Parimal,
Recreational boater advocacy has been and continues to be a significant issue and a very real need. Our website is up to date and I believe it explains our role pretty well. So it's perhaps a bit repetitive to say here that we are the completely volunteer, entirely uncompensated lobbyists for a special interest group, the several thousand recreational boaters of Dana Point Harbor.
"Lobbyists" and "Special Interest Group" - these two terms sound kind of unsavory don't they? We don't think so! It is a fact that the boaters of Dana Point Harbor are consistently ignored by fellow stakeholders... the merchants, marina operators and other commercial and government sales-tax-promoting interests that call most of the shots in Dana Point Harbor.
Take a look at the latest Orange County Fund 108 budget and plan (not yet approved) for fiscal year 2015/2016. It's on our website too, but I've also attached it here for quick reference. If you scan the document you'll see the words "boat" , "ocean" or "dock" are mentioned exactly twice in seven pages. This seems really odd at first blush, because Dana Point Harbor is after all, a harbor, "a place for boats" according to all the dictionaries I've read.
Mentioned only twice? Really? Yes!
The first time one of these three words appears is on page one, in a sentence regarding the County's strategic goal of "Facilitating recreational boating, effective communication with various stakeholder groups, and harbor commercial opportunities." (By the way, we're not certain what this sentence really means, either in general or specifics.) The second time one of these three words appears is on page four. There the word Boat appears in a sentence regarding The County's planned re-purposing of existing marina surface area for an already approved commercial parking structure, and therefore the need for an approved CDP (coastal development permit) for a proposed boat barn. According to The County's current redevelopment plans, building this boat barn is also necessary in order to get the parking structure built. Note that this is the officially sanctioned, 32+ million dollar alternative to continuing to use the surface area where over 500 boats are stored today. Note also that over 90% of boaters we've surveyed don't want and won't use a boat barn.
Above clearly illustrates our point, but that said, it's really not The County's fault. Their priorities and interests are clearly focused elsewhere. Regardless, this fact also remains quite clear: the Dana Point Boaters Association fills a huge void.
The boaters we present are paddlers, kayakers, fisherman, cruisers, power boaters and sailors. It doesn't matter whether these boaters have a boat in the water, a boat in dry storage somewhere, or perhaps they just enjoy and care about recreational boating. We seek their input and direction on an ongoing basis and we try very hard to represent their best interests. Our goal is this: to be effective harbor management and redevelopment planning stakeholders. Our operating agenda is this: to always be at the table when decisions are being made about the operations and future of our beautiful harbor.
Our view is that Dana Point Harbor should first and always be a wonderful place for boating. All other priorities, while important, are secondary. What this means to us is that we must stay engaged and make sure that the needs of all Dana Point boaters are understood and fully appreciated by other stakeholders. Further, that a fair and appropriate value is always placed on addressing these needs.
Our consistent focus is fixed on working with those local, regional, state and federal government agencies, as well as the various private parties who directly and indirectly contribute to the harbor decision making process. We're recreational boaters too, who became alarmed by the draconian plans for harbor redevelopment that The County made public for the first time in 2006. Since then, dozens and dozens of quite significant changes have been made to the harbor's redevelopment plans and the direction here has been decidedly for the good. However, our job will never be done. Recreational boaters will always need their spokesman, especially during the next few years ahead.
During the review cycle for the Commercial Core Reconstruction CDP that was approved by The County, Dana Point Planning Commission, Dana Point City Council, and then the California Coastal Commission last fall, we cited a long list of well documented boater issues. (To read click here) Both the sponsoring and approving government agencies acknowledged the vast majority these issues were entirely valid (and therefore would require mitigation during the project) but somehow they also decided that these issues were (just) "operational in nature" rather than relevant to planning. We of course strongly disagreed, but we lost that battle. So we are now engaged to address prior to and during the upcoming commercial core reconstruction phase. We anticipate success here, as we have an cooperative working relationship with OC Dana Point Harbor (the government agency on point in the decision making process), but it is still too soon to discuss our results in specifics.
Rodger