header bilingue
Revue de l'actualité - News Digest 
12 février 2015 - February 12, 2015
Législation antiterroriste
Anti-terror laws 


The Globe and Mail 12/02/2015 -
CSIS has now been given powers to engage in the active disruption of activities that it believes threaten the security of Canada, a power that was once illegally exercised by the RCMP and which led to the creation of CSIS with the mandate to focuso exclusively n intelligence gathering - not to engage in activities that often would otherwise be illegal. As the recent unfortunate history of intelligence agencies in the United States and Britain shows, we should be wary of this expanded mandate for our country's intelligence arm. The exercise of security powers must be made subject to review by an open, publicly observed review process. The work of the current oversight agency, the Security Intelligence Review Committee, while valuable when properly staffed, takes place below the radar of public knowledge. The new bill is defective in not establishing a public process for assessing whether the exercise of these powers respects the entrenched rights of Canadians and is safe for Canadians. Terrorism is a threat throughout the world, including Canada. We cannot adopt a passive attitude toward it. We must invest in discovering terrorist threats and in stopping them. But national security also means defending our democracy, and that depends on holding the loyalty of citizens and maintaining their confidence in a just and stable government. This requires tolerance for diverse opinions, respect for personal integrity and timely and effective accountability for governmental conduct, including security operations. Shortchanging these will only weaken our strength as a nation - and our security. The Prime Minister should withdraw this bill. If it is not withdrawn, Parliament should vote it down. Possibly, then, a more limited and focused statute would be worth debating. Security agencies may feel that their present powers constrain their ability to protect Canada. But let us have an open discussion of this claim within Parliament and its committees before rushing to impose politically motivated "solutions." Our rights as citizens are at stake.

Globe editorial: Anti-terrorism bill will unleash CSIS on a lot more than terrorists

Globe and Mail
05/02/2015 - Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau has announced his party will support the government's new anti-terrorism bill and sort out any vexing details later on. That's a bit like buying a bull because you hope its excrement can be sold as perfume. The NDP - the Official Opposition - actually intends to do its job and oppose the legislation. Here are some questions to help it along: Why does the bill do so much more than fight terrorism? One part of Bill C-51 creates a new definition of an "activity that undermines the sovereignty, security or territorial integrity of Canada" that includes "terrorism," "interference with critical infrastructure" and "interference with the capability of the Government in relation to ... the economic or financial stability of Canada." But wait. If a terrorist blew up critical infrastructure - a pipeline, for instance - wouldn't that be terrorism? So what is this other class of security-underminer the bill refers to? A political party that advocates Quebec independence (there goes our "territorial integrity")? Indian activists who disrupt a train line? Environmental activists denounced as radicals by a cabinet minister? These things are on a par with terrorism now?

Read more - Lire plus


The Tyee 10/02/2015 -
The past 10 days have been a difficult time for Canadians concerned with privacy and civil liberties. Strike one came with new Edward Snowden revelations regarding Canada's role in the daily tracking of the internet activities of millions. Strike two was the introduction of Bill C-51, the anti-terrorism legislation, which sparked concern from observers across the country. Strike three came with the response to those developments, with the government dismissing oversight mechanisms as "red tape" and the opposition parties choosing to focus on process rather than substance. The opposition parties' decision to focus on oversight is unsurprising given the weakness of the current system and the absence of any meaningful reforms within the proposed legislation. Yet the problem with focusing chiefly on oversight is that it leaves the substantive law (in the case of CSE internet surveillance) or proposed law (as in the case of C-51) largely unaddressed. If Canada fails to examine the shortcomings within the current law or within Bill C-51, there is no amount of accountability, oversight, or review that will restore the harm to privacy and civil liberties.
Politique et terrorisme
Politics and terrorism
 
Elizabeth May: Harper's police state law

The Tyee 09/02/2015 - Harper claims to believe Canada is a freedom-loving country. If he's right, he miscalculated in hoping we could be scared out of our wits. We already have anti-terror laws. Terrorism, treason, sedition, espionage, proliferating of nuclear and biological weapons and other offences repeated in C-51 are already illegal. The police already have expanded powers in relation to terrorism. RCMP have powers to disrupt terrorist plots. That's how they broke the Toronto 18, the VIA rail plot and ISIS sympathizers in Ottawa, before they could move their plots into action. Full marks to the RCMP for these proactive successes. Those suspected of terrorism already have a second set of Kafka-esque laws to allow their detention through security certificates. Oversight of the operations of Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) was reduced in the 2012 omnibus Bill C-38. Put simply, Canada has already significantly intruded on charter rights to give the RCMP, CSIS and the Communications Security Establishment (CSE) broader powers and less oversight. Thanks to Edward Snowden, we now know that CSE has been gathering millions of internet communications every day from Canadians -- even though CSE's mandate was supposed to apply only to foreign activities. Under project "Levitation" CSE collects as many as 15 million records of uploads and downloads every day.

