and from existing funds already held by the club.
The lease agreement and memorandum of understanding between the two clubs was signed in March 2014.
As part of the research for the grant application, the original terrain specifications (taken from the EPA website) were provided to several builders. Only one quote was received (£21,000) and this was used as the figure for terrain construction in the grant application.
The balance of the grant was for soil removal (£10k), Professional fees (£2k), Shelter (£4k), Building an access path (£4.5k) and a contingency (£3.5k)
As the requirements of the Sports England grant are detailed and quite stringent the committee decided that the terrain should be professionally designed to ensure that the ground conditions and slope were properly addressed.
It now seems that this original estimate did not take into account the amount of drainage needed, and the significant slope of the land. Initial feedback from contractors indicated that the cost of building the terrain may be significantly higher than originally anticipated
Context: As outlined above, we need to do things 'by the book' in order to meet Sport England requirements. They will not release any grant money to the Club unless detailed and stringent requirements are met.
Size and location of the terrain: 'approx 36m x 20m' is specified in lease agreement. LSC need to have access on all sides of the terrain for their tractor / mower to cut the grass and the hedge. LSC are keen to retain as much space as possible on the clubhouse side for football practice, and allow space to extend their car park on the upper field.
Fencing: Fencing is needed on the West side of the terrain to prevent footballers using the practice pitch falling onto terrain. The level of the terrain above the ground on the East side means that fencing will also be required on this side to prevent players and boules going down the slope.
Drainage: There is a spring in the football pitch meaning that both water from the spring and rainwater run-off need to be properly addressed.
Disabled access: initial discussions with LSC indicated that wheelchair access could be via the existing concrete path with a new shallow gradient path constructed diagonally through the hedge line (following removal of this section of hedge). Since these initial discussions, LSC have installed additional WC facilities with concrete path and surrounds, which mean that this route can no longer be used. We will need to look at alternative means of wheelchair access.
Planning: despite the commonly held view that planning consent is not required, B&NES planners have confirmed, both to Diana Lockwood and the Architect that both full planning and building regulation consent will be required, as this is regarded as 'development with engineering works'. This is regardless of whether we go for retaining walls or a banked earth method of construction. If it had been possible to proceed without planning consent, we would have done so. Sport England (as part of the condition of the grant) require confirmation of planning consent from the local planning authority or evidence that it is not required. Clearly B&NES will not provide the latter.
Terrain design / specification: there is no single accepted method of terrain construction. Internet research reveals some common factors, but the actual materials and layers used need to address: soil type, slope, drainage, local rainfall.
The EPA website gives dimensions for international level of competitions, however below this level the dimensions can vary once minimum piste size has been met.
Action / progress to date: