912 Patriots of Lower Bucks - Your Daily Updates ALL in ONE Place!
November 12, 2012
|
Quote:
"This quote came from the Czech Republic.
Someone over there has it figured out. It was translated into Englishfrom an article in the Prague newspaper, Prager Zeitungon.
"The danger to America is not Barack Obama, but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency.
It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president.
The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America. Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince.
The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool.
It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools, such as those who made him their president.""
|
If you see a story that you believe would be useful and important to our readers, simply respond to this email with a link and a brief description of why it is important. (Even if it may be obvious)
If you wish to unsubscribe (and we hope you don't) please click the "safe unsubscribe" link.
|
PICKET: Companies plan massive layoffs as Obamacare becomes reality
Freedom Works has put together a list of companies that will be laying off employees as a result of President Barack Obama's health care law:
Welch Allyn Welch Allyn, a company that manufactures medical diagnostic equipment in central New York, announced in September that they would be laying off 275 employees, or roughly 10% of their workforce over the next three years. One of the major reasons discussed for the layoffs was a proactive response to the Medical Device Tax mandated by the new healthcare law. Dana Holding Corp. As recently as a week ago, a global auto parts manufacturing company in Ohio known as Dana Holding Corp., warned their employees of potential layoffs, citing "$24 million over the next six years in additional U.S. health care expenses". After laying off several white collar staffers, company insiders have hinted at more to come. The company will have to cover the additional $24 million cost somehow, which will likely equate to numerous cuts in their current workforce of 25,500 worldwide. Stryker One of the biggest medical device manufacturers in the world, Stryker will close their facility in Orchard Park, New York, eliminating 96 jobs in December. Worse, they plan on countering the medical device tax in Obamacare by slashing 5% of their global workforce - an estimated 1,170 positions. Boston Scientific In October of 2009, Boston Scientific CEO Ray Elliott, warned that proposed taxes in the health care reform bill could "lead to significant job losses" for his company. Nearly two years later, Elliott announced that the company would be cutting anywhere between 1,200 and 1,400 jobs, while simultaneously shifting investments and workers overseas - to China.
Read More . . .
|
|
Ohio Vote Totals For Barack Obama A Statistical Miracle!
November 10, 2012
By Tom Tillison Florida Political Press
Editor's Note - There is an photo floating around on FaceBook that states that 100% of Cuyahoga County voted for Obama with the web address for Florida Political Press attached. I am not responsible for this image and have contacted those who created it and asked them to delete it. The article below accurately points out that 15 precincts in Cuyahoga voted 100% for Obama, NOT the entire county.
Front Page Magazine is reporting that Barack Obama won Wood County in Ohio this year with 108% of registered voters. That's not a typo.
http://frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/voter-fraud-obama-won-%108-of-registered-voters-in-ohio-county/
In 2012, 106,258 people in Wood County are registered to vote out of an eligible 98,213. This is not to say that the 108% registered all voted for Obama, just that more people are registered than eligible.
Perhaps even more astonishing is FPM reports that he won 100% of the vote in 21 districts in Cleveland. Think about that... Ohio voters had 7 presidential candidates to choose from, plus the option to write in candidates of their choosing, yet every last voter in 21 districts chose Obama.
Gary Johnson, the candidate for disaffected Libertarians who received 43,479 votes here in Florida, was on the Ohio Ballot. And while Roseanne Barr was not, she did make it on the Florida ballot and the 7,971 misguided souls that voted for her shows that there are always going to be those who choose to follow their own path. Always.
Except in Cleveland, Ohio.
Is that not a stunning consideration? As of early September, voting registration lists totaled 900,135 in Cuyahoga County, which makes up much of the Cleveland metropolitan area, so exactly how many votes do 15 districts represent? Thousands... tens of thousands?
Yet every last one, down to a man in these 15 districts voted for Barack Obama - a statistical miracle!
Reports such as this are sure to trickle out around the country for weeks to come. We have become a very sick society and considering the current President of the United States once taught Saul Alinksy in college, who's philosophy is the ends justify the means, rampant corruption should not come as a surprise.
While you may expect a thorough investigation to be launched, particularly so considering Ohio has a Republican governor, with a negligent media sure to suppress the story and an Obama Administration that can stonewall with the best of them (Fast & Furious, Benghazi), and with the American people ready to move on from the election, this is going nowhere fast.
And as long as the citizens of this country continue to deny the corruption exists, justify it in whatever manner or just look the other way, they are bringing irreparable harm upon future generations, who will pay the ultimate price for this lack of courage.
Unfortunately, any efforts to address the issue end up being hijacked by demagogues, with the Democratic Party typically pushing back for even fewer controls and accusing Republicans of racism and voter suppression, regardless of the proposal put forth.
Times that try men's souls...
Article source . . .
~~~
Related Articles -
St. Lucie County Reports 141.1% Voter Turnout.. Results Impact Allen West's 'Failed' Reelection Bid
|
 | Greatest Religious Lie of the 21st Century |
Franklin Graham lied to Carol Costello by saying he didn't know the Mormon Church was listed as a cult on their website. Recorded on 6 November 2012.
|
|
|
Spring, 2012 Media Parade Honoring Returning Veterans (Photo: Jerry Klein)
November 11, 2012, 7:30 PM
Dear Members and Friends,
This Veterans Day, we honor the brave men and women who have
demonstrated their willingness to risk their lives in service to our country.
Their commitment reaffirms for us the importance of defending our Republic from forces who would seek to undermine it--whether they be foreign or domestic.
In honor of all who sacrificed their lives for our country, and all of those who were willing to do so, the Association asks all of you to take the pledge found in the Declaration of Independence:
"...And for the support of this Declaration [of the United States], and with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge... our lives, our fortune, and our Sacred honor."
For those of you observing Veterans Day tomorrow, you are invited to join Dom Giordano and Congressman Pat Meehan at the 53rd Annual Veterans Day Parade in Media, PA--the largest of its kind in the state.
According to organizers, this year's parade will honor "the 'new' greatest generation of veterans from the Iraq and Afghanistan wars."
Media's 53nd Annual Veterans Day Parade
When: Monday, Nov. 12, 11 AM
Where: Downtown Media, PA
Who: Media Mayor Bob McMahon, Congressman Pat Meehan, Dom
Giordano, and other dignitaries.
Hope to see you!
On behalf of the Association Board of Directors,
Teri Adams
|
|
|
|
The Independence Hall Tea Party Association formed after historic February 28 and April 18, 2009 Tea Parties on Independence Mall. It is the oldest and largest independent grassroots Tea Party organization in the tri-state (DE, NJ, PA) region and encompasses the 5th leading media market in the United States.
Visit us @ www.IndependenceHallTeaParty.com.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITIZENS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT Tuesday, November 13, 6:30-8:30pm Quakertown Library, 401 W. Mill St., Quakertown "Constitutional Literacy" (4th in the series) video by Michael Farris of ParentalRights.org SAM ROHRER leads Open Discussion period on "What now?" "Where do we go from here?" "Is there still hope for America?" "Do we need to rethink our focus, refocus our efforts?" Legislative Update - what you can do now to make our voice heard Details on our annual Christmas dinner....plan to join us for this fun and encouraging time with fellow patriots...Tuesday, December 11
|

The David Horowitz Philadelphia Freedom Center
Upcoming Event! |
| | |
|
Dear Linda,
On November 19th the Philadelphia Freedom Center will be having a lunch with John Fund. The noon event will be at the Union League of Philadelphia. For more information and registration please click here or go to phillyfreedom.org.
|
John Fund
An American political journalist and conservative columnist. Currently a senior editor of The American Spectator,he was previously a columnist for The Wall Street Journal, where he wrote a weekly column named "On the Trail" and contributed to the Journal's newsletter, Political Diary.
|
|
|
|
The election is over. "Are YOU still supporting your destroyers?" is a sentence asked in "Atlas Shrugged" as the country falls apart. There is something we can all do to stop funding our own destruction. Research, then act. OpenSecrets.org is a cool website where you can search by company, state, zip code, city, and other ways to find out who sent money to Barack Obama (or other candidates). You can even find out who in your company or town who gave to Obama. For example, if you click on the link below, you'll notice that Comcast contributed very large sums to Obama. For a real eye-opener, search for "bundlers" for "Barack Obama." Jeffrey Katzenberg of DreamWorks Animation gave $2,334,092.00 to Obama. Warner Bros. gave $1,948,580.00 to Obama. Comcast Corp. again comes up with another $1,152,431.00 to Obama under "David and Rhonda Cohen" as bundlers. The list is 17 pages long of companies who gave large sums to fund our destruction. Do we really need to support our own destruction with paying for Comcast in our homes? http://www.opensecrets.org/pres12/search.php?cid=N00009638&name=%28all%29&employ=Comcast&state=%28all%29&zip=%28any+zip%29&submit=OK&amt=b&sort=A
|
FREE e-BOOK: Rules for Conservative Radicals!
|
Sign up now to receive a free copy of Rules For Conservative Radicals: How the Tea Party Movement Can Save America (PDF)
America has arrived at a critical juncture in its history. as a nation, we can either reverse our current course-one that leads to a country of the government, by the government, and for the government-or we can chart a new course that will, once again, be guided by the principles for which our Founders pledged their lives, fortunes, and sacred honor. See how in this 94 page download.
Please note: After entering your email information, you will receive a confirmation email that will take you to the free pdf. |
|
Florida Family Association's webmaster American Family Online has produced the following remarkable product to protect children and adults from explicit material on cell phones and tablets.
( You can find more information please see http://mobilewebguard.com )
According to our research at AFO, the largest growing group of smart phone users is the 12-17 year old age group. Unfortunately, also according to research, the largest viewership of pornography from the Internet on smart phones is 12 to 17 year old children. The impact is catastrophic. Desensitization, failed relationships, abuse of women are the results, nothing good.
Although there are other so called parental control functions and filtered browser apps available, none give the protection and full functionality of MobileWebGuard. We are most proud of the intelligent content scanning and the lock down so that it cannot be easily removed or deactivated. A filter that can easily be removed or bypassed is a placebo and will do more harm than good if a parent thinks the phone is filtered and it is not.
This app works on most Android and Apple (iOS) devices including smart phones and tablets! These are the fastest growing segments in consumer technology and thus the most exposed to the dark side of the Internet. For peace of mind online, a parent must insure their child has a protected mobile device.
Related Scripture Verses
1 Corinthians 6:18 Flee from sexual immorality. All other sins a person commits are outside the body, but whoever sins sexually, sins against their own body.
Romans 1:24 Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another.
2 Corinthians 12:21 I am afraid that when I come again my God will humble me before you, and I will be grieved over many who have sinned earlier and have not repented of the impurity, sexual sin and debauchery in which they have indulged.
Philippians 4:8- Finally, brothers and sisters, whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable-if anything is excellent or praiseworthy-think about such things. 1 Peter 4:7-10 The end of all things is near. Therefore be alert and of sober mind so that you may pray. 8 Above all, love each other deeply, because love covers over a multitude of sins. 9 Offer hospitality to one another without grumbling. 10 Each of you should use whatever gift you have received to serve others, as faithful stewards of God's grace in its various forms.
Features
Compatible with most iOS (Apple) and Android devices and includes ...
* Blacklist Checking
|
* Whitelist Checking
|
* Parental Control
|
* Time of Day Control
|
* Content Scanning
|
* History Tracking
|
* Customizeable
|
* Tamper Resistant
|
* Wifi and Cell
|
* and more
|
You can find more information please see http://mobilewebguard.com
Floridafamily.org Email: ffa@floridafamily.org Florida Family Association, Inc. P.O. Box 46547, Tampa, FL 33646-0105 Telephone 813-264-5888
|
Yes, it's true: You can support ACT! for America-at no cost to you! An important message from Guy Rodgers, Executive Director
The next time you make an online purchase of almost anything, you could be helping ACT! for America-at no cost to you. Sound too good to be true? It isn't. All you have to do is sign up for "iGive"-a program that's been around since 1997. The concept is as powerful as it is simple.
Every time an iGive member makes an online purchase at over 1,000 brand-name stores, a percentage of that purchase is donated to that person's charity of choice.
|
And with the holidays just around the corner, you could be helping ACT! for America with every gift you buy! The concept isn't new. In the mid-1990s many supporters of non-profit organizations signed up with long distance telephone programs where a percentage of their bill was donated to their charity of choice. But our investigation of iGive has convinced us that this program has an ease of use and sophistication that we find remarkable.
- Imagine booking a hotel room on Orbitz-and having 1.6% of that purchase price donated to ACT! for America.
- Or buying an Xbox at Best Buy-and having 1.2% of the purchase price donated to ACT! for America.
|
The same goes for buying merchandise at Amazon, Bath and Body Works, Advance Auto Parts, Game Stop, Kmart, Home Depot, Holiday Inn, Old Navy, NASCAR Superstore, Overstock.com, Mattel, J.C. Penney, Office Max, QVC, Radio Shack, Shoe Carnival, Pottery Barn-and on and on the list goes.
|
In other words, every time you make a purchase of merchandise you would buy anyway, you would be financially supporting ACT! for America! All you have to do is log on below and follow the directions to create your account and download the iGive "button." (Note: downloading the "button" is key).
Get Started Here!
When I was first informed of iGive, I was skeptical. I've seen these ideas come and go. Often, they're too good to be true. Or there are all kinds of glitches and problems. So I spent hours researching. I looked at online customer reviews (which were very good). I read all of iGive's fine print, such as Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. I signed up and even emailed two tech support questions to see how good their tech support was.
And the more I dug, the more I liked what I saw. For instance, both of my tech support questions were responded to within 60 minutes. How often does THAT happen?
|
As you know from our Patriot Partner program, we're all about encouraging a lot of people to each do a little-to do something. When everyone does a little, together we accomplish a lot. So consider what could happen.
If just 1% of ACT! for America members each purchased just $400 in merchandise in 2013, from all the available outlets, and the average percentage donated to ACT! was 1.5%, the total amount donated back to ACT! for America would be... ...$15,000. That's a lot of money, wouldn't you agree? And if you were one of those ACT! for America members, it wouldn't cost you one thin dime to help ACT! for America receive $15,000. If this idea really caught on, and eventually 5% of our members made purchases with iGive, that $15,000 could explode to $50,000, $75,000 or more!
|
What's more, that 1.5% figure might be low. Many of the merchants offer percentage donations that are much higher. One printer inkjet company I looked at offered 13%! Every merchant website you visit tells you right at the top what percentage of your purchase price will be donated to ACT! for America. Just think what we could accomplish with an extra $15,000, $50,000 or $75,000 in our fight against radical Islam!
Get Started Here!
One of the things I most wanted to know was their Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Check it out for yourself. I confirmed the terms with a company representative. And I like what I learned. As security-conscious as I am, I have no hesitation using the service-and I'm already doing so.
|
I know there are many people out there who would love to support ACT! for America, or give more than they're giving, but in these tough economic times they simply can't. Well, here's a way that everyone who believes in our mission can easily support what we're doing-at no cost to them. It doesn't get any better than that.
There are already chapter leaders who have signed up for the program, and the feedback I have been getting from them has been all positive. They love the idea and many of them are already using it.
|
So please, join me and these ACT! for America chapter leaders who are already signed up and using the iGive service. Yours for a safe and free America
Guy Rodgers |
'The Hope And The Change' - Full Movie by Citizens United
See the movie for free here:
|
Today we are excited to announce that "Occupy Unmasked" will be made available on Video on Demand (VOD), on the heels of its successful limited theatrical release. "Occupy Unmasked" must be seen to be believed and now you and millions of others will have that opportunity right in your own homes. The VOD providers carrying "Occupy Unmasked" include iTunes; Amazon; Charter; Comcast; Google Play; DirecTV; Playstation3; Suddenlink; Time Warner; Verizon FIOS; VUDU; Xbox Zune; AT&T UVerse; Cablevision; Cox; and Dish Network. For more information on how to watch on VOD please click HERE. "Occupy Unmasked," takes viewers into the Occupy Wall Street camps across the country in New York, Los Angeles, Washington, D.C., Portland, Denver and Oakland for an up-close look at what's happened there and who's at the heart of the movement. Exclusive footage and first-hand eyewitness accounts tell the story of the criminal activity and raw brutality in the camps - much of which has not been reported by the mainstream media. Featuring the late conservative icon Andrew Breitbart, as well as former leftist radicals turned patriotic citizen journalists Brandon Darby, David Horowitz, Pam Keys, Anita MonCrief, Mandy Nagy, and Lee Stranahan, among others, this film delves beneath the surface of the Occupy movement to show its anarchist roots. Please check your local cable provider to see if "Occupy Unmasked" is available on demand on your TV or download and watch the film online. Sincerely, David N. BossiePresident of Citizens United Executive Producer of Occupy Unmasked |
Memorial Lecture
Wednesday, Jan. 9, 2013
7:30pm
The Annual Jay Michael Swartz Memorial Lecture: An Evening with Michael Medved
|
|
 |
 For Men and Women Wednesday, Jan. 9, 2013 7:30pm *Pre-lecture dinner 6:15pm At the Glazier Jewish Center | 25 N. State St. Fee: $36 *Pre-lecture dinner with Michael Medved (includes lecture): $100
|  |
|
AMERICAN JEWS AND CHRISTIAN EVANGELICALS: IRRECONCILABLE ENEMIES OR INEVITABLE ALLIES?
|
|
Michael Medved is a nationally syndicated radio talk show host and bestselling author. His daily show is heard by over 3.75 million people across the country. Born in Philadelphia, Michael won admission to Yale at age 16 as a National Merit Scholar. He majored in American History and graduated with honors, before attending Yale Law School, where his classmates included Bill and Hillary Clinton. Michael wrote his first bestseller at age 26 - "What Really Happened to the Class of '65?" - a skeptical reconsideration of the "counterculture" of the 1960's that became a weekly TV series on NBC.
Many American Jews distrust and even fear the rise of the evangelical Christianity. They see this religious movement as a threat to the survival of Judaism in the United States and to the continuance of a society that values pluralism and religious liberty. On the other hand increasing numbers of American Jews view evangelicals as natural allies, not just when it comes to support of Israel, but on a range of social issues here in the U.S. In this provocative presentation, Michael Medved will explain where Jews and Christians already agree, and where they can never agree, in their participation in the ongoing battles shaping American society.
|
|
Lubavitch of Bucks County * 25 N State Street * Newtown, PA 18940 * 215-497-9925
|
Dear Fellow Conservative, Registration for CPAC 2013 is now open! The American Conservative Union's legendary annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) is scheduled for March 14-16, 2013 at the Gaylord National Resort & Convention Center. Register Now for CPAC 2013 Don't miss your chance to help take our country back to the right. To register now and reserve your space, visit conservative.org. Join the Celebration In honor of CPAC's 40th Anniversary, we look forward to joining conservatives from across the nation for CPAC 2013, celebrating the accomplishments of the movement while also energizing the next generation of conservatives. New Location CPAC 2013 boasts a new location at the Gaylord National Resort & Convention Center. Complimentary CPAC shuttle busses to and from the Gaylord Center will be available at convenient locations across the National Capitol Region. Details will be released in the coming weeks; please visit conservative.org for updates. CPAC Past & Present The ACU has hosted CPAC in the Nation's Capital since 1973, and it now stands as the largest annual gathering of conservatives in the country. Additionally, the ACU this year hosted two regional CPACs designed to energize and mobilize Midwest and Mountain West conservatives, giving them the tools needed to defeat the liberal agenda in 2012 while also highlighting rising conservative stars and issues in the region. Stay tuned for details on 2013 regional CPAC locations! Interested in Sponsoring CPAC 2013? National and local partners are critical to achieving a successful event. CPAC 2013 provides an excellent platform to promote your message and network with the leaders and activists who are on the frontlines of the conservative movement. We invite you to review the special opportunities available to join the action at CPAC 2013 by visiting conservative.org. See you at the National Harbor! The American Conservative Union Questions regarding CPAC 2013 may be sent to cpac@conservative.org.
This email was sent by: American Conservative Union 1331 H. St., NW Washington, DC, 20005,
|
|
Join Us on Fridays and Take a Stand for Israel:

|

The Great Betrayal: Obama's Wars and the War in Iraq
Jul 18th, 2012
Daniel Greenfield's new Freedom Center pamphlet, The Great Betrayal: Obama's Wars and the War in Iraq, is an effort to understand the politics of the "war on terror" which has now reached a final punctuation point with the U.S. decision to speed its withdrawal from the battlefields of Iraq and Afghanistan (where success was once deemed so crucial to national security), and to practice an incoherent form of regime change in Libya while ignoring more serious threats in Syria and Iran.
The war on terror began, Greenfield shows, as an admirable bipartisan commitment soon after the tragedy of 9/11-an effort to transcend party lines not only to punish those who attacked our country but also to interrupt planning for further attacks and try to stop the international spread of the Islamic jihad behind the attacks. But the Democratic Party, with the honorable exception of a few individuals like Richard Gephardt and Joe Lieberman, turned its back on a war soon after authorizing it, and did so at a time when American troops were facing hostile enemy fire.
