The Law Offices of Steven D. Rubin, APC
 
Table of Contents
Featured In This Issue
Independent Contractor vs. Employee: I Got You Under My Thumb ...
Partnership Capital Accounts ... a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma ... or maybe not.
Real Life Stories/ Personal audits: Exactly what does "we want to see the backup" mean?...
Tax Returns and Archeology: The study of the life of ancient (and not so ancient) peoples
Quick Links
Featured In This Issue

 
(Independent Contractor vs. Employee) 
  
 
 
In this issue is an article that discusses when an employer is confronted with the potential reclassification by federal or state taxing authorities of its "independent contractors" to "employees," the outcome can have huge consequences for the employer.
Rubin Tax Law eNews Reporter
THE ELECTRONIC TAX NEWSLETTER OF THE LAW OFFICES OF STEVEN D. RUBIN, APC
 
January 2014
  
The Law Offices of Steven D. Rubin, APC
1912 Broadway, Suite 105
Santa Monica, CA 90404
Tel (310) 453-7812/ Fax (310) 496-1686
Top
Dear Clients, Colleagues and Friends,
  
Welcome to the January 2014 issue of the
Rubin Tax Law eNews Reporter. This electronic tax newsletter intends to address tax topics that our clients, colleagues and friends have made known to us to be of interest and importance to them. The Rubin Tax Law eNews Reporter does not attempt to offer solutions to individual problems but rather to provide information about current developments in those areas of the law encompassed by our law practice. Readers in need of legal assistance should retain the services of competent counsel.
   

 

 

 

Independent Contractor vs. Employee: I Got You Under My Thumb ....

 

 

 

By Steven Rubin
  
Vintage Guitar   
 

When an employer is confronted with the potential reclassification by federal or state taxing authorities of its "independent contractors" to "employees," the outcome can have huge consequences for the employer. If reclassified, the taxing authority(ies) can seek backup withholding taxes for one or more years, as well as penalties and interest. There are non tax consequences as well, such as the failure to provide Workers Compensation insurance as mandated by state law. With so much riding on such a determination, it behooves employers to take a sober look at whether an "independent contractor" is really an employee.

 

A Practical Approach:

 

Does the independent contractor (IC) under scrutiny follow an independent trade? Individuals such as physicians, lawyers, dentists, contractors, and subcontractors, who follow an independent trade, business, or profession in which they offer their services to the public, generally are not employees. Look up the definition of "independent" in the dictionary. Read it carefully. Read it several times. Is the IC under scrutiny really "independent?" Really? Think of your physician, your lawyer, and your dentist. No taxing authority would ever think of reclassifying your physician, your lawyer or your dentist as your "employee." Of course they wouldn't. Why would they? You have absolutely no control over them. In fact, except when you go to visit them, you really haven't the slightest clue how they spend their day, how they do their work. In other words, they are completely "independent" of you.

 

Now, imagine on one end of the spectrum is your aforementioned physician, lawyer or dentist. On the other end is one of those happy Wal-Mart employees that we see on television commercials wearing those fashionable blue vests. The Wal-Mart employee, perhaps with the exception of what color socks to wear and what to eat, is told by his or her employor exactly what to do the entire day right down to when to take lunch, when to take a break, where to punch the time clock, and what days and hours to work. Now, as you move across this spectrum from the complete independence of the physician/lawyer/dentist to the utter absence of independence of the Wal-Mart employee, there is a point at which the IC under scrutiny no longer has sufficient independence to support his or her being treated as an independent contractor for tax purposes. Where this point is may be different in each case, but the basic premise of independence does not change.

 

Ask yourself. Does he or she truly have an independent trade in which they offer their services to the public?

 

  • Does he or she have a fictitious business name?
  • Does he or she even have a business card? Letterhead? Website?
  • Does he or she have an office? Even a home office?
  • Does he or she have a business license?
  • Does he or she have other clients? Even if they are not all currently active?
  • How many other clients? One, two, more?
  • Does he or she just happen to work at your place of business every day?

