|
Informed Compliance for eManifest Highway Mode Extended to Fall 2013
|
The Canada Border Services Agency has advised trade organizations and commercial stakeholders that due to "late approval of the regulations" involved, the informed compliance period regarding the third phase of the Advance Commercial Information (ACI) eManifest highway mode that was to have ended May 2013 is now being extended until the fall of 2013.
The CBSA will provide 60 days notice of the new mandatory date.
Even though the informed compliance period has been extended, all carriers are nevertheless encouraged to transition to the eManifest system thereby enabling them to transmit shipment information to the CBSA prior to arrival. Utilizing eManifest helps improve border security while reducing border wait times. Click here to find out more about GHY's eManifest solution. |
|

 |

 |
 |
|
| Sequestration Effects on the North American Supply Chain |  |
For logistics providers providing services such as temperature-controlled warehousing and distribution, fiscal cuts could mean delays in inspections, certifications and recall notifications which could endanger the safety of the pharma-ceutical and food supplies.
According to the Federal Aviation Agency, the mandatory cuts could possibly mean eliminating some airport control towers all together and eliminating overnight staffing at other control towers. This would impact air cargo carriers such as FedEx and UPS who utilize night flights to move a good bit of cargo.
Like other government agencies, along with spending cuts, the Customs Border and Patrol will face mandatory furloughs beginning in April. Entering the country whether along the Mexican or Canadian border, a port or airport will result in a longer wait. According to the CBP, cargo release wait times at border entry points will double from the current two hours to about four to five hours.
|
| Wood Packaging Materials Update |  | |
USDA-APHIS authorities advise the status quo for unmarked WPM remains in effect for 2013. The CFIA also confirm that USDA-APHIS are moving forward with the proposed rule to lift the current exemption from International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures No. 15 (ISPM No. 15) requirements for unmarked WPM originating in and moving between Canada and the United States. However, as the final regulation has yet been approved and with minimum implementation and enforcement requirements to provide stakeholders adequate time to prepare, no action will be taken before 2014 at earliest and full implementation will not likely occur before 2015.
With respect to the status quo for unmarked WPM originating in and moving between Canada and the United States, the CFIA recommends and reminds industry that a declaration or statement of origin for the unmarked WPM should be made on shipping documents to allow Customs to readily verify their origin. This is particularly important if the goods in the shipment are of a non-U.S/Canadian foreign origin and/or the shipment contains both marked and unmarked WPM. Shipments may be delayed or not approved for release if Customs is unable to verify the origin of the WPM at the border.
|
|
US Labeling Rules Cost Canada Hog Farmers $2 Billion
|  | |
U.S. country-of-origin meat-labeling rules have directly cost Canada's hog and pork industry more than $2 billion, according to a report that could help determine retaliation against U.S. exports if Washington does not change its requirements.
The United States must bring the labeling rules, known by the acronym COOL, into compliance with a World Trade Organization ruling by May 23, 2013, according to a WTO decision released last month.
But citing no apparent movement by the U.S. Congress since the original WTO ruling in mid-2012, the Canadian Pork Council has called on Ottawa to impose retaliatory tariffs on imports from the United States if there is no change by the WTO deadline.
|
|
The High Cost of Ignoring America's Infrastructure
|  | |
The transportation and energy networks are the lifelines of the U.S. economy, powering factories, enabling the delivery of goods and materials, and sustaining quality of life. But investment in our nation's infrastructure has fallen perilously low, and the economic repercussions could be disastrous.
Infrastructure investment is vital. The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) recently warned that unless the U.S. devotes an additional $1.57 billion per year on infrastructure through 2020, the country will lose $3.1 trillion in gross national product (GNP) and $1.1 trillion in trade. On an individual level, the average American will lose $3,100 each year in personal disposable income, resulting in $2.4 trillion in lost consumer spending in the next seven years and the subsequent elimination of 3.1 million jobs.
|
|
US and Mexico Sign Joint Work Plan for Mutual Recognition of Trusted Trader Programs
|  | |
U.S. CBP and Mexico's Tax Administration Service (SAT) signed a Joint Work Plan recently that lays out the path to mutual recognition of the two countries' Authorized Economic Operator programs: CBP's Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT) and SAT's New Certified Companies Scheme.
The plan, expected to be implemented in two years, would allow for companies enrolled in one country's program to receive reciprocal benefits from the other with the result of both further securing the international supply chain and facilitating trade between the U.S. and Mexico.
