header bilingue
Revue de l'actualité - News Digest 
12 mars 2015 - March 12, 2015
Législation antiterroriste
Anti-terror legislation  

Civil liberties, First Nation rights compromised by C-51, committee hears

CCPA 12/03/2015 -
Part one of today's two-part committee hearing into the Anti-Terrorism Act 2015 (C-51) has just wrapped up, with three of four witnesses opposing many aspects of the legislation for their potential impacts on civil liberties, the right to protest (without fear of surveillance, or being labelled a terrorist), and possible legal violations of First Nations rights, in both the democratic process (lack of consultation) and substance of C-51. [...] In his presentation later this morning, Paul Champ, representing the International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group, explained that repeated requests, since 2007 (when there were 2,000 people on Canada's list), for more information on the no-fly list (e.g., the number of people on it now) have gone unanswered by the government. He asked we were "doubling down" on the no-fly list system when we should be reviewing it for its efficacy and impact on rights. Champ told committee U.S. courts found the U.S. no-fly list violated the equivalent of Section 7 of Canada's Charter (life, liberty and security of the person). Both the ICLMG and BCCLA also opposed expanding the definition of promoting terrorism in the criminal code, of lowering the threshold for preventative arrests, and of giving CSIS the powers to disrupt what they consider to be threats, based on a much broader definition of what threatens the security of Canada, and by violating Charter rights if a court warrants it.

Briefs on Bill C-51 from the witnesses appearing before the Committee on Public Safety and National Security

Bill C-51: Blaney, MacKay questioned on anti-terror bill fine print

CBC News 12/03/2015 - The government's proposed anti-terror law will almost certainly face legal and constitutional challenges on multiple fronts, according to witnesses who appeared before the House public safety committee on Thursday morning. Former Security Information Review Committee (SIRC) chair Ron Atkey warned MPs that the provision to allow CSIS agents to apply for federal court authorization for measures that could potentially contravene a charter right is a "major flaw" in the proposed legislation. "That provision, in my view, is clearly unconstitutional, and will be struck down by the courts," he told the committee. "If Parliament wants to invoke the notwithstanding clause, it is free to do so under this Constitution, although no federal Parliament has had the courage or the need to do so since the charter was proclaimed in 1982," he added. "But why provoke an avoidable constitutional challenge?" he wondered. "Canadian judges are fiercely independent, and are not agents of the government who can be mandated to authorize measures at all costs to protect against terrorist threats." Describing the proposed section as drafted as a "constitutional mess," Atkey suggested that it be rewritten to make it clear that judges would not be asked to authorize actions that risked violating charter rights. Speaking with reporters before question period, Justice Minister Peter MacKay maintained the bill was constitutional.

Read more - Lire plus 
CBC News 12/03/3015 - During Tuesday's meeting, New Democrat MP Randall Garrison attempted to get unanimous consent for a motion to add a one-hour session with Therrien to the meeting schedule, but he was rebuffed by the Conservatives. Public Safety Minister Steven Blaney stated, in response to a question, that his office had "consulted" with the commissioner on the bill. The minister said he intends to meet with Therrien. "As you know, this bill is about the protection of the rights and freedoms of Canadians and their privacy," he said. "There are embedded mechanisms in Bill C-51 and already within government, such as the privacy impact assessment, that will apply to the measures planned in this bill." But according to Therrien's office, while he was "informed" of the bill in advance, he was not consulted. "A few weeks before Bill C-51 was tabled, he met with public safety officials and was informed in very general terms about a plan to introduce legislation to enhance information-sharing for national security purposes," Lawton told CBC News on Thursday. Therrien did not see the contents of the bill before it was introduced in the House, she said - and though he "expressed certain views, [he] ultimately did not see those views reflected in the bill that was tabled." 
 
Read more - Lire plus

Daniel Therrien: Without big changes, Bill C-51 means big data

Les Premières nations veulent contester C-51 devant les tribunaux

First Nations vow legal challenge of anti-terror bill

Michael Geist - Why the anti-terrorism bill is really an anti-privacy bill: Bill C-51's evisceration of privacy protection

Bill C-51 could have been used to prevent Arar from coming back from Syria to Canada, says lawyer

War Measures Act less onerous than Bill C-51

Alex Neve: Anti-terror bill a setback for human rights in Canada

C-51 inquiète le directeur de Greenpeace International

Harper government's "Anti-Terrorism Act" isn't about terrorism, it's a torture act

Bill C-51 wants you to stop protesting in support of Palestinians

B.C. premier Christy Clark says anti-terror bill could 'impinge' rights

22 Minutes Anti-Terror correspondent, Connie (Mary Walsh) counter-attacks proposed limitations on freedom (video) 
Politique et terrorisme
Politics and terrorism
 

