APRIL GAZETTE | Our 92nd year!
April, 2014 - Vol 61, Issue 7
Inside the Gazette
Board of Governors
CTTC Schedule
Golf Tournament
Sponsors
Notice of Meeting
Meeting Summary
Seminar Summary
Meeting Photos
Viewpoint
Research Promotion
PAOE
YEA
Quick Links

Toronto Chapter Website

Meeting Registration

Past Gazette Issues

ASHRAE Society Website

Join Our Mailing List!
Board of Governors

 

President

Delta Controls


President-Elect

Glenn Kilmer
Kilmer Environmental


VIce President  

Al Porter, P.Eng.
Trane ULC / MASHRAE  


Treasurer  

Honeywell Building Solutions  


Secretary 

EH Price Sales


Past President

Michael Khaw P. Eng. 

VCI Controls

ASHRAE TC 7.3 Voting Member Region 2 RVC MP


Johnson Paterson

Chapter Past President 


Chapter Past President

Carrier Enterprise Canada


Peter Turk P.Eng. 

Victaulic


Imtee Baksh P. Eng. 

EFI Concepts


Dynergy Energy Management


Nailor Industries


Zain Yassi
Engineered Air

Social Media

Have you "liked" us?

Social Media Toronto Chapter
Questions? Email us
President's Message


Greetings, 

 

Hope you all are holding on tight with the wonderful spring weather we are enjoying :). It has been a longer winter than we all would have wished for, I'm hoping our spring will come soon.  

 
Our March joint BCA Toronto and BOMA Toronto Associations seminar and dinner meeting held at Spirale Banquet Centre was a great success! The half day seminar was attended overwhelmingly and the group of speakers we had in our line up were awesome. This is an event that I feel we should keep facilitating every year as it will keep growing if we keep up the good work. I can envision this seminar to perhaps in future years be a full day event with a vast spectrum of speakers and guests attending the ASHRAE Toronto Chapter event along with our great friends at BCA Toronto and BOMA Toronto.

 

I would like to thank all Toronto ASHRAE Chapter team members, BCA Toronto team members, BOMA Association and of course our speakers for making this event such a great success.


For April we have another fantastic event for you to attend. It is a joint event with our fellow Hamilton ASHRAE Chapter and will be held at the Holiday Inn in Oakville. Our guest speaker is Mr. Nick Stark from HH Angus Consulting. Nick will be delivering a presentation to us the largest hospital project going on in Canada at present time, CHUM Hospital in Montreal, Quebec. I have personally seen this hospital grow from the engineering stage to the construction stage and where it is at present time. It is an project with many wonderful features and hurdles that needed to be climbed. Will be great to see, hope to see you at the meeting.


We are presently in nomination mode for our chapter 2014-2015 year. Mr. Glenn Kilmer our President Elect and the Nominating Committee Chair, Mr. Kurt Monterio delivered the nomination slate at our meeting in March at our dinner meeting. If you would like to discuss the nomination procedure please contact one of us and we would be happy to answer any questions or offer any information to you about this chapter process that we undertake every year in March for the next chapter year.


There is a lot going on in our chapter right now as you can see above. If you would like to find out more about what we have going on, please check out our website- www.torontoashre.com  

 

If there is anything I can assist with please get in touch. 416-571-0046 or dbenedetti@deltacontrols.com

 

Regards,

President - ASHRAE Toronto Chapter

  

CTTC Schedule
  
ASHRAE Toronto Meetings 2014:


CTTC Schedule for Toronto Chapter

Please click here to see ASHRAE Toronto's 2014 Program Schedule. Please note that the schedule can change.

Members will be prompted via email to register for upcoming events at TorontoASHRAE.com.
 
