What makes something beautiful?
 |
|
 | Image: Cornelia Parker, Cold Dark Matter
|
We all know beauty when we see it. Or do we? In the past, beauty was associated with a kind of formal perfection which was often referred to as "classical beauty". Beauty could be judged by mathematical proportions, such as those found in the
Golden Ratio. Definitions of beauty have changed over the centuries to the point where things don't have to be geometrically correct or structurally sound to be beautiful. For example, in today's context, something that is on the verge of falling apart, might be considered to have beauty because of its ethereal quality and delicate fragility, as can be seen in the
Cornelia Parker installation made of components of a blown up shed (image on left).
The current exhibition at the Cooper-Hewitt museum, called
Beauty, plays with this expanded idea of what constitutes "beauty" in the 21st century. The exhibition is organized around seven themes: extravagant, intricate, ethereal, transgressive, emergent, elemental, and transformative. Of course it is impossible to divide a concept as complex as beauty into seven categories, as Guardian writer
Jonathan Jones discusses in his review of the show, but I do think giving this a try makes a fascinating premise for a design exhibition.
Broadcaster Matthew Collins, attempts to define the question "What is beauty", by categorizing (with corresponding images) the
10 qualities that make art beautiful: nature, simplicity, unity, transformation, surroundings, animation, pattern, surprise, selection and spontaneity. Here is a link to Collins' one-hour BBC production:
What is Beauty? While there is probably consensus that all of the images Collins has selected are representative of beauty, one wonders about the images and objects that might fall outside of these "10 qualities". Beauty is often a taboo word in the world of contemporary art as it is sometimes associated with shallow and less complex forms of work, so many artists go out of their way to make their work non-beautiful. But perhaps in doing so, they are just opening up the definition of what makes something beautiful.
We have come a far distance from the sentiments of the Romantic poet, John Keats, who ends his poem
"Ode to a Grecian Urn" with the following declaration:
"Beauty is truth, truth beauty,-that is all
Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know."
Keats, like Collins and the curators of the
Beauty exhibition, has come up with specific criteria for beauty; the beauty of the Grecian urn is based on the narrative painted on its surface. For Keats "narrative" is the defining feature of beauty. Nineteenth century art critic Louis LeRoy said about Monet's painting
Impression: Sunrise: "wallpaper in its embryonic state is more labored than this seascape!" For LeRoy "labour" was one of the main criteria for defining beauty.
Our understanding and expectations of beauty always changing, and we no longer use "beauty" as the main criteria for how to judge a work of art. Sometimes we get distracted by a work's beauty and we don't see the level of complexities that might exist beneath the surface. Some artists such as
Dana Shutz or
George Condo are really pushing the boundaries by deliberately going against what is traditionally considered "beautiful". Despite what seems like a self-conscious desire to repel, both Shutz's and Condo's work could easily fit into one of Collins' criteria for beauty such as "transformation" or "surprise".
However simplistic, the breakdown of beauty into specific categories really gets you thinking about how any given artwork can fit into one of them, and perhaps also makes you ponder which of the adjectives used by the curators of
Beauty or by Collins can best describe your own work.
Image above: Design non-woven wallpaper by Studio Job. Designed for Dutch brand NLXL (part of Beauty exhibition at Cooper-Hewitt)
Wendy Welch
Executive Director
Vancouver Island School of Art
Please consider making a tax-deductible donation to support the many art-related activities offered by Vancouver Island School of Art including this newsletter, art courses, workshops, artist talks and exhibitions.
Registered Charity # 86392 1433 RR0001
|