Toxics Use Reduction Institute
  | 
 May 16, 2016 
 |   
 |  
  | 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 | 
 This is the bi-weekly bulletin of the TURI Library at the University of Massachusetts Lowell. Greenlist Bulletin provides previews of recent publications and websites relevant to reducing the use of toxic chemicals by industries, businesses, communities, individuals and government. You are welcome to send a message to mary@turi.org if you would like more information on any of the articles listed here, or if this email is not displaying properly. 
  
 |  
  | 
  
 
 
 
 
 Mass. firefighters seek ban on flame retardants 
Source: The Boston Globe, April 24, 2016Author: David Abel Amid growing concern that flame retardants are responsible for  elevated cancer rates in firefighters, Massachusetts lawmakers are  pushing legislation that would go further than any other state's in  banning the use of chemicals meant to slow the spread of fires.
 
  Fire  officials and environmental advocates, who have joined forces to  support the restrictions, contend that at least 10 chemicals used in  flame retardants endanger firefighters, while doing little to stop  fires. They support two bills that would prohibit manufacturers and  retailers from using the chemicals in children's products and  upholstered furniture and authorize state environmental officials to ban  other retardants they designate as health risks.  
 |  
  | 
  
 
  | 
  
   | 
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
  
  
 
 
 | 
 Characterizing Flame Retardant Applications and Potential Human Exposure in Backpacking Tents  
Source: Environmental Science & Technology, April 15, 2016 Authors: Genna Gomes, Peyton Ward, Amelia Lorenzo, Kate Hoffman, and Heather M. Stapleton
 
 Flame retardant (FR) chemicals are applied to products to meet flammability standards; however, exposure to some additive FRs has been shown to be associated with adverse health effects. Previous research on FR exposure has primarily focused on chemicals applied to furniture and electronics; however, camping tents sold in the United States, which often meet flammability standard CPAI-84, remain largely unstudied in regards to their chemical treatments. In this study, FRs from five brands of CPAI-84-compliant, two-person backpacking tents were measured and potential exposure was assessed. Dermal and inhalation exposure levels were assessed by collecting hand wipes from 20 volunteers before and after tent setup and by using active air samplers placed inside assembled tents, respectively. Organophosphate flame retardants (OPFRs) were the most commonly detected FR in the tent materials and included triphenyl phosphate (TPHP), tris(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl)phosphate (TDCIPP) and tris(2-chloroethyl)phosphate (TCEP). Levels of OPFRS measured on hand wipes were significantly higher post-tent setup compared to pre setup, and in the case of TDCIPP, levels were 29 times higher post setup. OPFRs were also detected at measurable concentrations in the air inside of treated tents. Significant, positive correlations were found between FR levels in treated textiles and measures of dermal and inhalation exposure. These results demonstrate that dermal exposure to FRs occurs from handling camping tents and that inhalation exposure will likely occur while inside a tent.
 
  Read more...
  |  
 | 
 New York Assembly passes children's products bill  
Source: Chemical Watch, May 11, 2016 Author: Kelly Franklin
 
 New York's Assembly has passed a bill aimed at regulating substances  of concern in children's products, through reporting requirements,  substance bans and retail signage.
 
  The "Child Safe Products Act" (AB 5612) passed the Assembly by a 112-29 margin, and now moves to the Senate.
 
  The  bill says the state Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC)  should establish lists of priority chemicals and chemicals of high  concern. Requirements for products, containing the substances, would  include: - reporting their presence, along with additional  data, to the DEC, with the information to be made available on the  agency's website;
 - a Prop 65-style requirement for retailers to  "conspicuously post notice to consumers, identifying such products and  the priority chemicals they contain"; and,
 - a sales ban on covered products containing them from 1 January 2019.
  Read more...  |  
 Organic pesticide being tested 
Source: Albuquerque Journal, April 25, 2016Author: Kevin Robinson-Avila ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. -- A new organic pesticide developed at New Mexico State University is being tested this spring in California's Salinas Valley, where some of the world's biggest organic commercial growers are based.
 