Golf Tournament
  
ASHRAE Toronto 2014 Annual Golf Tournament

golf_balls_lined.jpgMonday June 16, 2013
Nobleton Lakes Golf Club

Hole Sponsors: 24 @ $500
Major Sponsors: 3 @ $2000 

Foursomes: $900
Individuals: $225
Dinner Only: $75

Registration: 9am to 10am 
Box Lunch TO GO
Shotgun 10:30am Sharp
Scramble Format
Limited to 216 golfers
Dinner to Follow at 5:00pm

Click Here to Register

 

Major Sponsorship includes one hole sponsorship, table at sponsored hole, table inside dinner reception area & speaker mention.

Gazette Sponsors


ASHRAE Toronto Chapter thanks the following
companies for their support of the Gazette
  
Kilmer Environmental Business Card

Contact Emma Wildeman to Post your Business Card Here!

 

Notice of Meeting
 
 
April Dinner Meeting
 
Monday April 7, 2014
5:00 pm to 8:30 pm
 
Holiday Inn Oakville

 

500 Argus Road, Oakville, ON, L6J 3J3

Google Maps to Holiday Inn Oakville

 

 

ASHRAE Toronto Chapter and ASHRAE Hamilton Chapter present

the following dinner meeting presentation:

  

CHMU Hospital Montreal:
State-of-the-art P3 Facility

Nick Stark
Vice President, Knowledge Management, HH Angus & Associates Limited 
 
CHMU is the Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal, and is both the largest single healthcare development under-way in Canada and the largest P3 project in North America with 2.5 million sq ft serving 345,000 ambulatory patients, 22,000 inpatients and 65,000 emergency patients annually. CHUM accommodate 770 single-patient rooms, ambulatory and diagnostic centers, surgery, intensive care, clinical laboratories and a research centre that encompasses 35 medical disciplines.




 
Pre-Registration Required
 
We ask that you pre-register for the dinner meeting at your earliest convenience online at www.torontoashrae.com. If you require assistance please contact the ASHRAE Toronto Chapter office (Sabrina Tai - 905 602 4714 or stai@hrai.ca).
 
Please indicate at the time of registration if you have any specific meal requirements. There will always be a vegetarian option, simply notify us at the time of registration. No walk-in registrations will be permitted for the dinner meeting event.
 

  
Need Assistance?
 
Feel free to contact the following members for further details:

Peter Turk
ASHRAE Toronto Chapter Technology Transfer Committee Chair


Meeting Summary  

March 2014 Dinner Presentation
 
Retro-commissioning: Improving Existing Building Performance
Luka Matutinovic, P.Eng, LEED AP BD+C
 
 
 
Luka Matutinovic is a Building Energy Specialist and Technical Lead with Halsall Associates, a multi-disciplinary engineering firm. Luka is a member of ASHRAE, IBPSA Canada and is part of the committee developing ASHRAE Standard 209 for energy simulation aided design. Halsall has over 75,000,000 ft² of commissioning experience across the country. In the last 5-10 years, they have seen a greater demand for sustainability and green initiatives in the real estate market. The focus of Lukas's presentation was on the value that Retro-commissioning can provide to existing buildings.

Why Improve Commercial Real Estate?
In Toronto and across Canada, there is increasing pressure on existing building owners and managers to maintain best in class assets in order to attract and retain tenants, especially when new office towers are being built with increased focus on sustainability and energy efficiency.

Beyond competitive pressures, there is also the possibility that future regulations will require public disclosure of energy performance data (several North American jurisdictions like New York City already do). Poor performers will not remain anonymous, those that participate in voluntary benchmarking and disclosure programs like the Race to Reduce will be better-prepared to respond.

In terms of energy performance, the average energy intensity of existing commercial office buildings in Toronto is around 30 ekWh/ft², while many new commercial office developments across the country are targeting performance in the 16-18 ekWh/ft² range. Retro-commissioning can be a major step for existing buildings towards bridging this performance gap while improving occupant comfort.