Although Senate Democrats on the intelligence oversight committee had been granted access to every piece of data available to the White House, they now accused President Bush of tricking them to secure their approval. In fact, their own about-face was entirely dictated by political considerations when a Sixties antiwar activist, Howard Dean, surged ahead in the Democratic primary polls and it appeared for a moment that Americans were on the side of retreat and capitulation.
Although regime change in Iraq had been official U.S. policy since Bill Clinton signed the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998, Democratic senators such as John Kerry who only months earlier had supported the war effort now launched demoralizing attacks on the American commander-in-chief and his troops in the field, stigmatizing it as "the wrong war in the wrong place at the wrong time." If the truth was the first casualty of their war against the Bush administration, the second casualty was the principle of bi-partisanship that had guided foreign policy debates throughout the Cold War, the principle that "politics stops at the water's edge." Now partisan politics trumped security.
The unrestrained attacks on the Iraq War as illegal and unjustified went largely unanswered by Republicans who failed to call the Democratic saboteurs of the nation's war effort to account or to decry the risk their cynical attacks posed to American servicemen and women on the battlefield. As Greenfield demonstrates, the Democrats' partisanship had consequences not only in Iraq but elsewhere in the region: the paralysis that resulted from their "anti-war" campaign led straight to the destruction of Lebanon and the installation of a terrorist army, Hezbollah, there as a regime within a regime. And it emboldened an overtly Islamofascist regime in Iran not only to supply the IEDs responsible for most of our troop fatalities in Iraq but also to proceed with a nuclear program aimed directly at Israel and the West.
The Great Betrayal shows that Barack Obama's abandonment of Iraq is a betrayal of all the Americans and Iraqis who gave their lives to establish freedom in that country. And the result of his policies in Afghanistan has been as disastrous. While the President presented his rationale for pursuing war there as the pursuit of al-Qaeda, after abandoning his "surge" (which resulted in two thirds of all America's Afghan casualties there and the resurgence of the Taliban allies of al-Qaeda), he blithely prepared for withdrawal as if national objectives had been met.
Order your copy of The Great Betrayal today by clicking here.
|
Individuals sympathetic to the Muslim Brotherhood's sinister agenda have infiltrated the Obama Administration.
Brainwashed by the Muslim Students Association and then propelled in to the position of Deputy Chief of Staff to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the David Horowitz Freedom Center tracks the path of Huma Abedin and other Muslim sympathizers who have navigated their way into positions of great influence in the Obama Administration. Everything is revealed in the explosive new Freedom Center pamphlet, "The Muslim Brotherhood in the Obama Administration," written by Frank Gaffney, national security expert who served as Assistant Secretary of Defense under Ronald Reagan.
The David Horowitz Freedom Center is committed to educating the public on the Muslim Brotherhood's sinister Agenda. That is why we are giving away this pamphlet for FREE.
Go here:
|
"Losing our Sons": Documentary looks at domestic Islamic radicalization and jihadization
Charles Jacobs at Americans for Peace and Tolerance announced today the release of a trailer for their upcoming documentary, "Losing Our Sons", featuring Melvin Bledsoe - father of domestic terrorist Carlos Bledsoe aka Abdulhakim Mohamed who gunned down US Army recruiter Pvt. William Long at an Army-Navy recruiting center in Little Rock, Arkansas in June 2009. Melvin Bledsoe testified at the House Homeland Security Committee hearing earlier this month.
The upcoming documentary discusses how Bledsoe was radicalized by the Muslim Student Association in Tennessee and sent to terrorist training in Yemen with the written recommendation of the imam of a Nashville mosque. It also discusses how the agents of radicalization in the Nashville Muslim community have been aided by collaborators in the establishment media, politics and the so-called "interfaith" community.
Go here for ordering information: |
|
LISTEN LIVE TO REPATRIOT RADIO
"BETTER THAN EVER"
(all times are eastern)
Monday 3-4pm "Bordering on Insanity" - Sue Payne and Frosty Wooldridge
Tuesday 3-4pm "American Freedom Watch" - Karen Schoen with contributors John Estabrooks and Dr. Ronald Myers
Wednesday 3-4pm "Patriots Watch" - Billy Baer and Dan Haggerty
Thursday 3-4pm "America's Black Shield" - Ted Hayes and Terrance Lang
Friday 10-11pm "Veterans' Weekly Forum" - Rich Davis and David Bellavia
|
|
|
Independence Hall Tea Party PAC
| |
|
November 8, 2012 11 PM
Dear Friends,
Despite our obvious disappointment with Tuesday's election results, we have some excellent news to report!
PAC endorsed candidate Keith Rothfus (PA-12) defeated freshman Congressman Mark Critz to win the seat previously occupied by deceased Congressman John Murtha. It was the only Congressional pick up in the tri-state area.
(Due to your generosity, we bundled a $1000 check to the Rothfus campaign
last week.)
Also, all of our endorsed incumbent Congressmen from PA and NJ won re-election.
We congratulate Congressmen Jim Gerlach (PA-6), Pat Meehan (PA-7), Mike
Fitzpatrick (PA-8), Lou Barletta (PA-11), Charlie Dent (PA-15), Joe Pitts (PA-16), Jon Runyan (NJ-3), and Chris Smith (NJ-4).
PAC endorsed State Senate candidate Dave Argall (PA-29) was elected to his first full term in the PA Assemby . We were sorry to learn that PAC friend, State Representative Tom Quigley (PA-126), appears to have lost his seat by a mere 200 votes.
On another note, we wish to thank all of those who volunteered so much of their time on behalf of our candidates, especially Board Members Stephanie Lieberman, Dave Sommers, Teri Adams, Gerry Pascal, Rochelle Porto, Lin DeCesare, Carol Reighn, Sean Carpenter, Cort Rosholt, John Peteraf & his sister Rosemary, Carol & Jerry Kein, Kacey & Keith Brown.
Also, we thank members Gene Shusman, Janet Cantor, Ellie Towey, Teodozia Pepe, Joe Szalwinski, Donald Coughlin, Claire & David Rosenthal, Peter & Trudy Beckshi.
Additionally, many thanks to those who volunteered as poll watchers. We are most appreciative of your efforts. As all of you now well know, poll watching is extremely important in the effort to reduce voter fraud.
Of course, we know many more of you (too many to list) were working hard at the Victory Centers to elect our candidates--and we thank you from the bottom of our hearts.
Last, but not least--a big thank you to all who contributed to the PAC's Save Our Republic Money Drop campaign.
We reached our goal of $5000 on Election Day!
On behalf of the PAC Board of Delegates,
Don Adams, President
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
 | Jon Voight Campaigning for Romney in Conshohocken |
Mitt Romney famously came up short in Pennsylvania after what, in retrospect, was confirmed as a pseudo-desperate play for it. But he actually did cut pretty solidly into Obama's advantages both in the Philadelphia suburbs (he narrowly flipped Chester County and Berks County) and everywhere else.
Read more: |

RedState Morning Briefing
For November 12, 2012
1. No.
For five years I have consistently maintained that Mitt Romney could not be elected President of the United States. The only thing that changed was Barack Obama's terrible debate performance and I made the unfortunate mistake of going with the herd toward "he can win now." A year ago - to be precise, November 8th of last year - I wrote that Mitt Romney would be the nominee, conservatism would die, and Barack Obama would win. Regrettably, I told you so.
As I wrote would happen, Mitt Romney tried to blur lines with Barack Obama. He did not defend social conservatism, but let those attacks go unanswered. He did not articulate strong fiscal conservatism and he never repudiated Romneycare, thereby failing to make any credible attacks on Obamacare.
Conservatives and conservative institutions who embraced him early on are now scrambling to make excuses. They were so invested in a failure they cannot bring themselves to admit Mitt Romney and his campaign were failures. Mitt Romney's campaign was, to Republicans, what green energy is to Barack Obama.
Because these conservatives cannot accept that they were wrong, they must conclude that conservatism itself is somehow broken. . . . please click here for the rest of the post →
2. Dear Conservative Organizations Rumors are swirling that many Republican Governors are thinking of going wobbly on setting up state level healthcare exchanges to comply with Obamacare, instead of forcing the federal government to set up a federal exchange. The deadline to notify Washington is November 16, 2012. Michael Cannon has an excellent must read on why no state should do so. Further, the Republican Party controls 30 Governors' Mansions. Most importantly, as Michael Cannon notes, "defaulting to a federal exchange exempts a state's employers from the employer mandate." I think it is incumbent on each and every conservative and conservative organization, with this deadline upon us, to make a very simple pledge: We will not support the re-election of any Republican Governor who creates a healthcare exchange in his or her state. Further, we will oppose for the nomination to the Presidency, any Republican who creates a healthcare exchange in his or her state. In fact, I will go first. . . . please click here for the rest of the post → 3. Paul Krugman Agrees There Is No Fiscal Cliff Last week I posted two essays on why I believe the best way for the GOP to address the wildly misnamed "Fiscal Cliff" is to walk away. The impact of doing so, according to the CBO, will be a temporary downturn in the economy which will make the economy stronger in the long run. Fiscal impact aside it is rarely in your interests to cut a bad deal. As it turns out, Nobel Prize winning economist Paul Krugman agrees. . . . please click here for the rest of the post → 4. The CBO Says The Fiscal Cliff Is A Good Thing One of the things the left is really go about is coming up with catchy slogans. Some of them are rather unfortunate, like calling your plan to stamp out inflation the Moral Equivalent of War (MEOW), some are ridiculous, like the War on Women, but the fact remains that if you can name something you go a long way towards determining how people view the subject. (As an aside, none of these compare with naming your terrorist group the Moro Independent Liberation Front or MILF. Don't they have porn in the Philippines?) Did FDR illegally arm Great Britain in violation of the Neutrality Act and the expressed will of Congress? Or did the United States become the Arsenal of Democracy? . . . please click here for the rest of the post → 5. Campaign Sources: The Romney Campaign was a Consultant Con Job If you spend your time watching politics and haven't been hiding in a deep depression since Tuesday, you've probably been hearing a lot about "ORCA." According to the Washington Post, ORCA "was designed as a first-of-its-kind tool to employ smartphones to mobilize voters, allowing them to microtarget which of their supporters had gone to the polls." There is now widespread condemnation of the program as being sloppy and poorly deployed. . . . please click here for the rest of the post → 6. Playing the Right Game confess, it is fascinating to watch the Republican consultants responsible for the Orca system debacle try and explain its inherent short comings away. Let's begin with the first problem they face. They put an untested piece of technology in the field the day of the election. Let me repeat that-they put an untested piece of technology in the field the day of the election. You might do that if you wanted to fail a junior high science experiment, but not a Presidential election. Technology is a wonderful thing. And it is buggy. A small piece of code here or there can cause an entire system to either slow down or crash. And yet the Romney campaign and the RNC committed to funneling all of its volunteers, upwards of 30,000, into it for election day. . . . please click here for the rest of the post → |
Heritage Hotsheet
Experts on the Day's Hottest News
Items for October 15, 2012
|
November 12, 2012
The Real Lesson of the Election Jack Cashill Indiana and Ohio tell a story the Democrats would rather remain unnoticed. More
America Votes to End Modern Civilization Daren Jonescu The stakes could not have been higher: freedom or coercion, individualism or collectivism, modern civilization or uncivilized brutalism. America chose the latter option in each case. More
Rebranding the Democrats Stella Paul Now that the regime is firmly entrenched and we've all been downgraded from citizens to dissidents, one of the few weapons that we may have left is our language. More
Russell Brand and the Degeneration of the Public Discourse Robert Spencer Ridicule is a prescribed Alinskyite tactic for dealing with ideological enemies, but it is more than that as well: it is a confession of intellectual bankruptcy. More
Outsmarting a Chicago Smarty at His Own Game Jeannie DeAngelis Instead of allowing Barack Obama to continue calling the shots, House Republicans could use General Petraeus's resignation as a catalyst to place control back into the hands of the American people. More
Obama Voters Rewrite American National Anthem Reuel E. Topas We'll see red glare, all right, but it won't be the rockets' -- it will be our cities burning to the ground. Will our flag still be there? More
It Is Not Too Early for Conservatives... David Coughlin It is not too early for the conservatives to start work to take back the party and the country. The Republican establishment elite does not learn from its mistakes, and conservatives can no longer wait for Republicans to wake up. More
Sunday November 11, 2012 The Disappointment of Living in an Electoral Republic 11-11-2012 01:04:59 AM It's sad to contemplate the possibility that the party that wins a close election is the one who is better at rounding up the most homeless, senile, or otherwise completely ignorant people and herd them to the polls and tell them how to vote...» What Conservatives Need 11-11-2012 01:04:55 AM In the end, cannibalism causes us to self-immolate. We have the right principles for prosperity, liberty, and civil society. We need to remind ourselves of this....» Remembering the Power of Cool 11-11-2012 01:04:50 AM If you think conservatism is on the run and underground, take another look at what really happened in Tuesday's election....» After Obama: The Coming Reign of Incredibly Small Government 11-11-2012 01:04:40 AM Conservatives might be pleased to hear that very small government is most definitely in our immediate future. The bad news is that not even conservatives are going to like it....» We are not outnumbered. 11-11-2012 01:04:32 AM There are at least three options in how conservatives respond to the election results...» The Government Didn't Build That! 11-11-2012 01:04:30 AM According to government mythology, the world owes the existence of the internet to the government, and computer communications would not exist today without the government thinking up the idea of computer networks. ...» Mr. Putin: Denounce This Vile Russian Hoax 11-11-2012 01:04:00 AM If Vladimir Putin would really like to recast Russia as open to and welcoming of Jews, he might consider acknowledging and denouncing Russia's role in starting the lie that fomented vicious anti-Jewish persecution around the world....» The Answer Is outside the Mideast 11-11-2012 01:03:30 AM The Palestinian emigration solution is not perfect. Nor is it wholly just. But Bismarck noted that "politics is the art of the possible;" for justice we will have to wait for the return of the Messiah....» Young Blood and Good News: A Report from the Sex Wars in Princeton, NJ 11-11-2012 01:03:00 AM If you think the next generation of American conservatives has given up the culture war, think again....» Remaking the GOP 11-11-2012 01:02:35 AM It's the end as we know it. The end of an era for the Republican Party. But with every end, there comes a new beginning....» Of Moses and Mises: How Businesses Are Better Than Charities 11-11-2012 01:02:00 AM Some people refuse to acknowledge the inherent good of business -- to a point that puts it on the same level as charity. Yet the evidence is plain for all of us to see....» Why Mitt Lost and Obama Won: A Different Perspective 11-11-2012 01:01:50 AM You have cold, rational economic reality on your side, but people have the warm pleasure principle inside them. That need for pleasure may explain, in a big way, why Republicans lost seats in the Senate and the House....» Veteran's Day and Afghanistan 11-11-2012 01:01:40 AM In 2008 Obama said in his campaign that Afghanistan was the "good war," but his actions have made it clear that it is now the "complicated war."...» The Gideon Levys of Israel 11-11-2012 01:01:30 AM There are no market-takers for defamatory stories on Greeks; there are for defamation by Israelis upon the Israelis. It's a product for which international demand is guaranteed, so much so that the apartheid smear commands a premium....» 
Saturday November 10, 2012
Winning the Future: The Fiscal-Conservative Fantasy 11-10-2012 01:04:59 AM "Dispense with the social issues!" we're counseled. "Don't trouble over abortion or faux marriage and instead just focus on fiscal matters." Yeah, good luck with that....» Early Education or Early Indoctrination? 11-10-2012 01:04:10 AM The United Nations is creeping into our educational system and not only changing the way our youngest learn academic basics, but challenging family beliefs on American sovereignty, parental rights, and freedom of religion....» It's Your Move, Mr. President 11-10-2012 01:04:00 AM We're watching......» Mitt Romney's 47% Coming Home to Roost 11-10-2012 01:03:55 AM Because majority rule is a central characteristic of democracy, the danger always exists that a majority, free of restrictions on its power, will oppress members of the minority. ...» Eugenics Still Alive and Well in 2012 11-10-2012 01:03:50 AM Planned Parenthood, the biggest abortion-provider in the nation, has eternal friends in leftist radicals throughout the United States. And their message is chilling....» 'It Ain't Over 'til It's Over': What to Do Now 11-10-2012 01:03:40 AM In all the crying and wailing going on about Mr. Obama's continued presence in the White House two things seem to be completely missing: an honest appraisal of what happened and a serious plan for saving the republic....» Al Sharpton and His Trickle 11-10-2012 01:03:30 AM The good Reverend Al, and the rabid race-warriors he loves to stir up, have in fact benefited tremendously from the misunderstood and improperly named "trickle-down" concept in the past thirty years....» Is It Time for a Virtual Congress? 11-10-2012 01:03:15 AM Exile all 535 members of Congress and the Senate to their respective districts and states? It might be good for them, and it would definitely be good for us....» The Mythology Channel 11-10-2012 01:02:30 AM The History Channel continues its depressing leftward slide with a hideously biased account of Henry Clay Frick and 19th-century Pittsburgh's Homestead Strike....» Gen-Xers Gave Us Obama's America 11-10-2012 01:02:25 AM With the degraded values of Generation X on full display, is an American revival even possible?...» 'Pst...Can We Talk?' 11-10-2012 01:02:00 AM It's time this country's women have an honest conversation: a girl-to-girl, woman-to-woman, one-to-one chat like we had with our mothers when we "came of age." ...»
 | AT Cartoon: "US Umbrella" |
 | AT Video - Click to Watch Condoleezza Rice: GOP Needs 'Even Bigger Tent' for 'Broadly Popular' Political Philosophy |
 | AT Video - Click to Watch Utah Company Blames Obama's 'War on Coal' for 100+ Layoffs |
 | AT Video - Click to Watch Behind the Scenes: Palestinian Demonstrations Using Kids |
 | Walking Through That Door by Madison Rising |
 | Veterans Day Tribute |
 | Alumni Symposium 2012 Paula Broadwell |

November 9, 2012
Media Mash - Brent Bozell of the Media Research Center Discusses Election Reactions with Hannity
Read more: November 9, 2012 Coming Storm? Vegas Employer Lays Off 20% After Election ResultsRead more:
November 9, 2012 Buzz60: Sandy Damage Estimates Include 250,000 Cars Lost, Fisker and $50 Billion CostRead more:
|

Inside the Mind of Climate Alarmist Jeremy Rifkin Nov 10, 2012 11:13 am
Time For A Conservative Third Party? Nov 10, 2012 10:55 am
The Truth About the Election Nov 09, 2012 10:15 pm
Belgium Will Become an Islamic State Nov 09, 2012 05:33 pm
Forecast for America Nov 09, 2012 02:26 pm
The Pony in Obama Winning a Second Term Nov 09, 2012 10:35 am
Who Murdered America? What Comes Next? Nov 09, 2012 09:56 am
A Day for Democrats Nov 09, 2012 09:43 am
Kristallnacht without Jews Nov 09, 2012 09:27 am
Veterans Day, 2012 Nov 11, 2012 10:53 am
What Went Wrong - It's Midnight in America Nov 10, 2012 02:38 pm
The Voters Who Stayed Home Nov 10, 2012 02:21 pm
Inside the Mind of Climate Alarmist Jeremy Rifkin Nov 10, 2012 11:13 am
Time For A Conservative Third Party? Nov 10, 2012 10:55 am
US Shale Gas Won't Last Ten Years: Bill Powers Nov 08, 2012 09:14 pm A Guide to the Fiscal Cliff and the Options for Congress Nov 08, 2012 09:06 pm The Expensive, Diminishing Threat of Somali Piracy Nov 08, 2012 11:12 am Socialism Kills Nov 08, 2012 11:00 am What We Lost in This Election Nov 08, 2012 10:12 am America: Get Ready For War! Nov 08, 2012 09:52 am
|

|
A key question to ask when reading the article below is, "Would Nakoula have been imprisoned for a year if he had uploaded a video of funny kittens?" If not, then we are witnessing our first imprisonment for blasphemy against Islam in the United States.
The President "made an example of" Nakoula, denouncing him before the entire world, imprisoning him, and marking him for eventual death at the hands of vengeful Islamists. Because Hillary Clinton declared that "we are going to arrest the man who made that film" (see video Father of Slain Seal Wants to Know Truth, 3½-minute mark), it looks like Nakoula's punishment was predetermined and simply needed a pretext. The message to the rest of us is that if we openly denounce Islam, the Obama Regime will denounce us to the world and scrutinize us until it finds something it can prosecute us for, and then it will prosecute us to the MAX.
Given that Rev. Terry Jones is still walking a free man, he must have kept his nose very clean. His only punishment for burning a Koran was public denouncement by the President, the Secretary of State, and a 4-Star General.
Never before has freedom of speech been so threatened in the United States. With the imprisonment of Mr. Nakoula, President Obama has become a collaborator with the Islamists and terrorists...as if we didn't already know this from his cordial relations with the Muslim Brotherhood.
Please Click Here to sign a petition to demand a full investigation into the Benghazi attack!
Dave
Man behind 'Innocence of Muslims' film sentenced to one year in prison for violating probation
Mona Shafer Edwards / AFP - Getty Images file
This Sept. 27 courtroom drawing shows Nakoula Basseley Nakoula in court on probation violation charges in Los Angeles.