 

Read more - Lire plus


Loi antiterroriste : la politique a le dessus

L'actualité 06/02/2015 - Le projet de loi antiterroriste (C-51) n'a même pas encore fait l'objet d'une seule heure de débat aux Communes que les libéraux de Justin Trudeau ont déjà fait leur nid. Ils l'appuieront, que soient acceptés ou non leurs amendements en faveur d'une meilleure surveillance des agences de renseignement et de sécurité et d'une clause crépusculaire obligeant un examen périodique de la loi pour la maintenir en vigueur. Le NPD, qui pourrait faire connaître sa position la semaine prochaine, les accuse d'avoir donné un chèque en blanc au gouvernement, car il pourra ignorer sans sourciller l'avis des libéraux, leur appui lui étant assuré. Cette décision, prise lors du caucus de mercredi et seulement cinq jours après la présentation de ce projet complexe, en est une avant tout politique, quoi qu'en dise Justin Trudeau. Le PLC veut de toute évidence s'éviter les attaques conservatrices et éviter de se mettre une partie de l'électorat à dos.  [...] Pourtant, il a lui-même dit, en évoquant les modifications souhaitées, que lorsqu'un «gouvernement demande à ses citoyens de céder ne serait-ce qu'une minime portion de leur liberté, il a l'ultime responsabilité de garantir que les nouveaux pouvoirs ne conduiront pas à des abus. Ça ne suffit pas, surtout après tout ce que nous avons appris au cours des 14 dernières années, de simplement dire qu'on peut lui faire confiance.» Mais si cela est la responsabilité du gouvernement, celle de l'opposition est de s'assurer que ce même gouvernement assume pleinement cette responsabilité. Pour cela, il faut un vrai débat, une étude studieuse, des questions pointues et une pression de tous les instants afin d'obtenir les amendements jugés nécessaires.

Maximum-effect terror threat
 
NOW Magazine 11/02/2015 - When the RCMP announced an anti-terrorism arrest in Ottawa last week, the timing could not have been better for a federal government that appears to thrive on national security hysteria. After all, Prime Minister Stephen Harper, positioning himself as a wartime leader protecting Canadians from terrorists, had just introduced Bill C-51, legislation that would vastly increase the powers of Canada's state security agencies. Facebook feeds were immediately full of Conservative-sponsored clickbait about "Protecting Canadians From Terrorist Threats" and Public Safety Minister Steven Blaney's personal message proclaiming that "jihadists have declared war on us all." Why was it so important, in the midst of a debate over controversial new policing powers, to detain 25-year-old Awso Peshdary, who appears to have been under surveillance for a good five years, for the alleged crime of raising money to send two Canadians to fight in Syria in 2012 and 2014? In addition, why were the Mounties suddenly issuing warrants that named two individuals overseas (one of them reportedly killed last December) whose activities have long been public knowledge? The federal government's ability to create a mirage of cascading terror threats was further enhanced by its introduction of C-51 before two long-scheduled terrorism proceedings were set to begin. The defendants in those trials - the Toronto Via Rail plot and the BC Canada Day pressure cooker plan - were also arrested at convenient times.

Read more - Lire plus

Thomas Mulcair hopes Quebecers remember NDP was against War Measures Act

Ottawa's anti-terror, corruption crackdowns show the problem with rushing in 
Liberté de la presse
Freedom of the press 


La Presse 12/02/2015 - Un tribunal égyptien chargé de rejuger des journalistes d'Al-Jazeera, dont le Canadien Mohamed Fahmy, emprisonnés pour leur soutien présumé à l'opposition islamiste a ordonné jeudi leur remise en liberté, après plus de 400 jours de détention dans une affaire qui avait déclenché un tollé international. M. Fahmy a été remis en liberté en échange d'une caution de 250 000 livres égyptiennes (environ 41 000 $) tandis que son collègue égyptien Baher Mohamed a été remis en liberté après un engagement à comparaître pour le reste du procès, dont la prochaine audience a été fixée au 23 février. «JE SUIS LIBRE», a immédiatement écrit M. Mohamed sur son compte Twitter. La décision de justice intervient moins de deux semaines après l'expulsion de l'Australien Peter Greste. Le troisième des journalistes de la chaîne qatarie avait été condamné avec ses confrères, mais a quitté l'Égypte le 1er février en vertu d'un décret présidentiel autorisant l'expulsion des étrangers condamnés ou en instance de jugement. [...] «Je n'ai pas choisi de renoncer à ma nationalité égyptienne, un responsable de la sécurité m'a rendu visite et m'a demandé d'abandonner ma nationalité parce que l'État veut se débarrasser de cette affaire qui a tourné au cauchemar», a affirmé M. Fahmy, agitant un drapeau égyptien à la fin de son allocution.