Why commission new and existing buildings?
Beyond providing a response to competitive and regulatory pressures to improve energy performance, simply put, retro-commissioning saves money. The February 2011 edition of the ASHRAE Journal contained a short article by Dr. Evan Mills summarizing his study of commissioning projects on over 640 buildings. He identified over 10,000 energy related issues and addressing those issues resulted on average, 16% energy savings with a paybacks of 13 months. Our experience on more than 30 projects suggests similar savings opportunities and returns on investment.

What is Retro-Commissioning (ReCx)?
In short, ReCx is a structured process for uncovering ways to operate a building better. It complements the process of commissioning, which occurs when the systems are first set into operation. Retro-commissioning looks at how the systems are currently operating and compares this to the current needs of the occupants and spaces.

What is the Retro-Commissioning Process?
Planning: What works well and not so well in the building in order to develop a Retro-commissioning Plan which outlines who, what, how and how much?
Investigation: On-site test, monitor, trend and analyze key data to determine corrective measures.
Reporting: Present a "Master List of Findings" complete with ROM costing, energy savings and simple payback period to clarify and document the tasks.
Implementation: "Where the rubber hits the road", the Operations Team may take care of the identified tasks themselves if they have a solid understanding of what the recommendations are.
Persistence: Develop on-going tasks for operators and service contractors to maintain proper operations. These tasks go beyond typical PM activities being performed, but can be scheduled and tracked with the same automated tools.

Things to Consider?
Retro-commissioning is a fairly new service; there are a limited number of experienced providers.
There are a variety of end goals and the provider should know how deep to dig for savings.
There should be a good Scope of Work with the client's priorities outlined.
Present clear messages about energy savings, involve Building Operators.
Apply for incentives, leverage base building service providers.

True Retro-Commissioning Story: Downtown Toronto Office Tower
1970s Class "A" property, renovated in the 1990s, 30% reduction in energy use from retrofits.

What's next? Retro-commissioning the building for additional savings.

Findings include: $230,000 savings from unnecessary ventilation; $69,000 savings in lighting; and $94,000 savings with winter free cooling. In total, building achieved a 10% savings in energy costs with a simple payback of 9 months.

 

 

Alessandra Cupillari

ACupillari@halsall.com

 

Seminar Summary  

March 2014 Commissioning Seminar
 

On Monday March 3rd from 2-5pm the Toronto Chapter along with the Eastern Canadian Chapter of the Building Commissioning Association (BCA) and the Toronto Building Owners and Managers Association held our second annual commissioning seminar.   The seminar had more than 120 attendees and was packed full of information.   The following 6 topics were presented:

 

1. Commissioning of Healthcare Facilities

 

David Kennard, Stantec. 

 

A review of CSA Standard CSA Z8001-13 (formerly CSA Z318.0-05).  There are challenges faced in a healthcare facility with the balance between health, safety and sustainability.  Commissioning responsibility matrixes and task sheets were shown.   CSA Z8001-13 contains key definitions in the world of commissioning, in particular the overall seminar themes of retro-commissioning and recommissioning:

 

Commissioning (commissioning process) is defined as...

 

"a systematic verification, documentation and training process applied to all activities during the design, construction, static verification,  start-up and functional  performance testing of equipment and systems in a facility to ensure that the facility operates in conformity with the owner's project requirements and the basis of design in accordance with the contract documents."

 

Ongoing Commissioning

 

"a process /program which monitors and documents the building's performance using the original commissioning documentation as a bench mark"

 

Recommissioning

 

"To commission a building using the documentation created during the previous commissioning process"

 

Retro Commissioning

 

"To commission a building new or existing, when commissioning has never been carried out and documentation does not exist"

 

The commissioning process through the design phases and construction phases were reviewed. 