By The Associated Press and NBC News staff November 7, 2012
A California man who was behind an anti-Muslim film that spurred violent protests in the Middle East was sentenced on Wednesday to one year in prison for violating the terms of his probation stemming from a 2010 bank fraud conviction.
Mark Basseley Youssef, a 55-year-old Egyptian-American, was sentenced by U.S. District Court Judge Christina Snyder after he admitted four of eight alleged violations including obtaining a fraudulent California driver's license.
Youssef served most of a 21-month prison term in the bank fraud case. Federal authorities wanted Youssef to serve two years for the violations.
None of the violations had to do with the content of "Innocence of Muslims," a 13-minute film that mocks the prophet Mohammad as a religious fraud, pedophile and a womanizer. The movie sparked a torrent of violence in Libya and other parts of the Middle East, and dozens died.
Federal authorities have said they believe Youssef is responsible for the film, but they haven't said whether he was the person who posted it online. He also wasn't supposed to use any name other than his true legal name without the prior written approval of his probation officer.
Read more...
American Muslim group applauds defeat of Republican candidates
CAIR says that Republican Congresswoman Michelle Bachmann had led an "anti-Muslim witch hunt" in the House.
By Martin Barillas Wednesday, November 07, 2012
In a press release, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) welcomed what it called "the rejection of Islamophobic candidates by voters nationwide." This followed the re-election of President Barack Obama, a professing Christian, who has long been rumored to be a Muslim in secret. CAIR focused on the electoral defeat of Rep. Allen West (R), who the group quoted as saying that Islam is not a religion but is instead a "totalitarian theocratic political ideology" that is a "very vile and very vicious enemy," was defeated by a narrow margin.
Also in Florida, State Representative Adam Hasner (R) was defeated in his bid for Congress. Hasner once co-hosted an event featuring Dutch anti-Islam politician Geert Wilders that was also sponsored by the person CAIR characterized as an "Anti-Muslim hate group leader" Pamela Geller - blogger who frequently writes about terrorism and the persecution of Christians in Muslim lands. CAIR criticized Hasner for blocking "Florida Muslim Capitol Day" in 2009.
CAIR also applauded the defeat of Florida man, Terry Kemple, who lost his campaign for the Hillsborough County School Board. The CAIR release stated, "Kemple's main issue in the race was seeking to keep Muslim speakers out of local schools."
In Illinois, Rep. Joe Walsh (R) was defeated in his re-election bid. CAIR claims that during the campaign this year, when a town hall meeting attendee told him that he was "looking for some godly men and women in the Senate, in the Congress, who will stand in the face of the danger of Islam," Walsh supposedly "left the door open for suspicion of every Muslim living in Illinois" when he said that Islamism is more of a threat "now that it was right after 9/11" and "It's here. It's in Elk Grove. It's in Addison. It's in Elgin. It's here."
In Arkansas, Rep. James McLean defeated Republican Charlie Fuqua, a candidate who advocated the deportation of all Muslims in a self-published book.
In Minnesota, Rep. Chip Cravaack (R-MN) lost his seat. According to CAIR, Cravaack was a key supporter of Rep. Peter King's (R-NY) series of "anti-Muslim hearings."
Read more...
|
Following in the footsteps of our Founding Fathers by Guy Rodgers, Exec. Director Would you do me the favor of taking a few minutes to read this email all the way to the end? Yesterday we received an email in response to the email I sent out on Wednesday entitled "What now?" The person emailing us expressed concern that the three fact statements in my Wednesday email regarding the Obama administration were "polarizing." The person sending it urged that, instead of criticizing the Obama administration, we work with the administration to resolve these issues. Without a doubt the person who emailed us was sincere and heartfelt, which I can understand, given how combative the presidential campaign was. It is a worthy aspiration to hope that somehow people can come together and work toward a mutually satisfactory resolution.
Unfortunately, for nearly four years, the Obama administration, in virtually every way possible, has made it clear that it has a perspective and position on radical Islam that it is unwilling to modify, even in the slightest.
|
Here are just a few examples:
|
1)
|
Attorney General Eric Holder's exchange with House Judiciary Chairman Lamar Smith. Rep. Smith asked Holder repeatedly if "radical Islam" COULD have been a motive for many of the homegrown terrorists we had arrested. Holder literally tied himself in rhetorical knots trying to avoid answering.
| |
2)
|
John Brennan, President Obama's top counterterrorism advisor, has repeatedly dismissed any notion that "jihad" refers to violence against non-Muslims or that Muslims, who refer to themselves as "jihadists," should be characterized that way. Brennan's position is that jihad only refers to a personal striving to be a good Muslim. This may be appealing to Western sensibilities but it's not the way jihad is characterized in the vast majority of passages in the Qur'an and the most authoritative hadith.
| |
3)
|
In the 9/11 commission report, the terms "jihadist," "jihad," "Muslim," and "Islam," appeared a total of 625 times. In the Obama administration's 2009 "National Intelligence Strategy" report, those terms did not appear once. They were completely stripped out of our intelligence assessment.
| |
4)
|
The Pentagon report that examined the Ft. Hood massacre did not include a single reference to jihad, radical Islam, or any other related term in the body of the report. Instead, it characterized the attack as "workplace violence." This in spite of the fact that Nidal Hasan's behavior and words in the years leading up to the attack, as well as his shouting "Allahu Akbar" during the attack, leave no doubt he saw himself as a jihadist. To this day the Obama administration refuses to characterize this attack as a terrorist act. The stubborn refusal by the Obama administration to acknowledge what the vast majority of Americans know to be true is, frankly, breathtaking.
| |
5)
|
Lt. Col. Matthew Dooley was publicly reprimanded by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff after Muslim organizations, several of which are connected to the Muslim Brotherhood, complained about a course Lt. Col. Dooley taught at the Joint Forces Staff College.
| |
6)
|
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has been actively leading the State Department support of UN Resolution 16/18, the latest effort by the Organization of Islamic Cooperation to get the UN to support a ban on any speech deemed critical of Islam. This resolution is a direct assault on our first amendment right of free speech.
| |
7)
|
As I stated in my Wednesday email, the Obama White House has opened its doors to numerous Muslims who are leaders of or connected to Muslim Brotherhood affiliated organizations.
|
I could provide many other examples, the most recent of which would be the Obama administration's demonstrably false claim that an obscure film on YouTube triggered the assault on our embassy in Cairo and our consulate in Benghazi.
The course set by this administration regarding radical Islam could not be clearer. It is a dangerous course that is compromising our national security and chilling American free speech. What's more, the administration has rebuffed every effort to persuade it to change that course.
|
I wish this were not the case, but all the wishing in the world won't change the reality. What, then, should ACT! for America do? Should we be silent so as not to appear "polarizing?" I can assure you of this. If a Republican administration had charted this course, and had shown no willingness to modify its course, we would be exposing it just as we are doing now with respect to the Obama administration.
The reason is that this is not a matter of political parties, Republican or Democrat. The intent is not to be "polarizing." As Brigitte Gabriel says so often, national security is not a "Republican" issue or a "Democratic" issue, it's an "American issue." Therefore, it is incumbent upon us to report the facts and the truth. America must become aware of what the Obama administration is doing to compromise our national security and our right to free speech. If we fail to expose this agenda, we are derelict in our duty as Americans and we are compromising the ACT! for America mission. What's more, we would not be keeping faith with the countless Americans who have served and sacrificed in our Armed Forces so we could enjoy the blessings of safety and freedom.
|
We welcome Americans of all political stripes into ACT! for America. I can tell you that this is the most diverse coalition of people working for a common cause I've ever seen in my 25+ years in politics. For example, I have been in ACT! for America meetings where a lesbian and an evangelical Christian both spoke up about how they were supporting the ACT! for America effort. How often does that happen in the world of politics?
Having said that, if it's "polarizing" to expose a truth as obvious and as dangerous as the Obama administration's position on radical Islam, then we will choose to tell the truth. We will choose to follow in the footsteps of courageous founding fathers like John Adams, Patrick Henry, Thomas Jefferson, and Sam Adams, whose words and deeds in the cause of liberty were criticized by some as "polarizing."
|
The stakes are too high, and the American landscape is too littered with political correctness, for us to choose any other path. Yours for a safe and free America, Guy Rodgers
|
|
Read FamilySecurityMatters.org Contributing Editor J. Christian Adams' SHOCKING new book! Buy it here
|
|
by GABRIEL GARNICA, ESQ.
Clearly, the GOP has drifted away from its conservative roots, as the liberal records of many Republicans, the GOP's constant failure to uphold true conservative principles, and its alienation of and from the Tea Party show.
by FRANK SALVATO
The one truth that is coming out of all the analytical blather - and that's not to say the only truth - is that the United States of America is no longer a Center-Right nation politically.
by PAUL TOSCANO
In an election that often focused on debates about class warfare, President Barack Obama was favored over multimillionaire businessman Mitt Romney in eight of the nation's 10 wealthiest counties.
by ARMY SGT. 1ST CLASS TYRONE C. MARSHALL JR.
A recent Iranian attack on a U.S. drone occurred over international waters, but the aircraft suffered no damage and returned safely to base, Pentagon Press Secretary George Little said today.
Also on this breaking news topic...
Charles Krauthammer responds to latest news...Pentagon just releasing reports that Iran fired at a U.S. drone in the Persian Gulf...seven days ago
by CHARLES JACOBS
Now, the Newton public school system is enmeshed in a similar controversy about deceptive lessons concerning Muslim women. This time there is an anti-Semitic theme.
McDonald's Corp. reported its first decline in monthly U.S. same store sales in nine years Thursday.
by DR. LAINA FARHAT-HOLZMAN
Because of the dangers of having embassies in Muslim countries, the United States has turned our embassies into fortresses.
by TOM MCLAUGHLIN
The wagon-riders have become the majority. Most Americans don't want real liberty - the liberty to succeed or fail on their own - they want to remain attached to the government umbilical cord and stay home watching "Dancing With The Stars."
Victims of an unforgiving one-two punch from superstorm Sandy and a nor'easter that both hit New York's Staten Island say FEMA has forgotten them.
by STEVE EMERSON
An Islamist activist honored by the White House last December as a "Champion of Change" called Zionism "racism" this week and said "nothing is creepier" than the belief in a Jewish homeland.
Did you know that if everyone who visited our FSM website this year donated just $1, we would easily exceed our annual budget?
Your gift will be an investment in freedom.
As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, The Family Security Foundation relies upon the thoughtfulness and (tax-deductible!) generosity of visitors like you.
PLEASE CLICK HERE TO SEND YOUR 100% TAX-DEDUCTIBLE DONATION TO FAMILYSECURITYMATTERS.ORG
"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same." ~ Ronald Reagan
THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONTINUED SUPPORT OF FAMILYSECURITYMATTERS.ORG.
We certainly couldn't do it without you!
Checks may be sent here:
Family Security Foundation, Inc. 2020 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., #298 Washington, D.C. 20006
|
|
|
 | The Real Reason Petraeus Resigned |
|
Was Petraeus' Affair Outed to Keep Him from Testifying at Benghazi Investigation?
I think we're beginning to get a glimpse into the behind-the-scenes battle over the Benghazi cover-up and the likely blackmail threat that led General Petraeus to announce his affair (apparently to beat the punch of being "outed." See this video) and resign in the portentous words below (see bottom of this article):
Petraeus had been scheduled to testify before the House and Senate Intelligence committees next week about the attack on the Benghazi Consulate, but he will no longer be testifying and it's not yet clear if the committees will summon him in the future to testify about the attack. Acting CIA director Michael Morell will testify in his place next week.
As usual, the politically correct mainstream media hides the most important fact: The man who insisted on praying in the aisle was a Muslim. How can we deduce this? Because only Muslims pray in a way that would necessitate getting down in the aisle of a plane. Why is this fact important? Because one of the Islamist strategies for taking over the West is to overload our systems and make daily life so insecure and expensive that society breaks down. If you want to get a picture of what this looks like, take a look at the "Arab Spring" nations. How does this strategy apply to the case of this praying man? Think of the cost involved in the emergency procedures his behavior provoked. Scrambling the jets cost many thousands of dollars. The emergency landing disrupted the airport, costing more money and creating an emergency atmosphere. And of course there are all of those people who were on that plane, who's business meetings and personal lives have been disrupted and now have to take another flight to get to their destinations, costing many tens of thousands of dollars. All because a guy got down in an airplane aisle, prayed loudly, and refused to get up. This disruptive act needed no expertise, no practice, cost nothing, and won't even result in criminal charges.
And now for the punch line: Imagine a thousand Muslims like him all doing the same act at the same time. They could basically bring down all passenger air traffic in the United States, cost the U.S. Air Force millions of dollars, and throw the entire country into a state of emergency - all at no cost and minimal personal risk. WAKE UP AMERICA!
Dave
Airliner makes emergency landing after passenger rejects instructions
By Aaron Cooper, CNN Fri November 9, 2012
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
- Fighter jets escorted a United Airlines 757 Thursday night
- Station says passenger who ignored landing instructions was a man praying in an aisle
- The aircraft landed uneventfully at Dulles International Airport near Washington, D.C.
- No charges were filed, and the passenger was taken to a local hospital, official says
Washington (CNN) -- A United Airlines plane, escorted by fighter jets, made an emergency landing Thursday night after a passenger refused to follow flight attendant instructions.
Flight 662, a 757 aircraft, was in route from Denver and scheduled to land at Dulles International Airport near Washington, D.C., at 9:10 p.m.
"The flight declared an emergency because a passenger would not follow flight attendant instructions for landing," Megan McCarthy, a United spokeswoman, told CNN in a statement, referring all other questions to law enforcement.
CNN affiliate WUSA reported that the passenger who ignored the instructions was a man praying in the aisle of the jet.
"Out of an abundance of caution we scrambled two F-16s," Lt. Cmdr. Bill Lewis of the North American Aerospace Defense Command said.
The aircraft landed uneventfully at Dulles, according to Rob Yingling, a Metropolitan Washington Airport Authority spokesman.
Police responded, but no arrest was made and no charges were filed, he said. The passenger was taken to a local hospital.
Read more...
|
 | Pat Condell Finally Gets it on Israel |
|

Nobody cares. And that is the real problem. The right is decimated. We have no strong voices, no muscle, no leadership.
Obama suppressing the military vote: Overseas service members unable to access the polls Washington Examiner
The men and women who risk their lives to preserve freedom for all Americans are at risk of losing one of the very freedoms they protect. Overseas military absentee voting was abysmal in 2008 - only 20 percent of overseas military turned in absentee ballots - and it looks like it's going to be even worse in 2012. In Virginia and Ohio, military and overseas ballots have fallen 70 percent since 2008, according to the Military Voter Protection Project. Ohio received only 9,700 ballots in September, whereas in September 2008, it received 32,000. So, why aren't soldiers voting? In many cases they simply can't, and they have their commander in chief, President Obama, to blame.
Read more:
|
Israeli Aid Missions Providing Relief to Hurricane Sandy Victims
By: Anav Silverman, Tazpit News Agency
Published: November 9th, 2012
Israel Flying Aid and synagogue volunteers in Connecticut preparing an emergency food convoy. Photo Credit: Israel News Agency
An Israeli delegation of trained rescue volunteers is departing to New York today, Friday, November 9, to assist victims devastated by Hurricane Sandy. The delegation is headed by Shahar Zahavi, CEO of IsraAID, the Israel Forum for International Humanitarian Aid, an Israeli non-governmental organization (NGO) that has facilitated aid and relief program across the world, including in Haiti, Japan, Turkey, Kenya and South Sudan.
The 12-person delegation will be offering rescue, rehabilitation, and communal resource services to New York residents of Far Rockaway and Long Beach, as well as the Atlantic City-Margate area along the Jersey Shore. They will also be identifying areas with vulnerable populations and allocating resources to older people and families with young children who have suffered significant damages to their homes and have no power.
Financing for the mission comes from young Israelis and from Israeli businesses, alongside partner companies in the United States, which are supplying the Israeli crew with water, food, gasoline, clothing, blankets and storage facilities to distribute to people who have been evacuated from their homes.
Read more:
|
 | Hamas Terrorists Firing Rockets on Israel from Houses in Gaza |
The following video shows Hamas terrorists firing rockets at Israel from within urban living areas in Gaza. The video, uploaded only two days ago by Hamas themselves, reveals Hamas' repeated and unapologetic use of "human shield" tactics. By operating from densely populated areas, Hamas willingly endangers it own people, turning their houses and schools into terror sites and weapon depots.
|
 | "ISM" 1948 Cartoon Explains Capitalism and Class Warfare |
|
Obamacare Is Still Vulnerable
By Michael F. Cannon November 9, 2012
President Obama has won reelection, and his administration has asked state officials to decide by Friday, November 16, whether their state will create one of Obamacare's health-insurance "exchanges." States also have to decide whether to implement the law's massive expansion of Medicaid. The correct answer to both questions remains a resounding no.
State-created exchanges mean higher taxes, fewer jobs, and less protection of religious freedom. States are better off defaulting to a federal exchange. The Medicaid expansion is likewise too costly and risky a proposition. Republican Governors Association chairman Bob McDonnell (R.,Va.) agrees, and has announced that Virginia will implement neither provision.
There are many arguments against creating exchanges.
First, states are under no obligation to create one.
Second, operating an Obamacare exchange would be illegal in 14 states. Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Montana, Ohio, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Utah, and Virginia have enacted either statutes or constitutional amendments (or both) forbidding state employees to participate in an essential exchange function: implementing Obamacare's individual and employer mandates.
Third, each exchange would cost its state an estimated $10 million to $100 million per year, necessitating tax increases.
Read more:
|
Come right in and step right up. See the bright lights and the oddities of nature. Inside folks, for the low price of twenty-two trillion dollars, you can see Binders of Women, Team Big Bird and entire reams of green windmills and fields full of bayonets and horses. Here lies become the truth and everything is full of sugar. And the highlight of the show will be Barack, the Exotic Prince from the Wilds of Indonesia and Kenya, with a special appearance by Oprah and a hologram of JFK. Here in the Carnival of Fools, the party never stops and no one ever has to pay the bill. "There's a sucker born every minute," a famous connoisseur of them once said. And suckers are big business. Very big business indeed. But don't feel too sorry for the sucker. The sucker is a creature composed of ignorance and greed. He believes in his own specialness. He believes that he can fool other people into giving him their money, when actually he is the one being fleeced. The mark is an aspiring scammer who is too dumb to realize that nothing in life is free and the scam is on him.
Read more: |
How Long Does It Take A Political Party To Wear Out Its Welcome?
Posted: 10 Nov 2012 02:24 PM PST
(John Hinderaker)
To those of us who follow the news closely, four years seems like forever. But for most Americans, it seems that four years isn't enough for a political party to wear out its welcome.
