News Digest - March 21, 2013
Border security

Border Security: Exploiting Immigrants for Canadian Reality TV
 
The Huffington Post 19/03/2013 - Our own federal government put its stamp of approval on a Hunger Games-like "misery for reality-TV" show. And it's our  bureaucrats' time and expertise that will serve as pawns in the scheme. Luke put it this way to the CBC: "I think CBSA is putting in in-kind contributions in the way of staff time. Clearly, they have a huge burden in terms of vetting the footage." Lowly undocumented workers, desperate to leave their horrible homelands to start a new life in the 11th best country in the world, are now fodder for the cable television subscribers' amusement. The state is volunteering in-kind contributions (government workers' time) for a corporate venture to garner ratings and valuable advertising dollars under the cloak of "promotion of Canada's commitment to border security." Reports point to the TV consent forms being offered up to the alleged undocumented personnel before they were given access to a legal representative. How exactly is that prioritization conducive to "Canada's commitment to border security"?

 

Read more

Migrant workers raid by border agents filmed by camera crew

Fury after B.C. immigration agents allegedly invite reality TV crew to "American style" raids

TV cameras filming CBSA immigration raids for reality show is okay: Public Safety Minister Vic Toews

Video: Tories defend border security TV show

Ottawa Citizen Editorial: Exploiting migrants

Opinion: Immigration raids are not a form of TV entertainment
Omar Khadr

Faulty info in file suggests he killed two Afghans
 
The Canadian Press 19/03/2013 - The federal government's file on Omar Khadr contains faulty information based on a memo prepared by a senior policy analyst for Public Safety Minister Vic Toews, internal documents obtained by The Canadian Press suggest. The memo, by Liliane Keryluk, contains a series of statements reflecting Khadr's 2010 deal with a U.S. military commission in which he pleaded guilty to five war crimes, among them throwing a hand grenade that killed an American special forces soldier in Afghanistan. However Keryluk's memo - reprised in Toews' decision - goes even further than American military prosecutors. In particular, her memo asserts: "Mr. Khadr engaged U.S. military and coalition personnel with small-arms fire, killing two members of the Afghan militia force. He threw and/or fired grenades at nearby coalition forces, resulting in numerous injuries to them." Although someone inside the compound where Khadr was staying shot the two Afghans, nowhere in his signed admission, which was drafted by military commission prosecutors, is there any suggestion he personally killed them.

 

Read more
Iraq: 10 years later  

Warm and fuzzies: Canadian mythmaking on the 10th anniversary of a slaughter
 
rabble.ca 19/03/2013 - This past week has provided Canadians with a series of warm and fuzzies that, like most of this nation's mythology, were built on self-congratulatory lies. From the breathless and ankle-deep CBC and CTV interviews with former prime minister Jean Chretien to the Globe and Mail's front-page shout out to that most disingenuous of foreign ministers, Bill Graham, the occasion was the
10th anniversary of the 2003 escalation of the 23-year war against the people of Iraq. That numerically awkward phrase is necessary because 2003 was billed as a new war when, in fact, the aggression against the Iraqi people never ended following the 1991 slaughter from the skies. Canada spent over a billion dollars militarily enforcing sanctions that were described by UN officials as genocidal. Canada more than made up for that outlay with billions in war contracts for everything from the hundreds of millions of bullets pouring out of the Quebec SNC-TEC factory to guidance systems for cruise missiles and drone strikes produced by the likes of Northrup Grumman (Litton) and L-3 Wescam.

Read more

10 years later: Harper was wrong on Iraq, so why are war resisters still being punished?

Canada's 'no' to Iraq war a defining moment for Prime Minister, even 10 years later

A war of agression

rsn 20/03/2013 - According to sources inside the administration, George W. Bush was planning to invade Iraq and remove its government well  before the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. Such an invasion violates the UN Charter, which the United States signed in 1945 after the bloodiest conflict in history. The Charter permits countries to use military force against another country only in self-defense or with Security Council permission. But the evidence indicates that the US-led invasion satisfied neither condition and is therefore a war of aggression, which constitutes a Crime Against Peace Ğ exactly the kind of war the Charter was meant to prevent.

