission's work may lead to legislation in 2013 focused specifically on items common in marine debris, or more broadly on packaging and printed products.

 

In the coming year, legislation on packaging and printed products could be introduced in several other states as well. Minnesota, home to Recycling Reinvented, will most likely lead the pack, though campaigns may also be launched in Maryland, Delaware, Washington and North Carolina.

 

California Beverage Container Recycling Program Reform

After years of operating with revenue from unredeemed deposits, the California Beverage Container Recycling Program is facing a structural deficit, projected to be $100 million per year, due to high redemption rates. The state is evaluating program reform options to eliminate the deficit.

   

Degradable Additives Regulation in North Carolina

Efforts to regulate the use of degradable additives in plastic bottles sold in North Carolina continue apace. At a hearing in October, NAPCOR member ClearPath, HDPE recycler Envision, and fiber manufacturer Unifi made presentations (the first, sixth and ninth in the list) to the legislature's Environmental Review Commission to help them understand the plastic recycling process, the importance of the industry, and the threat posed by the additives. On December 12 and 14, ClearPath and Unifi hosted tours for state legislators and policy makers to bring that message home. Meanwhile, staff at the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) are hard at work completing a study, mandated by legislation passed last year, on the impact of degradable additives on the state's plastic recycling industry. The study is expected to set the stage for a legislative proposal to regulate the use of such additives in plastic bottles sold in the state.

 

FTC Issues 'Green Guides' Revisions    

The Federal Trade Commission has published its revised Green Guides for the use of environmental marketing claims. Major revisions address unqualified claims of degradability and acceptable use of terms such as compostable, recyclable, recycled content and source-reduced.

 

Ernst & Young has produced The three S's of environmental marketing, a helpful summary of the Green Guides with suggestions for compliance. Your claims, the firm says, need to be specific, straightforward and substantiated.

 

Carolina Plastics Recycling Council Taking Shape

State staffers in the Carolinas have teamed up with recyclers to develop materials for promoting the plastic recycling industry in the two states. A fact sheet on recycling's economic impact, talking points, and model letters and articles are among the tools they've created to help companies communicate the industry's importance to policy makers and the public. NAPCOR members interested in using the tools or getting involved in the Council can contact Resa Dimino.

 

 

CA bill requires documentation of recycled content
Effective January 1, 2013, California Assembly Bill 837 requires documentation of certain recycled-content claims. Manufacturers and suppliers of plastic food containers (beverage containers aren't included) must maintain certain information and documentation in support of their environmental marketing claims. The information, or a web link to it, must be furnished to any member of the public upon request.

There are no further details on compliance or regulatory language yet, and we don't know what agency may be charged with enforcement. We're keeping an eye on it, and will report on any developments.

 

More RPPCs covered by CA law
Also effective January 1, more thermoformed packages are covered by California's Rigid Plastic Packaging Container Law. The expansion is mainly due to a broadening of the definition of a "package closure" to include any occurring during manufacturing or production. Packaging covered by the law must be recycled at a 45% rate, source-reduced (lightweighted) by 10%, or made with 25% recycled content. Since their packages probably won't make the recycling rate or lightweighting cuts, thermoformers are likely to be seeking more recycled material. Packaging Digest's digital edition has a good summary written by EPI's Victor Bell. 

 

Are you an ASTM member?

At our annual NAPCOR meeting in November, staff was asked to build an email list of NAPCOR members who also belong to ASTM. Three subgroups of ASTM's Committee D20 on Plastics are in the process of developing standards that are likely to affect NAPCOR member interests. The subcommittee ballot cycles begin this month and continue through February 2013, and we'd like to inform and engage our common members around these issues.  

 

If you are an ASTM member, or have a colleague who is amenable to being included on this distribution, please send us their email address. NAPCOR's data manager, Sarah Stewart, recently became an ASTM member, and she and Kate Eagles will maintain the list. 

 

You can join ASTM as an individual for $75; organizational membership is $400. To get involved with any of the relevant D20 subcommittees--Recycled Plastics (D20.95), SPI Resin Codes (D20.95.01) or Environmentally Degradable Plastics and Biobased Standards (D20.96)--contact Tom Pecorini of Eastman Chemical Company at tjpec [at] eastman [dot] com. The ASTM web site, http://astm.org, is rich in content and easy to navigate. 

 

Subscription to this newsletter is a benefit of NAPCOR membership;
its content is intended for member companies only.
To add colleagues from your company to the distribution list, 
please send us their email addresses.
We want to know how this newsletter can be helpful to you,
so we welcome your comments, complaints and suggestions.

(And if you're on the distribution list and
don't want to be,
just click the SafeUnsubscribe button below.)

 


Best regards and Happy Holidays,

 

Kate
 
Kate Eagles
NAPCOR Communications Director
keagles[at]napcor[dot]com