JPMorgan loses 44% of its Comex gold in 5 days

I know this doesn't have anything to do with business, however, what kind of people are we just to sit back and assign "oh, that is crazy talk" to a story.  If we cared this much about our country instead of just sitting back perhaps we wouldn't be in as much trouble.

We must credit Laurie Roth for trying to do something.

Church of Wells - Using Hypnosis, threats, Scripture as weapons - Remaking Minds, Hearts and Souls to their Evil Agenda

BY ADMIN, ON JANUARY 29TH, 2014

The more I dig the more I hear real horror stories regarding Church of Wells that have nothing to do with Christianity at all.  Those who have left the Church and others who have visited there with hopes of talking with a family member there report all kinds of alarming statements and actions by Church elders and Deacons.

Threatening, Demonic and Hypnotic behavior observed by witnesses

More than one member growling like a dog

One man told me (He asked to have his identity withheld) when he and his wife visited Wells to try and talk some reason into their friend to not submit to an arranged marriage, they were kicked out of the wedding.  Later that night they report being surrounded by between 8 and10 Church of Wells guys, had scripture quoted at them and were glared at.  One of the members growled at them like a dog.  The next day, he reported that Cory McLaughlin, road his bike to their gas station and walked inside where he and his wife were standing.  He reported that Cory also growled like a dog at them.  When confronted with his growling, Cory denied growling and said he was tired from riding his bike.  Really?  My source said both episodes were clear...growling like a dog.

Elders surrounded Andy and Patty Grove and prayed death upon them from God

Is this how Christian leadership acts?

Andy and Patty Grove, the loving and concerned parents of Catherine Grove have been called evil by church members to their face and accused, in front of their daughter Catherine that they they were trying to kill Catherine.  They listened in horror and watched as Catherine meekly nodded in agreement. Patty reports at one point they were surrounded by Church elders who put their hands to the sky and started praying a prayer that sounded more like a curse or threat...ending with Ryan Ringnald and Jacob Gardner calling on God to strike Andy and Patty dead right in front of them.  Apparently, their satanic prayers hiding behind Jesus don't work too well.  Andy and Patty are still breathing air and most alive.

Signs that Hypnotic and Mind control is going on

Patty also reported to me that when visiting with one church member in their store and asking normal questions about his family, his eyes suddenly started twitching, glazed over and he started talking in a robotic, un attached way.  Patty said when talking with Catherine and trying to give her her Grandpa's letter that her eyes also started twitching, staring off and speaking in a robotic, UN attached and programmed way.

After piecing together many accounts of witnesses, threats, growling at visitors, praying death down from the sky, using Holy Scripture as weapons, locked prayer closets and then sudden eye twitching and robotic talking, it is quite clear. Church of Wells is using classic mind control techniques to seek, destroy, and then build up their controllable spiritual and worker surfs from scratch. 

These transformed Church surfs no longer have any hope except Church of Wells leadership and their disfigured version of Jesus. There is no joy because salvation is not secure and can be taken away because of their sin. There is no future, no freedom and no family members since they are idols. To top it off and solidify the members growing confusion and submission, there is little sleep since that is also an idol.  The cherry on top is that all their possessions and money belong to church leaders who redistribute to each of them as they see fit.

Witnesses have said that now Church members are being constantly flooded with 'martyrdom' sermons.  They are told that they will be martyred for Christ and that when the evil pressure and heat builds big enough they will go into one of their homes together and go up in a holy fire.'  Now, they are training the members to expect death and be ready to follow orders.  They are the 'godly persecuted ones,'  Is the Jim Jones saga closer than we realize? 

Church members reading this...NOW is the time to WAKE UP. Whether you understand everything that is happening to you or not - GET OUT. Even if you don't trust yourself anymore, trust me then - GET OUT. It is time to leave and get back on the REAL track with the Lord Jesus, your life and family.  Go somewhere in Wells and call the number below.  Don't announce it just do it. Someone will get back to you and get you out.  Or, email us and someone will get back to you with a safe exit plan.  Do it!

