Responsible Drilling Alliance

RDA - Protecting Communities and Special Places

 e-Newsletter, February 2013 v. 6     

Take Action!
 

 Ask President Obama to take a closer look at liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports.  

 

www.TimeOutLNGexports.org   

For more information on the issue, see the NRP interview with Sarah Ladislaw of the Center for Strategic and International Studies. 

 

 

From the NPR interview:

 

 

This is a huge question that's facing the federal government right now. Do we want to export this to other places? Will that have a price impact here?... if you believe that you need to de-carbonize the energy sector for the purposes of doing something about climate change, then you have to seriously evaluate what this oil and gas means in that context... How do you put yourself on a pathway to being able to reduce emissions over the longer term, while not, you know, killing this golden goose, which is essentially providing low cost energy for the United States right now in a time of fiscal distress, offering the potential for lots of jobs going forward, and putting you sort of in a different energy position from a strategic standpoint?

RDA In The News

   

RDA sponsors large ad in NY Times calling for a "time out" to examine the potential impacts from approval of facilities to produce LNG to export.

 

 The 1/3 page ad appeared in the Feb 13th issue. RDA joined more than 40 

groups to sponsor the ad urging the President to consider the impacts on both our economy and environment from exporting a significant percentage of America's natural gas for use by other nations.  

 

The US Dept. of Energy is currently evaluating the business-side economics of exports. The NG industry wants to liquefy and export shale gas to countries like China that have a huge demand for energy and will pay a great premium for LNG, while leaving our communities to deal with consequences, including paying an increased domestic price for the commodity and bringing us closer to the day when we will have to import NG here. The DOE is not considering the water, air and public health effects, and we ask the President to consider the long term cost effects of those too in the equation.  

 

This Weeks Headlines

 

Any Connection?

 

Our Bradford County friend, dairy farmer Carol French, posted a disconcerting comment on Facebook on Monday that we edited for you below. Please friend Carol on Facebook if you want the full story and to follow the problems she and others have been having in Bradford County. This is second report of late term spontaneous abortion in farm animals RDA had in two weeks and there have been others in the past, all from people near drilling operations wondering if there is a connection. If any of you have had or know of a similar situation, please let us know: 

 

We made our way to the barn to only find that another cow aborts her calf. She was eight months into her pregnancy. Before I was done milking my cows, cow number three starts to abort her calf. She too is eight months into her pregnancy... A cow that aborts during this time of her pregnancy doesn't "come into" her milk real well. This Farmer counts on the replacement calves to continue farming the same number of cows. I have heard from other farmers with "changed" water having similar problems. 

 

See a video of Carol before this latest incident and hear her story of shale gas development in Bradford County.

 

Sound Familiar? Colorado Wrestling With Setbacks 

and Waivers: 

 

The Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission recently approved 500-foot buffers between new wells and homes on Monday. The oil and gas industry opposed the setback, which replace a 350 ft. in urban areas and 150 ft. in rural areas. Environmental and community groups want a 1,000 ft. setback, and will push for legislation to get it. The industry is already whining about the need create "regulatory stability" at the same time the rules allow for variances to be applied for in rural areas. 

 

A big difference over PA's 500-foot setback is the new Colorado rules makes operators drilling within 1,000 ft. of a home use closed-loop systems that eliminate waste fluid pits, and also require devices to capture air emissions and control noise. 

 

Drilling within 1,000 ft, of a school or nursing home will need commission approval. 

 

Another difference: Setbacks being subject to the political process on their own instead of being part of 170 plus pages of law on all fronts of shale gas development as happened here

 

 

How Much Longer Will They Put Up With It?

 

Ace reporter Rachel Morgan's account of Youngstown residents reacting to 20,000 gallons of suspected fracking wastewater dumped into a storm sewer leading directly into the Mahoning River makes you wonder what happens if Ohio stops accepting PA's toxic gas industry fluids? 

  

"We've opened up our arms to Pennsylvania's dirty,  

tainted water,"... "Hopefully, this spill will send up an alarm." 

