USAHA.org


The Nation's Animal Health Forum Since 1897

A service to members of the United States Animal Health Association.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 
  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 
USAHA News Alert Summaries - January 26, 2016 - In this issue:
* * * * * * * * * *
 
1. New Mexico EHV Update: Five Horses Affected
By Edited Press Release
TheHorse.com
January 25, 2016
 
 
Five horses at Sunland Park Racetrack, in New Mexico, have now been confirmed positive for neurologic equine herpesvirus-1 (EHV-1).
 
The New Mexico Livestock Board and the New Mexico Racing Commission are working with officials at Sunland Park Racetrack to ensure the virus does not spread further. Several barns at Sunland Park Racetrack are under quarantine following the positive test results last week.
 
The livestock board is taking extra precautions by restricting horse movement to and from the area that includes Sunland Park, as well as three local horse-training centers: Frontera, Jovi, and Lazy S.
 
Early reports suggesting the strain was EHV-4-which produces mainly respiratory problems-were erroneous. The five horses did, in fact, test positive for the neurotropic form of EHV-1, which can cause severe neurologic problems. The first confirmation was made Jan 21.
 
 
Full text:
 
********

2. Effective biosurveillance vital to achieving healthy swine herds, industry
By Kevin Schulz
National Hog Farmer
January 25, 2016
 
 
Every hog producer knows that technology has greatly enhanced the industry's way of doing business.
 
One area that is vastly changing in today's hog industry is biosurveillance. Changes need to be made to be able to react more rapidly in the event of a disease outbreak. That lesson was learned when porcine epidemic diarrhea virus first hit the U.S. swine herd in 2013, and the industry could only react.
 
Jeff Zimmerman, professor of disease ecology in the Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, says producers have a good system in place, but it needs some tweaking.
 
As a broad definition, Zimmerman says surveillance is data based on testing, but one has to know what they are testing and how. Zimmerman uses Senecavirus A research by Pablo Pineyro as an example. Pineyro had a study of sows that were rRT-PCR-positive for Senecavirus A, even though whether serum, feces or tonsil swabs were tested, 9%, 18% and 27%, respectively, appeared clinically normal (see chart above). Screening of piglets showed similar results: 18% being PCR-positive for Senecavirus A, even though they were clinically normal. Piglets' screenings of feces and tonsils came back 36% and 27% PCR-positive, respectively. "We need to be in position where we can deal with the subclinical or aclinical," Zimmerman says.
 
This leads into Zimmerman's plea that to make a surveillance work and be effective, it needs to be fast, accurate, affordable and practical. "A long-recognized fact is that we need to have a federal, state and industry partnership," Zimmerman says.
 
 
 
********

3. Poultry Producers Tighten Security [OH - edited]
By: Ed Lentz
The Courier
January 26, 2016
 
 
After a quiet fall, an avian influenza virus again has been detected in commercial poultry, this time in southern Indiana.
 
It is important the nation keeps the domestic poultry population free from avian flu to avoid international trade problems. To address this concern, the poultry industry learned from 2015 the importance of quickly detecting the virus, killing infected flocks and disinfecting barns, and disposal of dead birds to control the disease.
 
The strategy is also to impose 21 days of down time with confirmed negative testing before repopulating the barns.
 
Ohio poultry producers are asked again to tighten biosecurity measures to reduce the chance of direct contact between infected and uninfected birds, and indirectly by objects that have come in contact with diseased birds, such as people, rodents, pets, feed, vehicles, and equipment.
 
Mohamed El-Gazzar, Ohio State University Extension poultry veterinarian, recommends the following practices:
* Minimize direct contact with infected birds.
* Avoid contact between your flock and other birds, wild and domestic, especially around open water and pastures.
* Prevent mixing between species within the same flocks, such as ducks, geese, and chickens, and between multiple ages of the same species.
* Purchase birds from National Poultry Improvement Plan disease-free sources.
* Quarantine new birds for a week before mixing with the rest of the flock.
* If you show birds, such as at fairs, quarantine for a week before returning to the main flock. Last year the Ohio Department of Agriculture banned shows to prevent the potential spread of the disease. It is considering the same thing after the outbreak in southern Indiana.
Practices to minimize indirect contact:
* Do not allow outside people to visit your flock. They could inadvertently carry the disease on their clothes, shoes, hands, or other objects brought with them.
* Dedicate specific clothes and shoes while working with your flock.
* Use disposable coveralls, gloves and shoe covers when working with your flock.
* Wash your hands before and after handling birds and their surroundings, including feed and water.
* Establish a hand-sanitizing station near the flock for use each time the poultry house is entered or exited.
* Do not allow pets near the flock.
* Animal-proof your poultry house, especially against birds and rodents.
* Acquire feed from trusted sources and properly store in a secure place safe from other animals.
* Drinking water should be the same quality as used by humans. Surface water from rivers, ponds, or puddles may contain the virus left by migratory wild birds.
 
 
Full text:
 
********

4. Making Sense Of Egg Labels
By Lesley McClurg
Capital Public Radio
January 25, 2016
 
 
Many consumers are increasingly animal-welfare conscious. But, when it comes to buying eggs the options can be overwhelming -- cage-free, organic, pasture-raised. Are the labels worth the extra money?
 
Jennifer Fearing, an animal welfare consultant for the Humane Society of the United States, says it depends. Sometimes your dollars pay for better conditions on a farm, and other times labels are misleading.
 
She's is standing in front of the egg display case at a Raley's grocery store in Sacramento.
 
"You've got price points at $3, $4, $5, $6 and $7," says Fearing.
 
She says egg labels should reflect conditions on a chicken farm, but...
 
"Claims like cage-free, free-range, free-roaming, pasture based those are not regulated, the government isn't proclaiming what cage-free is," Fearing explains.
 
 
Full text:
 
********

5. Food companies increasing importance they attach to farm animal welfare - Business Benchmark reveals
Eat Out Magazine [UK]
January 25, 2016
 
 
The global Business Benchmark on Farm Animal Welfare (BBFAW) has found that 69% of companies now have published farm animal welfare policies compared to 46% in 2012.
 
The report, which will be published tomorrow, finds that the restaurant and bar sector has improved its average score by 8%, but still lags behind the retail and manufacturing sectors.
 
Companies such as Burger King, Domino's, Greggs, JD Wetherspoon, McDonald's, Subway and Starbucks scored 29% on average. Contract catering companies, such as Compass, Elior and SSP scored just 17% on average.
 
The Business Benchmark notes Greggs as a significant improver, moving its rating from Tier 5 to Tier 3. Mitchells & Butlers (Tier 4) and Whitbread (Tier 3) are also highlighted as key movers. Noble Foods reached the top tier, whilst McDonald's and Unilever retained their place in Tier 2.
 
 
 
********

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 
Quick Links...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
 

 

Order your copy of Foreign Animal Diseases, 7th Edition 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Report news leads to brichey@usaha.org.  
Please add usaha@usaha.ccsend.com  to your Spam filter permissions.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

FOLLOW USAHA on Facebook and Twitter 

 

 

USAHA News Alert Summaries is a service provided to its members as a timely, up-to-date source of news affecting animal health and related subjects, intended for personal use by USAHA members.  Information in these articles does not necessarily represent the views or positions of USAHA. 

   Sources of articles are state, national and international media outlets, press releases, and direct from organizations or agencies.  Each article includes direct citation and link.  Comments, questions or concerns about the information included in each article should be directed to the source in addition to USAHA. While USAHA strives for accuracy in the information it shares, the News Alert Summaries should be treated as a tool that provides a snapshot of information being reported regarding animal health and related subjects.