Call: 206 - 984 - 6859

Email:churchofwellsexitplan@hushmail.com

Mind control and programming expert Dr. Corydon Hammond gave a famous and historic speech "Hypnosis in MPD:Ritual Abuse."   Read it and learn about how your mind can be so easily manipulated and turned into something you don't recognize at all.

He talks of the use of pain, fear and the manipulation of when 'comfort' is allowed.  He talks of Nazi mind control experiments with children. They put one 8-year-old child's in a mousetrap with comfort only being allowed after the crying would stop.  Other experiments were designed to separate feelings and rewards, literally creating mental illness.  In some cases a person would have electrodes placed on them and manipulated to experience real anger against someone in a group, then asked the question "are you angry at someone in the group?" When they would say "yes" they would be shocked.  More manipulative questions would be asked and more shocks would be given until they would give the desired response completely disconnected from reality.

Look at the mind control techniques Church of Wells leadership is using on members

Here is a list of Church of Wells lies and distortions:

1. Salvation is not a free gift of God through Jesus Christ, where Jesus did all the work on the cross.  WRONG!  The Holy Bible says we are to simply repent of our sins and except the gift, already paid for by Jesus.  Salvation is NOT works at all.  Church of Wells, however, uses it as a weapon where it can never quite be attained, certainly without the careful instructions of cult leaders.

2. Locked prayer closets are used as classic mind control manipulation.  These are the places that the cult literally controls the growth of mental illness to completely control members - 'God attacks you'   'You get rid of yourself - your worldly, desires, questions and unbelief.'  When the elders finally let you out of the 'prayer closet' you are comforted and naturally look to the elder as the Christ given authority that rescued you and gave you relief from your own sinful condition.  Remember, in human Trafficking, the pimp or handler, beats their victim down, creates submissive servants by giving a mixture of threats, compliments, rewards and punishment...all mixed up with reality.  They will beat and rape you, then comfort you and buy you dinner. WRONG AGAIN!

3. Every source of love and strength in your life are now idols to be shunned.  WRONG! These include: Families, money, careers, hopes, dreams, your ability and right to understand the Holy Bible and faith on your own.

4. They steal a foundational right and dream all people have - to fall in love and get married.  Church of Wells now chooses your spouse and it is to someone else in the cult. WRONG!

5.  They control all money and assets of members, then point and click them as worker bees in businesses they control and own.  WRONG!  All money is redistributed as the elders see fit.

Church of Wells is a growing and terminal cancer of lies and warped theology form the pit of hell. It has nothing at all to do with real Christianity as Jesus Christ and the Holy Bible defines.   It is simply designed to seduce na�ve Christians or 'searchers' who want to get close to God and do the right thing yet don't have a deep or rooted foundation in their faith.  Once they have pulled the 'searcher' into their ranks, weapons of war and transformation start in:  Completely separate the new recruit from all who can help them and really love them:  Use Scripture to control and terrorize - A little hope, A lot of fear:  Hold Salvation out as the almost unachievable goal that only submitting to Church of Wells can secure.

Get out now!     Call: 206 - 984 - 6859

This guy is absolutely correct.  For 19 years we have said the same thing...difference is he is a former Harvard economics professor.

He talks of the Federal reserve rigging markets since 1987 BUT the main problem was the creation of the Federal 74 years earlier because anytime you control the money supply you control everything.

From Terry Burnham, former Harvard economics professor, author of "Mean Genes" and "Mean Markets and Lizard Brains," provocative poster on this page and long-time critic of the Federal Reserve, argues that the Fed's efforts to strengthen America's banks have perversely weakened them. First posted in PBS.

Is your money safe at the bank? An economist says 'no' and withdraws his

Last week I had over $1,000,000 in a checking account at Bank of America. Next week, I will have $10,000.

Why am I getting in line to take my money out of Bank of America? Because of Ben Bernanke and Janet Yellen, who officially begins her term as chairwoman on Feb. 1.

Before I explain, let me disclose that I have been a stopped clock of criticism of the Federal Reserve for half a decade. That's because I believe that when the Fed intervenes in markets, it has two effects - both negative. First, it decreases overall wealth by distorting markets and causing bad investment decisions. Second, the members of the Fed become reverse Robin Hoods as they take from the poor (and unsophisticated) investors and give to the rich (and politically connected). These effects have been noticed; a Gallup poll taken in the last few days reports that only the richest Americans support the Fed. (See the table.)

