logo gif 

Newsletter
Winter Update 2013
In This Issue
Red Lighthouse is Expanding
2012 Review: Economy & Markets
Nate Silver on Financial Markets
What Do the New Tax Laws Means for Financial Planning?


I want to thank you for your confidence over the years. Red Lighthouse has grown to over $140 million and we have expanded our capabilities. 


Mark Sladkus 

Red Lighthouse is Expanding

 

 

I am happy to announce that I have added a new partner to Red Lighthouse to broaden our wealth management capabilities. Gary Link will focus on wealth planning. In addition to investment management, Gary will work with clients to evaluate retirement plans, tax strategies, insurance requirements and estate planning needs. Gary will coordinate with tax accountants, estate attorneys and insurance experts to implement plans.

 

Gary and I have been close friends going back to our Cornell days. We both started our careers at JP Morgan 35 years ago. Gary spent over 20 years at JP Morgan, including 6 years in the Private Bank. Most recently Gary has been the CEO for an institutional investment management firm in London.

 

As a consequence of this addition, we have moved offices within the same building. We are now at 15 W. 72nd Street, Suite 8K.

 

Gary's e-mail is glink@redlighthouseinvestment.com and his phone number is 212-580-0502.

 

Please let either of us know if you see an opportunity to use these new capabilities.

 

Mark 

 


2012 Review: Economy & Markets

 

 

Throughout 2012, investors were subject to a continuing stream of bad news. But investors who acted upon their fears by exiting the equity markets missed out on strong returns.

 

The year opened amid concern about the weak US recovery, the debt crisis in Europe, fears of a slowdown in China, and political uncertainty around the world.  Some predicted a eurozone breakup triggered by impending debt defaults in Greece and Portugal. The global economy was weak, and many investors were weighing the potential economic impact of the US elections and so-called "fiscal cliff."

 

The world stock market performance chart below offers a snapshot of global stock market performance, as measured by the MSCI All Country World Index. The global headlines show that despite an abundance of negative news during the year, global stocks had an exceptional year. 

 

 

 

 

Economic Backdrop

 

Sluggish US Recovery

The current expansion, which started in mid-2009, is the weakest in postwar history. The norm is for deep recessions to be followed by strong recoveries. Overall, there was continued weakness in job growth, real wages, consumer confidence, and spending. Of course the news wasn't all bad. Healthy corporate earnings, low inflation, falling oil prices, low mortgage rates, and a strengthening of the housing market were among the more positive economic indicators.

 

Continued European Debt Troubles

The eurozone continued its sovereign debt problems particularly Greece, Spain, and Italy. The European recession prompted banks that are holding the troubled assets to reduce lending, which contributed to lower growth across the region. During 2012, the euro finance ministers agreed on a second bailout package for Greece. In May, concern grew over Spain's fiscal health when a major bank requested a massive bailout and disclosed troubled assets. Following the Greek election in June, the European central bank pledged to provide monetary support to protect the euro, leading to a rally in stocks and bonds.

 

Rising Global Economic Worries

During the first half of 2012, China's economy showed signs of weakening, with growth expected to fall to around 8% - a significant drop from its historical growth rate. China exports heavily to the eurozone. In the latter part of 2012, concerns over slowing growth in emerging markets had begun to ease as economies appeared to bottom out. Europe faced its own worries as austerity programs threw several economies back into recession.

 

Stabilizing Actions by Central Banks

Many investors did not appear to anticipate the degree to which markets would positively respond to central bank actions. Many analysts credit the US and European central banks with boosting investor confidence in both markets, and in the case of the European Union, helping avert a euro breakup. In September and October, the Bank of Japan announced measures to provide monetary stimulus through 2013 in response to slowing economic activity.

 

 

2012 Investment Overview

 

Highlights

After a flat 2011, the US stock market posted a strong first quarter as the US economy showed signs of improvement and perceptions of the European debt crisis improved. The start of the year was the best first quarter for US equities since 1998. When the second quarter began, markets retreated as Europe's debt crisis returned to center stage and signs of slowing global growth emerged.

 

By June, US stocks had surrendered all of the year's gains amid continuing concerns about the eurozone's sovereign debt problems. The US economy showed more signs of weakness. Stock markets around the globe stumbled in the second quarter, with non-US stocks suffering the most. During the summer, the markets improved, as European tensions eased on increased European Central Bank loans to Spain and Italy. There was also rising speculation that the Federal Reserve was prepared to deliver additional monetary stimulus to the US economy.

 

In September, the Fed announced its third round of quantitative easing to push long-term interest rates lower. The Bank of Japan also announced a stimulus plan. These central bank actions helped drive the markets during the third quarter. The S&P 500 surged 14% from its June 1 low and reached a five-year high on September 14. US economic indicators sent mixed signals, the economy reportedly expanded at a 3.1% rate for the 3rd quarter - the fastest pace since late 2011 -  but apparently shrunk by 0.1% in the 4th quarter. Mortgage rates reached historical lows, and year-over-year home prices rose for the first time since the 2007 financial crisis.

