Greenlist Bulletin From the Toxics Use Reduction Institute at the University of Massachusetts Lowell
  February 22, 2013
 
  |   
         | 
     
    
         | 
     
    
        
        
        	
            | 
            
            
            
             | 
             | 
            
            
  |   
This is the weekly bulletin of the TURI Library at the University of Massachusetts Lowell. Greenlist Bulletin provide s previews of recent publications and websites relevant to reducing the use of toxic chemicals by industries, businesses, communities, individuals and government. You are welcome to send a message to mary@turi.org if you would like more information on any of the articles listed here, or if this email is not displaying properly. 
  
 |   
            
             UNEP Year Book 2013: Emerging issues in our global environment
  |  Source: United Nations Environment Programme, February 2013
 
 The UNEP Year Book 2013 is the 10th edition of the Year Book series.  This series presents annual reviews of emerging environmental issues  and policy-relevant developments.   Rapid change in the Arctic threatens ecosystems but also  provides new development opportunities, including easier access to oil  and gas, minerals and fisheries. The Year Book 2013 shows that change in  the Arctic has consequences far beyond this fragile region, and that  international response is urgently needed.   To meet the internationally agreed goal of producing and using chemicals  in ways that minimize significant adverse impacts on health and the  environment by 2020, countries need to step up efforts to reduce use of  toxic chemicals, promote safer alternatives and build capacity for sound  chemicals management. Adequate information for minimizing chemical  risks is essential to support these efforts.   The Year Book looks at key environmental events in 2012-13 and at  changes in the global environment, based on key environmental  indicators.   Read more...TURI's Note:  Rachel Massey, Policy Program Manager at TURI, served       as part of the expert panel that coauthored the chapter on       chemicals in this publication. Read full report  here.  |  
  | 
         
         
         | 
     
    
         | 
     
    
        
        
        
        
        | 
 How Hidden Fragrance Allergens Harm Public Health 
 |  Source: Women's Voices For The Earth, February 2013
 
 Fragrance affects us all.  For some, it can enhance a moment, invoke a  memory, or even improve a mood.  As consumers, we seek it out in all  kinds of products we use in our everyday lives.  And for many of us,  there's a positive sensory experience associated with fragrance.  But  unfortunately, this may not be without consequence.  In addition to the  potential health consequences of certain fragrance ingredients linked to  cancer, interference with hormones, and reproductive harm, a  significant portion of the population suffers from fragrance-related  allergies.   Almost 20% of the general population is sensitized to at least one  allergen, and studies find that fragrance is one of the most frequently  identified substances causing allergic reactions.  Fragrance allergy  affects 2 to 11 percent of the general population.  This translates to  tens of millions of people globally affected by fragrance.  Women are  disproportionately impacted by fragrance allergies, and the rates in  children have been rising dramatically in the last few decades.     Read more...  Read full report here.
    |  
 |  Phthalates and Childhood Asthma: Revealing an Association through Urinary Biomarkers |  Source: Environmental Health Perspectives, February 1, 2013 Author: Tanya Tillett
  Exposure to phthalates, substances used as plasticizers in a large  number of consumer goods, can occur by ingestion, inhalation, or skin  contact. Children -- who are uniquely vulnerable to adverse health effects  of environmental exposures because of their still-developing  neurological, immunological, and respiratory systems -- can receive  particularly high exposures due to more frequent contact with  phthalate-rich surfaces such as plastic toys and polyvinyl chloride  (PVC) flooring, as well as house dust, which collects phthalates (and  other chemicals). Researchers now report an association between  phthalate exposure and asthma and allergic disease in a cohort of  10-year-old Norwegian children. 
  Read more...
   Read original study in Environmental Health Perspectives: "Urinary Biomarkers for Phthalates Associated with Asthma in Norwegian Children."      |  
 |  Characterization of Residential Pesticide Use and Chemical  Formulations through Self-Report and Household Inventory: The Northern  California Childhood Leukemia Study |  
Authors: Neela Guha, Mary H. Ward, Robert Gunier, Joanne S. Colt, C. Suzanne Lea, Patricia A. Buffler, and Catherine Metayer Background: Home and  garden pesticide use has been linked to cancer and other health outcomes  in numerous epidemiological studies. Exposure has generally been  self-reported, so the assessment is potentially limited by recall bias  and lack of information on specific chemicals. . . .    Conclusions: Our data on  specific active ingredients and patterns of storage and use will inform  future etiologic analyses of residential pesticide exposures from  self-reported data, particularly among households with young children.     Read more... 
  
