RGL "PIPELINE"

 

  

RGL Group Pic Alt 

 

 

 13724 Venetian Court

Orland Park, Illinois 60467
Office 708-301-6425 
 Fax:  708-301-6455
  
 

Providing Human Resources Consulting for Small to Mid-Size Organizations

 

May, 2013

 
Top 

Greetings!

 

Dealing with employees with performance deficiencies can be delicate; clearly communicating the problem, its impact, and your expectations going forward in a manner which inspires performance improvement as opposed to de-motivating staff is the focus of this month's feature article.

 

Generational differences are often cited in today's workplace; however, there are a number of myths about Millennials discussed below that you my find enlightening.

 

Business CoachingThe Sub-Par Performance Conversation- A Manager's Script

 

 

There are many articles which provide valuable information about what performance management is and what it isn't and how to conduct a proper employee evaluation. However, there is not much on how to actually deal with underperformance once identified. Knowing how to have an effective conversation about an employee performance problem is one of the hardest things for any manager to do, new or experienced, and should be taken very seriously for the greatest impact (improving performance).

 

We often see the a full spectrum of approaches - managers are either too vague and soft or too blunt and harsh. Either method truly fails to reach the desired results of improving performance. However, in the manager's defense, addressing poor performance is something that is not practiced frequently. If you find yourself engaging in these type of conversations often and feel you are an expert - then there may be a larger problem that needs to be investigated! Dan McCarthy of Great Leadership, also agrees that "managers don't get a lot of practice - unlike coaching or listening - so we can't rely on repetition to get good at it." He provides a basic roadmap to follow that works in just about any situation.

 

Prepare

 

It's either some objective performance data (sales numbers) or some type of behavioral issue (texting during a meeting). Gather all the data you can - get input from other sources if you can. Then, write an outline of what you want to say and how you want to say it. If it is a serious issue, consider involving the human resources department for guidance and support. Schedule a meeting - allowing an hour - in a private location. There is never a good time to have this kind of conversation but McCarthy suggests a Friday afternoon may be best.

 

Explain the performance issue.

 

Forget the friendly small talk - just get to the point. In a calm and conversational manner, explain to the employee what the performance issue or behavior is and why it concerns you. There are a couple models for doing this:

SBR (Situation, Behavior, and Result): "In our meeting this week, you were completely disconnected and texting during the entire session. I had to stop the meeting and recall your attention to the issues embarrassing you in front of your peers."

 

BFE (Behavior, Feeling, and Effect): "When you were constantly texting and disconnected during our meeting, I felt like you were not interested in what I had to say. That sets a poor example for the rest of the team."

However you do it, you're basically helping the employee understand what exactly you are concerned about and why it concerns you.

  
Ask for reasons and listen.
  

Give the employee a chance to give their side of things. Ask them to help you understand how/why this could happen.

The key here is to really listen - for facts. There may be some legitimate reason for the problem - there usually is, at least from the employee's perspective. You do not have to accept or agree with their explanation - but understanding the real underlying causes will help you and the employee do the next step.

 

Solve the problem.
  

That's the whole point of the discussion, to eliminate the causes and make the problem go away. Many managers seem to lose sight of that. This should be a collaborative discussion. In fact, it's best to ask for the employee's ideas on solving the problem first. People support what they create. The employee's idea may not be as good as yours, but they'll be more likely to own it and have success implementing it. If you're not confident the employee's idea is going to work, you can always add your own as an additional idea. The key here is to make sure the employee is committed.

 

Ask for commitment and set a follow-up date.
  

Summarize the action plan, and ask for the employee's commitment. They need to say it to own it. Then make sure to set and agree on a follow-up date to check in on progress. That way, if your original ideas are not working, you can come up with additional ideas. You also let the employee know you're not going to let it slide.

 

Express your confidence (and possible consequences).
  

If this is just the first discussion, and not a serious infraction, then there's no need to mention consequences. However, if not, then you'll need to make sure you clearly describe what will happen if there is insufficient improvement in performance or if the behavior does not improve. This is an important aspect of the conversation. Knowing there are consequences, and what they are may be the final catalyst to improve behavior/performance. Try to end on a positive note. Do not say things that you don't mean. Honesty is the best policy.

 

Document, document, document

 

Document the discussion, and keep it in your employee file. Then, make sure there's follow-up.

 

Truthfully, good employees screw up now and then. If you follow this process, you'll get most of them back on track before it gets out of hand.

 

 

 

GENERATIONAL EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION MYTH DE-BUNKEDmillenials 

 

A new report, PwC's NextGen: A global generational study, reveals that enhancing workplace flexibility and equity between work and home is one of the keys to improving job satisfaction among Millennials. According to the report, while younger workers are more tech-savvy, globally focused, informal, and willing to share information, they do not feel more entitled or less committed than their non-Millennial counterparts, and are willing to work just as hard.

 

Among the major study findings:

  • Millennial and non-Millennial employees alike want greater options in their work hours and location. Millennials and non-Millennials alike want the option to shift their work hours to accommodate their own schedule and are interested in working in locations outside the office where they can stay connected by way of technology. Employees across all generations say they would be willing to forego some pay and delay promotions in exchange for reducing their hours. Given the opportunity, 64 percent of Millennials (and 66 percent of non-Millennials) would like to occasionally work from home, and 66 percent of Millennials (and 64 percent of non-Millennials) would like the option to occasionally shift their work hours. Across the board, 15 percent of male employees and 21 percent of female employees say they would give up some of their pay and slow the pace of promotion in exchange for working fewer hours.

Millennials put a premium on work/life flexibility. Unlike past generations who put an emphasis on their careers and worked well beyond a 40-hour work week in the hope of rising to the well-compensated ranks of a company later on, Millennial employees are not convinced that such early-career sacrifices are worth the potential rewards. A balance between their personal and work lives is what is most important to them.

Issue:47

 
 
 

We encourage you to forward this Newsletter to colleagues or others whom you feel would be interested in receiving the RGL Pipeline
  
 

 

EMPLOYERS ARE CONCERNED ABOUT EMPLOYEE STRESS

 

A key focus for employers over the next two years is stress management, according to Towers Watson. "The Health, Wellbeing and Productivity Survey" shows that over 40 percent of employers already have stress management programs in place and an additional 31 percent plan to introduce them in the next two years.

 

According to the survey, almost all (98 percent) of employers feel stress is an issue for their workforce, while a similar percentage (97 percent) believe work-life balance is also an issue. In response, the survey shows that improving the mental health of workers is the second highest priority for employers (62 percent), with raising employee engagement being their number one priority.
 
The majority of employers believe excessive workload and/or long hours are the most significant causes of stress, with some 86 percent citing this as an issue. The expanding role of technology - facilitating access outside normal working hours - is named as the second highest cause of stress (76 percent).
 
Other causes are: lack of work-life balance (75 percent); inadequate staffing (63 percent); fears about job loss (58 percent); and lack of support or training (30 percent).
 

The study shows that organizations that have taken steps to help manage employee stress mainly do so by introducing an Employee Assistance Program (88 percent). Another popular approach is support for flexible working arrangements (73 percent).

 

Fewer companies are taking steps to preempt stress arising as an issue for their staff with only around one-third of firms having education and awareness campaigns in place or having introduced risk assessments or stress audits.

 

If you have been forwarded this email and would like to continue to receive our Newsletter, please "Click" the button below to be added to our mailing list.Join Our Mailing List 

 

Regards from,
  Dave                       Rich                        Jim
  Dave Slivinski                           Rich Lehr                                    Jim Kacena

    Consultant                               President                            Consultant/Coach

VIsit us on the web at www.rglconsultants.com