Okla. AG amends lawsuit attacking health care law
By Tim Talley
Associated Press
OKLAHOMA CITY - Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt on Wednesday amended a federal lawsuit that challenges the nation's health care overhaul, continuing a legal fight that appeared to be over when the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the law almost three months ago.
Pruitt's 23-page amended petition, filed in U.S. District Court in Muskogee, challenges procedures created to help implement the new law and the effect they will have on Oklahomans. Pruitt's original lawsuit, filed in January 2011 shortly after he took office, challenged the constitutionality of the federal law and its requirement that all Americans purchase private health insurance or pay a penalty.
The amendment was filed on the last day the lawsuit could be amended under an order filed by U.S. District Judge Ronald White, who lifted a stay in the case.
White had halted the case while the Supreme Court decided a separate lawsuit filed earlier by Florida and 25 other states that also challenged the law and its individual mandate. In a 5-4 vote, the nation's highest court upheld the health care law on June 28.
In its ruling, the Supreme Court said Congress lacks the power under the Constitution's commerce clause to put the individual mandate in place. But the court ruled that the government has the power to impose a tax on people without health insurance.
Pruitt, a Republican former state senator and frequent critic of federal government policies under Democratic President Barack Obama, said the state's amended petition makes it the only active lawsuit challenging the federal Affordable Care Act that seeks to hold the government accountable in how it implements the law.
"Now that the Supreme Court has deemed the ACA a tax, and therefore constitutional, the federal government must follow the law and proper procedures, and that is not being done," Pruitt said in a statement.
The amended complaint challenges a new Internal Revenue Service rule that will help implement the law and seeks recognition that the Oklahoma Constitution protects citizens from mandated purchases of health care.
It alleges that federal regulations and plans to create online insurance marketplaces do not comply with the Administrative Procedures Act and should be invalidated.
The insurance exchanges are a key component of the health care law and will permit people to shop for health insurance and buy policies. Like many other Republican-controlled states, Oklahoma resisted setting up new online marketplaces. The law allows the U.S. Health and Human Services secretary to establish exchanges in states that choose not to.
"Under the Act, this choice has important consequences for the state's people and the state's economy," the lawsuit states. States that create their own exchange are eligible for government premium tax credits to insurers to subsidize health insurance enrollment, but subsidies for even one employee trigger what the lawsuit says are "costly obligations" on employers, "placing the electing state at a competitive disadvantage for jobs and job growth."
The lawsuit alleges the law is unconstitutional because it gives the government control over state legislative and executive power, exceeds Congress' authority and infringes on state sovereignty.
|