 

In the fourth quarter, investor attention turned to the close US election and the prospect of gaining certainty regarding future government spending, taxes, growth policy, and regulation. Stocks fell in the weeks following the election as investors gauged the prospects of continued political gridlock and the economic impact of spending cuts and tax hikes, known as the "fiscal cliff." The S&P recovered its earlier losses in the quarter by late December.

 

Market Summary

All major US market indices were up substantially for 2012. The S&P 500 gained 16% including dividends. Non-US developed market indices performed even better. The MSCI World ex USA Index, a benchmark for large cap stocks in developed markets outside the US, returned 16.4%. The MSCI Emerging Markets Index returned 18.2%.

 

Small cap and large cap stocks had similar performance in the US, but small cap substantially outperformed large cap in both the non-US developed and emerging markets. Value stocks outperformed growth stocks in the US and non-US developed markets, while slightly underperforming growth in emerging markets.

  

Nate Silver on Financial Markets

Many of you will know that Nate Silver's 538 blog in the New York Times correctly predicted the results of the presidential election for all 50 states. As a consequence his methods and his book "The Signal and the Noise: Why So Many Predictions Fail - But Some Don't" published last September, have gotten a lot of attention.

 

A key message of his book is to warn readers not to get too enamored with statistics alone - but to always consider their context, and to continuously challenge assumptions and consider opposing viewpoints. In addition, he cites our need for certainty and our resistance to being honest with ourselves about our own biases as the cause of our own inability to separate the signal from the noise. We tend to find the answers that confirm our biases.

 

Silver warns: don't interpret facts from the data without a sensible framework for those facts. For example, an often cited study shows that stock prices are highly correlated to hemlines, which highlights the perils of data mining without a common sense explanation. Carefully consider pundits who are super confident. We expect too much from forecasters, and misinterpret their confidence for certainty. And there are far too many incentives for economic and political forecasters to be confident rather than correct.

 

What interested us the most are Silver's observations about financial markets. First, he explains that forecasting is generally better when many independent views are backed financially as in a market, and markets backed by money for political predictions generally work better. While financial markets where a trader has to "put his money where his mouth is" can be very efficient, Silver observes that bubbles still appear to form and distort prices in certain cases. But even so, since it is impossible to predict when the bubbles will burst, particularly in the short term by which managers are typically evaluated, there is no practical way to time bubbles. As Keynes said "the market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent."

 

Silver addresses the question as to whether statistics can predict which active mutual funds will outperform in the future. He found no correlation between past and future performance. As a consequence, he concludes, you are best off choosing the funds with the lowest fees. And while individual traders may occasionally beat the market, this is rarely true after you take into account their transaction costs.

 

Silver's conclusions are very consistent with our views at Red Lighthouse and provide further evidence to support our approach. Nevertheless, as per his advice we will continue to study all views.

 

What Do the New Tax Laws Mean for Financial Planning?

  

The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (ATRA) kept the U.S. from going over the fiscal cliff, but what does it change from a financial planning point of view? The answer, as usual with taxes, is "it's complicated." But the simplest answer is that the wealthiest taxpayers will be subject to a number of tax increases. This increases the benefits of tax deferral for those affected.

  

The good news from the perspective of a taxpayer is that many of the provisions of the new law replace temporary rules with permanent measures that make planning easier. In addition income tax rates for individuals making less than $400,000 or couples making under $450,000 don't change, and the estate tax exemption is made permanent at the $5 million level for individuals and $10 million for couples and is adjusted for inflation. Finally, the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) exemption amounts are made permanent and indexed to inflation.

  

The bad news in terms of taxpayers' pocketbooks is that the employee portion of Social Security Witholding Tax goes back up to 6.25% from 4.2% where it had been for the previous two years.

  

And the wealthiest taxpayers will face:

  • an increased income tax rate to 39.6% from 35% on income over $400,000 for individuals and $450,000 for couples
  • a 20% rather than 15% rate on capital gains and qualified dividends above the $400,000/$450,000 thresholds
  • the restoration of complex phaseouts on itemized deductions for high incomes
  • a new 3.8% Medicare tax on investment income over $200,000/$250,000
  • an increased estate tax to 40% from 35% above the exemptions 

From a planning perspective we believe these changes could be material. There are many other details that could be important depending on individual circumstances (for example, certain individuals looking to make charitable gifts could consider using IRA Required Minimum Distributions because the law allowing these to made pre-tax has been reinstated through 2013.) 

 

Given the potential impact of these changes you should consider reviewing your situation with your tax accountant and with us over the course of the year. 

 

Disclaimer: This newsletter is for information purposes only.  Past performance is no guarantee of future results.  While the information and data contained herein is believed to be reliable, we do not represent it as accurate.  Any opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice.  Nothing contained herein should be considered a recommendation to buy or sell any security or fund.

 

Red Lighthouse Investment Management, LLC is a fee-only registered investment advisory firm based in New York City.

 

 Red Lighthouse Investment Management - 212.799.3532 www.redlighthouseinvestment.com 

 

 Copyright 2013 Red Lighthouse Investment Management, LLC