News Digest - March 28, 2013
Immigration and refugee rights

AI - Open letter to the Honourable Vic Toews
 
Amnesty International 21/03/2013 - Amnesty International is deeply concerned that filming and broadcasting immigration raids may endanger the lives of some of the people in question, as well as those of their families.  Some of the individuals  who are filmed in the course of these raids might have attempted to seek asylum in the past, or may be intending to seek refugee protection in the future. If such individuals are subsequently removed from Canada, they may face an even greater risk upon return to the countries they were fleeing, because of the publicity of their case through the television broadcast. This risk could also apply to family members who are deported, or who had remained in the country of origin. In AI's view, because of the possible presence of refugee claimants or other individuals who may face a risk of human rights violations in their country of origin, filming and broadcasting immigration raids is inherently and unpredictably dangerous.

 

Read more

Civil liberties watchdog files formal complaint against CBSA's use of Reality TV
Privacy

Police will need wiretap authority to snoop on private text messages, Supreme Court rules
 
The Canadian Press 19/03/2013 - The Supreme Court of Canada says police need wiretap authority, not just a search warrant, to snoop on cellphone text messages as part of criminal investigations. In a 5-2 decision, the court has sided with wireless giant Telus and quashed a general warrant that had forced the company to turn over all texts to police. The case arises from a warrant the Ontario Superior Court granted to police in Owen Sound, Ont., that ordered Telus to turn over texts from two of its customers. The warrant forced the company to email police a copy of the customers' texts every day for two weeks, unbeknownst to the owners of the phones. Telus appealed to the Supreme Court after losing its initial bid to quash the warrant.

 

Read more

Toronto Star editorial: Supreme Court is right to upholds texters' privacy
Iraq: 10 years later  

Media coverage of Iraq War anniversary erases role of popular protest

rabble.ca 28/03/2013 - While the more liberal end of the dominant media regurgitated the former PM's claim, it's completely false to say Canada did not participate in the 2003 invasion of Iraq. But the Jean Chrétien government didn't do what the Bush administration wanted above all else, which was to publicly endorse the invasion by joining the "coalition of the willing." Notwithstanding Chrétien's claims, this wasn't because he distrusted Bush's pre-war intelligence or because of any moral principle. Rather, the Liberal government refused to join the "coalition of the willing" because hundreds of thousands of Canadians took to the streets against the war, particularly in Quebec. With the biggest demonstrations taking place in Montréal and Quebecers strongly opposed to the war, the federal government feared that openly endorsing the invasion would boost the sovereignist Parti Québecois vote in the next provincial election.

Read more

'Enough is enough': U.S. war resister and Iraqi-Canadian reflect on decade of war

Exclusive: Dying Iraq war veteran Tomas Young reads "last letter" to President Bush and Dick Cheney

US 'shock and audit' over Iraq expenses

Reviewing this week's mea culpas on Iraq: The good, the bad and the ugly

Dahr Jamail returns to Iraq to find rampant torture and a failed state living in "utter devastation"

Iraq: 'You didn't fall... we pushed you'

"Leaning in" in Iraq: Women's rights and war?

The media didn't fail on Iraq; Iraq just showed we have a failed media

Phil Donahue on his 2003 firing from MSNBC, when Liberal network couldn't tolerate antiwar voices

The Republicans, "victims" of the Iraq war

Who won the Iraq War? China
War on terror   

Congress shouldn't give the President new power to fight terrorists

Slate 26/03/2013 - Though no one much noticed amid the debate over whether the CIA or the Pentagon should be in charge of drone strikes, last week the Senate Foreign Relations Committee heard testimony on the need for a new and improved law authorizing the president to use lethal force against a new and changeable set of terrorist groups. This week, Republican Sen. Bob Corker of Tennessee announced plans to introduce legislation that does just that. The idea is that now the war against al-Qaida is nearly won, it may be time to declare war anew, this time against one or more of a score of emerging radical Islamist groups who were "inspired" by some part of al-Qaida's message.

Read more
Rule of law
 
Statutes of limitations are expiring on some Bush crimes

The Nation
20/03/2013 - Americans have been facing a number of momentous deadlines, including the expiration of the Bush tax cuts and  the "sequester" of $1 trillion from federal programs. But another critical deadline is fast approaching without attracting much notice. Statutes of limitations applicable to possible crimes committed by former President George W. Bush and his top aides, with respect to wiretapping of Americans without court approval and to fraud in launching and continuing the Iraq War, may expire in early 2014, less than a year from now.

Read more

Videos - Rachel Maddow show: When do we start the war crimes trial?

As new drone policy is weighed, few practical effects are seen

Drones visualization: Every U.S. drone strike in Pakistan since 2004

So, who can we kill?

President Obama: The drones don't work, they just make it worse

A 50-point swing against targeted drone killings of U.S. citizens

Drone base in Niger gives U.S. a strategic foothold in West Africa 
 
More news
Access to information        

Anti-terrorism laws       

Aviation security     

Border security     

Guantanamo      

Immigration and refugee rights 

Internet freedom  

National security  

No-fly lists   

Racism     
State secrecy 

Surveillance and privacy      
Terrorism       
War in Mali        
War on terror       
Miscellaneous

 

About us

 

The ICLMG is a national coalition of thirty-nine Canadian civil society organizations that was established in the aftermath of the September, 2001 terrorist attacks in the United States. You will find in this News Digest news articles, events, calls to action and much more regarding national security, anti-terrorism, civil liberties and other issues related to the mandate and concerns of ICLMG and its member organizations.


Take action 

Deportation is not entertainment! Cancel the reality show Border Security     

Dozens of people were interrogated, arrested, and detained by the Canadian Border Services Agency. One of them was my husband.  Shockingly, some of these traumatic experiences were filmed for a reality TV show "Border Security" which airs on National Geographic Channel. Sign the petition to urge National Geographic Channel and Force Four Entertainment, to cancel the show "Border Security" immediately. 

 

Take action 

Donate to the legal fund for Mohamed Mahjoub    

The security certificate process was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of Canada in the 2007 Charkaoui ruling. A new certificate was issued against Mr. Mahjoub in February 2008 under this new process and he was forced to begin the process all over again. The Federal Court has not yet ruled on the 'reasonability' of the new certificate against him. In the context of these new security certificate proceedings, Mr. Mahjoub was subject to an unprecedented violation of his rights. The present fund-raising initiative is aimed at obtaining a permanent stay of the unfair proceedings against him in light of this unprecedented violation.

 

Take action 

"Hundred for Hassan" Campaign   

Hassan will be put in prison if he does not pay his "creditor" - in this case, the Canadian government - $2,000 per month for the cost of his own surveillance. We invite you to be one of 100 people who care about due process and the presumption of innocence and oppose abusive extradition proceedings, by pledging $20 per month or more to share the cost of Dr. Diab's oppressive burden. This is our way of taking a public stand and saying, "This is just wrong."