Transparency is the new watchword in American politics, a concept implying that governmental decision-making is an open process with all facts and points of view considered before an action is taken. In the American political lexicon, the party in power maintains they operate in this manner and the opposition proclaims this will be their governing philosophy if they attain power.
Transparency, in most instances, is simply a new term for the old shibboleth of business as usual. Foreign policy, spying on American citizens, holding people in jail without due process is still ongoing, regardless of which political party is running the country. A contagion of secrecy is developing in this country that threatens the core values of our political system.
The fight to abolish the death penalty is a prime example of where governmental secrecy is being invoked more than ever. A litany of new laws and policies are being implemented across the country to shield states from lawsuits and to expedite executions.
Missouri has amended the definition of its "execution team" to include the pharmacy that makes the execution drugs, the method of acquiring the drugs, and the identity of the medical personnel who approves the drug. All of this information is no longer available under the public records act. The state has been paying $11,000 in cash to a company in Oklahoma for one of the drugs.
Since European countries refuse to sell drugs to states that will use it to kill people, many states are reducing the number of drugs in the death-cocktail from three to one. The new drug is phenobarbital. It's a secret to most people that this drug is the primary one used to euthanize animals. In fact, People For The Ethical Treatment (PETA) recommends this drug when it becomes necessary to kill an animal.
Idaho media organizations had to file a federal lawsuit to force the state to comply with a court order to make all aspects of the execution process open to the public.
In Tennessee, Shelby County Assistant District Attorney General Robert Henderson was censured by the state supreme court for secretly keeping evidence from a defendant's lawyers. On two separate occasions the prosecuting attorney told the defense that the state had no "evidence which tends to exculpate the defendant of the crime charged against him." Ironically, the censure has no penalty, and Henderson's boss has stated he will not take any disciplinary action.
Proponents of the death penalty are not entitled to the dual standard of killing people, but exempting the details from public scrutiny. This is not transparency; it's totalitarianism.
If the death penalty is a deterrent, why is the government taking unprecedented measure to make the process a secret? What's driving the bloodlust to execute as many people as quickly as possible? "The liberties of a people never were, nor ever will be, secure," said Founding Father Patrick Henry, "when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them."
God's love and the death penalty are incompatible. In light of what's occurring across the country, it's our responsibility to ensure that Jesus' message of love and forgiveness is proclaimed.
Abolishing the death penalty is our goal, and you do not have to keep that a secret.
ALMIGHTY God, unto whom all hearts are open, all desires known, and from whom no secrets are hid; Cleanse the thoughts of our hearts by the inspiration of thy Holy Spirit, that we may perfectly love thee, and worthily magnify thy holy Name; through Christ our Lord. Amen.