Oakland Stands Up for Equal Opportunity
City weighs in on affirmative action case with consequences for CA
On August 30, 2013, Oakland joined other cities, state attorneys general and the University of California in opposing a Michigan law that prohibits consideration of race and gender in public education, public employment and government contracting.
Michigan's affirmative action ban is now before the U.S. Supreme Court, and the outcome of this case is important for Oakland, for our state and for the entire nation. (Schuette, Attorney Gen. Of Michigan v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action)
Michigan's ban, Proposition 2, mirrors California's own affirmative action ban - Proposition 209. Along with other jurisdictions, we are asking the Supreme Court to uphold an appellate court decision that Michigan's law violates the Equal Protection clause of the U.S. Constitution. Ideally, the justices will strike down Michigan's law with a ruling that will lay the groundwork to invalidate similar laws in California, Arizona, Washington and other states.
This case is particularly important as it follows on the heels of this year's Supreme Court ruling on the University of Texas' affirmative action policy, which made it next to impossible to consider race as one of many plus factors in college admissions.
The outcome of this case also is critical for Oakland and other cities with large populations of young people who do not have meaningful or equal educational opportunities at the primary, middle or high school levels, not to mention equal opportunity to attend college.
For example, it continues to be extremely difficult for an African American student in Oakland to graduate from high school with the course credits required to even enroll in Cal State or University of California schools.
The graduation rate in Oakland public high schools is improving, but it is still appallingly low - this year, the graduation rate for African American students was about 53%, according to OUSD.
But of the African American students who earned a diploma this year, only about 29% graduated with the course credits they need just to enroll in our own state's university system; these are public universities funded with our tax dollars. In contrast, the percentage of students who graduate from Piedmont High with those requirements is close to 100%.
Prohibiting consideration of race and gender in university admissions only perpetuates the unconscionable opportunity gap that we see in our public schools - a gap that so often breaks down along racial lines. Clearly, we have a long way to go before we have a level playing field.
As the University of California president wrote in a brief in this case: "More than 15 years after Proposition 209 barred consideration of race in admissions decisions ... the University of California still struggles to enroll a student body that encompasses the broad racial diversity of the state."
For more information, see the amicus (friend of the court) brief Oakland and other jurisdictions filed in the Supreme Court.
|