 

 

2. Building Enclosure Commissioning

 

Jennifer Hogan, Pretium Anderson Building Engineers

 

Commissioning the building enclosure cannot be overlooked by mechanical engineers.  Underperforming mechanical systems can sometimes be traced to the building enclosure.  Commissioning the enclosure can also:

  • Limit disruptions to the HVAC System design pressures due to infiltration / exfiltration
  • Potential Energy Savings
  • Limit Risk Associated with Construction Defects - For Owner and Contractor!
  • LEED v.4 Credits

The following standards were reviewed: 

  • ASTM E2813-12
  • ASTM E1186 - Practice for Air Leakage Site Detection in Building Envelopes and Air Barrier Systems
  • ASTM C1153 - Practice for Location of Wet Insulation in Roofing Systems Using Infrared Imaging
  • ASTM C1193 - Guide for Use of Joint Sealants: Field Applied Sealant Joint Hand Pull Tab

 

3. Hydronic Balancing

 

Jamie Dudley, Victaulic

 

The importance of hydronic balancing was presented with respect to building comfort and energy savings opportunities.  A properly balanced building is comfortable along with reduced pump energy and production energy (heating or cooling) savings.   For example in heating season a 1˚F increase (too high) in room temperature can increase the annual plant energy consumption by 4-7%.   In cooling 1˚F decrease (too low) in room temperature can increase the annual plant energy consumption by 6-10%.   A properly installed and functioning manual balancing valve can be a powerful troubleshooting tool as it has the function of balancing the flow, measuring the flow and providing a shut off valve.   

 

Any changes to a hydronic network in a building will typically require rebalancing of a manual balancing valve system.  Troubleshooting comfort issues often leads re-balancing which is why it should not be considered a "once and done" item when a new building is prepared for occupancy. 

 

Proper design and installation guidelines of balancing valves were shown, with helpful rules of thumb for commissioning agents to watch out for. 

 

 

4. Commissioning Process for Buildings & Systems ASHRAE Standard 202-2013

 

Derek Cheung, Isotherm Engineering Ltd.

 

The history of ASHRAE Commissioning standards was presented along with the highlights of the Standard 202.   Did you know that ASHRAE didn't form its first commissioning committee until 1982?  A relatively short time ago, reminding us that commissioning is a young child compared to the ASHRAE handbook that was first published in 1922. 

 

ASHRAE standards were compared to CSA standards.  The roles and responsibilities of commissioning agents were reviewed.  One of the more interesting slides detailed the following: 

 

Commissioning is NOT

  • Completing manufacturer's test forms
  • Contractor's QC check
  • Deficiency inspection
  • Construction management

 

5. Mission Critical Data Centre Commissioning

 

Nigel Bastiampillai, HH Angus & Associates Ltd.

 

Mission critical sites are: telecommunication facilities, financial data centres, air traffic control centres, CL4 laboratories and military defence buildings.  Mission critical facilities require different commissioning to ensure they operate 24/7.   Differences between typical commercial buildings include:

  • More rigid process; higher witness rate
  • Greater number of tests and iterations
  • Testing maintenance scenarios that allow continuous operations
  • Complexity of systems

There are 6 levels of mission critical commissioning.  Factory witness tests (Level 1) offer an important advantage with mission critical buildings.  Less problems in the field reduces the risk during the construction phase.   Risk reduction is the single greatest focus of any mission critical building.  Level 2 is pre-functional testing, confirmation of contract installation.  Functional testing (Level 3) is then done on site to ensure equipment continues to perform as expected.  The next level of best practices is the Individual System Test or IST (Level 4).  The focus is on the interactive nature of all components of a system.  Level 5 is the Integrated System Operation Test which includes my favourite names for tests:  Pull The Plug (PTP) and Black Start.  Finally Level 6 is warranty commissioning. 

 

 

6. Condominium Commissioning

 

Reg Barsoum, Ecovert Cx

 

Condominium commissioning is a growing and challenging field.  The economics of condominium construction make a big rush to get building completed as quickly as possible.  Early attention to the details are the key, but not an easy thing to do.  LEED buildings provide the impetus and drive to look at, evaluate, and give thought to the details.  3rd party commissioning is key to having a specialist keep focus on the priorities that don't seem important to the project management staff that are under economic pressure to build the condominium as quickly as possible.  Developers should target high priority items for condo owners such as migration of odours, noise, balancing, air pressure tests and energy use.   Finally developers should prioritize documenting commissioning activities which includes functional testing and training. In summary:

  1. A good condo can be built
  2. Happy condo owners can be found
  3. LEED is not a magic bullet
  4. The LEED process can minimize risk. 

