RGL "PIPELINE"
 
  
RGL GRoup pic 

RGL Logo

 
13724 Venetian Court
Orland Park, Illinois 60467
Office 708-301-6425 
 Fax:  708-301-6455

 

 
 
  
 

Providing Human Resources Consulting for Small to Mid-Size Organizations

 

April, 2013

 
Top 

Greetings!

  

We often hear job seekers complain that they submit their resume for an advertised position and never get acknowledged. We also hear that an interview seemingly went well, with the employer promising to get back in touch to schedule a second interview, but they don't hear back and employers don't respond to follow-up efforts. 

 

Are you too busy to acknowledge receipt of resumes or applications for employment?  Do you keep applicants fully informed of the status of their candidacy throughout the selection process?  Your interactions (or lack of interaction) with job seekers could negatively impact your business in the long run.

 

On another topic, did you ever wonder why employees don't consistently meet your expectations of performance?  Perhaps they aren't fully aware of your expectations.

 

Please see the articles that follow. 

 

Don't Yell at Me!How You Treat Job Applicants Can Have a Lasting Impact on You Business 

 

More than one in four workers report that they have had a bad experience when applying for a job. The vast majority (75%) of workers who applied for jobs using various resources in the last year said they never heard back from the employer, according to a nationwide CareerBuilder survey. While this speaks to the challenges of finding employment in a highly competitive market, it also brings to light negative implications for today's employers.

 

The survey shows candidates who have had a bad experience when applying for a position are less likely to seek employment at that company again and are more likely to discourage friends and family from applying or purchasing products from that company.

 

The study of more than 3,900 U.S. workers was conducted online by Harris InteractiveŠ from November 1 to November 30, 2012. 82% of workers expect to hear back from a company when they apply for a job regardless of whether the employer is interested. Nearly one-third (32%) of workers said they would be less inclined to purchase products or services from a company that didn't respond to their application.

 

26% of workers have had a bad experience as a job applicant, citing a lack of follow through, inconsistencies from the employer or poor representation of the company's brand as the primary culprits.
  • Employer never bothered letting me know the decision after the interview
  • Found out during the interview that the job didn't match what was written in the job ad
  • Company representative didn't present a positive work experience
  • Company representative didn't seem to be knowledgeable
  • Employer never acknowledged receiving my application

The effects of a candidate's negative experience can lead to a broader impact on the employer's ability to recruit or sell products. Workers said if they are dissatisfied with the way their application is handled by an employer, they would:

  • Never seek employment at the company again
  • Tell others not to work there
  • Tell others not to purchase products or services from the company
What would workers do if they have a good applicant experience?
The study found that a good applicant experience can have positive long-term effects for organizations regardless if the candidate was actually hired. Workers said if they are happy with the way they are treated by an employer when applying for a job, they would:
  • Consider seeking employment with the company again in the future - 56%
  • Tell others to seek employment there - 37%.
  • Be more likely to purchase products or services from the company - 23%

 

 
Independent Contractor Do Your Employees Know What They Are Accountable For?

 

All employees are accountable for something, but very few fully understand exactly what they are accountable for, according to a new study conducted by Wayne Hochwarter, the Jim Moran Professor of Business Administration in Florida State University's College of Business, and research associate Allison Batterton. The research, which assessed the opinions of more than 750 blue- and white-collar employees across multiple job environments, had a number of objectives.

 

First, the researchers wanted to better understand how many employees simply do not know what is expected of them at work each day. Second, they wanted to get a better idea of what work life was like for those who understood their level of accountability versus those who did not.

 

Surprisingly, less than 20 percent of employees reported feeling certain they knew what was expected of them at work each day, while the vast majority of workers reported varying levels of accountability ranging from some to complete ambiguity. As one respondent said, I thought I was working on something important ... I guess the boss who fired me didn't think so.

 

Differences between those who knew what was expected versus those who didn't were considerable. For example, workers who were uncertain of their accountabilities at work reported:

  • 60 percent higher levels of mistrust with leadership as it relates to communication.
  • 50 percent higher levels of overall work frustration.
  • 45 percent less control regarding the best way to complete their work.
  • 40 percent higher levels of work overload.
  • 35 percent fewer work accomplishments to the organization.
  • 33 percent less social and resource support from one's immediate supervisor.
  • 33 percent greater likelihood of searching for a new job within the next year.
  • 25 percent more job neglect (slacking off, slowing down).

These findings cost American organizations hundreds of millions of dollars each year - in both direct and indirect costs, the researchers said. When employees aren't sure what's expected of them, the results simply just cannot be positive, especially when the complexity of work and the pace of change is taken into consideration, Batterton said.

 

In terms of reasons for the lack of understanding, most employees cite management's failure to be forthcoming and proactively develop communications until a lack of accountability triggers an organizational crisis.

 

Leaders are becoming more and more accountable as well, which often takes them further from their employees. It seems the more that communication is needed, the less likely it is provided - no wonder so many employees feel completely lost at work these days, Hochwarter said.

 

The researchers prescribe a four-step approach to dealing with accountability failures:

  1. Set up a formal communication system using the most current and user-friendly technology, and make sure all employees are able to use it effectively.
  2. Make employee accountability part of both the supervisor's and employee's performance evaluation.
  3. Develop informal accountability networks (i.e., buddy system) that allow employees real-time access to information needed to effectively focus attention on tasks considered most important for that particular day (or hour).
  4. Make accountability proactive rather than reactive.

Most employees want to do a good job and contribute to their organization, Hochwarter said. Perhaps it's overly simplistic, but this can only take place when employees know what's expected. Sadly, many do not, and the situation appears to be getting worse rather than better.

 

Source: Newswise.

Issue:46

 
 
 

We encourage you to forward this Newsletter to colleagues or others whom you feel would be interested in receiving the RGL Pipeline
  
 

REVISED I-9 FORM MANDATORY USE BY MAY 7, 2013

 

The revised Employment Eligibility Verification I-9 Form has been released.  Employers may begin using this Form immediately, but MUST implement its use by May 7, 2013.

 

The new Form has a much different look including being two pages, with a more organized layout separating the information employees must provide from the information employers must complete.  The new Form also incorporates additional data fields, including the employee's foreign passport information (if applicable), telephone numbers, and email addresses (optional) and "other names used", including maiden name (mandatory).  In addition, the new Form carries with it six (6) full pages of instructions.

 

Although the documents acceptable for Form I-9 purposes remain the same, the new Form revises the format of the Lists of Acceptable Documents to clarify the requirements for certain documents.  

  

Note:  RGL Consultants strongly encourages the employer to make and retain copies of the documents you review and verify for Employment Eligibility Verification; attaching them to the completed Form I-9.

 

It is critical that employers understand the nuances that go along with the Form I-9 process and the changes to that process that the new Form I-9 requires.  For example, newly hired employees must complete and sign Section 1 of Form I-9 no later than the first day of employment.  The employer must complete Section 2 within 3 business days of the employee's first day of employment.

 
We welcome the opportunity to discuss them with you.

 

The link to the new Form I-9 follows:
 

http://www.uscis.gov/files/form/i-9.pdf

 

 

 

 

If you have been forwarded this email and would like to continue to receive our Newsletter, please "Click" the button below to be added to our mailing list.Join Our Mailing List 

 

Regards,
 Rich                        Dave               Jim
Rich Lehr, President                   Dave Slivinski                  Jim Kacena
RGL Consultants                        RGL Consultants              RGL Consultants

VIsit us on the web at www.rglconsultants.com