Mental Health Matters
Forensic Edition
July 2013
 
Published by: Lepage Associates
Psychological & Psychiatric Svs.
 
 First time recipient? See below for info.

Like us on Facebook  Follow us on Twitter  View our profile on LinkedIn

PARENTAL ALIENATION SYNDROME:

STATUS AS OF THE 5th 
EDITION OF
THE DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL 
OF MENTAL DISORDERS 
PUBLISHED MAY 27, 2013

DSM-5
Child custody is a pressing issue in the court given the matter of who is best fit to raise the child is one that has a major impact on the lives of children. Over the past 25 years, a term that has become increasingly popular involving child custody cases is "Parental Alienation Syndrome."

 

The late Richard Gardner was the psychiatrist that came up with the controversial "Parental Alienation Syndrome." He regarded it as a condition in which children are obsessed with criticism of a parent that is often unjustified and/or exaggerated. A parent will "brainwash" the child meaning that the parent is "deliberately bring[ing] about the alienation of the child from the other parent" and it occurs in a very obvious manner. There becomes the sense of a "loved" parent versus a "hated" parent. Another important factor is the contributions the child makes on their own to the denigration of the "hated" parent that is uninfluenced by the "loved" parent (Gardner, 1985) Dr. Douglass Darnall (1999) clarifies the difference between "parental alienation" and "Parental Alienation Syndrome" by saying that parental alienation focuses on the parents' behavior, while Parental Alienation Syndrome focuses on the child's behavior and their unjustifiable denigration towards the target parent.

 

"Parental Alienation Syndrome," however, has been a controversial topic for psychologists since the term was created. Since it is different than parental alienation itself, it has been sought after by many to be included in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition, that was published on May 27, 2013. Vice chair of the DSM task force was quoted as saying back in 2010,
"There is not sufficient scientific evidence to warrant its inclusion in the DSM" and said that there is a "slim" chance that it would be placed in the DSM-5 (Crary). That prediction came true, and it is not included in the DSM-5. 

 

References:

Crary, David. "Psychiatric experts assess parental alienation."

Washington Times. Oct 2010.

Darnall, Douglass. "Parental Alienation: Not in the Best Interest of the Children." North Dakota Law Review, Volume 75, 1999, p 323-364.
Gardner, R. A. "Recent Trends in Divorce and Custody Litigation." Academy Forum, Volume 29, Number 2, 1985, p. 3-7.New York: The American Academy of Psychoanalysis.

Herold, Conners, & Moore. "American Psychiatric Association Board of Trustees Approves DSM-5: Diagnostic manual passes major milestone before May 2013 publication." American Psychiatric Association. Dec 2012. 

Please Welcome our New Psychiatrist 

Available Evenings & Saturdays!
 
Jay Patel
Jay Patel, MD


Dr. Jay Patel completed both Child/Adolescent and Adult Psychiatry training at East Carolina University. His specialty training allows him to treat the full range of mental health concerns in children, adolescents and adults.

 

                   

New Links to Weekly and Monthly

Local Articles

Featuring Dr. Tina Lepage

 
READ her weekly Column at http://chapelboro.com   
mom&daughterlaughing



PARENTING PAGE
A humorous insider look
at a child psychologist
raising a child.

                   

 

  
  
  
laughing mom and daughter 
 
 
 
ASK ANYTHING!
A monthly child advice article

 

 

 

 

READ Dr. Lepage's monthly Article at 

  
Lepage Associates
Lepage Associates
Solution-Based Psychological
 and Psychiatric Services
  
________________________________________________________________________________________
Disclaimer

Permissions: We are careful not to overload in-boxes, and send the newsletter only six times per year (every other month); we have received much positive feedback on the newsletter and hope you enjoy it. If you are receiving this newsletter for the first time, it should be because: you signed up for it on our web site or at an event; have met, spoken with, emailed, or attended a training or meeting with someone who works here and provided your email for reciprocal business communication; work for a business that has an existing professional relationship with us and receives our business communications; or are a client who opted-in on your intake form. If a friend, colleague, or client of yours thought you'd be interested and signed you up, hopefully they let you know they did so. If you have received this newsletter in error (our sincere apologies), and no longer wish to receive it, please use our one-click Unsubscribe below to stop all future transmissions. Thank you.