 

You see where I am going with this? These days some of the above items, such as a fictitious business name, business card, letterhead, business license, or even a website do not cost a lot of money. If someone is truly in an independent trade in which they offer their services to the public wouldn't they at least have these items?

 

Bottom line, if you are an employer and you currently have independent contractors, don't wait for the taxing authorities to come asking you these questions. Ask them yourself. Ask them now. Try to develop a "feel" for whether your independent contractors are in fact independent contractors for tax purposes. If not, start to develop a plan for what to do about it. The taxing authorities know what they will do ... 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Partnership Capital Accounts ... a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma ... or maybe not.

 

  
By Steven Rubin
  
 
   

 

In a radio broadcast in October 1939, in addressing the mystery of Russia, Winston Churchill made the following statement:

"I cannot forecast to you the action of Russia. It is a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma; but perhaps there is a key. That key is Russian national interest." A riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma. In my view, these words could also be used to describe America's partnership tax regulations. When I was attending Georgetown's Master of Laws Program in Taxation in 1990-1991, I took a class on partnership taxation. I remember our professor made the following comments regarding the partnership tax regulations: "There are only two guys who understand the partnership tax regulations, and these are the guys that wrote them, and they are making a fortune running around telling everyone else what they mean."

Frankly, I wouldn't be surprised if even these two guys did not know what they mean.

That said, the partnership (and this INCLUDES limited liability companies that are taxed like partnerships) are a very common form of business structure. So whether complicated or not, many people elect to do business in the partnership form (and limited liability company form that elects to be taxed as a partnership) and therefore are subject to the partnership tax regulations whether they like it or not, and whether they understand it or not. So, this article takes a peek at how Capital Accounts work, and then points you to the places in the related tax returns and schedules where a partner can "see" how his or her Capital Account is doing.

A Peek at how Capital Accounts work:

The partnership tax regulations provide that in order for partnership allocations to have "substantial economic effect" (and therefore be respected by the IRS) the partnership must establish and maintain capital accounts for the partners.      

A partner's capital account represents the value of a partner's equity interest in the partnership (often expressed in dollars). Each partner's capital account also reflects the interest that partner has in the partnership in relation to the other partners' interests (often expressed as a percentage). For this purpose, capital accounts are generally recorded using market values because the relationship among the partners is generally based on the values of their contributions to the partnership.

Although a partner's capital account (i.e., the net worth of the partner's share of the partnership) is generally determined by the value of the property that each partner contributed to the partnership, the partnership financial statements may not reflect a partner's actual interest in the partnership if the financial statements are recorded using tax accounting (i.e., tax basis - this will be subject of a future article).

The partner's capital accounts are adjusted to reflect the changing value of each partner's interest. Adjustments are made each year for the income or loss of the partnership and any distributions made to the partners. If a partnership has generated an operating profit, the value of the partnership's assets has increased by the amount of this operating profit. Accordingly, the partners' capital accounts are also increased by the amount of partnership profits. Any distributions to the partners, conversely, represent a decrease in the value of assets owned by the partnership; the partners' capital accounts are also decreased by the amount of any distributions.

Example -Adjustments to Capital Accounts

X and Y form an equal partnership to which each contributes $10,000. X and Y each have a $10,000 initial capital account. In Year 1, the partnership generates $1,000 of income, shared equally between X and Y. X and Y each report $500 of partnership income, and each of their capital accounts is increased by $500. If the partnership later distributes $1,000 to X and Y, each of their capital accounts is reduced by $500.

When a partnership borrows money to finance the acquisition of assets by the partnership, no adjustment is made to the capital accounts. The increase in the value of partnership assets is offset by the increase in partnership liabilities. Therefore, the net worth of the partners' equity remains the same. If partnership assets are distributed to creditors to satisfy partnership liabilities, no adjustment is made to the capital accounts. The decrease in the value of partnership assets is offset by the decrease in partnership liabilities.

Where can I "see" my Capital Account?