|
|
|
| GHY E-Newsletter March 2013 |
President Obama Announces Launch of EU-US Trade Agreement In his most recent State of the Union address, U.S. President Barack Obama announced that Washington would launch negotiations with the European Union this year on a comprehensive venture called the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). Negotiators in the United States and Europe aspire to make the TTIP the most advanced economic agreement in the world, and any deal will likely go beyond the most basic aspect of free trade -- namely, the elimination of tariffs. More broadly, Europe and the United States can be expected to align their regulations regarding manufacturing and services such as finance and telecommunications. The deal would also address new frontiers of economic growth, including the U.S. shale gas market and online intellectual property. They also hope to eliminate almost all barriers to foreign direct investment. With a combined market of 800 million people, the U.S. and European economies together account for approximately 50 percent of global GDP, and the trade, investment, and commerce that passes between them amounts to $5 trillion annually. The elimination of tariffs alone, which average out to four percent on goods traded between the United States and Europe, could remove a $24 billion impediment to transatlantic trade. From a strategic perspective, a U.S.-EU trade deal would allow the United States and Europe to maintain their sway over global economic governance. Both recognize that their ability to set global rules will diminish as economic power shifts to the Asia-Pacific region. In the coming decade, no one power will be able to drive the international agenda. But if they join forces, the United States and Europe can channel their combined economic weight to keep control of the reins of the global economic order. |
|
GHY Achieves 50 Best Managed Companies Re-qualification for 5th Consecutive Year
GHY International wishes to thank our clients, associates, and coaches for their contribution to our re-qualification for the fifth consecutive year as one of Canada's Best Managed Companies - continuing our Gold Standard Level certified provider of exclusive customs brokerage services in North America.
|
|
CETA's Closing Window of Opportunity
Canadian and European officials have been trying to hammer out a comprehensive economic trade agreement (CETA) since 2009 with the predicted date for a conclusion to the negotiations changing repeatedly over the talks' duration. Having failed to wrap up a deal last year as it had pledged, the Harper government now says there is currently no precise end date. "I have not committed to a firm time line. We're not going to be rushed into a deal that doesn't serve Canadians," Canada's Trade Minister Ed Fast said recently. "There is a small basket of issues left and as in any negotiations, they are the toughest ones to resolve," adding that he is "certainly committed to negotiating around or through those."
Sensitive issues that remain outstanding include access for agricultural goods, opening up government procurement markets, the extension of pharmaceutical patents, and oversight of financial institutions.
While Ottawa would prefer not to be rushed, various outside factors are threatening to close Canada's window of opportunity for reaching a deal if it doesn't. The key such factor is the emergence of the United States as another free trade dance partner for the EU. Since the American market represents a far bigger economic prize than Canada, this development effectively serves to compromise the Canadian negotiating position.
Impending elections in the European Parliament is another factor creating a sense of urgency in Canada-EU trade negotiations. If an agreement isn't reached and ratified before 2014 elections, then substantial delays can be expected in the ratification process.
|
|
Chinese Economy, not the Canadian Loonie, Explains Canada's Shifting Tradewinds
The "lost decade" of essentially no growth in Canadian exports is due less to the strong dollar and more to the rise of China and other emerging economies. A Conference Board of Canada report for the Global Commerce Centre explains how Canada's trade has shifted this "two-gear" trade model in which the United States is relatively less important and emerging markets offer the greatest opportunity for growth. Canada's overall export volumes (both goods and services) changed little in the 2000s. Exports to the United States have been flat since the since the turn of the century, while exports to emerging markets grew by 80%. The strong loonie alone does not explain this trend. While Canadian exports to the U.S. stagnated, Canadian imports from the U.S. should have risen with the higher dollar, and they have not. Yet, over the same period, the Canadian dollar also rose against many other currencies, such as the euro, the British pound, the Chinese yuan, and the Mexican peso. And in each case, Canada's bilateral trade increased.
Since the dawn of the 2000s, what Canada trades has changed. A decade ago, five key products - transportation equipment, pulp and paper, electronic products, plastics and wood products - accounted for almost half of Canadian exports. Today, the top five consists of oil and gas, mineral products, chemicals, primary metals and food products. Other areas of trade strength in recent years include professional and financial services.
The emergence of China on the world stage has led to a realignment of North American trading patterns. A new trade equilibrium is developing among China, Canada and the United States. Canada is losing market share in the U.S. to China, and Chinese imports are capturing market share in Canada from the United States. However, the Chinese market provides massive opportunities for Canadian firms.
The report Walking the Silk Road: Understanding Canada's Changing Trade Patterns is published by the Conference Board's Global Commerce Centre. The Centre provides evidence-based tools to help companies and governments respond successfully to the trends reshaping the global business environment.
|
|
Amendments to the GPT Tariff
The current legislation for the GPT (General Preferential Tariff) as contained in the Customs Tariff is set to expire on June 30, 2014. The GPT legislation is based on a 10-year cycle and has previously been renewed three times since its implementation in 1974. Most developed economies have established a preferential tariff regime for developing countries, but these vary considerably in regard to the countries and products that they cover. Canada currently extends the GPT coverage to 175 beneficiary countries which covers more than 80% of the tariff items and to which either a duty free rate or a preferential rate applies, but does not include most apparel, footwear and certain agricultural products. Under the Economic Action Plan 2012 the government has undertaken a comprehensive review of the GPT. Over time, since the introduction of the GPT in 1974, significant shifts in the income level and trade competitiveness of certain developing countries have taken place. This has necessitated a review of the original policy intent of the GPT which was to encourage imports from developing countries in order to promote their economic growth and export earnings. Certain countries during this period have become among the world's largest and most influential economies of the 21st century. Among these are the so-called BRICS countries which include Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. All of these countries are currently entitled to the GPT tariff in Canada.