In a post yesterday, Paul noted that defeating an incumbent president isn't easy: from 1896 to the present, only five incumbents who sought re-election have been rejected by the voters. A reader refines that number further and, I think, persuasively:
Read More . . . More on the Timing of Petraeus's Resignation Posted: 10 Nov 2012 08:04 AM PST (John Hinderaker) Ronald Kessler of Newsmax has more details on the Petraeus affair. They are rather sordid, and raise more questions about the timing of his resignation: Read More . . . George Will Says to Cheer Up Posted: 10 Nov 2012 07:15 AM PST (Steven Hayward) Spent a portion of last evening in the company of George Will at the Pacific Research Institute's annual dinner (I reprised my schtick as master of ceremonies-sometime I'll have to do an MC cage match with Hinderaker-hey, maybe that could be a reality TV show??). As you can imagine, people were looking for some cheer after this week, and we gave it to them. From my welcoming remarks:
Read More . . . A stalemate, not a mandate Posted: 10 Nov 2012 04:21 AM PST (Scott Johnson)
The Fall 2012 issue of the Claremont Review of Books is forthcoming, but we have a timely preview. The issue will carry Professor James Ceaser's analysis of the meaning of the election. Ceaser is professor of politics at the University of Virginia. Our friends at the CRB have posted a column adapted from his forthcoming essay. Professor Ceaser is a shrewd observer of the political scene. He anticipated four scenarios for "The day after" the election in an excellent Weekly Standard article. As it happens, the outcome appears to have landed somewhere between scenarios 1 and 2. Under each of these scenarios, Professor Ceaser observed: Read More . . . |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  |
Pollster Frank Luntz � one of the many to predict a Romney victory last week � appeared on Fox News Saturday to explain where Republicans took a wrong turn in forecasting voter turnout. Watch the video and see why Frank Luntz believes "viewers should be outraged"HERE.
|  |  |  |  |  | READ THIS | | | |
| |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | University President Scolds Students For Ann Coulter Invite |  |  |  |  |  | American universities are often criticized for their left-leaning biases, but the president of Fordham University in New York appeared to take that bias a step further when he singled out the College Republicans on campus for inviting Ann Coulter to speak. Read the university-wide email sent by President Joseph M. McShaneHERE. |  |  |  |  |  |
Officials say, for the first time since the 1973 Yom Kippur War, Israeli forces on Sunday fired over the country�s northern border into Syria as a warning after a mortar shell fired from Syrian territory exploded in the Golan Heights. Get the latest details on this developing storyHERE. |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  |
We'll let Glenn Beck tell you about this week's pick, a must-read for history and WWII buffs: "Freedom's Forge" sets straight the truth about how FDR almost lost the world while labor unions, aided by communists sabotaged our efforts to defeat Hitler. And it inspires by revealing how American industries and businesses armed the boys in the skies and on the beaches and achieved ultimate victory. A great book about real American history. Check it out HERE.
|  |  |  |  |  | READ THIS | |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Blaze editor and writer Tiffany Gabbay's passion for politics was fostered at an early age by her father, a successful entrepreneur and war hero. In this post, Ms. Gabbay breaks down the successful strategy employed by Democrats to win last week's election. Was "class warfare" really a winning game plan for President Obama? Get Tiffany's take on the subject HERE. | | | |  |  | READ THIS |  |  |  |  |  | |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Obama To Accompany Wise Men In Italian Nativity Scenes |  |  |  |  |  | President Barack Obama, riding on the heels of his historic electoral victory this week, has another accomplishment to boot: He will be included, as a character, in traditional Italian nativity scenes in Naples this Christmas. No, we�re not joking. See the proof HERE. READ THIS | |  |  | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Obama Voters Can't Answer Basic Questions About Gov't |  |
TheBlaze has captured some video gold to help conservatives get past Tuesday's election results. Observe the religious-like conviction of the Obama voters here when rattling off their liberal talking points. However, beyond the rhetoric, how much do these eager voters know about our American government? Let's go to the videoHERE.
|  | READ THIS | |  |  |  | 7 Reasons Why The GOP Should Be Worried |  | Tuesday night�s victory for President Barack Obama has sparked many on the right to dig deep and search for the cause of the GOP's failure. This story offers seven reasons why Republicans should be worried about facing more electoral wipeouts in the future. Read the detailsHERE. |  | READ THIS | |
|  | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Republicans Won't Like The Message On The Cover Of Newsweek |  |  |  |  |  | Newsweek editor Tina Brown announced earlier this year that the magazine would transition from print to all-digital by early 2013; meaning that, excluding the following, the publication has one more issue to go. Take a look at Newsweek's post-election message for the GOPHERE. |  |  |  |  |  | READ THIS | | | |
| |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Krauthammer Says A Single Policy Change Could Save The GOP |  |  |  |  |  | Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer gave the Republican Party some tough love on Thursday. He told the the party: �No whimpering. No whining. No reinvention when none is needed. Do conservatism but do it better." However, Krauthammer did have one specific suggestion that he thinks could turn around the GOP. See what this respected pundit believes to be the answerHERE. |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  | Shephard Smith Has A Mini-Meltdown Over The Fiscal Cliff |  |  |  |  |  | During his Wednesday show, Fox News� Shep Smith had a mini-meltdown while discussing the impending �fiscal cliff� with Democratic campaign consultant John Rowley and Republican strategist Cheri Jacobus. No further explanation is required. Watch Mr. Smith "going off"HERE. |  |  |  |  |  | READ THIS | |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  | Tonight On TheBlaze TV |  |  |  |  |  |
- Glenn Beck: Is President Obama really coming after your guns? Last night, Glenn and NRA President David Keene talked about the possibility. Watch that segment HERE. Tune in at 5pm ET or on-demand on TheBlaze TV.
- Wilkow!: Andrew talks with Peter Schiff about the economy and David Horotwitz about the emergence of the new Left. Watch Wilkow! at 7pm ET -- only on TheBlaze TV.
|
| | | |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Have You Made Travel Plans? If Not, Check Out 'Flushland' |  |  |  |  |  | The Restroom Cultural Park, also known as the �World�s First Toilet Theme Park� has opened in South Korea. Seriously.The park has a museum showing the development of the toilet through history, painting of toilets, and sculptures showing people� well� you know. Take a tourHERE. READ THIS | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Obama: Election Proves Americans Want The Rich To Pay More |  |  |  |  |  | In his weekly address, President Barack Obama said that his re-election is proof that Americans want taxes raised on the wealthy combined with spending cuts to reduce the deficit. What else does the President have planned for his second term? Watch the entire weekly addressHERE. |  |  |  |  |  | READ THIS | |
|
|
|
|  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Did This Woman Deserve To Be Fired Over A Facebook Post? |  |  |  |  |  | An outrageous Facebook post about President Barack Obama has cost a California woman her job and reputation after the disgusting message went viral. See the message and learn why virtually everyone thinks her termination was justifiedHERE. |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |
Back in September, during the Democratic National Convention, TheBlaze asked who President Obama might choose to replace in his Cabinet in the event that he won a second term. At the time, we predicted that two members would most likely choose to leave voluntarily, while two would very likely be fired. See how our predictions are holding up and read our suggestions for other Cabinet member replacementsHERE.
|  |  |  |  |  |
A United Airlines plane made an emergency landing on Thursday night after a passenger reportedly began fervently praying in the aisle. The man who apparently refused to go back to his seat, became a problematic distraction while the plane was preparing for landing. See what happened after the pilot declared an emergencyHERE.
|  |  |  |  |  | READ THIS | |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |
|
|
|
|  |  | |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | What Does A Belly Button Have In Common With The Rainforest? |  |  |  |  |  |
Researchers studying the belly button have found a lot of variety when it comes to differences in types of bacteria seen in one person�s navel to another. The more belly buttons they sampled and cultured bacteria from, the more differences they discovered. Find out why this is so similar to the rainforestHERE.
|  |  |
|
|

Friday, November 9 |  |
Exclusive - Inside Orca: How the Romney Campaign Suppressed Its Own Vote |
|
by Joel B. Pollak
As Republicans try to explain their Election Day losses in terms of policy, tactics, and strategy, one factor is emerging as the essential difference between the Obama and Romney campaigns on November 6: the absolute failure of Romney's get-out-the-vote effort, which underperformed even John McCain's lackluster 2008 turnout. One culprit appears to be "Orca," the Romney's massive technology effort, which failed completely.
A source within the Romney campaign agreed to share his reflections on Project Orca with Breitbart News
More
| |
| |
Big Peace
Taliban: Obama Must Pull Out 'Defeated' U.S. from Afghanistan More
|
|
|
|
|
|

By Discover The Networks
A look inside the mind of a "climate change" alarmist. Read more »
|
More to read:
|
|
Video: The Real Reason Petraeus Resigned
Nov 10, 2012 01:44 pm
It was just a coincidence that the attack on the Benghazi consulate occurred on the anniversary of 9/11. We were told that it was really a "protest turned violent" over an anti-Islam video that had exactly seventeen views on YouTube, being uploaded two months before, averaging less than one view per day. CIA director David [...]
Watch the Video and Comment: Video: The Real Reason Petraeus Resigned
Democrats No Longer CareNov 10, 2012 01:38 pm
The election revealed the true nature of the supporters of Barack Obama; they do not care about anyone but themselves. The Free Obama-phone Lady from Ohio is now the face of America. If you don't give her free stuff, you suck. After a hard day of ranting about how great Obama is and how evil [...]
Read More and Comment: Democrats No Longer Care
The Real Reason Romney LostNov 10, 2012 01:21 pm
Now that Mitt Romney lost to one of the most unpopular presidents in U.S. history, the question many are asking is why? Political pundits on the Left and Right are claiming that Romney appealed too much to the "extreme Right fringe" and was not "moderate enough." The truth is that the exact opposite is true. [...]
Read More and Comment: The Real Reason Romney Lost
Video: Malkin: Impeach Obama For Benghazi 'Jihadi-Coddling'Nov 10, 2012 01:10 pm
Michelle Malkin sounds off on Obama's disgraceful conduct on Sean Hannity's Fox News show. Related posts: Michelle Malkin Exposes Obama's Real War On Women Michelle Malkin helps Sean Hannity fact-check the recent debate.... Continue... Homeland Security Turned Into Frat House Sean Hannity and Michelle Malkin discuss the case of a...
Read More and Comment: Video: Malkin: Impeach Obama For Benghazi 'Jihadi-Coddling'
A Word From The PresidentNov 10, 2012 01:01 pm
My fellow Americans, It's been a few days since my resounding reelection victory, and Michelle reminded me to thank those who helped me receive another four years serving the American people from the Oval Office. The list is quite long, so I will attempt to hit the high points. First and foremost, I owe a [...]
Read More and Comment: A Word From The President
Pro-life Hero Rebukes Pseudo-pro-lifer Ann Coulter!Nov 10, 2012 12:55 pm
I knew this would happen! I predicted that Republican party apologists would blame Richard Mourdoch and Todd Akin's losses on the fact that they are 100% pro-life, instead of acknowledging that the losses were due to how poorly they expressed their positions. And sure enough, the day after the election, Ann Coulter did just that. [...]
Read More and Comment: Pro-life Hero Rebukes Pseudo-pro-lifer Ann Coulter!
Video: Local Businessman Blames Obama Administration For Coal LayoffsNov 10, 2012 12:42 pm
Good for this patriot in Ohio! Related posts: Coal Miners Declare War On Obama Coal miners in Ohio are sick and tired of Barack... How Obama Is Destroying The American Coal Industry The iconic Patriot Coal Corporation just recently filed for bankruptcy...
Watch the Video and Comment: Video: Local Businessman Blames Obama Administration For Coal Layoffs
God Is DeadNov 10, 2012 12:32 pm
Editor's note: The views expressed here are solely those of the author.) God is dead. Hear me out, my neo-conservative Christian friends. I grew up in the Bible Belt, Alabama to be specific, and fully understand the importance of personal spirituality and the core faith so many enjoy in the United States. Since the liberals [...]
Read More and Comment: God Is Dead
Video: Congressman Wants Petraeus To Testify One Way Or The OtherNov 10, 2012 12:27 pm
Rep. Trey Gowdy told Greta Van Susteren last night that Petraeus will be questioned before Congress despite his resignation today, even if he has to be subpoenaed. Related posts: Romney Donor On Obama's Enemies List: They're Stalking My Kids Romney donor Frank VanderSloot, one of the eight men detailed... Trump Rips Greta: You Don't Know [...]
Watch the Video and Comment: Video: Congressman Wants Petraeus To Testify One Way Or The Other
Middle Schoolers Subjected To Graphic Gay IndoctrinationNov 10, 2012 12:23 pm
Shortly before Maine became one of the first states to approve gay marriage at the ballot box, a school district in the state was ahead of the curve with a presentation of graphic gay sex acts. Promoted as part of the school's "Diversity Day", 25 students in a middle school class were subjected to the [...]
Read More and Comment: Middle Schoolers Subjected To Graphic Gay Indoctrination
Video: NRA CEO On The Results Of Election Day 2012Nov 10, 2012 12:11 pm
Cam Edwards and Ginny Simone talk to Wayne LaPierre, NRA Executive Vice President and CEO, about the results of Election Day 2012. He calls upon members to show their support and membership in the NRA like never before and declares that the NRA will fight any and all attacks on Second Amendment freedoms at the [...]
Watch the Video and Comment: Video: NRA CEO On The Results Of Election Day 2012
Goodbye, AmericaNov 10, 2012 12:08 pm
The America we once knew is gone, replaced by an eviscerated ghost of itself. This specter has become a worshiper of sex, exercising no limit to its approbation or potential approbation for any conceivable consensual sexual antic - men wanting to be women and women wanting to be men, sex among three or more people, [...]
Read More and Comment: Goodbye, America
Video: Joe Miller's Post-Election BreakdownNov 10, 2012 11:55 am
Joe Miller has some harsh words for the GOP establishment and even Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan. Related posts: Romney Names Paul Ryan His No. 2 Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney has selected Wisconsin Rep. Paul... Ryan Seen As Romney's Bridge Across Gop Spectrum Even before Wisconsin sent Paul Ryan to Congress, he was...
Watch the Video and Comment: Video: Joe Miller's Post-Election Breakdown
A Fork In The Road, Part INov 10, 2012 11:49 am
Note-This is the first in a two-part series on where things stand following the 2012 election cycle. Part 2 will focus on where we stand spiritually. Part 1 is about where we stand politically. New York Yankees great Yogi Berra once famously observed, "When you come to a fork in the road-take it." And that [...]
Read More and Comment: A Fork In The Road, Part I
Post-Election State Of The UnionNov 10, 2012 11:38 am
Among conservatives and Christians in this country, the outcome of the recent presidential election has incited a gamut of emotions and feelings ranging from disappointment to hopelessness, fear, and anger. While any of these feelings are understandable (and most of them may be useful for the future), given the right control and direction, a feeling [...]
Read More and Comment: Post-Election State Of The Union
Hispanic Group Demands National Amnesty For 11 Million IllegalsNov 10, 2012 11:33 am
Hispanic amnesty activists are expanding their goals beyond the so-called "DREAM Act" youth amnesty, towards a national amnesty for roughly 11 million Hispanic illegals. President Barack Obama and Congress "need to come together to deliver change on immigration policy, and by that we mean ... a roadmap to citizenship for our parents and communities," said [...]
Read More and Comment: Hispanic Group Demands National Amnesty For 11 Million Illegals
CIA Director Petraeus Resigns, Cites Extramarital AffairNov 09, 2012 04:26 pm
Central Intelligence Agency Director David Petraeus has resigned, citing "extremely poor judgment" for having an extramarital affair. Petraeus told President Barack Obama of the affair on Thursday and offered to resign, a senior official told NBC News. Obama accepted his resignation in a phone call Friday afternoon. "Yesterday afternoon, I went to the White House and asked [...]
Read More and Comment: CIA Director Petraeus Resigns, Cites Extramarital Affair
'Gay marriage' adopted: Are you prepared for what's coming next?
|
If you think Tuesday's passage of 'gay'-marriage measures in several states is going to result in formerly angry homosexuals and lesbians surrendering to connubial bliss and spending quite evenings at home in front of the TV or fireplace with the new spouse, you've missed what these electoral victories mean. Here's what's coming for the rest of us ...
|
Read the latest now on WND.com.
|
Planned Parenthood: Obama Victory Ensures More Dead Babies
Nov 09, 2012 01:53 pm
While conservatives in general bemoan an enormous setback for traditional American values after Tuesday's election, members of the left's core constituency are applauding Obama's radical agenda and the fact that it will continue through at least 2016. Chief among those cheerleaders is Planned Parenthood, which receives nearly $500 million in confiscatory tax money per year, according to the most [...] Read More and Comment: Planned Parenthood: Obama Victory Ensures More Dead Babies
Maybe Voters Didn't Know Their Lives Really Did Depend On The OutcomeNov 09, 2012 01:17 pm
Many have called the 2012 election the most important in their lifetime. But in citing the economy, unemployment, foreign affairs, gas prices, healthcare, and the burgeoning corruption of the American judiciary, political pundits may have universally ignored the real threat to the American public and the reason it was imperative to remove the Obama Regime [...] Read More and Comment: Maybe Voters Didn't Know Their Lives Really Did Depend On The Outcome
Marxist, Socialist Students Celebrate Obama's ReelectionNov 09, 2012 01:13 pm
Students celebrate President Obama's reelection outside the White House by chanting "Karl Marx," among other things. Contains some strong language. Related posts: The Obamas Celebrate Black Racial Solidarity In Annual Kwanzaa Message Barack and Michelle Obama rushed out a message to... America's Marxist Media It has by now become glaringly apparent to all but... Read More and Comment: Marxist, Socialist Students Celebrate Obama's Reelection
Video: You Won't Believe How Little These Obama Voters Know About Our Gov'tNov 09, 2012 12:58 pm
A three block line weaved through a quaint neighborhood in South End of Boston, each person waiting to cast their vote at the polling place inside the Benjamin Franklin Institute of Technology. This is an austere, historic and heavily liberal section of Boston (generously assuming there are some non-liberal parts of Boston). Signs for Elizabeth Warren and [...] Read More and Comment: Video: You Won't Believe How Little These Obama Voters Know About Our Gov't
America's Fundamental TransformationNov 09, 2012 12:46 pm
Timing is everything in politics. For four years, I angered conservatives by insisting that Barack Obama would get reelected. I figured that an electorate willing to elect a man with ideas and a record that far to the left in 2008 would do so again. I began changing my view, however, after the first presidential debate. Over the [...] Read More and Comment: America's Fundamental Transformation
Video: Caught On Tape: 'You Have To Vote To Get Obamaphone'Nov 09, 2012 12:42 pm
This was on the Michael Berry show. It seems like he dressed up as Uncle Sam and asked what he had to do to get an Obamaphone. Related posts: Russian Ballot Box Stuffing Caught On Tape Elections are only as good as the people that supervise... CAUGHT ON TAPE: Ohio Voter Fraud Update Three Ohio [...] Read More and Comment: Video: Caught On Tape: 'You Have To Vote To Get Obamaphone'
The Hand Of God WAS On The ElectionNov 09, 2012 12:35 pm
As those in our great Nation woke up on Wednesday morning, we scratched our heads in disbelief as to what happened in the election. We thought every base was covered. Romney did well in the debates, he was hosting huge crowds of supporters, and his polling numbers were either tied or exceeded Obama's. So what [...] Read More and Comment: The Hand Of God WAS On The Election
Video: Giuliani: Benghazi Will Haunt Re-elected ObamaNov 09, 2012 12:32 pm
Former NYC mayor Rudy Giuliani says Obama won election, but his administration will still have to answer for Libyan terror attacks at hearing. Watch the latest video at video.foxnews.com Related posts: Giuliani On CNN: 'Am I Debating The Obama Campaign?' Former NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani handled himself well the other... Giuliani Blasts Obama Over Hurricane [...] Read More and Comment: Video: Giuliani: Benghazi Will Haunt Re-elected Obama
Video: Obama Represented And WonNov 09, 2012 12:15 pm
Zo is not surprised that President Obama won reelection. He is surprised that the Republicans cannot field a winning a candidate. Hear more as AlfonZo Rachel discusses Gov. Mitt Romney, Herman Cain and the future of conservatism and the Republican party. Related posts: Cain: The Democratic Party's Biggest Threat What to do about Herman Cain? [...] Watch the Video and Comment: Video: Obama Represented And Won
Obama Re-election Sends U.S. Down 'Path Of Destruction,' Says Franklin GrahamNov 09, 2012 12:06 pm
CHARLOTTE, N.C. - On the day of his father's 94th birthday, and the day after the country re-elected President Barack Obama president, evangelist Franklin Graham gave two-pronged advice to the American people: Politically, it's time for the two parties to work more closely. Yet spiritually, Tuesday's results sent America further down a "path of destruction." [...] Read More and Comment: Obama Re-election Sends U.S. Down 'Path Of Destruction,' Says Franklin Graham
Video: GOP: We Don't Need Social IssuesNov 09, 2012 12:03 pm
A video that shows what happens when Republicans ignore social issues. Related posts: Social Issues Bubbling Up In GOP Campaign Mitt Romney is forced to defend his opposition to same-sex... Documents Show Kagan's Liberal Opinion On Social Issues Elena Kagan has kept her cards so close to the... Watch the Video and Comment: Video: GOP: We Don't Need Social Issues
Ron Paul: Election Shows U.S. 'Far Gone'Nov 09, 2012 11:58 am
Rep. Ron Paul, whose maverick presidential bids shook the GOP, said in the wake of this week's elections that the country has already veered over the fiscal cliff and he sees no chance of righting ship in a country where too many people are dependent on government. "We're so far gone. We're over the cliff," [...] Read More and Comment: Ron Paul: Election Shows U.S. 'Far Gone'
Ron Paul: Election Shows U.S. 'Far Gone'Nov 09, 2012 11:58 am
Rep. Ron Paul, whose maverick presidential bids shook the GOP, said in the wake of this week's elections that the country has already veered over the fiscal cliff and he sees no chance of righting ship in a country where too many people are dependent on government. "We're so far gone. We're over the cliff," [...] Read More and Comment: Ron Paul: Election Shows U.S. 'Far Gone'
Election Results Quickly Takes Toll On Economy And JobsNov 09, 2012 11:52 am
Shortly before midnight on Tuesday, we all learned that Barack Obama had won a second term as President. Like so many elections in the past the news had an immediate effect on the nation. On Wednesday, the Stock Market was so thrilled with facing another four years of Obamanomics that it fell 313 points. Wall [...] Read More and Comment: Election Results Quickly Takes Toll On Economy And Jobs
UN Arms Trade Treaty Gaining Ground As Globalists Scheme To Disarm The WorldNov 09, 2012 11:48 am
The UN General Assembly's First Committee on Disarmament Meeting held this week decided that their plans for finalizing the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) will culminate in March 2013. Supporting the ATT are countries like China, France, Germany, the UK and the US. One hundred and seven countries across the world signed onto the resolution. In [...] Read More and Comment: UN Arms Trade Treaty Gaining Ground As Globalists Scheme To Disarm The World
Video: Churches Helping Sandy Victims, Not Red Cross Or FEMANov 09, 2012 11:37 am
Personally, I am awed by all that private charity can do. I hope you are too after watching this video. Related posts: Sandy Victims Beg For Help Barack Obama after Hurricane Sandy decimated the eastern seaboard made... Tales From Fast And Furious, Part 2: Victims Of A Rogue Government In this second video in our [...] Watch the Video and Comment: Video: Churches Helping Sandy Victims, Not Red Cross Or FEMA
The Unmitigated Disaster Known As Project ORCANov 09, 2012 11:05 am
What is Project Orca? Well, this is what they told us: Project ORCA is a massive undertaking - the Republican Party's newest, unprecedented and most technologically advanced plan to win the 2012 presidential election. Pretty much everything in that sentence is false. The "massive undertaking" is true, however. It would take a lot of planning, [...] Read More and Comment: The Unmitigated Disaster Known As Project ORCA
|
More to read:
|
|

Arabs in Israel: Don't touch our prophet
|
Just because Arab citizens of Israel enjoy the fruits of freedom and democracy more than any other Arabs in the Middle East doesn't mean they like it. And they'll grasp for the most discredited "evidence" to make their case against freedom ...
