News Digest - February 14, 2013
Privacy

Victory for Internet freedom: Conservatives won't bring back online surveillance bill    

rabble.ca 12/02/2013 - After a massive public outcry, the Conservatives have ditched their online surveillance bill once and for all.

Monday's statements from the government mark the defeat of legislation that Public Safety Minister Vic Toews once advocated for by stating that critics of the bill had to decide whether they were "with us or with the child pornographers."

Justice Minister Rob Nicholson explained that the controversial provisions the government had tried to push through with Bill C-30 will not be resurrected. "This is a victory for privacy and for freedom," said Ontario Privacy Commissioner Ann Cavoukian

 

Read more

Torture

Afghan govt acknowledges torture of detainees but denies systematic abuse of prisoners 

The Washington Post 11/02/2013 -  An Afghan government panel acknowledged Monday that  detainees face widespread torture but denied there is systematic abuse in government-run prisons. The panel's findings were the result of a two-week fact-finding mission following a U.N. report last month that said Afghan authorities are still torturing prisoners despite promises of reforms. The country's intelligence service earlier had denied any torture in its detention facilities.

 

Read more

"He was the agency": Ex-CIA analyst questions Brennan claim he couldn't stop waterboarding, torture

 Brennan and Kiriakou, drones and torture
War in Mali

Op-Ed: Canadians are right to worry about getting involved in Mali
 
The Ottawa Citizen 12/02/2013 - The Canadian public is leery of the role being played by our military in the troubled West African country of Mali, and rightly so. Having emerged from the sacrifices made in Afghanistan with seemingly little to show for them, Canadians cannot be faulted for fearing "mission creep" and involvement in another unwinnable conflict. Some have found this reluctance to embrace the war frustrating. War historian Jack Granatstein, a well-known supporter of a strong Canadian military and critic of UN peacekeeping, used these pages last week to berate what he described as "the pacifist left," and my organization in particular, the Rideau Institute, for not supporting the Harper government's military contribution to the conflict. But as a historian, can Granatstein overlook our past mistakes in Afghanistan, only to repeat them in Mali? Even Time Magazine described Mali as "Africanistan."

 

Read more

Mali and the true cost of Canada's military adventures in Africa

Weak support in poll for sending Canadian troops to Mali

Baird warns Mali involvement invites 'another Afghanistan'

Left behind in a house in Timbuktu, al-Qaida's manifesto, outlining strategic vision for Mali

Islam is not the real issue we are facing in Africa

Mokhtar Belmokthar could be added to secret 'kill' list, move driven by senior Obama officials

Mali: Is France's Operation Serval anti-terrorism or pro-business?

'We did not predict this': Top Algerian Minister discusses January hostage crisis
War on terror 

Comment: Terror - America scared witless

The Huffington Post 14/02/2013 - Most of our frenetic violence in the "war on terror" has been misguided: its chosen targets of uncertain threat to the United States, its methods crude, its implementation incompetent and corrupt (except in narrow and tactical military terms), politically obtuse, ethically deeply compromised and counter-productive. It has come to be robotic as muscle displaces mind. Driven by fear rather than foresight, the trumpeted "WAR ON TERROR" has seriously damaged American. The gravest, most enduring damage has been done to American self-identity and the country's capacity for somber, discriminating action -- as opposed to disjointed, aimless flailing. As with an auto-immune system run amok, the over stressed body politic began to attack itself. The killing of American citizens by drones, the gross abuses of civil liberties represented by massive surveillance and now the draconian provisions of the NDAA that VOID basic habeas corpus provisions of the Constitution, and the suppression of criticism are doing irreparable harm to the health of the Republic.

Read more

The imaginary world of the 'war against al-Qaida'

Despite planned troop withdrawal, special ops & private forces prepare to continue Afghan war

Obama calls al-Qaida 'shadow of former self' but still evolving threat

How the Iraq war was sold
Rule of law

The NDAA and the death of the democratic state 

truthdig 11/02/2013 - On Wednesday a few hundred activists crowded into the courtroom of the Second Circuit, the spillover room with its  faulty audio feed and dearth of chairs, and Foley Square outside the
Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse in
Manhattan where many huddled in the cold. The fate of the nation, we understood, could be decided by the three judges who will rule on our lawsuit against President Barack Obama for signing into law Section 1021(b)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). The section permits the military to detain anyone, including U.S. citizens, who "substantially support"-an undefined legal term-al-Qaida, the Taliban or "associated forces," again a term that is legally undefined. Those detained can be imprisoned indefinitely by the military and denied due process until "the end of hostilities." In an age of permanent war this is probably a lifetime. 
The short slide from drones to despotism