The government proposes to modify the list of beneficiary countries that are currently entitled to the GPT based on a countries income or its share of world exports according to latest World Bank and World Trade Organization statistics. Under these proposals, 72 countries which currently enjoy the benefits of the GPT, are tentatively scheduled to have their GPT eligibility withdrawn effective July 1, 2014. Notably among these countries, in addition to the previous BRIC countries mentioned, are Hong Kong, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, South Korea, and Thailand. The GPT benefit, under this proposal, would continue to apply to 103 countries after June 30, 2014. These countries, to mention a few, include Bangladesh, Cambodia, Egypt, Laos, Pakistan, Philippines, Sri Lanka, and Vietnam.
|
|
CBP to Publish Seizure and Forfeiture Notices on DOJ Website
U.S. Customs and Border Protection has issued a final rule that, effective Feb. 28, will allow for the publication of notices of seizure and intent to forfeit on an official government forfeiture Web site. CBP believes this change will reduce administrative costs and improve the effectiveness of its notice procedures because Internet publication will reach a broader range of the public and provide access to more parties who may have an interest in the seized property. CBP has authority to seize property violating certain laws enforced or administered by CBP or U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Such seized property may be forfeited and disposed of in a manner specified by applicable provisions of law, which generally authorize the government to take possession of and legally acquire title to the seized property. Under the CBP forfeiture procedure, a party may assert a claim to the seized property through judicial or administrative proceedings.
Under this final rule CBP will post all seizure and forfeiture notices for 30 consecutive days on an official government forfeiture Web site (which CBP has said will be the Department of Justice's forfeiture website). For property appraised in excess of $5,000, CBP will no longer need to publish administrative seizure and forfeiture notices in newspapers (although it will still have discretion to do so) and will notify all known parties-in-interest of the Web site posting and the expected date of publication. For seized property appraised at $5,000 or less, CBP will continue to also post notice at the customhouse or U.S. Border Patrol sector office.
|
|
Shippers May be in for a Trucking Industry Capacity Crunch
The annual Transportation Buying Trends Survey, conducted by Cormark Securities Inc. in partnership with CITT and CTL, shows shippers already believe that LTL and TL trucking will have the greatest pricing power amongst all modes in 2013. But so far, shippers expect increases to core pricing (excluding surcharges) in both the LTL and TL trucking sectors to be modest with about half expecting no more than a 5% increase and about a fifth expecting rates to remain flat with 2012. Fewer than 10% of shippers we surveyed expect core pricing rates to spike beyond 5%. Motor carrier executives themselves, although wasting no opportunity at industry conferences to speak about the need for significant price increases to repair the damage to their bottom lines since the recession, predominantly expect core rate increases lower than 4%. And almost 40% of the carrier executives we surveyed actually believed rates in 2013 would be about the same as 2012.
Throw in the reality that the year-over-year increase in the fuel surcharge in 2012 was just 7%, compared to 41% the previous year, and there is hardly cause for concern among shippers about sharp pressure to ground transportation budgets. These are certainly good times for purchasers of transportation services when the mode they feel has the greatest pricing power is unlikely to push for more than a 5% rate increase.
But there are some factors at play that could change that scenario. To find out more, click here to view/download the presentation of the survey's findings from our website.
|
|
New Value-Added Trade Statistic Show Canada Exporting Less to U.S.
According to new data from the OECD and WTO, Canadian exports to the U.S. are much lower than conventional trade statistics indicate.
The collaborative Trade in Value-Added Database (TiVA) released this year is the first attempt by the two bodies to better measure the impact of intermediate imports in global value chains. Unlike conventional trade statistics, which only measure the final export of a good from one country to another, value-added trade statistics try to capture every stage of the production process - including all the countries and inputs involved. When applied to Canada, the most noticeable finding is a decrease in Canadian exports to its largest trading partner. "The U.S. is by far Canada's main trading partner, accounting for 58% of its exports and 44% of its imports in value-added terms," they say in their analysis. "This is significantly lower than the share of gross exports (70%) and imports (48%) with the US, reflecting intermediate input trade within NAFTA."
The Conference Board of Canada reached a similar conclusion a year ago, concluding that, in value-added terms, the U.S. share of Canadian trade was closer to 61.8% than 69% - where conventional measures pegged it.
Canada is highly integrated in global value chains - predominantly with the US - in the transport vehicles industry, as illustrated by a 42% share of foreign content in gross exports and by the fact that 58% of imported transport parts are used for exports.
|
U.S. Informal Entry and Canadian Low Value Shipment (LVS) Thresholds Raised Effective January 8, 2013, the LVS threshold increased to an estimated value for duty not exceeding CAD $2,500. Also coming into effect on the same date, Canada increased to CAD $2,500 the low-value threshold for exemption from the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Certificate of Origin requirements. The U.S. Customs and Border Protection Agency likewise increased from $2,000 to the statutory maximum of $2,500 the value below which merchandise may qualify for informal entry. In order to make system changes required to ensure a seamless transition, major couriers such as FedEx and UPS did not begin processing eligible LVS shipments at the new value threshold until the beginning of February. |
|
|
|
|