|
Read the latest now on WND.com.
|
Did Petraeus mistress reveal big CIA secret?
|
Paula Broadwell, the biographer who had an extramarital affair with former CIA Director David Petraeus leading to his resignation, may have also spilled the beans on this big secret that no one has mentioned. That is, until now ...
|
Read the latest now on WND.com.
|
Megapastor: Obama win 'paves way' for Antichrist
|
The well-known pastor of an American megachurch says Barack Obama's re-election will lead to the rise of the Antichrist. He also says it's "time for Christians to stand up and to push back against this evil that is overtaking our nation."
|
Read the latest now on WND.com.
|
Is THIS what Obama meant by 'revenge'?
|
When Barack Obama said on the campaign trail, "Voting is the best revenge," is THIS what he actually meant? And can America survive with politics this bloody?
|
Read the latest now on WND.com.
|
'Without a doubt' voter fraud stole the election
|
One of America's top political analysts says there's no question Barack Obama just stole the presidential election. "Am I suggesting that the recent presidential election was stolen through voter fraud and manipulation? Without a doubt. Do I have evidence? Yes." Look who has the guts to say it like it is, as well as the evidence ...
|
Read the latest now on WND.com.
|
Are drones equalizing the battlefield?
|
The air superiority that allows Israel to make regular incursions into Lebanon's air space to spy on the activities of Hezbollah is being challenged. And it has the potential to be a game changer if Hezbollah's next drone, sent deep into Israel, is armed with an electromagnetic-pulse emitter instead of cameras.
|
Read the latest now on WND.com.
|
Democrats actually shouted THIS when Obama won
|
If you thought that business about Democrats liking socialism and Karl Marx was just a myth, listen to these shouts at Obama victory rallies ...
|
Read the latest now on WND.com.
|
Horror in Syria: Rebels executing Christians
|
A video of a Nov. 1 attack in which black-clad Syrian rebels reportedly killed 28 men was misreported as the execution of Syrian soldiers, says the head of a Christian group providing aid in the war-torn country. He should know -- two of those gunned down worked with him and there's good reason to believe the others were Christians as well, targeted for death by the very people the Obama administration is funneling weapons to.
|
Read the latest now on WND.com.
|
'We're looking at the background of the victim'
|
City officials in Baltimore knew exactly what to do when a mob of black people beat John Mason almost to death. They blamed the white victim ... beaten into a coma ... at a downtown bus stop ... in front of cameras ... in the middle of the day ... on a crowded street. Police, seeking a motive, say they're "looking at the background of the victim." Memo to Baltimore: This is NOT what is meant by a "color-blind society."
|
Read the latest now on WND.com.
|
Louisiana residents petition to secede
|
"When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another ..." Philadelphia, July 4, 1776? No. Slidell, La., Nov. 7, 2012 - the day after the election. If the Obama administration had trouble with the tea party movement, how will it respond to a secession movement?
|
Read the latest now on WND.com.
|
Middle East sounds off on Obama re-election | |
Maybe Obama should have bowed even lower to the Saudi king ... or perhaps he should have said again during the campaign how much he loved hearing the Muslim call to prayer.
Whatever, Obama's not getting a lot of mileage for all his attempts to placate the Islamic world. Just take a look at how his re-election is playing in the Middle East ...
| Read the latest now on WND.com | | Plus! | |
In the afterglow of Obama's victory, Ayman al-Zawahiri, Ayatollah Khamenei, Vladimir Putin and Chris Matthews, as well as millions of pot-heads, sodomites, pro-aborts and all common moochers, are sharing a collective thrill. The American people by a clear majority have rejected fiscal responsibility, energy independence, national security, border security, traditional family values, and worst of all, standing with the most defenseless and innocent among us. Barack Obama's re-election is a complete political, economic, moral, social and spiritual catastrophe.
But despite the very real implications of America's downfall, Christians have far more substantial hope and reason to remain joyful.
| Click here for details | | The movie list liberals don't want you to see | | In honor of Veteran's Day we have made a list of movies which ... | Click here for details |
Must Read News | | |
| | Other Highlights | | |
- Next climate report to 'scare the wits out of everyone'
- School kids taught about 'gay' foreplay, Saran Wrap
- Romney 'transition website' leaks online
- Prof praises Stalin â€" never committed '1 crime'
- Chants for 'Karl Marx,' 'socialism' at Dem victory rally
|
'It is high noon for America'
|
|
His parents were dissidents in the Soviet Union who braved gulags to voice the cry for freedom in a totalitarian state.
When he was five years old, his family fled to the West.
Now Jamie Glazov, editor of FrontPageMag.com, is following his parents' footsteps, speaking out against the biggest issues threatening the freedom he found in America. And according to Glazov, the threat has never been more real or more urgent.
|
Read the latest now on WND.com
|
|
Plus!
|
|
This year marks the 50th anniversary of the Vietnam War.
As we celebrate Veterans Day, Medal of Honor recipient Gen. Patrick Brady clears up a few misconceptions about America's noble warriors who fought in that conflict ...
|
Click here for details
|
Student journalist faced suspension ... for asking questions
|
|
If you're wondering how today's journalism fell into such a sad state, consider State University of New York College at Oswego as Exhibit A.
There, a student journalist found himself facing suspension for asking this simple question.
With this kind of education, is it any wonder so few journalism graduates have the courage in their careers to ask the really hard questions?
|
Read the latest now on WND.com
|
|
Plus!
|
|
You put your kids on the school bus in the morning, believing they're in good hands and that responsible adults will make responsible choices to keep them safe.
And then THIS happens ...
|
Click here for details
|
|
FEMA: let's house Sandy's Staten Island White Middle Class victims in an old prison
Nov 11, 2012 06:27 am | Coach Collins
By Kevin "Coach" Collins
Just imagine for a moment what would happen if George Bush's FEMA Director "Brownie" had suggested homeless African American victims of Katrina be relocated to an empty Louisiana prison. I'll wait while you try to stop laughing and compose yourself. Whether it would have been a good idea or a TERRIBLE INSULT would have made no difference; it would never have even been discussed.
Paternalistic liberals could not sleep at night knowing this was going on. They would much rather see their Black people being forced to sleep in tents and exposed to the elements than sleep in a well-lit warm and safe former prison. "Oh the inhumanity of it all!"
Nevertheless, placing Staten Island's White Middle Class Sandy victims in the Island's now abandoned Arthur Kill Correctional Facility is "on the table" as a possibility for solving the temporary housing needs of thousands of homeless Staten Islanders living in New York's ... Continue Reading:FEMA: let's house Sandy's Staten Island White Middle Class victims in an old prison
comments | read more
Maybe voters didn't know their lives really did depend on the outcome
Nov 09, 2012 05:13 am | Coach Collins
by Doug Book, staff writer
Many have called the 2012 election the most important in their lifetime. But in citing the economy, unemployment, foreign affairs, gas prices, healthcare and the burgeoning corruption of the American judiciary, political pundits may have universally ignored the real threat to the American public and the reason it was imperative to remove the Obama Regime from power.
It happened back in March. Republican representative Tom Graves of Georgia asked FBI Director Robert Mueller whether the Administration's "...policy of extra-judicial killings of American citizens abroad could also apply in the United States." Incredibly, Mueller responded "I have to go back. Uh, I'm not certain whether that was addressed or not." (1)
Graves then made it a bit easier, asking whether "...from a historical perspective the federal government has the ability to kill a United States citizen on United States soil, or just overseas." "I'm going to defer that to others in the ... Continue Reading:Maybe voters didn't know their lives really did depend on the outcome
comments | read more
Democrats No Longer Care
Nov 10, 2012 05:13 am | Coach Collins
By Jim Emerson, staff writer
The election revealed the true nature of the supporters of Barack Obama: they do not care about anyone but themselves. The Free Obama-phone Lady from Ohio is now the face of America. If you don't give her free stuff you suck. After a hard day of ranting about how great Obama is and how evil conservatives are goes home to watch her flat screen TV she got with her Obama bucks EBT card.
Voter Suppression
The only Americans who were denied the right to vote were the men and women selflessly serving this nation overseas, Obama supporters and no-show Republicans don't care. This weekend American celebrates Veteran's Day. Obama supporters only think of it as a three day weekend if they had a job. For most entitlement leeches it a day the Post Office takes off so they have to wait an extra day to get the Bluetooth ear piece for ... Continue Reading:Democrats No Longer Care
comments | read more
Half of America celebrates but the rest of us know the plagues Obamacare will bring us on Jan. 1 Nov 08, 2012 12:13 pm | Coach Collins By Kevin "Coach" Collins Those who are "whooping it up" over Barack Obama and his Party's victory won't care about this list of taxes and other plagues that will be forced on us by Obamacare come next January. Some are blissfully ignorant of what is coming; others have always been content to be surfs and still others know all this and don't give a damn - they like hanging out and drinking beer in the park. Nevertheless, those who voted for Barack Obama still work and have a real life have big surprises coming their way. The most serious plague of re-electing Barack Obama is that it has put into peril the spiritual life of his Christian and Orthodox Jewish supporters. Someday they will be called upon to explain their support for those who desecrate God's laws. Obamacare will force faith based medical facilitates to close or commit abortions. Obama's voters have opted for a ... Continue Reading:Half of America celebrates but the rest of us know the plagues Obamacare will bring us on Jan. 1 comments | read more |
November 8, 2012
WES VERNON, RA ANALYST - It is said the iconic songwriter George Gershwin's talent had reached such overwhelming proportions in the twenties and thirties that, along with popular acclaim and respect, he had generated deep envy amongst his peers... (more)
November 8, 2012 ALAN KEYES - Romney/Ryan lost. The GOP held on to the U.S. House of Representatives. But the Democrats held on to their majority in the U.S. Senate. They did so thanks, in no small part, to the politically murderous treachery of the GOP wing of the elitist faction, orchestrated by Karl Rove and quietly approved by GOP nominee Mitt Romney... (more)
November 8, 2012 CLIFF KINCAID - Although Republican Mitt Romney lost an easily winnable election, many conservative commentators and analysts took a beating as well. They were determined to believe that Romney would win no matter what Obama threw at him... (more)
November 8, 2012 The best of Fred Hutchison FRED HUTCHISON, RA ANALYST - By coincidence, both Terri Schiavo and Pope John Paul II, the great advocate of the value of life, had feeding tubes inserted by doctors. Both Terri and the pope evidenced the desire to live: Terri did so by her sunny attitudes, and the pope did so by his writings about the sanctity of life... (more)
November 8, 2012 JOSEPH FARAH - I hate to say it, but I saw Barack Obama's re-election coming. I saw it coming many months ago. Obama's favorable ratings were too high for a guy who had done everything in his power to wreck the greatest economy in the world, to embarrass the U.S. around the world and to attack individual liberty and state sovereignty at every turn... (more)
November 8, 2012 REUTERS - As television networks began declaring that President Barack Obama had won re-election, the most captivating televised drama Tuesday evening played out on Fox News, where Republican strategist Karl Rove refused to believe the race between Obama and Mitt Romney was over... (more)
November 8, 2012 ANDREW NAPOLITANO - Only in America can a president who inherits a deep recession and whose policies have actually made the effects of that recession worse get re-elected. Only in America can a president get re-elected who wants the bureaucrats who can't run the Post Office to micromanage the administration of every American's health care... (more)
November 8, 2012 WASHINGTON TIMES - Slamming the Republican Party establishment for tapping Mitt Romney as its standard-bearer, the co-founder of the nation's largest tea party group said Wednesday the lessons learned from the 2012 presidential election will strengthen the grass-roots movement, making it an even more important part of the GOP's future... (more)
November 8, 2012 TIMOTHY P. CARNEY - Republicans need a new coalition and a new message. The heart of that coalition should be the working class. The message should be populism. Populist movements in the past have often been ugly because they scapegoated vulnerable minorities... (more)
November 8, 2012 ASSOCIATED PRESS - A drop in voter turnout in Tuesday's election didn't keep President Barack Obama from winning a second term. Preliminary figures suggest fewer people voted this year than four years ago, when voters shattered turnout records as they elected Obama to his first term... (more)
November 8, 2012 WASHINGTON TIMES - Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said Wednesday that he will try to push through a change to Senate rules that would limit the GOP's ability to filibuster bills. Speaking in the wake of Tuesday's election, which boosted Senate Democrats' numbers slightly, Mr. Reid said he won't end filibusters altogether but that the rules need to change so that the minority party cannot use the legislative blocking tool as often... (more)
November 8, 2012 WORLDNETDAILY - The state of Israel will not capitulate before President Obama, whose "naive" leadership has hurt the U.S., stated Danny Danon, deputy speaker of Israel's Knesset. Danon, a Knesset member from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's ruling Likud party, was reacting to the re-election of Obama... (more)
November 7, 2012 WASHINGTON TIMES - President Obama won re-election to the White House on Tuesday night, holding together enough of his hope-and-change coalition to repeat his historic 2008 election and surviving a sluggish economy and a fractured electorate that desired a change but failed to find Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney a credible alternative... (more)
November 7, 2012 JOSEPH FARAH - For many of us, the unthinkable has happened. America has decisively turned the corner away from the constitutional principles of limited government and self-government with the re-election of Barack Obama. There may be no way home for us... (more)
November 7, 2012 WALL STREET JOURNAL - Americans for the first time approved gay marriage at the ballot box on Tuesday, pointing to changing attitudes on the divisive issue... (more)
November 7, 2012 AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE - Colorado became the first US state to approve a proposal to legalize marijuana, including for recreational use, with Washington state appearing set to follow suit, according to US media... (more)
November 5, 2012 STEPHEN STONE, RA PRESIDENT - In a contested race for political office, it's impossible to vote against someone. The ballot doesn't allow it. That reality has somehow gotten lost in this year's election, due to the intensity of disapproval for Barack Hussein Obama... (more)
November 5, 2012 SELWYN DUKE - "I'm guessing that as soon as I walk into the voting booth, I'll probably make up my mind then." So said undecided voter Kerry Ladka, appearing on Greta Van Susteren's program after the second presidential debate... (more)
November 5, 2012 ALAN KEYES - This week, I read a surprising piece by WND's David Kupelian in which he asserted that people willing to accept the choice of evils in this year's presidential election are following the example of America's founders ("Beware the 'lesser-of-two-evils' trap"). Kupelian notes that in order to secure approval of the U.S. Constitution, the founders compromised with the existence of slavery... (more)
November 5, 2012 CLIFF KINCAID - A breaking report in the New York Times of a Romney Russian connection could help cost the Republican nominee the election on Tuesday... (more) |

Where Do We Go From Here? The calls and emails have been coming in furiously. Stated in different ways, 'where do we go from here,' is the question that is on just about everyone's mind. We can answer that question in two words, "leadership" and "courage," but before we go any further, let's take an honest and realistic look at what actually happened on Tuesday, where we stand, and what potential long-term disasters were possibly averted on Tuesday. As we lick our wounds, it may seem unreasonable for us to make the following point but bear with us: Nothing actually changed on Tuesday. Pause and think about it for just a minute. In reality, as a nation, we simply maintained a horrendous and intolerable status quo. Barack Hussein Obama is still illegally occupying the White House. Harry Reid is still in charge of a small but obstructionist Democrat majority in the United States Senate and the spineless John Boehner is still 'leading' the House of Representatives. Obviously, we gained nothing, but we haven't lost ground either. Our country is in the same (albeit intolerable) position that it occupied on November 5th; and while we have said, in the past, that Barack Obama is a "disease" that is afflicting this great country, truth be told, he's merely a symptom of a far greater sickness that has afflicted this great country for far too long. Star Parker so aptly stated: "For years, we've talked about the demographic shift impacting our country's policies, with liberals selling entitlements to an ever-enlarging voter block in exchange for votes and values. Well, it's time to stop talking because the shift has happened." Parker is right but if one were to point fingers, our Republican leaders have been quilty for years, unwittingly perhaps, of spreading the very cancer that is destroying this great nation. Here's just one example of how our Republican leaders have allowed the left to build constituencies that erode our very foundations and drive the country ever leftward. For years we've allowed the government to fund so-called "comprehensive sex education programs" in our public schools, we've allowed the government to fund Planned Parenthood. As a country, we've worshipped at the altar of birth control and abortion and pushed welfare programs that place the government into the role of father in the lives of far too many of our children; and now we wonder why single, unmarried women and young people voted in overwhelming numbers for the man who supports such suicidal programs. We could cite countless examples but suffice it to say that our problems did not surface overnight. We are indeed reaping what we sowed. As Obama's mentor, Jeremiah Wright would say: America's chickens have indeed come home to roost. And when it comes to "what we lost," namely, reversing the horrendous direction touched upon in the above paragraphs, a clear win, in this presidential election, was never an option. While we kept our powder dry during the campaign (lest we be falsely accused of sabotaging a Republican victory), we didn't swallow the Kool-aid either. We always knew that Mitt Romney was not a conservative. He never was a conservative and he will probably never be a conservative. A Romney administration would have simply continued the leftward march of this country, albeit at a much slower pace, put a "GOP-Stamp" on it and compromise-to-get-along Republicans in Congress would have simply jumped on the liberal Romney bandwagon, as if leftist policies advanced during a Republican administration are somehow better than leftist policies advanced during a Democrat administration. The dark cloud of Romney's loss, in the end, may have a silver lining. We may have averted a much worse disaster; the long-term continuation of a march to the left on the part of Republican elected officials which, over time, might have done more damage to our fortunes and our country than the hard times which are sure to come over the next four years. Put another way, disaster was unavoidable after Mitt Romney secured the GOP nomination; as a nation, assuming that we succeed in coming years when it comes to electing principled conservatives to office, we may have succeeded in trading a long-term disaster for a short-term disaster. Are we painting a rosy picture? By no means. If Barack Obama has his way, gas prices at the pump will continue to rise. The cost to heat our homes and feed our families will go up. More of us will lose our homes and our jobs. It's not a pretty picture but, as Americans, we are made of stern stuff. We can weather the storm. Are we engaging in a delusional attempt to put a happy face on a disastrous situation? Hardly. It was however necessary to take a realistic look at where we stand to adequately explain where we must go. So where do we go? We must stay the course and continue to force our elected officials, kicking and screaming if we must, to effect a change in the political dialogue in Washington. We must force them to start exhibiting qualities that have been in short supply in Washington in years past, namely, courage and leadership. One of our members, Dorothy L., in response to words of assurance we sent her in an email wrote us in reply: "For two elections now there have been excellent books and articles about who Obama really is. The leaders of Republican Party have said nothing I don't think that the fact that the Liberals have controlled the media is the real culprit. As you have said and I will paraphrase, the GOP is weak." Dorothy hit the nail on the head. We've perceived our Republican leaders as weak because they've followed (and are still following) a failed strategy. They only act when they believe the political dialogue indicates that it would be advantageous for them to act instead of acting to change the dialogue. That's a recipe for disaster. We must convince our Republican leaders to follow the example of Ronald Reagan and act to advance a dialogue that, in turn, makes it advantageous for them to pursue an affirmative agenda. Perhaps an illustration is in order. On Wednesday, Gary Bauer, a man whom I personally hold in the highest regard, made a statement in response to the question of where we go from here that touches upon the kind of thinking that brings us defeat. Bauer wrote: "We are probably stuck with ObamaCare. I hedge that somewhat because I believe it is possible that as the law is fully implemented over the next few years, and as its negative effects become obvious, its unpopularity will continue to grow." He went on to say: "The courts will be skewed further to the left as Obama has four more years to pack them with left-wing activists." Bauer was right to "hedge" because, truth be told, and in spite of what Republican elites make believe, we don't have to accept anything. We don't have to accept ObamaCare and we don't have to accept left-wing tyrants on the federal bench. The solution is simple. We must convince Republicans to have the courage and exhibit the leadership necessary to just say no. ObamaCare can be stopped. The Republican House can simply exercise its Constitutional duty of the purse and refuse to fund it. That was always an option, but it's an option the GOP leadership has refused, thus far, to explore. Why the refusal? The GOP political establishment is living under the delusion that such a move would lead to a "government shutdown" which would be perceived as draconian and stigmatize the GOP in the eyes of the American people. We don't accept that premise. We don't accept the premise that it's necessary to attempt to engage Mr. Obama and then complain that getting him to "compromise" is like "nailing Jello to the wall." Here's a piece of advice Mr. Boehner. Draw a line in the sand and just say no. The tactic, after all, works for your opposition. Harry Reid and Senate Democrats have refused to pass a budget for almost 4 years. Isn't his refusal draconian? Didn't Harry Reid make crazy and highly inflammatory statements during the presidential campaign? Were his actions not the types of things that should cause public disenchantment and accusations of ineptness, stupidity and incompetence? Of course, but that hasn't stopped Harry Reid and there's a lesson to be learned in studying Harry Reid's tactics. The same goes for Obama's nominations to the Supreme Court and the federal bench. Senate Democrats obstructed George W. Bush's nominees to the federal bench. They "borked" Robert Bork. Are they stigmatized? Perhaps, but they're also the majority party in the United States Senate in spite of their foolishness and there's a lesson to be learned there as well. In short, Harry Reid acts, Nancy Pelosi acts, Barack Obama acts; and when they act, they change the dialogue and thereby "justify" their inane actions. In contrast, our "leaders" cede issues and fight from positions of weakness. They do it legislatively and they do it when they campaign. Mitt Romney ceded Benghazi... he ceded the Obama's administration's assault on the Church and people of faith. He ceded so many issues because his handlers thought that bringing them into the political dialogue would make him appear to be "stupid," or worse, an unreasonable political ideologue. Ronald Reagan knew better. He advanced the issues that politicians typically avoided and the media predictably called him "stupid" and "unreasonable" but he didn't seem to care because he knew that once he forced the issues into the political dialogue, people would come to understand those issues. People would come to understand why he was advancing those issues and people would come to actually support his "stupid" and "unreasonable" stances once they realized that his "stupidity" mirrored their own. If your opposition is going to paint you as a buffoon for supporting "idiotic" issues like traditional marriage (which most Americans support by the way), the sanctity of life (which most Americans support by the way), saving American lives (which most Americans support by the way), that organizations like Planned Parenthood, which not only advances genocide but has an annual budget of approximately 1 billion dollars, is not deserving of taxpayer money; or, in Reagan's case, calling the Soviet Union is an "evil empire"... don't back away from those issues, embrace them. The "squishy-middle" will never respect you for attempting to convince them that you really don't hold those "idiotic" views or that you only hold those views "moderately." Efforts to back-away, only add credibility to the false premise that such views are "idiotic." People will however respect you and join you when you make a reasonable argument for holding those views and there are words for that Reaganesque quality, courage and leadership. It's a quality Reagan had and Mitt Romney and John Boehner lack. What would happen, for example, if Mr. Boehner allowed Barack Obama to shut the government down over a refusal to fund the implementation of ObamaCare and very simply stated: 'If shutting down the government is necessary to stop the advancement of tyranny and ensure the American people will not be subjected to servitude to the federal government, then so be it.' Admittedly, the liberal media would castigate him. He'd watch his approval numbers temporarily plummet, but we maintain that the American people would, in fairly short order, affirm his bravery and his commitment were he to simply stay on message and refuse to compromise or equivocate. Courage and leadership are desperately needed in Washington, but it's not enough for us to simply say that courage and leadership are needed in Washington. Our mission is just as clear today as it was back in 2008, when we founded GrassTopsUSA. Courage and qualities of leadership may not come naturally to some of our self-appointed leaders in Congress but those qualities can we learned and we're more than willing to provide the necessary instruction. Our task won't be easy. Even self-proclaimed conservatives will, out of both malice and stupidity, oppose efforts to advance a truly conservative agenda. Stupidity? Oh yes and here's a case in point. The publisher of Newsmax, Chris Ruddy, recently cautioned us that Romney lost because Hurricane Issac preempted Senator Marco Rubio's primetime speech during the GOP convention and Hurricane Sandy put Romney's campaign into "freeze mode." Ruddy went on to blame "double-dealing" by Chris Christie, Romney's choice of Congressman Paul Ryan's as Veep (Ryan, in Ruddy's estimation was too "conservative" and therefore "unqualified" for the job), Romney and... here's the icing on the cake... Ryan's specific calls for fiscal sanity and the "myth" that a "conservative base" actually exists. Hey, we couldn't make this stuff up if we tried. It's hard to win a fight when the publisher of the most widely read "conservative" publication on the Internet behaves delusionally. It may never occur to Ruddy and Karl Rove or RNC Chair Reince Preibus for that matter, that Romney lost precisely because he failed to advance a conservative message. It may never occur to them that the fact they they're allowed to breath and occupy space on the planet earth contributed to Romney's defeat and it will never occur to them that we lost because Romney and men like Boehner and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell refused to unapologetically advance a conservative agenda. That last statement bears repeating. We're not saying that Boehner and McConnell don't fight for the conservative agenda. The problem is that they refuse to fight for it unapologetically. No one ever won a war with his hat in his hand. Yes, we'll not only be forced to fight the left, we'll find ourselves fighting the delusional and weak-willed who claim that they are not only within our ranks but that they are 'leaders' within our ranks. And, as we continue the fight, we'll all have to make sacrifices in our personal lives, some we will make freely and some will be bestowed upon us by an increasingly hostile government, but we are made of stern stuff and if we grid our loins and prepare for what is to come, we will be victorious. Keep the Faith Chris Carmouche GrassTopsUSA
Lies, D-mned Lies, And What Is Worse: STUPID Lies!