 

Read More

Join RDA
 
We welcome your active participation, and are in need of help for special events, publicity, research, and other projects. Contact us for details.
 
As a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization, RDA relies on donations for the important work we do. In order for RDA to continue its valuable education and advocacy outreach in 2013, please consider a tax-free contribution to our efforts.
 
 
Responsible Drilling Alliance  
 

Donations may also be
sent by mail to: 

Responsible Drilling Alliance 
PO Box 502 
Williamsport, PA 17703   
  
 Thank you for your support!

The Chamber Pot Stinks 

 

On the first Monday of each month, Williamsport Sun-Gazette readers are treated to the musings of our County's esteemed Chamber of Commerce President, Dr. Vincent Matteo. In the paper the column is called "The Chamber View. Many readers have an apt nickname for it: The Chamber Pot.  

 

This month's Chamber Pot needs to be emptied promptly. It stinks. There is little to argue with on our friend's introductory, light-hearted treatise on hypocrisy: the presumably not-biodiesel-powered bus tour that celebrities Yoko Ono, Sean Lennon and others took around Susquehanna County last month on their "Don't Stick Your Drill In My Aquifer" extravaganza. They are an easy target. 

 

But from that opening, our longtime C of C head goes into an utterly misleading diatribe: 

 

While I am on the subject of natural gas production and the economic gains it has brought to our region without any major environmental problems to date, I was wondering if it is just me, or have others noticed how the environmental extremists have switched much of their attacks from water quality to air quality? My guess is that, as expected, air quality will not be a major problem either, the extremists will move onto something else - not sure what it will be, but you can bet they will find something else. 

 

Either his definition of the word "region" doesn't go much beyond Williamsport, or he has been well-coached by his coterie of industry pals on the Governor's Marcellus Shale Committee and carefully chose the words "gas production" as opposed to "gas drilling" when referring to the lack of "major" problems. After all, those compressor station explosions in Susquehanna and Bedford Counties, took place pretty far away from "our region", and besides, none of the throngs (not) of people working at those sites were killed or maimed, so the incidents might not be considered major, unless they happened to have occurred near your home.  

 

As to the problems associated with gas drilling in a region of, say, a 50-mile radius of Williamsport, the center of the PA shale gas universe, Dr. Matteo (like our Governor) either doesn't know about the problems or doesn't care. In truth, there have been many major problems, that is if you have respect for the law - which surely he does. How could he not be aware of these incidents? 

  • Blowouts in Clearfield County and Leroy Township 

  • Methane and fluid-based geyser in Union Township, Tioga County 

  • Dead sheep that drank from their farmer's well while the geyser was flowing 

  • 75 - 100 holes in the "freshwater" impoundment liner that leaked flowback into the ground near municipal water supply wells in Duncan Township, Tioga 

  • A bouncing creek bed in Leroy 

  • Bubbling methane in two creeks in Sullivan County 

  • Big problems on Paradise Road, Sugar Run, Alba and the numerous troubles of Bradford homeowners 

  • Methane that bubbled for months in Little Muncy Creek 

  • Dangerous methane levels in dozens of drinking water wells in eastern Lycoming County 

  • Foaming 2BE and the leaked contents of a entire tanker load of partially treated flowback into Pine Creek 

  • Truckers caught deliberately dumping flowback in fields near Muncy and Roaring Branch  

If Vince hasn't heard of these and many other spills, leaks, illegal dumps and near disasters, he can ask the DEP.  If he actually has some clue as to what is happening in the real world of shale gas drilling, it is obvious that his definition of  "major environmental problems" is different from our "environmental extremist" view - and that of most rational people.  

 

Does he not read national press coverage of Williamsport? Did he miss the statement in the New York Times back in 2011 by one his own town's business people: 

 

"No one wants to admit it, but at some point, even with reuse of this water, you have to confront the disposal question," said Brent Halldorson, chief operating officer of Aqua-Pure/Fountain Quail Water Management, adding that the wastewater contains barium, strontium and radioactive elements that need to be removed. 