Why do I risk starting a run on Bank of America by withdrawing my money and presuming that many fellow depositors will read this and rush to withdraw too? Because they pay me zero interest. Thus, even an infinitesimal chance Bank of America will not repay me in full, whenever I ask, switches the cost-benefit conclusion from stay to flee.

Let me explain: Currently, I receive zero dollars in interest on my $1,000,000. The reason I had the money in Bank of America was to keep it safe. However, the potential cost to keeping my money in Bank of America is that the bank may be unwilling or unable to return my money.

They will not be able to return my money if:

• Many other depositors like you get in line before me. Banks today promise everyone that they can have their money back instantaneously, but the bank does not actually have enough money to pay everyone at once because they have lent most of it out to other people - 90 percent or more. Thus, banks are always at risk for runs where the depositors at the front of the line get their money back, but the depositors at the back of the line do not. Consider this image from a fully insured U.S. bank, IndyMac in California, just five years ago.
• Some of the investments of Bank of America go bust. Because Bank of America has loaned out the vast majority of depositors' money, if even a small percentage of its loans go bust, the firm is at risk for bankruptcy. Leverage, combined with some bad investments, caused the failure of Lehman Brothers in 2008 and would have caused the failure of Bank of America, AIG, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch, Bear Stearns, and many more institutions in 2008 had the government not bailed them out.

In recent days, the chances for trouble at Bank of America have become more salient because of woes in the emerging markets, particularly Argentina, Turkey, Russia and China. The emerging market fears caused the Dow Jones Industrial Average to lose more than 500 points over the last week.

Returning to my money now entrusted to Bank of America, market turmoil reminded me that this particular trustee is simply not safe. Or not safe enough, given the fact that safety is the reason I put the money there at all. The market turmoil could threaten "BofA" with bankruptcy today as it did in 2008, and as banks have experienced again and again over time.

If the chance that Bank of America will not return my money is, say, a mere 1 percent, then the expected cost to me is 1 percent of my million, or $10,000. That far exceeds the interest I receive, which, I hardly need remind depositors out there, is a cool $0. Even a 0.1 percent chance of loss has an expected cost to me of $1,000. Bank of America pays me the zero interest rate because the Federal Reserve has set interest rates to zero. Thus my incentive to leave at the first whiff of instability.

Surely, you say, the federal government is going to keep its promises, at least on insured deposits. Yes, the Federal Government (via the FDIC) insures deposits in most institutions up to $250,000. But there is a problem with this insurance. The FDIC currently has far less money in its fund than it has insured deposits: as of Sept. 1, about $41 billion in reserve against $6 trillion in insured deposits. (There are over $9 trillion on deposit at U.S. banks, by the way, so more than $3 trillion in deposits is completely uninsured.)

It's true, of course, that when the FDIC fund risks running dry, as it did in 2009, it can go back to other parts of the federal government for help. I expect those other parts will make the utmost efforts to oblige. But consider the possibility that they may be in crisis at the very same time, for the very same reasons, or that it might take some time to get approval. Remember that Congress voted against the TARP bailout in 2008 before it relented and finally voted for the bailout.

Thus, even insured depositors risk loss and/or delay in recovering their funds. In most time periods, these risks are balanced against the reward of getting interest. Not so long ago, Bank of America would have paid me $1,000 a week in interest on my million dollars. If I were getting $1,000 a week, I might bear the risks of delay and default. However, today I am receiving $0.

So my cash is leaving Bank of America.

But if Bank of America is not safe, you must be wondering, where can you and I put our money? No path is without risk, but here are a few options.

1.Keep some cash at home, though admittedly this runs the risk of loss or setting yourself up as a target for criminals.

2.Put some cash in a safety box. There is an urban myth that this is illegal; my understanding is that cash in a safety box is legal. However, I can imagine scenarios where capital controls are placed on safety deposit box withdrawals. And suppose the bank is shut down and you can't get to the box?

3.Pay your debts. You don't need to be Suze Orman to know that you need liquidity, so do not use all your cash to pay debts. However, you can use some surplus, should you have any.