|
The Real Reason Petraeus Resigned? America's Conservative News Petraeus towed the party line with the video but refused to fall on the sword and say the CIA gave this stand down order, thus implicating that it was Obama who had denied help to both the consulate and CIA annex which later came under attack. Read the Full Story
|
Will The Anti-Christ Be Muslim?
|
There is a growing and erroneous belief these days that the Anti-Christ will be a Muslim. How does one go about providing a valid counter argument to this growing belief while examining the pivotal role that Islam will play as a driving force in the end times? A newly released 5-Volume Special Report, The Final Crusade, examines the history of Islam and authoritatively answers this nagging question. Read More About The Final Crusade And The Rise Of Islam
|
Why The Sudden Urgency?
|
Petraeus's Lover Quoted From Petraeus E-Mail In Piece Published By Wash Post--In January By Terence P. Jeffrey CNSNews.com Paula Broadwell, a reserve Army officer who reportedly had an extramarital affair with Gen. David Petraeus, co-authored a feature about him for the Washington Post earlier this year that focused on the days leading up to Petraeus's June 23, 2011 confirmation hearing as director of the CIA and depicted his resolve not to resign his military command even if he disagreed with President Obama's decision to withdraw surge troops from Afghanistan by the end of the summer of 2012. Read the Full Story
|
|
|
What/Where Is Benghazi?
|
The Hidden Real Truth About Benghazi By Doug Hagmann CanadaFreePress.com Based on information provided by my source and corroborated elsewhere, the official account by administration officials is a mosaic of lies that were necessary to cover the unpalatable truth of covert actions taking place in Libya, Syria, Turkey, Jordan and Lebanon. The primary objective of our covert actions was to secretly arm anti-Assad "rebels" in Syria by funneling arms from Libya to Syria via Turkey, with other destinations that included Jordan and Lebanon. Regarding the threat to Stevens and the other murdered Americans, the truth will reformat the persistent question posed to government officials, from UN Ambassador Susan Rice to White House Spokesman Jay Carney and others from "how could you not have known" to "how could you have done these things?" Read the Full Story
|
|
|
More Ill-Advised Than Fast & Furious: Gun Running To Jihadists
|
Is This Why CIA Chief Really Resigned? By Aaron Klein WorldNetDaily The speculation surrounding the sudden resignation of CIA Chief General David Petraeus is focusing in large part on his role in an alleged cover-up of the attacks against the U.S. mission in Benghazi this past September. Perhaps overlooked is the CIA's role in purportedly using the Benghazi mission to coordinate U.S. aid to Syrian opposition groups and information those same insurgents include jihadists openly acting under the al-Qaida umbrella. Read The Full Story
|
"If you have always believed that everyone should play by the same rules and be judged by the same standards, that would have gotten you labeled a radical 60 years ago, a liberal 30 years ago and a racist today." ~ Thomas Sowell
|
No Time For All This Peace N Light
|
Why Does Boehner Want To Be 'Led' Off Fiscal Cliff? By David Harsanyi HumanEvents.com Unless someone revised the Constitution when no one was looking, Congress' job isn't to surrender to the desires of the president, even a president with a mandate. In fact, if mandates matter, then this conservative congress--the second largest GOP majority since 1938--has a job to do, as well. House Republicans might want to remember that when it comes to the "fiscal cliff." Read the Full Story
|
Will The Anti-Christ Be Muslim?
|
There is a growing and erroneous belief these days that the Anti-Christ will be a Muslim. How does one go about providing a valid counter argument to this growing belief while examining the pivotal role that Islam will play as a driving force in the end times? A newly released 5-Volume Special Report, The Final Crusade, examines the history of Islam and authoritatively answers this nagging question. Read More About The Final Crusade And The Rise Of Islam
|
Won By Voter Fraud
|
Did This Dirty Trick Get Obama Re-elected? By Aaron Klein WorldNetDaily Did the suppression or lack of voter ID laws aid President Obama's victory over Mitt Romney? Obama did not win a single state that requires photo IDs to vote, although he was victorious in four states that require non-photo identification - Washington, Colorado, Ohio and Virginia. Those states accept as legitimate identification current utility bills, bank statements and paychecks. Read the Full Story
|
Was Hurricans Sandy A Wake-Up Call?
|
Hurricane Sandy drove the point home. Statistics show that when food crises strike, one in four Americans go hungry and there is nothing more terrifying in this world than seeing your loved ones suffering right under your eyes; and there is nothing more terrifying than feeling completely useless as your family goes hungry because there's nothing you can do about it. Watch The Video
|
Weakened By Balkanization
|
Obama Win Shows Demographic Shifts Working Against Republicans By Susan Heavey Reuters/TownHall.com Tuesday's decisive win by Barack Obama in the U.S. presidential election highlighted how population shifts-- ethnic and generational--have buoyed Democrats while forcing Republicans to rethink their message. Read the Full Story
|
|
|
Losing Our Voices
|
American Conservative Union (ACU) Chair Al Cardenas' Love-In With The Left America's Conservative News Rush Limbaugh: See, there you go, and the Republican Party believes this. This Al Cardenas, the head of the American Conservative Union, said the party is too old, too white, too male. Three million Republicans didn't vote. And if they had, these numbers on single women and Hispanics would not have mattered because Romney would have won. But the theme is that the Republicans are too exclusive. Read The Full Story
|
|
What Does the Election Mean for Obamacare?
What's next for Obamacare now? The bad news is that many of the health care law's serious effects were delayed until after the election. Ten of its 18 new tax hikes have yet to kick in. And there is still so much about the law that we don't even know. Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) was absolutely right when she famously remarked in 2010 that "we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it." Thus far, we have seen revelations of increasing costs, higher taxes, and a flood of directives from Washington bureaucrats-yet there are countless major features of the law that have not been decided. Just a few of the questions that remain: What will a qualified health plan look like? What will be in the essential benefits package that insurers are required to provide? How will the employer and individual mandates to purchase insurance be implemented? The list goes on. Thankfully, this isn't the end of the story. Obamacare is not here to stay. Despite the 2012 election, the assumption that the health care law will stay on course is another example of the left's wishful thinking. Of course, efforts for a complete repeal will likely face the same fate as efforts in the last Congress did. But there are ample reasons, as well as opportunities, to change the course of this law. Public opinion has not changed. Exit polls show that more Americans still want the law repealed in full or in part. So much of the law has yet to be developed. As more regulatory details emerge, they will generate even more public controversy and create even more practical obstacles for implementation. These instances will provide ample opportunities for legislative remedial action. Bipartisan opposition to the law will continue. While the House vote earlier this year pressured five Democrats to support full repeal, more significant were the various piecemeal repeal bills that gained bipartisan support. Most notable: Repeal of the Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB), the unelected group of experts in charge of cutting future Medicare payments, passed the House and had more than 234 co-sponsors-Republicans and Democrats. These efforts will likely gain more attention in the future, as will efforts to weaken other elements of the law. House majority leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) has already vowed a vote on the IPAB repeal again. The states can and will have their say. Two of the largest elements of the health care law-the massive Medicaid expansion and the costly subsidies scheme funneled through government exchanges-are heavily dependent on state compliance. But the June Supreme Court decision reaffirmed that states are not at the mercy of the federal government. Many state officials realize that there is little upside to joining forces with Washington in implementing this disastrous endeavor, thus further eroding the long-term viability of Obamacare. Major lawsuits are moving ahead. The recent Supreme Court decision was not the only lawsuit against Obamacare. There are a number of lawsuits making their way through the federal courts. The anti-conscience mandate requiring virtually all employers to finance abortion-inducing drugs, sterilization, and contraception undercuts religious freedom. Today, there are already 40 suits representing more than 100 plaintiffs against it. An Oklahoma lawsuit raises a new legal question on the employer and individual penalties. More suits will certainly follow as more of the law is exposed. These unending complications give us the opportunity to present a more desirable alternative. Patient-centered, market-based reforms are the best antidote to Obamacare's top-down, government-run scheme. The Heritage Foundation's Saving the American Dream plan offers such a path. If the election had turned out differently, it would have been easier to repeal Obamacare. But that does not mean that Obamacare is here to stay. The only difference is that dismantling it will now be a more protracted and messy process.
|

November 9, 2012
How Did Marriage Fare in the 2012 Election? by Ryan T. Anderson and Andrew Walker
Until Tuesday, no state had redefined marriage by popular vote. Indeed, 32 out of 32 states that put the issue to a vote defined marriage as a union of a man and a woman. But in this week's election, citizens in Maine, Maryland, and Washington State all passed ballot initiatives redefining marriage to include same-sex relationships. Meanwhile, citizens in Minnesota failed to pass a constitutional amendment defining marriage as a man and woman. (It remains so defined, however, by statutory law.) But a little perspective on the setback is in order. The results were close, and marriage did better in these deep blue states than Mitt Romney did. Of the four states that had marriage questions on the ballot, traditional marriage outperformed the presidential candidate in each and every one: - In Maine, Romney received 41 percent of the vote, while marriage received 47 percent.
- In Maryland, Romney received 36 percent of the vote, while marriage received 48 percent.
- In Minnesota, Romney received 45 percent of the vote, while marriage received 48 percent.
- In Washington, Romney received 43 percent of the vote, while marriage received 48 percent.
Factor in also that pro-marriage forces were outspent by more than four to one, and the battle for redefining marriage is much tighter than headlines might make it appear. The exit polls also revealed that young Americans are more likely to support gay marriage. This should motivate conservatives to redouble their efforts to explain the nature and public purpose of marriage-what marriage is and why it is such a significant factor in maintaining civil society and limiting government. Our marriage law should reflect the truth about what marriage is: a pre-political institution springing from human nature itself. Government should not redefine or recreate marriage, nor should it obscure the truth about what marriage is. Recognizing same-sex relationships as marriages would weaken marriage as a social institution. It would redefine marriage as essentially an emotional bond, thus rendering marital norms arbitrary and less intelligible. It would further delink childbearing from marriage and deny, as a matter of law, the importance of a mother or a father in a child's life. The outcomes associated with such absence are far from promising. If the U.S. Supreme Court takes up the issue of marriage this term, as is widely expected, the coming months would offer an important opportunity to focus on the ramifications of redefining marriage. The potential clashes with religious liberty and the realities for educational norms for children is already evident, and they will become more so as three states move forward to recognize same-sex marriage as a result of Tuesday's votes. What are your thoughts on this issue? Raise your voice and join an active discussion of Culture Watch readers on our blog >>
|
|
 |
1 in 6 Americans Say "No" to Religion 
Since the 1990s, the percentage of Americans who say they have no religion has risen dramatically. However, only 10 percent of those with no religion report being atheists and 15 percent report being agnostic. Among the remaining 75 percent, about one-half say religion plays a somewhat or very important role in their lives.
|
|  |
|
// SHARE OUR SHORT VIDEO // CLICK IMAGE
|
|
| |
 |
DeVos Center for Religion and Civil Society at The Heritage Foundation
Founded in 1973, The Heritage Foundation is the nation's most broadly supported public policy organization. Heritage established the DeVos Center for Religion and Civil Society in 2004 to educate government officials, the media and the public about the role religion, family, and civil society play in sustaining freedom and the common good.
|
|
|
Alexander's Column - November 8, 2012
Part 2: Halftime Is Over ... We're Back in the FIGHT!
Bullet Points From the After Action Report
"Honor, justice, and humanity, forbid us tamely to surrender that freedom which we received from our gallant ancestors, and which our innocent posterity have a right to receive from us. We cannot endure the infamy and guilt of resigning succeeding generations to that wretchedness which inevitably awaits them if we basely entail hereditary bondage on them." --Thomas Jefferson (1775)
Tuesday, the final ballot-box battle to unseat Barack Hussein Obama was narrowly repelled, but in the process, his socialist cadres exposed the full range of weapons and tactics in their arsenal. While our unceasing efforts to defend Liberty would have received an assist by a Romney-Ryan victory, our mission in support of Liberty is not predicated upon who sits in the White House or on Capitol Hill.
While the Obama-Biden ticket's marginal victory certainly does not constitute a mandate, Obama will pursue his statist agenda as if he had won every vote rather than just the slim 50.4 percent majority. His objective remains "fundamentally transforming the United States of America," and he will pursue the centerpiece of that objective, breaking the back of free enterprise, with vigor.
American Patriots across the nation have and will continue to engage his socialist cadres every time they step onto the field.
Future Battle Bullet Points:
Read More . . .
|

NEW ON PJ MEDIA
|
The Market for Defiance By Richard Fernandez
There have been numerous articles suggesting that conservatives turn themselves into the Mod Squad and become "hip" in order to attract the voters of the future. This is wrong. An opportunity is being missed to market and brand ideas that have what I'll call the "Defiance Quality."
The 'Empathy Slander': A Lie That Would End Civilization, A Truth That Would Save It By David Steinberg
Conservatives care, liberals do not. But voters who selected "Cares about people like me" as the deciding factor for their presidential vote broke 81 percent for President Obama. Nothing else matters.
| | |
TOP STORIES ON PJ MEDIA
|
The Second Time Around: Things to Watch in Term No. 2 By Bridget Johnson
President Obama faces economic woes, a nuclear Iran, empowered China and Russia, al-Qaeda that wasn't quite so "on the run" after all, and more in his second term. What happens next?
Politicizing Ourselves to Death: Is the Culture War Over? By Chris Yogerst
As the post-election hangover sets in, we continue to witness incivility rolling like a tidal wave through this great nation. Much of this is due to the culture war, which grows more intense every day. One should wonder, is it worth fighting anymore? Or, has it already been won?
| | |
MORE FROM PJ MEDIA
|
|
|
Today's Headlines: Friday, November 09, 2012
Record 70.4 Million Enrolled in Medicaid in 2011: 1 Out of Every 5 Americans
6,125 Proposed Regulations and Notifications Posted in Last 90 Days--Average 68 per Day
DOJ: 'School Bullies Become Tomorrow's Hate Crime Defendants'
Please support CNSNews.com to ensure you get THE TRUTH for a long time to come.
Sudan Elected Onto Influential U.N. Body, Gets More Votes Than U.S.