The Huffington Post 11/02/2013 - This past week a secret white paper outlining legal justifications for the targeted killing of a U.S. citizen came to light. The brief, titled "Lawfulness of a Lethal Operation Directed Against a U.S. Citizen who is a Senior Operational Leader of Al Qaida or an Associated Force" discusses how the Obama administration might find legal support for what appears on first glance as a patently illegal act.The paper argues that the extrajudicial killing of US citizens does not violate citizens' 5th Amendment rights to due process, nor does it violate 4th Amendment rights to unreasonable searches and seizures. What's more, the paper even goes so far as to claim that the policy of targeted assassination of suspected members of Al-Qa'ida (AQ) does not violate US federal bans on unlawful killings in Title 18 or Executive Order 12333, which bans assassinations. In other words, the policy denies that government does any sort of wrong by acting outside of a body of constitutional and federal law that states the contrary.

Read more

Five Afghan children among ten civilians killed in NATO/US drone attack

Afghan children deaths: Hundreds killed by U.S. in last five years, UN 'alarmed' by civilian casualties

Blowback from US drone strikes on Pakistan leaves 10 civilians dead

DOJ kill list memo forces many Dems out of the closet as overtly unprincipled hacks

Kelly McParland: Obama's licence to kill worries friends and foes alike

John Brennan CIA drone hearing repeats hideous history: Mallick

Juan Cole: Top ten surprises of the Brennan hearing on CIA torture and drones

Innocent until proven guilty; imminent until proven - too late!

Analysis: Debating a court to vet drone strikes

'Trust us' won't do: How to hold Obama accountable for drone strikes

Whom can the US President kill?

State of the drones

Drone wars

US newspapers accused of complicity as drone report reopens security debate


Drone-speak lexicon: from 'bugsplat' to 'targeted killing'

Radio: A former drone operator speaks out

UN concerns about U.S. strikes killing hundreds of Afghan children 'unfounded' says NATO

Exclusive: U.N.'s drone investigator backs Brennan for top CIA job

Dick Cheney: Obama drone program is 'a good policy'

Jeremy Scahill: Assassinations of U.S. citizens largely ignored at Brennan CIA hearing

Critics: 'Doublespeak' and 'pure show' at Brennan's confirmation hearing

Brennan's obscene testimony at confirmation hearing

CODEPINK repeatedly disrupts Brennan hearing calling out names of civilians killed in drone strikes 
 
More news
Access to information    

Anti-terror laws   

Border security    

Criminalization of dissent     

Drones   
Guantanamo  

Immigration and refugee rights     

National security  

Racism  

Rendition to torture    

State secrets      
Miscellaneous

 

About us

 

The ICLMG is a national coalition of thirty-nine Canadian civil society organizations that was established in the aftermath of the September, 2001 terrorist attacks in the United States. You will find in this News Digest news articles, events, calls to action and much more regarding national security, anti-terrorism, civil liberties and other issues related to the mandate and concerns of ICLMG and its member organizations.


ICLMG in the news

Critics say biometric borders threaten civil liberties 
 
A new biometric system designed to screen temporary residents entering Canada has come under fire from the NDP and activists who warn that data-sharing with the U.S. threatens civil liberties and signals a dystopic future. "If you've never committed a crime, you have the right under the Charter to be anonymous from the state, unless you're doing an operation that requires a permit, like driving a car," says Roch Tassé, coordinator of the Ottawa-based International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group, a coalition that includes Amnesty International and other human rights groups.
Take action 

"Hundred for Hassan" Campaign   

Hassan will be put in prison if he does not pay his "creditor" - in this case, the Canadian government - $2,000 per month for the cost of his own surveillance. We invite you to be one of 100 people who care about due process and the presumption of innocence and oppose abusive extradition proceedings, by pledging $20 per month or more to share the cost of Dr. Diab's oppressive burden. This is our way of taking a public stand and saying, "This is just wrong."

 

Take action 

The Secret Trial 5 - donate to make the documentary a reality  

***6 days left!***

Many Canadians view the so-called War on Terror as something distant, something far away. The reality is, it has struck much closer to home than most of us realize. There are men, women and families right here in Canada that have been caught in its web. Our film is about five such individuals, and five such families.
Click below to watch an excerpt and share with your networks.

 

Event     

NCCAR presents:
An evening with Miko Peled: Can Israelis and Palestinians live together?  

 

Tuesday, February 26th
7:30pm
St. Paul University Auditorium, 233 Main Street, Ottawa

$10 ($15 at door)

 

An optimistic assessment of one of the world's most intractable problems. Miko Peled, Israeli/American Jew, former Israeli soldier, son of a famous Israeli general, discusses his frank views in a courageous new book. The book will be available for sale and signing by Mr Peled. This event is endorsed by the Independent Jewish Voices and the Group of 78.