Funding Subcommittee Reports Out Major Changes to Teacher Pay Model
Dr. Charles Knapp, the chair of the Commission as well as the chair of the Funding Subcommittee, began the meeting by presenting the progress of the Funding Subcommittee as they work to develop a new funding formula before the August 1st deadline imposed by Governor Deal. Knapp reiterated that the Funding Subcommittee is not attempting to identify the cost of educating Georgia students. Rather, their goal is to figure out a way to better distribute funding.
Members of the subcommittee developed a framework for new funding formula would include three components: base funding, weights for student characteristics and state initiatives, and categorical grants. Dr. Knapp provided a list of areas discussed by the subcommittee to be funded in the base:
Kindergarten, Grades 1-3, Grades 4-8, High School General Education, EIP K-5, Remedial 6-12, Nursing Services, Alternative Education, Central Administration, School Administration, Facility Maintenance and Operation, Media Center Program, 20 Days Additional Instruction, Staff and Professional Development, Teacher Training and Experience, State Health Benefits, Teacher Retirement Contributions, and CTAE
Teacher training and experience funding was discussed at length by members of the Commission. Dr. Knapp explained that teacher compensation should be tied to effectiveness and responsibility, and not to training and experience. Districts should have flexibility to determine teacher compensation and need time to develop new approaches to teacher compensation. The state would continue to calculate T & E for a period of time to allow districts to develop new models. At the previous meeting of the subcommittee, Marietta City Schools provided information on progress toward a new compensation model for the district.
When asked which teacher effectiveness measure will be used in determining compensation for T&E, Dr. Knapp explained there are some who would like to go back to old system due to the issues that have arisen from the TKES and LKES evaluation systems. His hope is that districts will use TKES to develop their compensation systems, but the responsibility will be theirs. He reiterated the goal of the subcommittee to allow districts to develop their own compensation models for T&E.
The weighted student characteristics discussed by the subcommittee include:
K-3 (to address literacy by the 3rd grade), 9-12 (to address expenses of specific career and post secondary preparation programs), ESOL, Exceptional Students (to include students with disabilities and gifted students), and Economically Disadvantaged Students.
Dr. Knapp pointed out that the subcommittee will continue discussions on how to properly weight economically disadvantaged students.
The categorical grants discussed by the subcommittee include:
Transportation, Sparsity, Hold harmless, Equalization, State charter system supplements, and System charter supplements.
PAGE provided comments to the Funding Subcommittee on updating the funding formula for public schools. CLICK HERE to read the report and the letter.
|