Well, not me anymore, because I had the gall to think independently of a majority of the board once too often.
Yes, I was "put on notice" by newly elected Jill Johnson that she would "remove her vote for me as chair" if I did not start following the wishes of the majority of the board.
Apparently being duly elected by the voters of Island County does not in itself obligate you to the duty of presiding over the commission when it is your turn. No, it seems now-a-days you need to be able to show a majority of the board you can engage in "group think" or "consensus".
Well, why not just have a dictator then? Who needs alternative ideas when we can all just walk together in lock-step?
(The unfortunate thing is this explosive, abusive behavior is beginning to show itself all too regularly at the county campus. This is what makes the conferences I attend, with work-sessions on things like civility, so very valuable. I am becoming concerned for the staff and am working on devising ways to protect them from abuse that may come their way.)
Back to why the chairmanship was taken from me. There were a number of whisperings, "we need a new chair" during work-sessions when I would show dissent. But it escalated when I was going to attend a public meeting in the North Whidbey portion of my district that the Sheriff was organizing about the law and justice levy.
Attending a public meeting, (especially in their own district) is the right of any individual commissioner and a majority of the board has no authority to form consensus and disallow it. That is just what my colleagues claim they did and felt was reason worthy of denying my district supporters their right of chair.
It was suggested to me by a colleague from another county (a functional one) that I reach out to the Attorney General's Office for clarification on commissioner authority, restrictions on special sessions and authority to remove an elected chair.