 

For a clue as to why we "extremists" are still talking about water quality and many other issues, read the articles in this letter, Vince. We invite you to think about the  many valid reasons for the growing opposition to shale gas development here and around the nation. We invite you to help protect the quality of life for those you help bring in to work here, and for the rest of us. Join in the fight to get your Governor to keep the surface of one extremely valuable portion of Lycoming County gas-development-free, as legally he can do on most of the Clarence Moore tracts in the Loyalsock State Forest. 

 

Finally, we invite you to stop disparaging concerned parents, rural small business owners, impacted families and those of us who have legitimate issues, questions and concerns about the future value of our homes and quality of our lives here - concerns that include our family's health, the longer term economy and ecology of this area, and the impact of shale gas development on the atmosphere of this planet.  

 

Ralph Kisberg for RDA 

 

 

SOTU 2013: POTUS Misses Boatus

 

In Tuesday night's State of the Union address, President Obama revealed his understanding of the realities of NG development on America's landmass, our long term future, and the planet's atmosphere don't differ much from those of Pennsylvania's Governor Tom Corbett and other gasophiles. His main difference is in more enthusiasm for government involvement in our energy future:  

 

Now is the time to reach a level of research and development not seen since the height of the Space Race. And today, no area holds more promise than our investments in American energy. 

 

The President praised the rise in NG production and the American CO2 emission reduction that has come with it, but fails to mention an additional impetus behind that reduction was a wounded economy. He also choose to ignore methane emissions as a much more potent greenhouse gas (over a shorter period) than CO2: 

 

We produce more natural gas than ever before...And over the last four years, our emissions of the dangerous carbon pollution that threatens our planet have actually fallen. 

 

The President at least acknowledged the threat of climate change:

  

But for the sake of our children and our future, we must do more to combat climate change... we can choose to believe in the overwhelming judgment of science - and act before it's too late. 

 

But while he evidenced that inkling of understanding, he does not yet fully grasp what a tremendous force for economic growth a renewable energy revolution will be:

 

Four years ago, other countries dominated the clean energy market and the jobs that came with it. We've begun to change that. Last year, wind energy added nearly half of all new power capacity in America. So let's generate even more. Solar energy gets cheaper by the year - so let's drive costs down even further. 

 

It's a start, but the President falls into the trap set by the NG public relations machine by choosing to enable the untrustworthy oil and gas industry to put the cart before the donkey by gobbling up more predominant subsurface rights to (over) produce their product:

 

...the natural gas boom has led to cleaner power and greater energy independence...(much of our new-found energy is drawn from lands and waters that we, the public, own together).... That's why my Administration will keep cutting red tape and speeding up new oil and gas permits. But I also want to work with this Congress to encourage the research and technology that helps natural gas burn even cleaner and protects our air and water.

  

So tonight, I propose we use some of our oil and gas revenues (from public land leases) to fund an Energy Security Trust that will drive new research and technology to shift our cars and trucks off oil for good. 

 

He proposed a glacially paced stab at vital conservation efforts:

 

...let's cut in half the energy wasted by our homes and businesses over the next twenty years. The states with the best ideas to create jobs and lower energy bills by constructing more efficient buildings will receive federal support to help make it happen.

 

But like most climate focused NGO's, both the President and his fellow NG travelers continues to miss the fact that worn out methods of large scale federal tax credits reduce government revenues at a time when the treasury can ill afford it. And chances are good that the Prez and both sides of the aisle continue to fail to see that carefully devised and distributed energy consumer dividends, derived from the production of fossil fuels, and mandated to be used for conservation and decentralized renewable energy hardware and technologies at the building level, chosen by consumers, not government, supplemented with private sector backed R and D aided by well funded government labs, is the 21st Century path to jump starting a tsunami of market driven job creating solutions that will dwarf the number of jobs taken away by the resulting lessening of fossil fuel production. 

 

Ralph Kisberg for RDA