The Toronto Star editorial: Invoking the Holocaust to silence critics of the anti-terror law goes too far

 

The Toronto Star 11/03/2015 - Really? Does Prime Minister Stephen Harper really expect Canadians to swallow the line that we risk a second Holocaust unless Parliament rams its hugely flawed anti-terror measures into law? It defies belief.  Yet Public Safety Minister Steven Blaney has thrown around the H-word with reckless abandon this week, in both official languages, as he seeks to justify the Anti-Terrorism Act 2015, which critics fear will chill freedom of speech and other rights. "The Holocaust did not begin in the gas chamber; it began with words," Blaney told the Commons panel that has begun hearing expert testimony on the bill. As the Star'sTonda MacCharles reports, Blaney defended Bill C-51's ban on "promoting" terrorism as necessary to protect the country from jihadist threats. Nor was he prepared to back down when New Democrat MP Randall Garrison objected that "there is no equivalence to anything we're talking about here today to the Holocaust," and challenged the minister's "overinflated rhetoric." Blaney was unmoved. "Violence begins with words. Hate begins with words," he insisted. This is a new low, even for this government. Setting aside the fact that Canadian lawalready prohibits the promotion of hatred, invoking the Holocaust to silence critics insults the memory of six million Jews and distorts history. It was Nazi state policy that conceived of the genocide and built those gas chambers. Likening jihadist propaganda, however vile, to the Nazi killing machine is a stretch too far. After the attack on Parliament Hill and other terrorist scares, including Wednesday's arrest of a man suspected of planning to bomb the American consulate in Toronto, no one will deny the terrorist threat is real. But the Tory rhetorical overkill is surreal. It discredits the party.

 

Read more - Lire plus  

 

The Toronto Star 05/03/2015 - When an Al Shabab video surfaced last month threatening a terror strike on the West Edmonton Mall, the federal government could have done a couple of things. It could have responsibly assured Canadians that there was no credible threat, there was no need to overreact and the government was maintaining vigilance. Or, the governing party could have used a screen grab of a hooded Al Shabab fighterwith the West Edmonton Mall logo and its co-ordinates in the background and tried to build support and ultimately raise funds from the threat. It should surprise no one that the federal Conservative party this week chose the second option. This is not to dismiss threats. Envelopes of white powder sent to the offices of Conservative cabinet ministers in Quebec are proof again there are threats in this country. But there is a difference between dealing with threats and using them for political gain.

 

Read more - Lire plus  

 

Tories under fire for using terrorist propaganda to promote C-51 

 

Terror fixation draws attention from failing economy  

 

Liberals are supporting Bill C-51 so Tories can't make 'political hay,' Trudeau says    

 

Harper's niqab ban plays dangerous politics 

 

Tale of the terror tape 

 

Tory MP mailout asks voters if they agree with anti-terror bill or if they think 'terrorists are victims too' 

 

Kenney tweets misleading photos of Muslim women in chains 

Surveillance des agences de sécurité
Oversight of security agencies  

Le Devoir 11/03/2015 - À en croire le ministre de la Sécurité publique, Steven Blaney, et son collègue de la Justice, Peter MacKay, le projet de loi antiterroriste, C-51, serait un modèle parfait d'équilibre entre la protection des Canadiens contre la menace terroriste et la protection de leurs droits et libertés. Qu'importe ce qu'en disent les partis d'opposition et les « soi-disant experts », les pouvoirs accrus accordés à la GRC et au Service canadien du renseignement de sécurité (SCRS) seront adéquatement surveillés, ont martelé les deux hommes, qui comparaissaient mardi devant le Comité parlementaire de la sécurité publique et nationale. [...] En fait, ils en connaissent si bien les limitations et les lacunes qu'ils passent leur temps à déformer la réalité et à amalgamer des choses fort différentes. Le ministre Blaney a même affirmé mardi qu'il y avait une surveillance continue du SCRS, ce qui est faux. Les deux ministres ne cessent de dire que l'exigence d'un mandat judiciaire pour poser certains gestes équivaut à une forme de surveillance. Il n'en est rien. Un juge attribue un mandat sur la base des informations que lui fournit un service. Dans le cas du SCRS, tout se passe en secret. Et avec C-51, c'est le SCRS lui-même qui déterminera s'il risque d'enfreindre la loi et si, par conséquent, il doit demander un mandat. Quant au juge, il ne pourra pas, par la suite, vérifier si les limites du mandat ont été respectées. Et comme il ne s'agit pas d'une opération policière pouvant mener à des accusations, il n'y aura pas d'examen ultérieur dans le cadre d'un procès. Il faudra donc attendre que le CSARS s'intéresse à l'affaire, mais ce dernier ne le fait qu'après le fait. Et le projet C-51 lui demande seulement de faire rapport chaque année sur le nombre de mandats obtenus et refusés et d'examiner « à chaque exercice au moins un aspect » des mesures prises par le SCRS pour « réduire les menaces ». Rien de plus.