Reid Links Storms Affecting U.S. With Climate Change At Obama State Dept., Pollster Tells Yemen TV: I Know Evangelicals are Voting 'If I See Cars with Little Statues of Jesus'
Clinton on Security at U.S. Diplomatic Posts: 'Nobody Takes That More Seriously Than I Do' Holder Not Sure He Will Stay on as Attorney General Harry Reid: Americans Aren't Interested in Issues of Same-Sex Marriage and Abortion Biden's Bishop Silent on Pro-Abortion Biden Receiving Holy Communion Marijuana Law Changes Won't Put NFL Drug Policies Up in Smoke 'Final' Talks on Global Arms Treaty Move Ahead, With U.S. Support
Jay Leno to Joe Biden: 'You've Been VP for Four Years. That IS Your Vacation'
COMMENTARY: Hollywood Won 2012? By L. Brent Bozell III The television industry loves to claim that all of the sex, violence and foul-mouthed language it displays has zero harmful effects on children. On the other hand, they would never dream of telling their advertisers that their paid messages on TV have no effect. So does the entertainment industry have an impact or doesn't it? Is the GOP Headed for the Boneyard? By Patrick J. Buchanan After its second defeat at the hands of Barack Obama, the Republican Party has at last awakened to its existential crisis. When the country looks like California demographically, it will look like California politically. Republicans are not whistling past the graveyard. They are right at the entrance. The Hope-a-Nomics Disaster: One Company's Horror Story By Michelle Malkin President Obama promises to move the country forward with his recycled pledge of five million green jobs. But in the real world, small businesses are struggling to stay afloat as they deal with the fiscal wreckage of this administration's disastrous venture socialism. Here's the tale of just one Colorado company victimized by the Obama Department of Energy. A Third Party By Rich Galen That Romney fell short of McCain's total in spite of spending far more money, tells me that the GOP is maxed out on voters. It has squeezed every vote out of its available voter base and has no choice but to expand that base if they are going to be successful in the future. The last thing the GOP needs is a third party gaining hold. NEWSPAPER ROUNDUP:
CNSNewsTV: |

Friday, November 9, 2012 To: Friends & Supporters From: Gary L. Bauer Confronting The Fiscal Cliff There are 51 days before the country goes over the so-called "fiscal cliff" -- a combination of mandatory spending cuts and massive tax increases that could plunge the country back into a recession. Speaking from the White House this afternoon, President Obama asserted that he won a mandate Tuesday to raise taxes. And he once again demanded that the Bush tax cuts for those earning $250,000 a year expire at the end of the year. Let's assume for a moment that Barack Obama gets his way and taxes on the rich go up next year. By most estimates Obama's proposed tax hikes would raise roughly $56 billion a year. Last year's federal deficit was $1.3 trillion or $1,300 billion. Just another $1,244 billion to go! Clearly Obama's tax increases are not the solution. They do not come close to fixing our fiscal mess. The problem is too much spending! Speaker John Boehner said yesterday that tax increases were unacceptable and wouldn't pass the House of Representatives. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell was equally defiant. In a statement, Senator McConnell said, "I wasn't sent to Washington to raise anybody's taxes to pay for more wasteful spending and this election doesn't change my principles." Hold on, folks. It's going to be a rough ride! GOP In Panic Mode There is a lot of handwringing among Republicans about the future of the party right now. Predictably, some are suggesting that we need to jettison values issues. Others are suggesting we need to embrace amnesty. Some even think the GOP should give in on taxes too. The Washington Post reports that the Republican Party has already begun an "exhaustive review of what went so wrong." I don't believe there is a single thing we can point to that conveniently explains what happened Tuesday night. The exit polls indicate Hurricane Sandy had a major impact on how people voted. I don't know what you do to counteract a hurricane. But can anyone point to a single substantive policy change the Democrats made after their losses in 2000, 2004 or 2010? I hope all of this anxiety to do "something" doesn't lead to any rash judgments if that "something" only further alienates the conservative base. Tuesday was disappointing, but it was by no means a liberal landslide. Obama lost millions of voters. He got 50% of the popular vote, a smaller percentage than 2008. The House of Representatives remains solidly Republican. Let's stop overreacting, take a deep breath and make sure we get this right. Media Notice Tune in Sunday at 9 AM and noon ET to CNN's "State of the Union." I will be on to discuss the future of the Republican Party. Joining me will be former Utah Governor and Ambassador Jon Huntsman, Jr., and Carlos Gutierrez, former Secretary of Commerce in George W. Bush's Administration. Honoring Our Veterans Communities across the country will honor our veterans this weekend. Please take a moment to tell your children and grandchildren about the sacrifices made to ensure that we remain free. There is a poem you have likely seen before, but I want to share it with you again, because it summarizes well what we owe our veterans.
It is the veteran, not the preacher, who has given you freedom of religion. It is the veteran, not the reporter, who has given you freedom of the press. It is the veteran, not the poet, who has given you freedom of speech. It is the veteran, not the protester, who has given you freedom to assemble. It is the veteran, not the lawyer, who has given you the right to a fair trial. It is the veteran, not the politician, who has given you the right to vote. It is the veteran, who salutes the Flag, who serves under the Flag, whose coffin is draped by the Flag.
To the millions who have always been there to stop the tyrant, protect the weak, and preserve the peace -- we have not forgotten you. A grateful nation thanks God for giving us men and women like you. If you would like to send a message of thanks to our troops, click here. NOTE: Our offices will be closed Monday, November 12th. The "End of Day" report will resume Tuesday, November 13th.
|
All In, Benghazi edition
Posted: 11 Nov 2012 02:58 PM PST
(Scott Johnson)
A reader points out that Paula Broadwell was the honored keynote speaker at a University of Denver event last month. The speech is obviously of interest in light of the revelation of her involvement with General Petraeus, whom she discusses in her speech.
One of the questions following her speech alludes to her interest in becoming the National Security Advisor. At about 35:00, Broadwell herself specifically discusses the terrorist attack in Benghazi and General Petraeus's response. She claims there were "militia prisoners" at the annex whose presence might have precipitated the attack. If true, this appears to raise the question whether she might have been the recipient of nonpublic information. In any event, the source of her information is not otherwise apparent, and she immediately refers to General Petraeus after mentioning it.
Israel National News is on the case:
Military expert Paula Broadwell, who was allegedly improperly involved withresigned CIA Director Gen. David Petraeus, confirmed in October that the CIA annex in Benghazi asked for reinforcements when the consulate came under attack on September 11. She also acknowledged that "there was a failure in the system."
Broadwell was speaking at her alma mater, the University of Denver, on October 26. Her lecture, which is on YouTube under the title "Alumni Symposium 2012 Paula Broadwell," now has added value, because based on the recent disclosures, it can now be assumed that she indeed knew exactly what it was that Petraeus knew about the attack.
Broadwell confirmed the reports on Fox News that the CIA annex asked for a special unit, the Commander in Chief's In Extremis Force, to come and assist it. She also said that the force could indeed have reinforced the consulate, and that Petraeus knew all of this, but was not allowed to talk to the press because of his position in the CIA.
"The challenge has been the fog of war, and the greater challenge is that it's political hunting season, and so this whole thing has been turned into a very political sort of arena, if you will," she said. "The fact that came out today is that the ground forces there at the CIA annex, which is different from the consulate, were requesting reinforcements.
"They were requesting the - it's called the C-in-C's In Extremis Force - a group of Delta Force operators, our very, most talented guys we have in the military. They could have come and reinforced the consulate and the CIA annex. Now, I don't know if a lot of you have heard this but the CIA annex had actually taken a couple of Libyan militia members prisoner, and they think that the attack on the consulate was an attempt to get these prisoners back. It's still being vetted.
"The challenging thing for Gen. Petraeus is that in his new position, he's not allowed to communicate with the press. So he's known all of this - they had correspondence with the CIA station chief in Libya, within 24 hours they kind of knew what was happening."
Broadwell did give some support to the administration, however, for its initial version of events, which tied the consulate attack to protests in the Muslim world.
"If you remember at the time, the Muslim video, the Mohammed video that came out, the demonstrations that were going on in Cairo, there were demonstrations in 22 other countries around the world, tens of thousands of people, and our government was very concerned that this was going to become a nightmare for us," she said.
"So you can understand if you put yourselves in his shoes or Secretary Clinton's shoes or the President's shoes, that we thought it was tied somehow to the demonstrations in Cairo. And it's true that we have signal intelligence that shows the militia members in Libya were watching the demonstration in Cairo, and it did sort of galvanize their effort. So we'll find out the facts soon enough.
"As a former intel officer it's frustrating to me because it reveals our sources and methods, I don't think the public necessarily needs to know all of that. It is a tragedy that we lost an ambassador and two other government officials, and [...] there was a failure in the system because there was additional security requested, but it's frustrating to see the sort of political aspect of what's going on with this whole investigation."
As Drudge might say, impacting...
|
Where Do Republicans Go From Here? The Social Issues
Posted: 11 Nov 2012 02:42 PM PST
(John Hinderaker)
Do Democrats engage in soul-searching after they lose an election? Maybe I miss it because I'm not a Democrat, but it doesn't seem that they do. After John Kerry lost in 2004, did Democrats agonize over whether they should stop opposing the war in Iraq, or become pro-abortion? When Democrats were "shellacked," as President Obama put it, in 2010, did they debate whether they should come up with a coherent plan to deal with the debt and start adopting budgets? Not that I recall.
We Republicans are different. Whenever we lose an election, you can be sure two things will happen: one group, which consists mostly of Democrats but includes some Republicans, will say it is time to give up on the social issues. Another group (this time all Republicans) will say that the party needs to nominate purer conservatives. These critiques come from the left and the right, respectively.
As for nominating purer conservatives, I see no evidence that the 2012 electorate rejected Mitt Romney and other Republicans because it hungered for more hard-line right-wing nominees. I wrote more about this here.
But with respect to the social issues, I think the time has come for Republicans to refine our approach. Let's start with a bit of history.
Contemporary conservatism is largely defined by Ronald Reagan, who united various strands of the movement in the "three-legged stool": economic conservatism, manifested by free-market policies; foreign policy conservatism, manifested by a strong national defense; and social conservatism, manifested by...what? In Reagan's time, the main social issues were crime and welfare. It is easy to forget, at a distance of more than 30 years, how large a role these issues played in Reagan's career and in the political debates of the time. Politically, conservatives won the battles over crime and welfare. Our cities (save only Detroit) were saved by tough law enforcement, and AFDC was repealed in the historic welfare reform act. Since the 1990s, neither crime nor welfare has figured prominently as an issue in national elections.
Starting in the 1990s and 2000s, when people talked about the social issues, they basically meant abortion. Republicans had generally opposed abortion all along, but it was a secondary issue; politicians like Reagan rarely talked about it. But with crime and welfare mostly off the table as political issues, abortion became the issue that defined social conservatism. Then, within the last decade, gay marriage-an idea that was virtually non-existent in Reagan's time-has suddenly become a prominent issue. When we talk about the social issues today, we mean, pretty much exclusively, abortion and gay marriage.
It seems obvious that the evolution of social issues from crime and welfare to abortion and gay marriage has hurt the Republican Party. Crime and welfare were serious public policy issues that could be, and were, debated from empirical premises. Abortion and gay marriage are moral, largely religious issues, and are less amenable to public policy debate. They are, for reasons that are entirely understandable, governed more by emotion than by empirical data. A great many people are heartily sick of these issues and wish they would go away, while others view them as matters of moral duty that are key to the ultimate survival of our civilization. Whether you agree with the latter perspective or not, it seems clear that contemporary conservatives have reached a dead end in their approach to the social issues. If we want to do better in future elections, we need, I think, to recalibrate our approach-by which I do not mean adopting liberal positions.
It seems useful to begin with the observation that abortion and gay marriage stand on very different footings. Abortion is an accomplished fact, and has been since the early 1970s. Millions upon millions of babies have been legally aborted since Roe v. Wade, for better or worse. With abortion established as a constitutional right, the overwhelming majority of office-holders have little or nothing to do with it, one way or another. It is beyond me why any voter should care about what a candidate for the House or the Senate, or for governor or a state legislature, thinks about abortion. It is equally hard to understand why such candidates would make support for abortion, or opposition to it, a significant part of their platforms.
The issue remains alive in large part because Democrats are constantly warning that Republican candidates will do away with "a woman's right to choose." This was, of course, part of the absurd war on women theme. But to be fair, Democrats get away with such efforts partly because many Republican candidates insist on talking about abortion as if it were a live issue. Since candidates on both sides raise the issue largely for political reasons, it makes sense to try to frame it in the most politically useful way. What does that mean for Republicans?
First, there is no reason to think that abortion is a toxic issue for conservatives. Contrary to what most people expected twenty years ago, public opinion has been trending steadily away from approval of abortion. Among the young, in particular, support for abortion is not strong. Consequently, Republicans should not hesitate to take a conservative position on those occasions when abortion is a legitimate issue, which will chiefly involve questions of public funding or, under Obamacare and the like, insurance mandates. On the other hand, however, most voters do not want to vote for candidates whose main reason for running appears to be opposition to abortion. This makes sense, since abortion will have little or nothing to do with most candidates' duties, if elected, and voters want candidates to focus on the issues that affect them. Consequently, it makes little sense for most Republicans to make issues relating to abortion a significant part of their campaigns.
If questioned about abortion, conservative candidates should focus on the areas where liberal positions are extreme. Thus, for example, a candidate could say:
I have always been opposed to abortion on moral grounds. Frankly, however, my opinion isn't very relevant since the Supreme Court has held that there is a constitutional right to abortion. But there are a few areas that are still open for discussion. One of them is infanticide. It seems to me that no matter how we feel about abortion, we ought to be able to agree that babies that are born alive shouldn't be killed. And yet the Democrats haven't been willing to join us in opposing infanticide. President Obama voted against a bill that would have outlawed infanticide when he was a state senator in Illinois, and most Democrats, including my opponent, are in favor of partial-birth abortion, which is nothing but infanticide under a different name. So I suggest you ask my opponent: is he willing to buck his party and come out against infanticide, including partial birth abortion?
If Republicans consistently answer questions about abortion in this manner, or something similar, reporters will stop asking them. One more thing: no politician should ever try to instruct voters on gynecology or obstetrics. Just don't do it. Ever.
Gay marriage is often lumped together with abortion, but in reality, it is a very different issue. For one thing, while there is no specifically conservative case for abortion, there is a conservative case for gay marriage. For another, while popular opinion is turning away from abortion, it is rapidly falling in line behind gay marriage. In my view, there is little reason to stand in front of this particular locomotive. It is true that the family is in crisis and our civilization may well be going down the drain, but not because of gay marriage; rather, because close to half of all American children are now born to unmarried women.
Republicans can take a big-tent approach to gay marriage by emphasizing process. If the time comes when a majority of people want to recognize gay marriage, so be it. At the end of the day, voters can define marriage in whatever way they choose. Republicans, meanwhile, can unite in opposing any resolution of the issue by judicial fiat. We can say: some Republicans are for gay marriage, some Republicans are against it; but we all agree that the issue should be resolved by the people and their elected representatives. While the party takes a hands-off approach, private groups, churches and others, can try to influence public opinion in one direction or the other, a task that is better suited to them than to politicians.
It has been some years since the social issues have been better than a wash for Republicans. But that can change, if Republican politicians shift the focus from abortion and gay marriage to welfare. Welfare has been mostly off the radar screen since Congress successfully reformed the federal welfare system in the mid-1990s. Since then, however, there has been backsliding. Today, I believe there are more people receiving federal welfare benefits than at any time in our history, approximately 100 million. The food stamp program alone has enrolled 47 million, and food stamps now account for 80% of what is euphemistically known as the "farm bill." And that isn't the worst of it: the Obama administration has aggressively tried to recruit illegal immigrants into the food stamp program. Currently, we are spending around $1 trillion per year on federal means-tested programs, double what we spend on national defense.
Profligate welfare spending is as damaging to the family today as it was when Republicans campaigned against it in the 1970s and 1980s. The single-parent lifestyle that is so lauded by liberals is enabled in large part by the largesse of federal and state welfare programs. Families are optional to the extent that welfare is a viable alternative. That's the real Life of Julia.
As Paul has noted, Rick Santorum's principal contribution to the primary season was his ability to explain the relationship between economic and social issues. There is a second connection that Republicans can draw, too: as soon as anyone attacks wasteful and destructive welfare programs, the refrain is, how about corporate welfare? In fact, it is Democrats, not Republicans, who are the party of corporate cronyism and corruption. Most voters haven't figured that out because of the Democrat/media campaign of disinformation, but if Republicans extend the welfare argument with a pledge to end all corporate welfare (by which I mean eliminating subsidies, not disallowing tax deductions for legitimate businesses expenses), they will accomplish multiple goals, all of them desirable.
So that's my prescription for the social issues: 1) Don't emphasize abortion, but don't walk away from the issue, either, when issues legitimately arise, as with respect to public funding. When pressed on the subject, don't be defensive, but respond by pointing out the Democrats' extremism. 2) Take a big-tent approach to gay marriage that emphasizes the need to resolve the issue democratically, not by judicial decree, and that makes it clear that there is room in the party for both those who favor and those who oppose gay marriage. 3) Bring welfare back as a political issue, by pointing out the extraordinary amount of money that we currently spend on means-tested programs, the waste and fraud that is endemic to those programs, and the social damage that is done by them.
|
The solution
Posted: 11 Nov 2012 01:56 PM PST
(Scott Johnson)
I'm pretty sure Bertolt Brecht was exercising his gift for sarcasm in "The Solution" when he offered a modest proposal to address the people's loss of confidence in the government. While the government asserted it could regain confidence in the people only by redoubled efforts, Brecht asked:
Would it not be easier In that case for the government To dissolve the people And elect another?
We seem to be living out a variation of "The Solution." In any event, Brecht's poem comes to mind in connection with Mexican political scientist Fredo Arias-King's comments, quoted by Mark Krikorian in "Amnesty is the best revenge."
While a representative for Vicente Fox's ultimately successful campaign for presidency of that country, Krikorian recalls, Mexican political scientist Fredo Arias-King met with almost 80 United States senators and representatives, discussing immigration in depth with most of them. Krikorian offer Arias-King's observation regarding what he calls "today's amnesty scramble" (with emphases added by Krikorian):
Also curiously, the Republican enthusiasm for increased immigration also was not so much about voting in the end, even with "converted" Latinos. Instead, these legislators seemingly believed that they could weaken the restraining and frustrating straightjacket devised by the Founding Fathers and abetted by American norms. In that idealized "new" United States, political uncertainty, demanding constituents, difficult elections, and accountability in general would "go away" after tinkering with the People, who have given lawmakers their privileges but who, like a Sword of Damocles, can also "unfairly" take them away. Hispanics would acquiesce and assist in the "natural progress" of these legislators to remain in power and increase the scope of that power. In this sense, Republicans and Democrats were similar.
Krikorian has more at the link, but that is a very powerful observation.
|
The Weekly Winston: Post-Election Edition
Posted: 11 Nov 2012 06:25 AM PST
(Steven Hayward)
Some of Churchill's most famous remarks involved election campaigns and their aftermath, especially losing campaigns. The most often recalled were his comment after the 1945 landslide loss when Clementine said that perhaps it was a blessing in disguise, to which Winston replied that if so, it was certainly very well disguised. Or: "In war you can only be killed once, but in politics many times."
But in light of this week's election result, there are a few others that appear on point:
On questions of economic law is does not matter at all what the electors think or vote or say. The economic laws proceed. (1929)
"All men are created equal," says the American Declaration of Independence. "All man shall be kept equal," say the British Socialist Party.
It is an error to believe that the world began when any particular party or statesman got into office. It has all been going on quite a long time. . .
Nothing would be more dangerous than for people to feel cheated because they had been led to expect attractive schemes which turn out to be economically impossible.
Quick, someone better tell Obama about IPAB.
|
Immigration reform, the Hispanic vote, and the path to citizenship
Posted: 10 Nov 2012 05:06 PM PST
(Paul Mirengoff)
During an interview with Liz Cheney on Fox yesterday, Charles Krauthammer reiterated his view that Republicans need much more effectively to court the Hispanic vote, and should do so by supporting amnesty for illegal aliens. The approach Krauthammer recommends would entail full legal normalization, just short of citizenship, in return for full border enforcement.
I have no strong objection to such a resolution of the immigration reform debate. But as a practical matter, it would not constitute a resolution. The Democrats would still insist on a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants now in the country. Even if Republicans agreed to everything short of such a path, the Democrats would still be able to tar them as the anti-immigrant Party.
This illustrates the broader problem Republicans face in courting the Hispanic vote. There will always be something else - some extra benefit - that the Democrats seek on behalf of Hispanics and that conservatives are loath to grant. If Republicans resist the demand, they will stay on the wrong side of Hispanics; if they agree, they will become less and less of a conservative Party.
However, as a way of marginally improving the Republican position with Hispanics, Krauthammer's approach makes good sense. Given the new political reality, Republicans are well-advised not to say "hell no" to amnesty. Rather, they should agree to normalization of the status of illegal immigrants, short of a path to citizenship, in return for full border enforcement.
But Republicans should also understand that, if they stick to their insistence of no parth to citizenship, there probably will be no immigration reform, and Hispanics will blame Republicans for its absence.
|
Barack Obama and the incumbent president conundrum
Posted: 09 Nov 2012 03:04 PM PST
(Paul Mirengoff)
A friend who predicted a narrow Obama victory writes:
I was thinking about the point I made earlier - incumbent presidents' attempts to win re-election. Starting with McKinley in 1896, every incumbent who sought re-election won except for four: Taft; Hoover; Ford; Carter; and George H.W. Bush. All but Hoover faced a strong primary challenge (TR in 1912; Ronald Reagan in 1976; Ted Kennedy in 1980; and Pat Buchanan in 1992) and three of the four faced a serious general election third party challenge (TR in 1912; John Anderson in 1980; and Ross Perot in 1992).
Hoover may be an outlier, but his situation is unique because of the Great Depression. Given this history, I wonder whether people should stop all the second-guessing about what happened this time: Mitt Romney had to overcome a difficult primary battle and unite a divided Republican Party, and he faced a united Democratic Party and a media that loves President Obama. It's not surprising that the incumbent won.
But there's another side to the incumbent advantage. It is expressed in this WSJ column by John Steele Gordon. He points out that the considerable majority of second terms were far less successful than the first term, with more than a few proving disastrous.
The list of presidents whose second term was much tougher sledding than the first is not confined to the likes of Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon, Bill Clinton, and George W. Bush. It also includes Thomas Jefferson, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, and Ronald Reagan.
But even if Obama's second administration is only marginally less successful than his first, he's still in for a rough time.
Unfortunately, a rough time for a president - even one whose policies we abhor - isn't necessarily good for the nation. That depends on the nature of the president's rough time.
|
Petraeus resigns - is there a Benghazi connection?
Posted: 09 Nov 2012 02:17 PM PST
(Paul Mirengoff)
General Petraeus has resigned as CIA Director, citing an extramarital affair. "Such behavior," he says, "is unacceptable, both as a husband and as the leader of an organization such as ours."