 

Peter Turk

ASHRAE Toronto Chapter CTTC Chair

PTurk@victaulic.com

 

Meeting Photos


Viewpoint
  
YEA Leadership Weekend

I am ever amazed by the tools ASHRAE has given me to succeed, not only as a professional, but as a person. It seems like the more I get involved and the more hard work I give to our chapter, the more it gives back. The YEA Leadership Weekend was one of the ASHRAE experiences that will benefit me for the rest of my career.

Armed with two fellow YEA Torontonians, we ventured over to the west coast in Portland, Oregon to partake on a three-day professional development weekend. None of us knew what to expect, and I must admit I was a little sceptical. But WOW - we engaged in the activities and we grew.

We learned about ourselves. We learned how our unique personalities can fit into the professional world. As with proper communication and team work, there is a place for all different types of people. We learned when to put our foot down based on core values. And explored the essence of our being - what makes us tick professionally? What is (or should be) the reason behind our career? What do we identify with? What is our "why"?

And, of course, it is always great to meet people from all over North America that are actively involved in their ASHRAE chapter. Sometimes I forget how global our organization is - it is a great feeling to have a common bond (ie ASHRAE) with someone you just met who lives 2,000 km away.

Besides, everyone needs a night of hardcore "team building" every once and awhile.

A very big thank you to those at the Toronto Chapter that sent me - and a very big thank you to ASHRAE Society who coordinated this event!

Spring 2014 YEA Leadership Weekend Participants
Toronto Chapter Members in the crowd: Trevor Caldwell, Brendan McDermott, and Emma Wildeman

Communications Committee Chair ASHRAE Toronto Chapter 2013-2014

Research Promotion
  

Several members have asked how research contributions are allocated. Your research investment is allocated to the following categories:

  1. Indoor air quality, comfort and health-20%
  2. Design and operation and maintenance tools-20%
  3. Energy conservation-20%
  4. Environmentally safe materials-15%
  5. High risk, innovative and other-10%
  6. Fire and safety-5%
  7. Refrigeration systems-5%
  8. Food processing and preservation-5%

Ashrae research results are presented at meetings and published in Ashrae transactions. Results are used to revise Ashrae handbooks. Popular topics are published as technical data bulletins or special reports. Results are often incorporated into industry standards and guidelines for system design and installation.

 

This is an open invitation to individuals and companies to make their investments in ASHRAE Research as soon as possible. The fiscal year ends June 30th, 2014. Toronto Chapters goal for this year is $33,700. To make your investment in ASHRAE Research, go to www.torontoashrae.com  Click on Donate/Pay Invoice Tab on the upper toolbar. Click on Donation: ASHRAE Research Canada. You can make your payment by credit card or Paypal just as you do for meeting and event registration.


Thank you again for your support.

Alan J. Porter, P. Eng.
Chair, Research Promotion ASHRAE Toronto Chapter 2013-2014

PAOE

 

PAOE or Presidents Award Of Excellence, provides the chapters in Region II with a means of measuring success across a wide range of chapter operations.   It is meant as a tool to guide the Board of Directors and Committee Chairs towards their goals.  Below is a summary of PAOE Points for all of the Chapters in Region II so far this year.
   
Glenn Kilmer

ASHRAE Toronto Chapter - President-Elect

YEA









Just a reminder- the May dinner meeting will focus Young Engineers in ASHRAE. Everyone is encouraged to sign up for the tour before the meeting when it becomes available on the website. Although the exact location is uncertain at this time, one thing is for sure: everyone is invited out to grab a drink after the meeting! I will let everyone know the details once we've picked out the location. 

Michael Genin
2012-2013 YEA Committee Chair