Sécurité nationale et abus
National security abuses  

Champ Law 09/03/2015 - Mr Benatta's lengthy court battle with Canada was scheduled to culminate in a four week trial in Toronto, starting March 30, 2015. Mr Benatta and the Government of Canada reached an agreement to settle the case on March 5, 2015. Mr Benatta still suffers from his terrible ordeal but is thankful the case has been resolved. "Canada is a great country but unfortunately there are many examples where Canadian officials have dispensed with human rights in the name of national security," said Mr Benatta. "People need to understand a terrible injustice was done to me. I was labelled a terrorist because I happened to be Muslim and had been in the air force. I was simply in the wrong place at the wrong time with the wrong ethnic background. That is racial profiling at its worst. These Canadian officials ruined my life without a second thought, and that is really hard to bear." Benamar Benatta was represented by Ottawa law firm Champ & Associates. "No one should have to wait so long for justice but I am very happy for Benamar now that he can start re-building his life," said his lawyer Paul Champ. "His case is a cautionary tale of the grave consequences on a person's life when government officials share personal information without properly considering its reliability. There was a series of gross mistakes here, but it all started with officials thinking its o.k. to ignore human rights in order to protect national security. When we abandon our values and principles to fight terror, the terrorists have already won. 

 

Surveillance globale 
Mass surveillance 

La NSA est poursuivie par des ONG pour espionnage de masse

Le Devoir 11/03/2015 -
Plusieurs organisations de défense des droits de la personne ont porté plainte mardi contre la puissante National Security Agency (NSA) sur la constitutionnalité du vaste système de surveillance des communications téléphoniques et Internet qu'elle a mis en place.  L'Union américaine de défense des libertés (ACLU) a déposé cette plainte devant un tribunal du Maryland, où la NSA a son siège, au nom d'Amnesty International USA, de Human Rights Watch (HRW) et de sept autres organisations non-gouvernementales, médiatiques et juridiques, dont la fondation Wikimedia qui chapeaute le site Internet Wikipedia. Elle vise la NSA, son directeur, Michael Rogers, l'Office national du renseignement (ODNI), son directeur James Clapper, ainsi que le ministère américain de la Justice et son actuel occupant, Eric Holder. La plainte argue que la NSA et d'autres agences de renseignement ont dépassé l'autorité que le Congrès leur a confié. Elle souligne que les droits constitutionnels des plaignants sont violés par l'espionnage des courriels et des communications téléphoniques, en particulier le premier amendement qui protège la liberté de parole et de la presse, et le 4e amendement qui interdit les fouilles ou saisies sans raison. Le document de 42 pages ajoute que ce système de surveillance de masse les empêche de faire leur travail de juristes, avocats et journalistes, en violant la confidentialité de leurs communications et en rendant les contacts difficiles avec les sources d'information.
 

  

The Intercept 10/03/2015 - Researchers working with the Central Intelligence Agency have conducted a multi-year, sustained effort to break the security of Apple's iPhones and iPads, according to top-secret documents obtained by The Intercept. The security researchers presented their latest tactics and achievements at a secret annual gathering, called the "Jamboree," where attendees discussed strategies for exploiting security flaws in household and commercial electronics. The conferences have spanned nearly a decade, with the first CIA-sponsored meeting taking place a year before the first iPhone was released. By targeting essential security keys used to encrypt data stored on Apple's devices, the researchers have sought to thwart the company's attempts to provide mobile security to hundreds of millions of Apple customers across the globe. Studying both "physical" and "non-invasive" techniques, U.S. government-sponsored research has been aimed at discovering ways to decrypt and ultimately penetrate Apple's encrypted firmware. This could enable spies to plant malicious code on Apple devices and seek out potential vulnerabilities in other parts of the iPhone and iPad currently masked by encryption. The CIA declined to comment for this story.