4.Prepay your taxes and some other obligations. Subject to the same caveat about liquidity, pay ahead. Make sure you only pay safe entities. Your local government is not going away, even in a depression, so, for example, you can prepay property taxes. (I would check with a tax accountant on the implications, however.)

5.Find a safer bank. Some local, smaller banks are much safer than the "too-big-to-fail banks." After its mistake of letting Lehman fail, the government has learned that it must try to save giant institutions. However, the government may not be able to save all failing institutions immediately and simultaneously in a crisis. Thus, depositors in big banks face delays and defaults in the event of a true crisis. (It is important to find the right small bank; I believe all big banks are fragile, while some small banks are robust.)

Someone should start a bank (or maybe someone has) that charges (rather than pays) interest and does not make loans. Such a bank would be a good example of how Fed actions create unintended outcomes that defeat their goals. The Fed wants to stimulate lending, but an anti-lending bank could be quite successful. I would be a customer.

(Interestingly, there was a famous anti-lending bank and it was also a "BofA" - the Bank of Amsterdam, founded in 1609. The Dutch BofA charged customers for safe-keeping, did not make loans and did not allow depositors to get their money out immediately. Adam Smith discusses this BofA favorably in his "Wealth of Nations," published in 1776. Unfortunately - and unbeknownst to Smith - the Bank of Amsterdam had starting secretly making risky loans to ventures in the East Indies and other areas, just like any other bank. When these risky ventures failed, so did the BofA.)

My point is that the Federal Reserve's actions have myriad, unanticipated, negative consequences. Over the last week, we saw the impact on the emerging markets. The Fed had created $3 trillion of new money in the last five-plus years - three times more than in its entire prior history. A big chunk of that $3 trillion found its way, via private investors and institutions, into risky, emerging markets.

Now that the Fed is reducing ("tapering") its new money creation (now down to $65 billion a month, or $780 billion a year, as of Wednesday's announcement), investments are flowing out of risky areas. Some of these countries are facing absolute crises, with Argentina's currency plummeting by more than 20 percent in under one month. That means investments in Argentina are worth 20 percent less in dollar terms than they were a month ago, even if they held their price in Pesos.

The Fed did not plan to impoverish investors by inducing them to buy overpriced Argentinian investments, of course, but that is one of the costly consequences of its actions. If you lost money in emerging markets over the last week, at one level, it is your responsibility. However, it is not crazy for you to blame the Fed for creating volatile prices that made investing more difficult.

Similarly, if you bought gold at the peak of almost $2,000 per ounce, you have lost one-third of your money; you share the blame for your golden losses with Alan Greenspan, Ben Bernanke and Janet Yellen. They removed the opportunities for safe investments and forced those with liquid assets to scramble for what safety they thought they could find. Furthermore, the uncertainty caused by the Fed has caused many assets to swing wildly in value, creating winners and losers.

The Fed played a role in the recent emerging markets turmoil. Next week, they will cause another crisis somewhere else. Eventually, the absurd effort to create wealth through monetary policy will unravel in the U.S. as it has every other time it has been tried from Weimar Germany to Robert Mugabe's Zimbabwe.

Even after the Fed created the housing problems, we would have been better of with a small 2009 depression rather than the larger depression that lies ahead. See my Making Sen$e posts "The Stockholm Syndrome and Printing Money" and "Ben Bernanke as Easter Bunny: Why the Fed Can't Prevent the Coming Crash" for the details of my argument.

Ever since Alan Greenspan intervened to save the stock market on Oct. 20, 1987, the Fed has sought to cushion every financial blow by adding liquidity. The trouble with trying to make the world safe for stupidity is that it creates fragility.

Bank of America and other big banks are fragile - and vulnerable to bank runs - because the Fed has set interest rates to zero. If a run gathers momentum, the government will take steps to stem it. But I am convinced they have limited ammunition and unlimited problems.

What is the solution? For you, save yourself and your family. For the system, revamp the Federal Reserve. The simplest first step would be to end the dual mandate of price stability and full employment. Price stability is enough. I favor rules over intervention. We don't need a maestro conducting monetary policy; we need a system that promotes stability and allows people (not printing presses) to make us richer