Read more

Iraq war's missing prisoners: families search for 16,000 unaccounted who may be held in secret prisons

Fresh evidence: MI6 and CIA were told before invasion that Iraq had no active WMD

Arundhati Roy on Iraq War's 10th: Bush may be gone, but "psychosis" of U.S. Foreign Policy prevails

Iraq war cost $800 billion, and what do we have to show for it?

Way worse than a dumb war: Iraq ten years later

A decade of occupation for Iraqi women

Right to heal: Iraqi civilians join U.S. veterans in new effort to recover from war's devastation

Iraq: Where terrorists go to school

David Frum, the Iraq war and oil

What happened to the US press corps?

NYT Editorial - Iraq's fragile future

"We've lost our country": An Iraqi American looks back on a decade of war that's devastated a nation

The Senate's 10-year Iraq war anniversary gift: war with Iran
Rule of law
 
US drone strikes in Pakistan violate country's sovereignty, UN says 

The Huffington Post
15/03/2013 - The head of a U.N. team investigating casualties from U.S. drone strikes in Pakistan declared after a secret research trip to the country that the attacks violate Pakistan's sovereignty. Ben Emmerson, the U.N. special rapporteur on human rights and counter-terrorism, said the Pakistani government made clear to him that it does not consent to the strikes - a position that has been disputed by U.S. officials. According to a U.N. statement that Emmerson emailed to The Associated Press on Friday, the Pakistani government told him it has confirmed at least 400 civilian deaths by U.S. drones on its territory. The statement was initially released on Thursday, following the investigator's three-day visit to Pakistan, which ended Wednesday. The visit was kept secret until Emmerson left.

Read more 

On April 16, let experts who did on-the-ground research in Pakistan testify about the drone strikes

The Huffington Post 19/03/2013 - On April 16, the Constitution Subcommittee of the Senate Judiciary Committee, chaired by Senator Dick Durbin of Illinois, is holding a hearing about U.S.  drone strikes in Pakistan, Yemen, and Somalia: about their Constitutionality, about their legality, about whether they are really in the interest of the United States, and about whether they are just and moral. This is historic. There's never been such a Congressional hearing before. That means that Durbin's hearing could be a historic opportunity for Americans to learn something about what is actually going on with the drone strike policy. 

 
 
More news
Access to information      

Criminalization of dissent    

Freedom of press     

Freedom of speech      

Guantanamo      

Immigration and refugee rights 

National security  

Racism     

State secrecy 

Surveillance and privacy      
Terrorism       
War in Mali        
War on terror       
Miscellaneous

 

About us

 

The ICLMG is a national coalition of thirty-nine Canadian civil society organizations that was established in the aftermath of the September, 2001 terrorist attacks in the United States. You will find in this News Digest news articles, events, calls to action and much more regarding national security, anti-terrorism, civil liberties and other issues related to the mandate and concerns of ICLMG and its member organizations.


Take action 

Deportation is not entertainment! Cancel the reality show Border Security     

Dozens of people were interrogated, arrested, and detained by the Canadian Border Services Agency. One of them was my husband.  Shockingly, some of these traumatic experiences were filmed for a reality TV show "Border Security" which airs on National Geographic Channel. Sign the petition to urge National Geographic Channel and Force Four Entertainment, to cancel the show "Border Security" immediately. 

 

Take action 

Donate to the legal fund for Mohamed Mahjoub    

The security certificate process was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of Canada in the 2007 Charkaoui ruling. A new certificate was issued against Mr. Mahjoub in February 2008 under this new process and he was forced to begin the process all over again. The Federal Court has not yet ruled on the 'reasonability' of the new certificate against him. In the context of these new security certificate proceedings, Mr. Mahjoub was subject to an unprecedented violation of his rights. The present fund-raising initiative is aimed at obtaining a permanent stay of the unfair proceedings against him in light of this unprecedented violation.

 

Take action 

"Hundred for Hassan" Campaign   

Hassan will be put in prison if he does not pay his "creditor" - in this case, the Canadian government - $2,000 per month for the cost of his own surveillance. We invite you to be one of 100 people who care about due process and the presumption of innocence and oppose abusive extradition proceedings, by pledging $20 per month or more to share the cost of Dr. Diab's oppressive burden. This is our way of taking a public stand and saying, "This is just wrong."