  If the tests show the product, called NMX, is successful in killing  fungal and bacterial infections, it could find a ready market in  California and beyond, particularly among growers of leafy vegetables,  which today have very few natural pesticides to protect their crops,  said Luke Smith, an NMSU graduate and head of EcoSeal, the new company  working to market NMX. Read more...  
 |  
 | 
 The $100 billion business case for safer chemistry     
Source: GreenBiz.com, May 6, 2016 Author: Libby Bernick
 
 What would be the value to businesses and our economy if safer  chemistry replaced conventional approaches? Is there a way to put a  monetary value on the risks and opportunities?
 
  Economic benefits  might include more jobs or a reduction in societal costs due to an  accidental release of hazardous chemicals. Business benefits might  include increased revenues for new products or reduced operating  expenses, because hazardous chemicals no longer require special handling  and management.
 
  
Two long-time thought leaders on the topic of  safer chemistry, the American Sustainable Business Council (ASBC) and  the Green Chemistry & Commerce Council (GC3), set out to determine  the business and economic case for safer chemistry. Trucost was engaged  to research the value of safer chemistry and devised an eight-part  framework to look at both risks and opportunities for businesses and  economies.
 
  
Read more...  |  
 Impact to Underground  Sources of Drinking Water and Domestic Wells from Production Well  Stimulation and Completion Practices in the Pavillion, Wyoming, Field  Source: Environmental Science & Technology, March 29, 2016 Authors: Dominic C. DiGiulio and Robert B. Jackson
 
 A comprehensive analysis of all publicly available data and reports was  conducted to evaluate impact to Underground Sources of Drinking Water  (USDWs) as a result of acid stimulation and hydraulic fracturing in the  Pavillion, WY, Field. Although injection of stimulation fluids into  USDWs in the Pavillion Field was documented by EPA, potential impact to  USDWs at the depths of stimulation as a result of this activity was not  previously evaluated. Concentrations of major ions in produced water  samples outside expected levels in the Wind River Formation, leakoff of  stimulation fluids into formation media, and likely loss of zonal  isolation during stimulation at several production wells, indicates that  impact to USDWs has occurred. Detection of organic compounds used for  well stimulation in samples from two monitoring wells installed by EPA,  plus anomalies in major ion concentrations in water from one of these  monitoring wells, provide additional evidence of impact to USDWs and  indicate upward solute migration to depths of current groundwater use.  Detections of diesel range organics and other organic compounds in  domestic wells <600 m from unlined pits used prior to the mid-1990s  to dispose diesel-fuel based drilling mud and production fluids suggest  impact to domestic wells as a result of legacy pit disposal practices.
 
  Read more...
  See articles from Ars Technica, "Ex-EPA scientist published Wyoming fracking study that agency abandoned" and The Guardian, "Scientists find fracking contaminated Wyoming water after EPA halted study".
  Also see information from the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality, "Pavillion Investigation"; the US EPA, "Pavillion"; and various articles on the topic from the Wyoming Public Media Statewide Network.
 
  |  
 | 
 New Report: Agricultural Pesticides Increasingly  Linked to Childhood Cancers & Neurological Harm        
Source: Pesticide Action Network (PAN) - North America, May 10, 2016
 
 Oakland, California -- A  new report released today spotlights pesticides used in the food system and the  harmful effects they are having on the nation's children. In particular,  the report finds that children living or attending school near  agricultural fields face some of the greatest risk of exposure from  pesticides linked to cancers and the developing brain. Kids on the Frontline: How pesticides are undermining the health of  rural children provides a rigorous assessment of dozens of independent  studies reviewed by leading academic experts in the field. The report  finds that the research has grown increasingly strong surrounding the  links between pesticides used in food production and health harms, like  cancers -- particularly leukemia and brain tumors -- and developmental  disorders or delays, including autism spectrum disorders.
 
  "Children in agricultural communities are on the front line of  exposure to pesticides that don't stay where they're put," said Emily  Marquez, PhD, an endocrinologist and staff scientist at PAN, as well as  one of the authors of the report. "Pesticides linked to cancer and  neurological harm travel through air, water and dust, ending up in homes  and schools -- and eventually in children's bodies."
 