Every partnership (including limited liability companies that elect to be taxed as partnerships) is required to file with the partnership's Form 1065 Partnership Tax Return, and provide a copy to each partner a Schedule K-1 Partner's Share of Income, Deductions, Credits, etc. (the "K-1"). If you look on the 2013 Schedule K-1, in Part II, the "story" of a partner's capital account is set forth at Items J, K and L. If properly filled out, you will get to "see" the "story." Furthermore, the information on all of the partners' K-1's in the aggregate should be reflected on the Form 1065 Partnership Tax Return at Schedule M-2 Analysis of Partners Capital Accounts. Once again, this time in the aggregate, the partners should be able to "see" the "story" of their respective Capital Accounts.

If the aggregate of the information on the partners' K-1's does not "jive" with the information on the aforementioned Schedule M-2, something may very well be rotten in the state of Denmark if you get my drift.

So, as complicated as the partnership tax regulations are, a partner should nevertheless be able to "see" at least a summary of how his or her Capital Account is faring without requiring an advanced degree in economics.

 

 

 

 

Back to Top 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
Real Life Stories/ Personal audits: Exactly what does "we want to see the backup" mean?  

 

By Steven Rubin
   

 

 

The following is a true story ...

 

 

A few years ago I was referred a client who was already under audit for returns filed in the mid-2000's. It is my understanding that the audit had been handled by the preparer of the tax returns under audit. I will refer to this person as the "Prior Representative." It would be an understatement to say the audit was not going well before I was brought in. It should go without saying that you should treat the Revenue Officer conducting the examination with professionalism and courtesy. Such had not been the case here. Big mistake ...

 

You see, as is the case in many audits, the Revenue Officer had issued a Form 4564 Information Document Request (IDR). The IDR requested the following items:

  1. General ledger and all journals for your Schedule C business for the year ending December 31, 20XX, including the chart of accounts
  2. Copies of your financial statements if one was prepared
  3. Work papers used to prepare return, including trial balance and adjusting entries
  4. Copy of prior and subsequent Federal income tax returns
  5. Copies of State Tax Returns
  6. Copies of prior audit reports from either state or federal agencies
  7. Copies of Forms 940, 941, W-2, and 1099's issued during the tax year
  8. Copies of current Forms W-4's
  9. Copies of sales tax returns incorporating the taxable year
  10. Bank statements and deposit slips for all business and personal accounts including checking, savings or brokerage accounts, for the period December 31, 20XX thru January 31, 20XX
  11. Copies of bank reconciliations, if prepared
  12. Documentation of all nontaxable income
  13. Copies of any 1099's you received
  14. A tour of the business facilities during the regular operating hours the day of the first appointment
  15. Please be prepared to specifically explain and show your invoices, cancelled checks and any other supporting documentation to verify the following account

    a. Other Deductions

                          i.      Outside Services - $XXXX

                          ii.      Materials & Supplies $XXXX

    b. Advertising - $XXXX

    c. Contract Labor - $XXXX

  16. Any other documents, records, or information which may be helpful to explain your tax return and expedite the examination

Now, pay particular attention to Items 15 and 16, above. I will refer to the documentation requested in IDR Items 15 and 16 collectively as the "Backup." Apparently the Prior Representative provided credit card statements to the Revenue Officer rather than the Backup taking the position that that was all that was required and that the taxpayer therefore did not need to produce any Backup since the credit card had been used to PAY for the Backup (i. e., the invoices and other supporting documentation). Furthermore, it appeared that in reliance on the Prior Representative's advice, the taxpayer did not keep the Backup in an organized manner, if at all.

 

Well here was the problem. The Revenue Officer did not feel the credit card statements were proper substantiation in and of themselves. Why? Because the credit card statements only identified a vendor. So for example, the credit card statement might read "Acme Widget Supply, $5,000.00." A particular invoice was NOT identified. WHAT was purchased was not described. NO particular job of the taxpayer was identified. There was no way for the Revenue Officer to tie the credit card statements to the taxpayer's specific claimed deductions. For all the Revenue Officer knew, items that had no relationship to the taxpayer's business were being purchased. Long story short, there was no way to directly connect the credit card entries to the specific deductions being claimed. This opened the door for the service to challenge these deductions. It was a mess ladies and gentlemen and required a lot of "reconstructive accounting" that should not have been necessary in the first place. None of which was aided by the hostile environment created by the Prior Representative.