 |  
 | REACH Review 2012: General Report on 
 Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and  Restriction of Chemical Substances  
 |  Source: European Commission, February 2013
 The  Commission has concluded that REACH functions well  and delivers on all  objectives that at present can be assessed. Some  needs for adjustments have  been identified, but balanced against the  interest of ensuring legislative  stability and predictability, the  Commission will not propose any changes to  the enacting terms of REACH.   Within the  current framework, however,  there is a need to reduce the impact of REACH on  SMEs (Small and Medium-sized Enterprises). The annex to the  general report sets out measures that will contribute to  this goal.   There are many other  opportunities for  further improvement of the functioning of REACH by optimizing  the  implementation at all levels. Some key findings and recommendations are: - The report makes  recommendations to improve REACH  implementation. These include improving the  quality of registration  dossiers, encouraging companies to enhance the use of  safety data  sheets as a central risk management tool, and addressing issues  related  to the transparency of cost sharing within the Substance Information   Exchange Forums (SIEFs). 
 - The report recommends reducing  the financial and  administrative burden on SMEs in order to ensure the  proportionality of  legislation and to assist them to fulfil all their REACH  obligations.  The Commission will look into greater fee reductions to SMEs.
 - There are no major overlaps  with other EU legislation. 
 - Considerable efforts to develop  alternative methods  to animal testing have been made and will continue: since  2007, the  Commission has made available € 330 million to fund research in this   area. 
 - Enforcement could be improved.  As this is the  responsibility of the Member States, the report recommends to  Member  States to reinforce coordination among them. 
 - Although the report identifies  a need for some  adjustments to the legislation, the Commission wants to ensure   legislative stability and predictability for European businesses. No  changes to  REACH's main terms are proposed at present.
  Read more...Read full report  here.   |  
 |  No Clear Winner In Race To Find Non-BPA Can Linings |  Source: Chemical & Engineering News, February 11, 2013 Author: Melody M. Bomgardner
 
 
In late January, California proposed, for the second time, to  list bisphenol A as a cause of reproductive toxicity under a state law  called Proposition 65. Although the maximum allowable dose would be too  high to require warning labels on most products, such as food cans that  are lined with BPA-based epoxy resins, the proposal adds another reason  that people might want to avoid the chemical. 
  
 
In the past decade, consumers and health experts have raised concerns  about the use of BPA in food packaging. The molecule has a shape  similar to estrogen's and thus may act as an endocrine disrupter. The  chemical industry and makers of metal food packaging contend that BPA is safe. 
  
But for food companies, pleasing consumers is a high priority, and  most are eager to move away from packaging based on BPA. Coating  manufacturers and their suppliers are working overtime to find a  replacement for the ubiquitous epoxies, which are made by reacting BPA  with epichlorohydrin. A review of patent filings and regulatory  approvals shows that dozens of substances are in the pipeline. They are  being developed by paint firms including Valspar, PPG Industries, and  AkzoNobel, and by chemical firms such as Eastman Chemical, Cytec Industries, and Dow Chemical. 
  
 
The winning recipe or recipes need to meet high-performance  requirements, because can coatings do double duty under difficult  conditions. They protect the integrity of the can from effects of the  food and protect the food from the steel or aluminum of the can. 
 
 Read more...
 
  |  
  | 
     
    
        		
        
        | Please send a message to mary@turi.org if you would like more information on any of these resources. Also, please tell us what topics you are particularly interested in monitoring, and who else should see Greenlist. An online search of the TURI Library catalog can be done at http://library.turi.org for greater topic coverage.
   
 |   		
        Greenlist Bulletin is compiled by:
  Mary Butow 
Research and Reference Specialist Toxics Use Reduction Institute  University of Massachusetts Lowell  600 Suffolk St., Wannalancit Mills  Lowell MA 01854  978-934-4365 978-934-3050 (fax)  mary@turi.org 
  
  
 |   
         | 	
     
    
        | 
        
         | 
     
     	
     |