Pursuant to a Ninth Circuit Court ruling, the Board decided that Hacienda Hotel Inc. Gaming Corp. violated NLRA Section 8(a)(5) and (1) when it unilaterally stopped processing dues check offs after the termination of the CBA. The NLRB agreed with the Ninth Circuit that bargaining to impasse was required prior to stopping dues checkoff after the CBA had expired under the circumstances. Typically, the Board would order a reimbursement of any dues the violating party failed to check off. Here, the remedies were limited to a cease and desist order, requirement to bargain before making unilateral changes, restoration of the dues check off, and a remedial notice posting due the length of litigation on the matter.