 

As I often tell my clients, you do not need to be mean and unprofessional in order to be an advocate for your client. Credit card statements are good, but they do not tell the WHOLE story. You need the Backup. Why? Because in an AUDIT, you need the WHOLE story, not just the chapter headings ...

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
Tax Returns and Archeology: The study of the life of ancient (and not so ancient) peoples

  

 

 

 

  

 

By Steven Rubin

 

  

I loved the Jurassic Park trilogy of movies. My oldest son and I must have watched them two dozen times. Heck, I watched them probably more than two dozen times without my oldest son! What can I say ... I love big, angry dinosaurs! I am sure that to some extent these movies idealized the lives of the archeologists portrayed. How about the way Sam Neill's character seems to face down T-Rex after T-Rex without breaking a sweat ... but I digress.

Truth be told, part of my love for archeology is how archeologists can learn so much about our natural world by excavating ancient cities and artifacts, then studying what they reveal. You are probably wondering what does this have to do with tax. Well, I am glad you asked. Just like the study of ancient cities and artifacts can teach archeologists so much, the study of past tax returns can teach so much about a business, its owners and its operations. For example, a companion article in this eNewsletter discusses the role of Capital Accounts in partnerships and how to "see" the Capital Accounts at work by reviewing the relevant partnership tax returns and schedule K-1's.

But what if it becomes necessary to re-construct who were the shareholders, directors and officers of a corporation at a time when for one or more reasons corporate records are lost, destroyed or otherwise unavailable? From time to time, in both a litigation and transactional context it may become important to be able to reconstruct this information.

Well, how about putting on your archeologists hat and let's go digging through the corporation's tax returns. What can they tell us? Well, in past the Form 1120 U. S. Corporation Income Tax Return contained a section called "Schedule E, Compensation of Officers." This section required the corporate taxpayer to provide the name of the officer (although not the office held), as well as the percentage of the corporation stock held by that officer. Thus, this section itself would provide you with who were the officers and  whether these officers were also shareholders; a good start in reconstructing who were the shareholders, directors and officers of a corporation. More recently, this information would be required to be put on a separate "Form 1125-E Compensation of Officers" and attached to the Form 1120 U.S. Corporation Income Tax Return.

And the neat thing (or perhaps not the neat thing depending on your perspective) with tax returns, is that like "dead men ... they tell no tales." Now I am not naïve and I am very much aware that the information put on a tax return may not be entirely accurate (wink, wink). But my point is, and particularly when the parties are all getting along, the information on the tax return is nevertheless probably reliable. When the dispute or context arises much later, and the relevant information is contained and reflected on prior returns, then, except in the rare case where an amendment was filed that relates to the issues at hand, the tax returns will "speak for themselves" and in that sense, "tell no tales." Who were the shareholders, officers and directors in 2007 or 2008? Maybe one of those shareholders, directors or officers all of a suddenly finds that it sure would be nice to be able to establish that he or she was NOT a shareholder, director or officer at a particular point in time. Even if all the corporation's records are lost, destroyed or otherwise unavailable, so long as tax returns were filed, that may be all that is needed to conclusively establish whether or not someone was in fact a shareholder, officer or director at a given point in time.

Now this article barely scratches the surface of the types of information available in a tax return. What were the assets owned by a corporation at a given point in time? When were those assets disposed of? When was money borrowed by the corporation? Was the money ever paid back? The list goes on and on. So, the next time these sorts of questions come up, you will know at least one place where you can aim your "shovels" and start "digging" ...

Beware of angry dinosaurs!


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright 2013 by The Law Offices of Steven D. Rubin, A Professional Corporation. To request addition to or removal from our mailing list contact Steven Rubin at The Law Offices of Steven D. Rubin, A Professional Corporation, 1912 Broadway, Suite 105, Santa Monica, CA 90404, phone (310) 453-7812. The Rubin Tax Law eNews Reporter does not attempt to offer solutions to individual problems, but rather to provide information about current developments in those areas of the law encompassed by our law practice. Readers in need of legal assistance should retain the services of competent counsel.