But the affair apparently took place some time ago. Petraeus says it happened "after 37 years marriage." He has been married for more than 38 years. He became CIA director on June 30, a week before his 37th wedding anniversary.
Two weeks ago, Petraeus made it clear, in a public statement, that the Benghazi disaster was not on the CIA. Is his departure, three days after the election, related to that statement? Does it have to do with upcoming congressional hearings in which he would have testified as head of the CIA? Or does Petraeus simply not want to work any longer for a president who, quite possibly against Petraeus' urging, declined to come to the aid of our beleaguered staff in Benghazi?
The kicker, of course, is Petraeus' confession of the extramarital affair. Presumably, he could have resigned without the confession. So why did he offer it?
Two possible answers come to my mind. First, the confession could have been an attempt to preempt the theory that his resignation is Benghazigate related - it provides an alternative explanation. Second, the confession eliminates the opportunity for others (such as folks in the White House) to try to influence his future conduct, including potential statements and/or testimony about Benghazi (his departure from the CIA doesn't preclude Congress from having him testify).
Petraeus' statement that the affair took place some time ago tends to support the second answer more than the first. But these aren't the only possible theories.
In any event, Benghazigate isn't going away, regardless of whether Petraeus' resignation turns out to represent a chapter or just a footnote.
JOHN adds: To make Paul's theory #2 not just more explicit but more lurid, it is possible that the Obama administration has been blackmailing Petraeus to make him join in their deceptions about Benghazi. He may have announced the affair to eliminate any further possibility of blackmail, with the intention of telling the truth now that he has resigned from the administration. I think that is highly unlikely, but it seems to fit the facts that we know reasonably well.
PAUL adds: Yes. Petraeus might have admitted publicly to the extramarital affair because he knew its existence would be revealed in any case. However, it's unlikely that anyone who wanted him to resign would have revealed this information once he, in fact, resigned. Perhaps someone wanted him to remain as head of the CIA, but in a compromised position, and Petraeus was unwilling to do so.
|
David Petraeus Resigns
Posted: 09 Nov 2012 01:32 PM PST
(John Hinderaker)
David Petraeus resigned today as director of the CIA, explaining that he had shown "extremely poor judgment" by having an extramarital affair. It is a sad loss for the country. Petraeus's services have been extraordinary and are too well-known to be recited here. That such a disciplined and dedicated public servant has been brought down by such a lapse seems shocking, but it should not be surprising. As Arthur Schopenhauer wrote:
[Sexual love] is the ultimate goal of almost all human effort; it...interrupts every hour the most serious occupations, and sometimes perplexes for a while even the greatest minds. It does not hesitate...to interfere with negotiations of statesmen and the investigations of the learned. It knows how to slip its love-notes and ringlets even into ministerial portfolios and philosophical manuscripts...
Somewhere he also has a wonderful image of a diplomat carrying around a lock of a chambermaid's hair, or something like that, but I can't immediately find it. In any event, you get the point. Everybody, as Springsteen put it, has a hungry heart. Petraeus will be missed, and the great service he has rendered to his country is not diminished by the circumstances of his departure.
Some observers have been puzzled by Petraeus's role, or lack thereof, in connection with Benghazi. The CIA was deeply involved in that disaster. Some of those killed worked for the agency, and it was the CIA that made the only effort to rescue the besieged Americans, by dispatching a relief force from Tripoli. Yet Petraeus was silent with respect to the events of September 11, even when the Obama administration lied about them. Such silence seemed uncharacteristic. Perhaps the unraveling of Petraeus's career in the manner that today became public played a role. Or perhaps not; at this point, one can only speculate.
UPDATE: This gets curiouser: Petraeus was scheduled to testify before a Congressional committee on Benghazi next week, but in view of his resignation his testimony has been canceled. That makes no sense to me. Why should his resignation have anything to do with testifying about events that occurred while he was the director of the agency?
FURTHER UPDATE: Here is the complete text of Petraeus's letter of resignation:
Yesterday afternoon, I went to the White House and asked the President to be allowed, for personal reasons, to resign from my position as D/CIA. After being married for over 37 years, I showed extremely poor judgment by engaging in an extramarital affair. Such behavior is unacceptable, both as a husband and as the leader of an organization such as ours. This afternoon, the President graciously accepted my resignation.
As I depart Langley, I want you to know that it has been the greatest of privileges to have served with you, the officers of our Nation's Silent Service, a work force that is truly exceptional in every regard. Indeed, you did extraordinary work on a host of critical missions during my time as director, and I am deeply grateful to you for that.
Teddy Roosevelt once observed that life's greatest gift is the opportunity to work hard at work worth doing. I will always treasure my opportunity to have done that with you and I will always regret the circumstances that brought that work with you to an end.
Thank you for your extraordinary service to our country, and best wishes for continued success in the important endeavors that lie ahead for our country and our Agency.
With admiration and appreciation, David H. Petraeus
PAUL adds: Thanks for the excellent Arthur "Bud" Schopenhauer reference and picture, John. You obviously got more out of Schopenhauer tutorial at Dartmouth than I did.
|
In search of the Hispanic vote, concurring with Scott
Posted: 09 Nov 2012 08:05 AM PST
(Paul Mirengoff)
I concur with Scott's thoughts, and those of Heather Mac Donald, about the folly of Republicans folding on amnesty in the hope of making meaningful inroads with Hispanic voters. As I argued yesterday, that hope is a pipe dream. It runs counter to the lessons of American history and to a sound understanding of human behavior.
If Republicans are losing elections because of the way Hispanics vote, the solution is not to create through legislation a significantly larger Hispanic vote. Suppose the last amnesty hadn't occurred? Republicans wouldn't be wringing their hands now about the difficulties of winning elections given the size of the Hispanic vote.
A second amnesty would, before long, end Republican chances of winning elections as a conservative party, and minimize the number of elections Republicans win at all.
But don't take my word for it. Heather Mac Donald has the facts. Read them. They trump the hopelessly romantic vision of the intersection of Hispanics and Republicans on which the political argument for supporting amnesty relies.
|
In search of the Hispanic vote
Posted: 09 Nov 2012 04:49 AM PST
(Scott Johnson)
Mickey Kaus raises a red flag (and has much to say on his own account, all of it worth reading) over the possibility of an impending cave-in by the GOP establishment on immigration in the wake of Tuesday's results:
Alert! The entire GOP elite seems to be trying to sell out en masse on immigration. Not only Boehner, but Cantor. And Hannity (who works for pro-amnesty world citizen Rupert Murdoch). Even Krauthammer. ...
Maybe these people are convinced the larger GOP project can be saved simply by caving on just this one issue. That seems cracked. The bulk of the Hispanic electorate appears to instinctively vote Democratic, and not just because of immigration.
Go to Kaus's post for the relevant links, among which are Charles Krauthammer's Washington Post column arguing for an amnesty plus enforcement deal to resolve the GOP's Hispanic problem and Heather Mac Donald's NRO column arguing against.
As between the two arguments, it seems to me that Mac Donald clearly has the better of it. Krauthammer cites no evidence for the proposition that amnesty plus enforcement would attract Latino voters to the GOP. Mac Donald argues (with some evidence) that issues other than immigration drive the Latino vote to the Democrats:
If Republicans want to change their stance on immigration, they should do so on the merits, not out of a belief that only immigration policy stands between them and a Republican Hispanic majority. It is not immigration policy that creates the strong bond between Hispanics and the Democratic party, but the core Democratic principles of a more generous safety net, strong government intervention in the economy, and progressive taxation. Hispanics will prove to be even more decisive in the victory of Governor Jerry Brown's Proposition 30, which raised upper-income taxes and the sales tax, than in the Obama election.
And California is the wave of the future. A March 2011 poll by Moore Information found that Republican economic policies were a stronger turn-off for Hispanic voters in California than Republican positions on illegal immigration. Twenty-nine percent of Hispanic voters were suspicious of the Republican party on class-warfare grounds - "it favors only the rich"; "Republicans are selfish and out for themselves"; "Republicans don't represent the average person"- compared with 7 percent who objected to Republican immigration stances.
Mac Donald also considers related data:
U.S.-born Hispanic households in California use welfare programs at twice the rate of native-born non-Hispanic households. And that is because nearly one-quarter of all Hispanics are poor in California, compared to a little over one-tenth of non-Hispanics. Nearly seven in ten poor children in the state are Hispanic, and one in three Hispanic children is poor, compared to less than one in six non-Hispanic children. One can see that disparity in classrooms across the state, which are chock full of social workers and teachers' aides trying to boost Hispanic educational performance.
The idea of the "social issues" Hispanic voter is also a mirage. A majority of Hispanics now support gay marriage, a Pew Research Center poll from last month found. The Hispanic out-of-wedlock birth rate is 53 percent, about twice that of whites.
The demographic changes set into motion by official and de facto immigration policy favoring low-skilled over high-skilled immigrants mean that a Republican party that purports to stand for small government and free markets faces an uncertain future.
I want to quibble only with Mac Donald's characterization of the GOP future under this scenario as "uncertain." Mac Donald, however, doesn't venture any proposal to counter the Democrats' straightforward (and Krauthammer's more complicated) push for amnesty. Kaus offers this:
A much better strategy would be to enact the enforcement measures (including a border fence and a system of employment checks), then wait a few years and see if they survive. If they do, sure, come up with some kind of amnesty. You could calmly pitch that plan to Latinos-it ends in the same place (amnesty). But that's not the sort of sensible approach you will insist on if you are part of a stampede of panicked pols and consultants whose only goal is to pander to what they think Latinos want to make up for their shortcomings in other areas.
(I would alter Kaus's formulation to put scare quotes around "shortcomings," but Kaus is a Democrat.) Kaus's proposal would be rejected by the Democrats, but it makes more sense than what they have on offer if we want to maintain a viable GOP future.
|
|
|
|
I know you must be as livid or concerned as all of us here by the comments of the Republican leadership in the U.S. House, suggesting willingness to help Pres. Obama pass another amnesty for illegal aliens so they can compete in the legal jobs market against beleaguered Americans.
Here's your opportunity to let Boehner, Cantor and other leaders know that they have stepped into a real mess with their post-election comments.
GOP Leaders Need To Hear Response This Afternoon |
---|
Comments suggesting amnesty from Boehner & Cantor were trial balloons. Extremely important that they hear that people are sticking pins in them
Click on the red button to find the phone numbers of top House GOP leaders and the talking points you can choose from. Just a quick call to express your concern will do w onders in slowing down these leaders from rushing into an amnesty agreement.
|
Because Gov. Romney ran on a strong pro-enforcement, anti-illegal immigration platform and performed more poorly with Hispanic voters than past Republican candidates, many national GOP leaders are saying the House Republican majority must approve an amnesty to attract more Hispanic votes in future elections.
< p style="margin-top:0;line-height:1.35;margin-left:0;margin-right:0;margin-bottom:14px;font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:16px;">The top Republican -- Speaker John Boehner -- is making gigantic news by rushing out to show his openness to this kind of thinking:
"It's an important issue that I think oughta be dealt with. There's- this issue has been around far too long. And while- I'm- believe it's important for us to secure our borders and to enforce our laws- I think a comprehensive approach is long overdue. And I'm confiden t- that- the president, myself, others- can find the common ground to take care of this issue once and for all."
Lest anybody doubt whether "comprehensive" means what it usually means (AMNESTY) or that GOP leaders are thinking much bigger than just younger illegal aliens, Majority Leader Eric Cantor's spokesman issued this comment:
"We understand that we can't keep kicking this can dow n the road.... We're going to address the 11 million people."
He was referring to the official estimate of ALL illegal aliens in the country.
The good news is that our Capitol Hill Team is finding strong evidence that the recently re-elected Republican majority in the House is not in much of a mood to follow their leaders over the amnesty cliff. And some are starting to publicly decry their leaders talking like this before even checking with their Members.
Once you get past the Republicans who gain money or power from corporations seeking cheaper labor, most Republicans can see the illogic behind increasing the number of voters who lean at least 2-1 Democratic.
A number of conservative commentators are pointing out the following:
Illegal aliens who are given an amnesty will not thank Republicans for it.
They didn't thank Republicans when Ronald Reagan signed the first amnesty in 1986. In the very next election, Hispanics voted in their highest numbers yet for the Democratic ticket. Republicans went along with six other smaller amnesties in the 1990s. They also went along with bringing in another 1 million immigrants every year. None of these groups of immigrants thanked Republicans by evenly splitting their votes. Nearly every immigrant group consistently votes at least 2-1 for Democrats, because Democrats always out-promise govern ment programs to immigrants who on average are lower income than other Americans. History has shown that immigrant groups only start turning toward Republican candidates after the flow of new immigrants from their home country is shut off, allowing them to really begin to assimilate. Democrats like retiring Rep. Barney Frank have been open about wanting high immigration to increase the number of Democratic voters. One can understand -- although not respect -- Democrats who push down the wages of American workers for their own political gain. But it makes no sense for Republicans to also work to harm American workers through high immigration when it only increases the Democratic voter advantage. Boehner's idea sounds like he wants to try to get immigrants to start voting 6-4 against Republicans instead of 7-3, while adding millions more people who will also vote 6-4 against Republicans. This is more than political insanity -- it's political suicide.
Some of those ideas may be worth conveying to Republican House leaders.
PLEASE MAKE THE PHONE CALL. THANKS.
|
|
|
|
Take our interests survey. Let us know what you're interested in so we can customize actions and other information to meet your needs |
|
|
|
|
Posted by Daniel Greenfield @ the Sultan Knish blog
WHAT WENT WRONG I The GOP neglected its base and frantically tried to show that they were more responsible Democrats, but with a deep love of free enterprise. The Democrats focused on turning out every single rotten member of their 2008 coalition and getting them to the polls. The GOP chased the voters it didn't have. The Democrats chased the voters they did have and made sure as many of them as possible showed up to vote. The GOP softened its message. The Democrats hardened theirs. The GOP tried to be moderate. The Democrats tried to be extremist. Guess which plan worked? In a low turnout election with the media running against you, you don't aim for the center, you act like a general, fire up your base and command your armies. WHAT WENT WRONG II Elections come down to turnout. Everything else is window dressing. And the voters did not come out in sufficient number. The election did not really come down to Obama vs. Romney. It came down to Romney vs. Obama. Or to put it another way, most Romney voters were really voting against Obama. And most Obama voters were really voting against Romney. In a competitive economic environment, the government class and the productive class were both trying to protect their economic lifelines. Whether it was the ability to earn a living or to get stuff from the government.
Read More . . . |
Two shining stars in the midst of GOP defeat
On Election night, the Pennsylvania GOP got its clock cleaned in nearly all Federal and statewide races.
On one front (US House), Pennsylvania seriously upgraded their delegation and moved to the right, electing two fiscal constitutional conservatives to replace a Republican RINO and a left leaning Democrat. Pennsylvanians now have 13 out of 18 seats filled by Republicans.
That's the good news...
Now the bad news: The average Heritage Action score for all Republicans is 54.9%. While that is better than the average Democrat score of 15.7%, it is unacceptable. Our PA delegation is led by usually reliable Joe Pitts with a 77% rating and it goes downhill from there.
Two Shining Stars that won and we hope to count on:
Keith Rothfus
In his victory on November 6th, when he defeated sitting Congressman Mark Critz, Keith Rothfus provided a blueprint to the GOP on how to win in a predominantly Democrat area. He ran by espousing strong conservative fiscal and social values and promoting his philosophy of limited government. His district was 52% Democrat, yet he was able to win by win by 3%.
Keith had lost a close contest against incumbent Jason Altmire in the 2010 race for the old 4th Congressional District. Republican mapmakers pushed Altmire and Critz into one gerrymandered district when they were forced to reduce the number of districts by one. Critz won in a hard fought contest that forced him to spend a significant part of his war chest on the primary.
Keith was aided by a strong grass roots effort including local groups like the 9.12 groups from Pittsburgh, Monroeville, and South Hills; the Pittsburgh and Southwest PA Tea Parties, and Veterans and Patriots United (among others). In addition, American Majority and Heritage Action coordinated to open a field office to focus on this race, where the grass roots activists could make phone calls.
.
.
. . . . . Keith Rothfus November 9th at Pgh 9.12 Meeting
Scott Perry
Republican Scott Perry, a three-term member of the state House of Representatives and a colonel in the Pennsylvania Army National Guard, succeeds Todd Platts as the representative for the state's 4th Congressional District.
Platts, who had become known as a RINO among limited government groups, did not seek reelection after serving six terms. The district covers York and Adams counties, nearly all of Harrisburg and part of Susquehanna Township in Dauphin County and parts of Cumberland County.
A veteran of the Iraq War and owner of a mechanical contracting firm, Scott is known as a fiscal conservative and a promoter of sound energy policy. He was a prime sponsor of the Castle Doctrine bill that allows Pennsylvanians to defend themselves against imminent violence without first retreating.
Scott beat a Democrat, a Libertarian and an Independent in the Nov. 6 election.
.
.
.
.
.
. Scott Perry: Patriot, Father, Husband and now Congressman
|
 NOVEMBER 7 is the glorious 95th anniversary of the Socialist Revolution in Russia, celebrated by the masses all over the world with spontaneous marching in goose-stepping columns as they share their rations of potatoes and beet vodka. It is symbolic that on this day American workers, peasants, and the toiling unwashed intelligentsia celebrate the re-election of their first openly socialist president, hoping he will soon abolish the capitalist oppression of gainful employment and replace it with equal rations of beets and potatoes. MORE >>
|
November 09, 2012
|
|
On Today's Program
Here's the conversation the GOP needs to have
As the stats keep pouring in, one key factor is moving to the top of the list as the main culprit: the old guard running the campaign show for the GOP has got to go. Glenn reads from great posts by Michael Walsh and Jennifer Rubin on radio today which lay out the new strategy the GOP must take. WATCH
See the t-shirt that perfectly sums up the election in one simple phrase HERE.
The return of More-On Trivia
Nothing quite like drowning your election sorrows by listening to hapless contestants on the phone fail to answer the simplest questions in existence today. Will the contestants be able to tell where the Great Wall of China is located? Or what the FBI stands for? Another classic episode of More-On Trivia today - see the results.
Glenn questions Stu, Pat's manliness over James Bond movie
Now that the country is lost (kidding! kinda) Glenn figured why not talk movies a little on radio today. While previewing the new James Bond movie Skyfall, Glenn discovered that Pat & Stu haven't seen all that many Bond movies. Despite having an extremely questionable 'manliness' factor (Broadway show addiction, inability to play any sport) Glenn takes them to task. MORE
Another Florida recount -- Allen West
Glenn spoke with Allen West on radio today, an American hero who is somehow in a contested battle to regain his seat in Congress. There is a recount happening after some alleged mistakes were made in double counting votes. West also picked up 300 extra votes in absentee ballots. Will he hang on? Glenn chats with West on radio today. WATCH
Forward! Obama wins, dozens of companies announce layoffs
Glenn went through the list of businesses who were forced to lay off employees in the wake of the Obama victory, perhaps many realizing Obamacare would definitely be kicking in soon with no chance of repeal. The list is so staggering it began to sound like a school closing list after about 3 feet of snowfall. See it here. Another Glenn Beck prediction comes true? David Petraeus steps down from CIA post: MORE
Tonight's Primetime Lineup on TheBlaze TV:
- 5pm ET - The Glenn Beck Program: What does this election mean for the future of this county? Glenn speaks to a wide range of experts tonight.
- 6pm ET - Real News: The smartest team breaks down the news of the day.
- 7pm ET - Wilkow!Andrew looks at "The New Left" that Obama's building. A coalition of people who don't want society or institutions. They just want money!
- Saturday @ 10pm ET - The B.S. of A: Unlike so many others, Brian actually follows through and moves to Canada after Obama's win. How did things go so wrong?
- Sunday @ 8pm ET - Independence USA: Preparing for the worst one project at a time - don't miss an all new episode this Sunday.
- Watch live or on demand - Start your free trial now!
|
Struggling to understand the election results and want to relive the greatness of America? Take a moment to pick up this Constitutional book package at 40% off from The Marketplace. For a limited time only, you'll get; The Making of America, The 5000 Year Leap, 101 Constitutional Questions to Ask Candidates, and two Pocket Constitutions -- all for just 29.95. Did Chris Christie lose the election for Romney? Pat & Stu discuss on today's show.
The Project is now available on DVD: When TheBlaze exposed The Project, many of you wanted to be able to share the truth about the Muslim Brotherhood's plan to infiltrate and defeat the West. Due to popular demand, we have made this must-see documentary available on DVD. Order a copy at a special low price today and share this vital information with your friends and family.
|

|
|
|
~ If you come across an issue or story that you think would be of interest to the group, forward it to this email address so we can include it in the daily newsletter. Please include any links to the associated story with your email so that we can source it for the newsletter. J
You have received this mailing because you subscribed to our mailing list or signed up at a meeting. If you have any problems with this mailing, please reply to this posting. Thank you for your support.
9/12 Patriots of Lower Buck County 215-274-5415
Visit us on the WEB
|
|
|
|