Electrician Reveals Horrific Injuries After Explosion at Scottish Bomb Factory

Published by Mirror -UK
April  19,  2015

An electrician has told how his ears "melted off" in a high-voltage explosion after a giant defense firm ignored safety laws.

 

Stevie Delargey also suffered horrific burns to his hands and neck and was off work for almost a year as he endured terrifying flashbacks of the accident.

 

The 51-year-old was hired as a contractor to replace capacitors at Raytheon Systems' bomb factory in Glenrothes - while the building's electrical system was live. A capacitor fell on to the live conductor, causing a "flashover" that severely injured Stevie and a colleague.

 

Stevie, who had carried out work on the plant for decades, had asked Raytheon to isolate the section he was working on from the electricity supply - but bosses at the American company refused, because they didn't want to interrupt production.

 

He said: "There was an electrical arc and it exploded in my face."

"My head went on fire and I had to pat it out with my hands. The skin was dripping off my face like wax. My ears were melting off - they're smaller now."

 

Raytheon, who last year made a profit of £65million in the UK alone, were last week fined £24,000 over the incident.  Stevie hit out at the fine, saying: "I think £24,000 is a paltry sum for a global company of that size.

 


Download FlashTrack Process Comparison - See For Yourself 


Facility Results has launched a new website dedicated to providing full documentation, tutorials and knowledge base for FlashTrack. 

The Arc Flash Data Collection Software.





This website is designed for the user to "meet" FlashTrack. 
To Learn More Go To
April 17, 2015 - OSHA Fines Duke Energy  $90,000  

Electrician's apprentice, Christopher Lee Dasher was testing and repairing electrical transformers at a substation in Reddick when he was electrocuted by more than 10,000 volts.   

   

 On Oct. 15, 2014, Dasher used a circuit testing technique that bypassed safety protocols designed to protect workers from electrical currents. He contacted an energized circuit and later died from injuries he sustained. Duke Energy knew workers bypassed safety protocols to conduct testing, but it did not enforce safety standards. Due to this practice, the company has a history of nonfatal shock injuries.  

 

The U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration inspected the utility company after learning of Dasher's injury.  Proposed penalties total $90,000.

 

OSHA Inspectors found one willful and five serious violations.

 

One Willful Violation:

 

  • Failure to have a qualified observer present during testing that could immediately de-energize circuits.

 

Five Serious Violations:

  • Failure to ensure that transformers were grounded and safety checked between each test and to provide training to workers who assisted with transformer testing.
  • Failure to ensure controlled access to the test area to protect workers from electrical shock hazards.
OSHA has created resources to protect workers from electrical hazards and proposes that Duke Energy be placed in the agency's Severe Violator Enforcement Program for demonstrating indifference to its OSH Act obligations to provide a safe and healthful workplace for employees.

 



ALL NEW VIDEOS - for the Industry's #1 Arc Flash Data Collection Software!
Are You Compliant With Your PPE?
Facility Results carries all the top-rated Personal Protective Equipment to fit your company's needs.   We have Salisbury, Carhartt, and more. MIS PPE Photo

Some of our top sellers include:
  • Electrical Insulated Gloves
  • Head Gear Kits
  • Clothing Kits
  • Insulated Tool Kits

Big News:  NFPA 70E - 2015 Standard Released  

   

 

The 2015 edition of NFPA 70E introduces a major change in how stakeholders evaluate electrical risk -- so that owners, managers, and employees can work together to ensure an electrically safe working area and comply with OSHA 1910 Subpart S and OSHA 1926 Subpart K.

  • Key changes throughout the Standard replace the phrase "hazard analysis" with "risk assessment" to enable a shift in awareness about the potential for failure.

  • Change in naming from "Hazard Risk Category" to "Arc Flash PPE Category."
  • Elimination of Hazard Risk Category 0.
  • Requirement added for proper maintenance of electrical equipment for both energized and de-energized maintenance.
  • Updated tables add clarity to requirements, such as the restricted approach boundary dimensions in Table 130.4 (D)(a).
  • New requirement 320.3 (A)(1) covers risk assessment associated with battery work.
  • New subsection in 130.2 (A)(4) provides requirements where normal operation of electric equipment is permitted.
  • Informative Annex E has updated text to correlate with the redefined terminology associated with hazard and risk. This annex provides clarity and consistency about definitions as well as risk management principles vital to electrical safety.
Available for purchase at

   


On-Site Training Is What We Do
At Facility Results, we recognize that to remain profitable, contractors and employees need to be working. That's why we offer practical, targeted training programs that capitalize on every minute spent in the classroom. null

Our students have been quoted
as saying...

"That was a real eye opener. Every one of our new employees should take this training!"


Managers that arranged the training have told us...

"My staff personally thanked me for having this training for them."


Call Facility Results 888-762-0090

Satisfaction Guaranteed! 
Free Download

NEW FREE Download of the Month

            

Other Popular Downloads, Posters, & Safety Tools FREE


Bad Wires Start Fires