Read more - Lire plus

La CIA travaillerait depuis des années à décrypter les appareils Apple  

  

 
Autres nouvelles - More news
Anti-terror legislation
Législation anti-terrorisme  
Drones 
Guantanamo

Guerre au terrorisme
War on terror 
Omar Khadr  
Press freedom
Liberté de la presse    
Privacy
Vie privée   
Réflexions sur le terrorisme
Reflections on terrorism 
State secret
Secret d'État 
Terrorism cases
Procès pour terrorisme
Torture 
Miscellenaous
Divers

 

 
CETTE SEMAINE / THIS WEEK
 
Action   

Defend our Freedom
A Day of Action to Stop the Secret Police Bill C-51    



This Saturday March 14, people will gather together in communities across Canada for an emergency day of action to stop the government's "secret police" law.
 
Action   

Canadian security bill puts your rights at risk    

Amnesty International Canada - Bill C-51, The Anti-Terrorism Act, forms the core of the most comprehensive reforms to the Canada 's national security laws since 2001. Widely expanded powers and new criminal offences raise serious human rights concerns.

Send a message to the Minister for Public Safety calling on him to withdraw Bill C-51 and ensure human rights.


Action   

Send a letter to the editor about "secret police" bill C-51!    

OpenMedia - Stephen Harper's Secret Police Bill C-51 is reckless, dangerous, and ineffective. Harper is trying to ram it through Parliament right now. Let's each take a moment to spread the word in our communities by publishing a letter in local newspapers through this easy-to-use tool.


Action   

Reject fear. Stop Harper's "secret police" bill C-51!    

LeadNow.ca - We call on Party leaders and MPs to reject Stephen Harper's fear campaign and stop the bill, unless it's amended to:
-- Include strong safeguards for Canadians, including a dedicated, high-level Parliamentary committee to oversee our spy agencies.
-- Strip out the outrageous attacks on civil liberties, including the sweeping expansion of spy powers, criminalization of speech, and preventative arrest for those who have committed no crime.
-- Clarify that the vague parts of the bill, to be certain it will only be used to target people who pose a violent threat to the lives and physical security of people

Video on Facebook


Film    

The Secret Trial 5 Canada-wide tour dates announced!    

The ST5 team - We are once again facing a move to place perceived security before individual freedom and, as as our film documents, these tactics have very real human consequences. A recent poll suggested that 80% of Canadians agree with Bill C-51 despite criticism from all over the political spectrum. We aim to change that one tour stop at a time. We believe wholeheartedly that when Canadians see the story of The Secret Trial 5, they will be moved by their sense of compassion, not fear.

From March 12th to 26th, 2015 in most major Canadian cities!

Tous les détails
Action   

Signez la pétition pour libérer le blogueur saoudien Raif Badawi  



Amnistie internationale - Raif Badawi, prisonnier d'opinion en Arabie saoudite, risque la mort pour avoir offert un débat sur la liberté religieuse.
Exigeons des autorités saoudiennes que les coups de fouet cessent immédiatement, que Raif soit libéré sans condition, et qu'il soit réuni avec sa famille réfugiée au Canada.
Exigeons de cet État qu'il respecte ses obligations en matière de droits humains et qu'il abolisse la flagellation.



English petition
Arar +10   

Watch the Arar +10: National Security and Human Rights, 10 years later conference

Retrospective of the Past Decade
Opening remarks: Retrospective of the Past Decade
Panel 1: The People and Lives Behind the Issues
Panel 1: The People and Lives Behind the Issues
Panel 2: Perspectives from the Media
Panel 2: Perspectives from the Media
Keynote Panel: Judicial Reflections on National Security and Human Rights
Keynote Panel: Judicial Reflections on National Security and Human Rights
Panel 3: Lawyering for Human Rights in a National Security Context
Panel 3: Lawyering for Human Rights in a National Security Context
Panel 4: A View from Community Level
Panel 4: A View from Community Level
Panel 5: Oversight and Review
Panel 5: Oversight and Review
Closing Remarks
Closing Remarks

Les opinions exprimées ne reflètent pas nécessairement les positions de la CSILC - The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the positions of ICLMG

What is the News Digest? Qu'est-ce que la Revue de l'actualité?

The News Digest is ICLMG's weekly publication of news articles, events, calls to action and much more regarding national security, anti-terrorism, and civil liberties. The ICLMG is a national coalition of thirty-eight Canadian civil society organizations that was established in the aftermath of the September, 2001 terrorist attacks in the United States.
+++
La revue de l'actualité est notre publication hebdomadaire de nouvelles, d'évènements, d'appels à l'action, et beaucoup plus, entourant la sécurité nationale, la lutte au terrorisme, et les libertés civiles. La CSILC est une coalition nationale de 38 organisations de la société civile canadienne qui a été créée suite aux attentats terroristes de septembre 2001 aux États-Unis.