  Children are facing what leading researchers have termed a "silent  pandemic" of diseases driven by environmental factors, including  pesticides. Rates of childhood leukemia and brain tumors have risen more  than 40 percent in the last fifty years, and one in every six U.S.  children are now diagnosed with one or more developmental disabilities.  Read more...
  See report from PAN North America, "Kids on the Frontline: How pesticides are undermining the health of rural children".  
  Also see article by Elizabeth Grossman, "Children in Farm Communities Pay a Steep Price for the Food We Eat".
  |  
 | 
 What Stinks? Toxic Phthalates in Your Home  
Source: Environmental Health Strategy Center and Prevent Harm, May 2016 Authors: Mike Belliveau, Emma Halas O'Connor, and Elyse C. Tipton
 
 Maine is a national leader in protecting public health from dangerous chemicals in everyday products. In 2008, the Pine Tree State passed one of the first and strongest state-based chemical policy reform known as the Kid Safe Products Act. Similar chemical safety laws have since been enacted in California, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington, are pending [sic] in several other states.
 
  Under Maine's law, manufacturers must disclose their use of high-priority chemicals of concern in consumer products sold in the state. They can be required to search for safer substitutes. The Kid Safe Products Act further authorizes the state to phase out chemical uses if safer alternatives are available, effective, and affordable.
 
  
In 2014, a grassroots campaign led by concerned Maine moms and health professionals petitioned the state to add four phthalates (THAL-eights) to its list of Priority Chemicals. Maine agreed, and some product manufacturers were required to report phthalate use by December 2015.
 
  
This report unveils those results, including some first-ever public data on the use of phthalates.
 
  
Read more...  |  
 | 
 Math May Be a Better Way to Help Researchers Test Consumer Products 
Source: University of Cincinnati, May 10, 2016
 
 
CINCINNATI -- Researchers at the University of  Cincinnati (UC) James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy are presenting  collaborative research on the use of mathematical methods for  understanding the transportation of chemical compounds in biological  tissues, like the skin.  
  
This could lead to better ways of testing cosmetic or consumer products without harming humans or animals.   
  
 Read more...
  Also see articles from the Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, "An Evaluation of Mathematical Models for Predicting Skin Permeability", and the journal Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology, "Mathematical models for skin toxicology".
  |  
 | 
 Bisphenol A and food safety: Lessons from developed to developing countries    
Source: Food and Chemical Toxicology, June 2016 Authors: Sylvia Angubua Baluka and Wilson K. Rumbeiha
 
 Modern lifestyles and changes in the socio-economic characteristics of  households have stimulated current developments in food technology,  processing and packaging. Chemicals such as bisphenol A (BPA) are known  to migrate from food packaging into the food, resulting in human  exposure to these chemicals. Similarly, BPA can migrate from baby  feeding bottles into milk. BPA has been associated with adverse effects  attributed to its estrogenic properties in various animal models. This  review analyzed peer-reviewed publications in the English literature on  human BPA exposure and regulations in developing countries compared to  developed countries. BPA has been reduced or eliminated from food  packaging and contact materials such as baby bottles in developed  countries either voluntarily or by legislation. The meager data from  developing countries shows that human BPA exposure in developing  countries is similar to that in developed countries. With minor  exceptions, BPA restriction, voluntary or legal, is virtually absent in  developing countries of Africa, SE Asia, and South and Central America.
 
  Read more...
  See article based on this research, "Widespread ingestion of packaging chemical revealed".
  Also see from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, "NTP star trainee receives three awards for her work".
  |  
 | 
 Greenlist Bulletin is compiled by:
  
Mary Butow
  
Research and Reference Specialist
  
Toxics Use Reduction Institute
  
University of Massachusetts Lowell
  
600 Suffolk Street, Wannalancit Mills Suite 501
  
Lowell, MA 01854-2866
  
978-934-4365
  
978-934-3050 (fax)
  
mary@turi.org
  
 |  
  | 
  
   | 
  
 
 | 
 
 
 
 
  | 
  
   |