Lire plus

Canadian Mohamed Fahmy released on bail from Cairo jail at opening of retrial on terror-related charges

Mohamed Fahmy's family launches #HarperCallEgypt campaign

Globe editorial: Mr. Harper has to call Egypt - before it's too late

Ottawa makes last-minute diplomatic push ahead of Fahmy trial

Two out of three investigative journalists in US believe they're being spied on

US drops to 49th in World Press Freedom rankings, worst since Obama became president
 
Autres nouvelles - More news
Anti-terror legislation
Législation anti-terrorisme  
Border controls
Contrôles frontaliers   
Criminalisation de la dissidence
Criminalization of dissent 
Drones 
Freedom of speech
Liberté d'expression 
Guantanamo

Guerre au terrorisme
War on terror 
Immigration and refugee rights
Immigration et droits des réfugié.es 
Islamophobie
Islamophobia 
Mass surveillance
Surveillance globale  
Omar Khadr
Privacy
Vie privée
Réflexions sur le terrorisme
Reflections on terrorism 
State secret
Secret d'État 
Terrorism cases
Procès pour terrorisme
Terrorism listings
Listes d'entités terroristes 
Torture 
Miscellenaous
Divers

 

 
CETTE SEMAINE / THIS WEEK
 
Action   

Reject fear. Stop Harper's "secret police" bill C-51!    

LeadNow.ca - We call on MPs to reject Stephen Harper's fear campaign and stop the bill, unless it's amended to:
-- Include strong safeguards for Canadians, including a dedicated, high-level Parliamentary committee to oversee our spy agencies.
-- Strip out the outrageous attacks on civil liberties, including the sweeping expansion of spy powers, criminalization of speech, and preventative arrest for those who have committed no crime.
-- Clarify that the vague parts of the bill, to be certain it will only be used to target people who pose a violent threat to the lives and physical security of people


Action   

Signez la pétition pour libérer le blogueur saoudien Raif Badawi  



Amnistie internationale - Raif Badawi, prisonnier d'opinion en Arabie saoudite, risque la mort pour avoir offert un débat sur la liberté religieuse.
Exigeons des autorités saoudiennes que les coups de fouet cessent immédiatement, que Raif soit libéré sans condition, et qu'il soit réuni avec sa famille réfugiée au Canada.
Exigeons de cet État qu'il respecte ses obligations en matière de droits humains et qu'il abolisse la flagellation.



English petition
Action   

Stop spying on us!   

OpenMedia - Breaking: leaked documents reveal that the Canadian spy agency CSE is conducting widespread, warrantless surveillance targeting use of our favourite downloading websites.

Tell Prime Minister Harper: I will not give up my right to privacy. These rights are more important than ever. End warrantless surveillance and rein in CSE now.


Arar +10   

Watch the Arar +10: National Security and Human Rights, 10 years later conference

Retrospective of the Past Decade
Opening remarks: Retrospective of the Past Decade
Panel 1: The People and Lives Behind the Issues
Panel 1: The People and Lives Behind the Issues
Panel 2: Perspectives from the Media
Panel 2: Perspectives from the Media
Keynote Panel: Judicial Reflections on National Security and Human Rights
Keynote Panel: Judicial Reflections on National Security and Human Rights
Panel 3: Lawyering for Human Rights in a National Security Context
Panel 3: Lawyering for Human Rights in a National Security Context
Panel 4: A View from Community Level
Panel 4: A View from Community Level
Panel 5: Oversight and Review
Panel 5: Oversight and Review
Closing Remarks
Closing Remarks

Les opinions exprimées ne reflètent pas nécessairement les positions de la CSILC - The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the positions of ICLMG

What is the News Digest? Qu'est-ce que la Revue de l'actualité?

The News Digest is ICLMG's weekly publication of news articles, events, calls to action and much more regarding national security, anti-terrorism, and civil liberties. The ICLMG is a national coalition of thirty-eight Canadian civil society organizations that was established in the aftermath of the September, 2001 terrorist attacks in the United States.
+++
La revue de l'actualité est notre publication hebdomadaire de nouvelles, d'évènements, d'appels à l'action, et beaucoup plus, entourant la sécurité nationale, la lutte au terrorisme, et les libertés civiles. La CSILC est une coalition nationale de 38 organisations de la société civile canadienne qui a été créée suite aux attentats terroristes de septembre 2001 aux États-Unis.